Ultrasound diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment by confirming baseline cross-sectional area measurement for normal and abnormal nerves

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging is most commonly employed, alongside electrodiagnostic studies, in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment. It is expensive, time consuming, not readily available to the general public, and limits imaging to a segment of the nerve at any given time. In contrast, high-frequency ultrasound is an inexpensive imaging modality with a flexible field of view through which the nerve can be traced. An ultrasound cross-sectional area (CSA) >0.075 cm² has previously been suggested as indicative of nerve entrapment. Objectives: To confirm the suggested CSA measurement of 0.075 cm² and discuss the difference in CSA measurement between abnormal nerves, nerves in the contra-lateral elbow of the same participant, and those of asymptomatic participants. Methods: Ultrasonography was performed on both elbows of 25 patients with confirmed unilateral ulnar nerve entrapment and on 25 healthy controls for comparison. Three CSA measurements were taken of the ulnar nerve along its course, and the mean measurement was recorded.Results: CSA measurements were significantly different between patients with ulnar nerve entrapment and healthy controls (p < 0.05). In our study, a CSA >0.070 cm² defined ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. Conclusion: Ultrasound CSA measurement of the ulnar nerve is accurate in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment. The range of values and varied criteria previously reported call for standardisation of the procedure and CSA measurement. We suggest that a measurement of 0.070 cm² be considered as a new baseline for the optimal diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment.[PDF to follow]

Ultrasonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: role of confounders

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors confounding high-resolution ultrasonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve to test their influence when discriminating between limbs affected and unaffected by ulnar nerve entrapment (UNE) at the elbow.

METHODS

High-resolution ultrasonographic measurements of ulnar nerve dimensions at the elbow were compared between 2 groups of subjects: symptomatic and asymptomatic for UNE. Rank analysis of covariance regression tests were performed to determine whether significant differences existed between the 2 groups. The changing coefficient method (using rank analysis of covariance tests) was used to test for potential confounding effects of age, weight, height, body mass index, sex, limb sidedness, limb handedness, and nerve mobility. These tests were repeated for each measurement while controlling for the identified confounders. Exact 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to test for significant differences between measurements of the diameter of the ulnar nerve with the elbow in full extension and full flexion.

RESULTS

Age, weight, body mass index, sex, and elbow position were shown to have confounding influences on high-resolution ultrasonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve. No confounding effect was apparent for limb sidedness or dominance. Cross-sectional area and long-axis diameter measurements demonstrated significant differences between nerves with and without UNE after controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Two cross-sectional measurements (area and maximum cross-sectional diameter) of the ulnar nerve, made at the level of the medial epicondyle, were found to be robust discriminators between nerves with and without UNE. In the absence of normative reference values of the ulnar nerve, the contralateral limb may be used as the comparative control.