Influential variables associated with outcomes in patients with cervicogenic headache

The effectiveness of manual and exercise therapy on headache intensity and frequency among patients with cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervicogenic headache is a secondary headache, and manual therapy is one of the most common treatment choices for this and other types of headache. Nonetheless, recent guidelines on the management of cervicogenic headache underlined the lack of trials comparing manual and exercise therapy to sham or no-treatment controls. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of different forms of manual and exercise therapy in people living with cervicogenic headache, when compared to other treatments, sham, or no treatment controls.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, the literature search was conducted until January 2022 on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, DOAJ, and PEDro. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of manual or exercise therapy on patients with cervicogenic headache with headache intensity or frequency as primary outcome measures were included. Study selection, data extraction and Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment were done in duplicate. GRADE was used to assess the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the review, with a total of 1439 patients. Common interventions were spinal manipulation, trigger point therapy, spinal mobilization, scapulo-thoracic and cranio-cervical exercises. Meta-analysis was only possible for six manual therapy trials with sham comparators. Data pooling showed moderate-to-large effects in favour of manual therapy for headache frequency and intensity at short-term, small-to-moderate for disability at short-term, small-to-moderate for headache intensity and small for headache frequency at long-term. A sensitivity meta-analysis of low-RoB trials showed small effects in favor of manual therapy in reducing headache intensity, frequency and disability at short and long-term. Both trials included in the sensitivity meta-analysis studied spinal manipulation as the intervention of interest. GRADE assessment showed moderate quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that manual and exercise therapy may reduce headache intensity, frequency and disability at short and long-term in people living with cervicogenic headache, but the overall RoB in most included trials was high. However, a sensitivity meta-analysis on low-RoB trials showed moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of spinal manipulation compared to sham interventions. More high-quality trials are necessary to make stronger recommendations, ideally based on methodological recommendations that enhance comparability between studies. Trial registration The protocol for this meta-analysis was pre-registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021249277.

Efficacy of Physiotherapy Interventions for The Management of Adults With Cervicogenic Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To update and appraise the efficacy of physiotherapy for adults with cervicogenic headache.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Bibliographic searches were conducted up to September 2021 for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions for adults with cervicogenic headache, in five databases: CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, Sage Journals and Wiley Online Library.

METHODS

Data extraction of included trials was conducted by two reviewers according to a standardized extraction form. The PEDro tool and the GRADE approach were used for grading evidence. Results from trials with similar interventions and with similar outcome measures were pooled into separate meta-analyses. A qualitative synthesis was performed for studies that were not pooled into meta-analyses.

SYNTHESIS

Fourteen trials were included. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that manual therapy significantly reduces headache frequency (MD: -0.93 episodes/week; 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.46; 2 RCTs; n=265) compared to sham manual therapy, and headache frequency (MD: -1.23 episodes/week; 95%CI: -1.55 to -0.91; 3 RCTs; n=126) and intensity (MD: -1.63/10; 95%CI: -2.15 to -1.10; 4 RCTs; n=208) compared to no treatment in the short term. At 12-month follow-up, moderate-certainty evidence indicates that manual therapy did not lead to greater reduction in headache intensity (MD VAS 0-10: -0.12; 95%CI: -0.49 to 0.26; 2 RCTs; n=265) nor frequency (MD: -0.32 episodes/week; 95%CI: -0.91 to 0.28; 2 RCTs; n=265) when compared to a sham manual therapy. In the long-term, in one high quality trial, neck exercise significantly reduces headache intensity compared to no treatment (MD: -1.51/10; 95%CI: -2.52 to -0.50; n=100) or to aerobic exercises in another trial of moderate quality (MD: -1.15/10; 95%CI: -2.1 to -0.20; n=180).

CONCLUSIONS

Manual therapy in the short term and neck exercise in the long term may be efficacious to treat adults with cervicogenic headache. More high quality evidence is needed and future results may change the current conclusions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Efficacy of interventions used by physiotherapists for patients with headache and migraine-systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

We aimed to conduct a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions used by physiotherapists on the intensity, frequency and duration of migraine, tension-type (TTH) and cervicogenic headache (CGH).

