CML in Elderly: Does Age Matter?

The median age of diagnosis for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in India is 35 years on the contrary to western literature which is 47 years. The outcome of the elderly patient in CML TKI era is not reported from the Indian population. However, Western literature suggests that use of TKI alleviate the adverse impact of age in outcomes of CML. This study was carried out to analyze the clinical profile and outcome of elderly, in comparison with younger patients with CML. We retrospectively analyzed CML patients treated at our department from January 2008 to December 2017. The data cutoff date was December 2018. The cohorts of 712 patients were divided into two groups. Patients belonging to the age group of ≥ 60 years were classified as the study group and those who were 18-60 years were used as controls. Patient's clinical history, examination and milestones in terms of achieving hematological, molecular responses and toxicity profile were also recorded. The total of 712 patients, 52 patients in the study group and 660 patients in the control group were treated during the study period. The study group was having more co-morbidities than the control group (15.3% vs. 4.5%). Patients having high-risk EUTOS score were similar in both groups (38.4% vs. 37.6%). The patients presented in blast phase were higher in the study group as compared to control group (9.6% vs. 6.36%) but the differences were not statistically significant. Rates of achieving a hematological response at 3 months (85.1% vs. 86.89%) and the major molecular response at 18 months (54.3% vs. 60.16%) were almost similar in both groups. However, hematological toxicity, muscle cramps and gastritis were reported more in elderly patients. The outcome of CML patients in TKI era do not differ in elderly patients. However, toxicity profile was not significantly inferior in elderly patients.

Clinical results according to age in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib frontline: The younger, the later, the worse?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate differences in clinical results according to age among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

METHODS

207 consecutive CML patients treated with imatinib frontline were revised, dividing them in young adults (>20 < 45 years) (YA), middle-aged adults (≥45 < 65 years) (MA) and elderly (≥65 years) (EL).

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMolR) were significantly higher in MA compared with YA and EL (P < .001 for CCyR and P = .001 for MMolR). Number of total events was lower in MA (8 [11.1%] vs 21 [34.4%] in YA and 28 [37.8%] in EL, P = .001): no difference was observed for blastic evolution (P = .478). Number of deaths was higher in the EL (12 [16.2%] vs 2 [3.2%] in YA and 0 in MA, P < .001): however, 11/12 deaths in EL were not related to CML. The PFS curve in MA was significantly longer than in YA and in EL (P = .02). The OS curve in EL was significantly shorter than in YA and in MA (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age at diagnosis influences significantly the course of CML patients treated with imatinib: a possible explanation of the counterintuitive worse course in YA is the delayed diagnosis compared to elderly.

Frontline imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: no impact of age on outcome, a survey by the GIMEMA CML Working Party

The median age of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is ∼ 60 years, and age is still considered an important prognostic factor, included in Sokal and EURO risk scores. However, few data are available about the long-term outcome of older patients treated with imatinib (IM) frontline. We analyzed the relationship between age and outcome in 559 early chronic-phase CML patients enrolled in 3 prospective clinical trials of Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto CML Working Party, treated frontline with IM, with a median follow-up of 60 months. There were 115 older patients (≥ 65 years; 21%). The complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rates were similar in the 2 age groups. In older patients, event-free survival (55% vs 67%), failure-free survival (78% vs 92%), progression-free survival (62% vs 78%), and overall survival (75% vs 89%) were significantly inferior (all P < .01) because of a higher proportion of deaths that occurred in complete hematologic response, therefore unrelated to CML progression (15% vs 3%, P < .0001). The outcome was similar once those deaths were censored. These data show that response to IM was not affected by age and that the mortality rate linked to CML is similar in both age groups. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00514488 and #NCT00510926.

"Real-life" results of front-line treatment with Imatinib in older patients (≥ 65 years) with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia

The age role was evaluated in 117 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CML at our Institution treated with front-line Imatinib from 9/02 to 3/08. Forty patients (34.1%) aged ≥ 65 years and 77 (65.9%) <65 years. Thirty-four older patients (85%) had at least 1 comorbidity versus 39 younger patients (50.6%) (p<0.001). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was achieved in 34/40 older patients (85%) as compared to 69/77 younger patients (89.6%), without statistically significant differences. Severe (grades 3-4 WHO) hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were more common in older patients (p=0.02 and p=0.017, respectively). Rates of permanent Imatinib discontinuation and dose reduction to 300 mg or less were significantly higher in older patients (p=0.009 and p=0.001, respectively). In conclusion, Imatinib in older patients with newly diagnosed CML seems to have the same efficacy as in younger patients, but tends to be more toxic, leading to higher rates of discontinuation and dose reduction. To overcome this problem, future trials concerning best dosage in this subset of patients could be useful.