The effect of imatinib therapy on the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

A review of immunotargeted therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: making progress in chemotherapy-free regimens

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PH + ALL) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality of B-ALL in adults and is associated with poor prognosis. Previously, the only curative treatment option in PH + ALL was allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Since 2000, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy, represented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib, has become the first-line treatment for PH + ALL. Currently, the remission rate and survival rate of Imatinib are superior to those of simple chemotherapy, and it can also improve the efficacy of transplantation. More recently, some innovative immune-targeted therapy greatly improved the prognosis of PH + ALL, such as Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin. For patients with ABL1 mutations and those who have relapsed or are refractory to other treatments, targeted oral small molecule drugs, monoclonal antibodies, Bispecific T cell Engagers (BiTE), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells immunotherapy are emerging as potential treatment options. These new therapeutic interventions are changing the treatment landscape for PH + ALL. In summary, this review discusses the current advancements in targeted therapeutic agents shift in the treatment strategy of PH + ALL towards using more tolerable chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation regimens confers better disease outcomes and might obviate the need for HSCT.

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: ten frequently asked questions

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions.

Chemotherapy with the use of next-generation TKIs based on MRD has the potential to avoid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treatment for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as postremission treatment is recommended for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in current guidelines. However, comparisons of later generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy with allo-HSCT have yielded similar outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate allo-HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) versus chemotherapy for adult Ph+ ALL in the TKI era.

METHODS

Pooled assessment of the hematologic and molecular complete response rates was performed after 3-month TKI treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with allo-HSCT. The effect of measurable residual disease status on survival benefit was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine retrospective and prospective single-arm cohort studies involving 5054 patients were included. Combined HRs indicated that in the general population, allo-HSCT favorably influenced DFS and OS. Achieving complete molecular remission (CMR) within 3 months after starting induction was a favorable survival prognostic factor regardless of whether the patient had undergone allo-HSCT. Among the patients with CMR, survival rates in the nontransplant subgroup were comparable with those in the transplant subgroup, with the estimated 5-year OS of 64% versus 58% and 5-year DFS of 58% versus 51%, respectively. The use of next-generation TKIs results in a higher proportion of patients achieving CMR (ponatinib 82% vs. imatinib 53%), while improving survival in nontransplant patients.

CONCLUSION

Our novel findings suggest that combination chemotherapy plus TKIs leads to a comparable survival benefit as with allo-HSCT for MRD-negative (CMR) patients. This study provides novel evidence for allo-HSCT indications for Ph+ ALL in CR1 in the TKI era.

Prophylactic or preemptive tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Prevention of disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains a major concern. Maintenance therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after allo-HCT has been used to reduce the incidence of relapse. Two main strategies are employed for using TKIs after allo-HCT: prophylactic TKI therapy, which is given before measurable residual disease (MRD) detection, and preemptive TKI therapy, which is given after MRD detection. These strategies both have advantages and disadvantages in terms of treatment efficacy, adverse events, adherence, and socioeconomic factors. In addition, many issues remain to be resolved because of the lack of large prospective studies on how to use TKIs after allo-HCT. These include indications for prophylactic and preemptive TKI therapy, timing of initiation, frequency of MRD monitoring, TKI selection, dose, and treatment duration. While the current available evidence is extremely limited, this article will discuss these issues after summarizing some representative and recent studies. It will also share a novel indicator that can be used to visualize the reversible transition between molecular relapse and remission by TKI therapy.

