Flow cytometric comparison of platelets from a whole blood and finger-prick sample: impact of 24 hours storage

Large extracellular vesicle (EV) and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) interaction captured in vivo during systemic inflammation

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are pivotal bioactive structures involved in various processes including inflammation. Herein we report the interactions between EVs and NETs during murine endotoxemia studied in situ directly in the vasculature (cremaster muscle, liver sinusoids) using intravital microscopy (IVM). We captured NETs and EV release in real time by both non- and polarized neutrophils in liver but not in cremaster vasculature. When comparing numbers of circulating EVs of various origin (nanoparticle tracking analysis-NTA, flow cytometry) with those interacting with endothelium and NETs (IVM) we observed that whereas platelet and monocyte/macrophage-derived EVs dominate in blood and peritoneal lavage, respectively, mostly neutrophil-derived EVs interact with the vascular lining, NETs and leukocytes. Despite the interaction, NETs do not affect EV formation as NET release inhibition did not alter EV release. However, EVs inhibit NETs formation and in particular, erythrocyte-derived EVs downregulate NET release and this effect is mediated via Siglec-E-dependent interactions with neutrophils. Overall, we report that EVs are present in NETs in vivo and they do modulate their release but the process in not bidirectional. Moreover, EVs isolated from body fluids might not reflect their importance in direct endothelial- and leukocyte-related interactions.

CD62P (P-selectin) expression as a platelet activation marker in patients with liver cirrhosis with and without cholestasis

AIM OF THE STUDY

P-selectin (CD62P) is a platelet activation marker that was claimed to mediate the accumulation of platelets induced by cholestasis. The nature of platelet dysfunction and hemostasis abnormalities in cholestatic liver disease needs to be more explored. The aim of this study was to assess platelet CD62P expression in cirrhotic patients with and without cholestasis, and to evaluate its relationship with a bleeding tendency.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

150 patients were included in this case-control study. Participants were divided into 84 patients with liver cirrhosis (group I), 44 of whom had cholestasis (Group Ia) and 40 patients were without cholestasis (group Ib); 36 patients who were cholestatic without liver cirrhosis (group II); and 30 healthy subjects who formed the control group (group III). Platelet CD62P expression was assessed by a flow cytometer.

RESULTS

Platelets expressing CD62P were significantly increased in all patient groups compared to controls (p < 0.001). Platelets expressing CD62P were significantly increased in gastrointestinal (GIT) bleeders compared to non-bleeders in cirrhotic and cholestatic groups (p < 0.001 each). Among group I patients at cut-off > 12.4, up-regulation of platelet CD62P yielded 72% sensitivity and 44.1% specificity to discriminate bleeders from non-bleeders (p = 0.01), while among group II at cut-off > 12.9, it yielded 90% sensitivity and 80.8% specificity (p < 0.001). In cirrhotic patients, platelet CD62P expression was significantly increased in patients with an advanced Child-Pugh class (p < 0.001). Platelet expressing CD62P was shown as an independent risk factor for bleeding among cirrhotic cases with an odds ratio of 1.07 and CI 0.99-1.15.

CONCLUSIONS

Up-regulation of platelet CD62P expression can serve as a GIT bleeding predictor in liver cirrhosis.