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of electronic databases and a hand search for controlled trials. A risk of bias analysis was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB). Meta-analyses present the combined mean effects; sensitivity analyses evaluate the influence of methodological quality.

RESULTS

Of 77 eligible trials, 26 were included in the RoB assessment. Twenty trials were included in meta-analyses. Nineteen out of 26 trials had a high RoB in >1 domain. Meta-analyses of all trials indicated a reduction of TTH ( ITALIC! p < 0.0001; mean reduction -1.11 on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS); 95% CI -1.64 to -0.57) and CGH ( ITALIC! p = 0.0002; mean reduction -2.52 on a 0-10 VAS; 95% CI -3.86 to -1.19) pain intensity, CGH frequency ( ITALIC! p < 0.00001; mean reduction -1.34 days per month; 95% CI -1.40 to -1.28), and migraine ( ITALIC! p = 0.0001; mean reduction -22.39 hours without relief; 95% CI -33.90 to -10.88) and CGH ( ITALIC! p < 0.00001; mean reduction -1.68 hours per day; 95% CI -2.09 to -1.26) duration. Excluding high RoB trials increased the effect sizes and reached additional statistical significance for migraine pain intensity ( ITALIC! p < 0.00001; mean reduction -1.94 on a 0-10 VAS; 95% CI -2.61 to -1.27) and frequency ( ITALIC! p < 0.00001; mean reduction -9.07 days per month; 95% CI -9.52 to -8.62).

DISCUSSION

Results suggest a statistically significant reduction in the intensity, frequency and duration of migraine, TTH and CGH. Pain reduction and reduction in CGH frequency do not reach clinically relevant effect sizes. Small sample sizes, inadequate use of headache classification, and other methodological shortcomings reduce the confidence in these results. Methodologically sound, randomized controlled trials with adequate sample sizes are required to provide information on whether and which physiotherapy approach is effective. According to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the current level of evidence is low.

Clinical reasoning for manual therapy management of tension type and cervicogenic headache

In recent years, there has been an increasing knowledge in the pathogenesis and better management of chronic headaches. Current scientific evidence supports the role of manual therapies in the management of tension type and cervicogenic headache, but the results are still conflicting. These inconsistent results can be related to the fact that maybe not all manual therapies are appropriate for all types of headaches; or maybe not all patients with headache will benefit from manual therapies. There are preliminary data suggesting that patients with a lower degree of sensitization will benefit to a greater extent from manual therapies, although more studies are needed. In fact, there is evidence demonstrating the presence of peripheral and central sensitization in chronic headaches, particularly in tension type. Clinical management of patients with headache needs to extend beyond local tissue-based pathology, to incorporate strategies directed at normalizing central nervous system sensitivity. In such a scenario, this paper exposes some examples of manual therapies for tension type and cervicogenic headache, based on a nociceptive pain rationale, for modulating central nervous system hypersensitivity: trigger point therapy, joint mobilization, joint manipulation, exercise, and cognitive pain approaches.

Therapeutic options for cervicogenic headache

The term cervicogenic headache (CeH) describes a syndrome originating from the cervical spine. There are a variety of therapeutic approaches used for the management of CeH, but scientific evidence of their effectiveness is scarce. No medication drug has proven to be effective. The evidence for greater occipital nerve blocks, cervical nerve blockades, facet joint injections and surgical procedures is limited. Several physical therapy interventions are proposed for CeH, with spinal manipulation and soft tissue interventions being the most commonly used. However, the lack of solid evidence of positive effects and risks of serious complications for spinal manipulation should be considered in favor of other physical therapy interventions associated with less risk. The inconsistent results in the literature can be related to the fact that maybe not all therapeutic interventions are appropriate for all patients with CeH or maybe not all patients with CeH will benefit from particular interventions.

Cervicogenic headaches: an evidence-led approach to clinical management

Cervicogenic headache (CGH), as the diagnosis suggests, refers to a headache of cervical origin. Historically, these types of headaches were difficult to diagnose and treat because their etiology and pathophysiology was not well-understood. Even today, management of a CGH remains challenging for sports rehabilitation specialists. The purpose of this clinical suggestion is to review the literature on CGH and develop an evidence-led approach to assessment and clinical management of CGH.