Real world outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation-A single institution experience

Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with a worse prognosis compared to Ph negative ALL. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has led to an improvement in response rates and survival, thus becoming a critical component of therapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Ph+ ALL patients treated at the University of Michigan who received TKI therapy pre- and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from April 2007 to November 2019. The study included 40 patients with Ph+ ALL (47.5% female) with a median age of 54 (24-69) years. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached, with a 5-year EFS of 61%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 5-year OS of 71%. There was no difference in 2-year EFS or OS for patients on pre-transplant imatinib or dasatinib (p = 0.16, 0.09, respectively), though definitive conclusions are challenging as post-transplant TKI therapy was variable. The incidence of any grade acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 62.5% (25/40) and any grade chronic GVHD was 77.5% (31/40). Complete molecular remission (CMR) was achieved in 57.5% of patients pre-transplant with no significant difference when stratified by induction TKI (p = 1). Achievement of CMR pre-HSCT showed a trend towards improved 2-year EFS (p=0.0198) but did not significantly change 2-year OS (p = 1). Patients receiving 1^st and 2^nd generation TKIs pre- and post-HSCT seem to have favorable outcomes, although type of TKI (pre-HSCT) did not significantly impact EFS or OS. In addition, attaining a CMR pre-transplant improved EFS, but did not change OS.

Impact of TKIs post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL

How to best use tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of BCR-ABL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown but will almost certainly not be addressed by a definitive randomized trial. Saini and colleagues provide a large body of observational data to reinforce earlier circumstantial evidence favoring prophylactic use of TKIs for at least 2 years posttransplant.

A new pre-emptive TKIs strategy for preventing relapse based on BCR/ABL monitoring for Ph+ALL undergoing allo-HCT: a prospective clinical cohort study

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure in Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a new pre-emptive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) strategy on relapse in Ph+ALL patients with complete remission undergoing allo-HCT. Pre-emptive TKIs initiation was based on BCR/ABL molecular monitoring. TKIs choice was based on BCR/ABL mutations. Donor lymphocyte infusion was recommended in those with poor response to TKIs. Prophylactic TKIs from historical data were as control. The primary endpoint was relapse. One hundred and sixty-seven Ph+ALL patients were enrolled in this study, including 103 in the pre-emptive group and 64 in the prophylactic group. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 11% and 31% in the pre-emptive and prophylactic groups (P = 0.001), respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 87% and 66% (P = 0.001), and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 83% and 61% (P = 0.000), respectively, in the pre-emptive and prophylactic groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the pre-emptive strategy was the protective factor for relapse, OS, and LFS (P = 0.005, P = 0.005, and P = 0.003, respectively). Our data suggest that this new pre-emptive TKIs strategy based on BCR/ABL molecular monitoring might reduce relapse and improve survival for Ph+ALL patients undergoing allo-HCT. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier (NCT01883219).

Efficacy and safety of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A study protocol for a multicenter exploratory prospective study (Auto-Ph17 study)

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) has been dramatically improved since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a major treatment option, the role of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) has been reconsidered, especially in patients who achieved early molecular remission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicenter exploratory study for Ph + ALL patients aged between 55 and 70 years who achieved complete molecular remission within 3 cycles of chemotherapy. The target sample size is 5, and the registration period is 2 years. The primary endpoint is Day100- mortality after transplantation, and the secondary endpoints are survival, relapse rate, nonrelapse mortality, and adverse events.This study is divided into 3 phases: peripheral blood stem cell harvest, transplantation, and maintenance. Chemomobilization is performed using a combination of cyclophosphamide (CPM), doxorubicin, vincristine (VCR), and prednisolone (PSL). As a preparative regimen, the LEED regimen is used, which consists of melphalan, CPM, etoposide, and dexamethasone. Twelve cycles of maintenance therapy using a combination of VCR, PSL, and dasatinib are performed.In association with relapse, the minimal residual disease (MRD) of BCR-ABL chimeric gene and T-cell subsets are analyzed both before and after auto-PBSCT.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Nagoya University Hospital and all the participating hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before registration, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results of the study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number UMIN000026445.

Hyper-CVAD Compared With BFM-like Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several induction regimens have been developed for treatment of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, only a few prospective randomized trials have directly compared these regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this report, we retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 62 adult ALL patients treated with either hyper-CVAD (hyper fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone; n = 38) or a BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster)-like regimen (n = 24) between November 2000 and January 2016 at the American university of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. The feasibility of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for those patients was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 29 (range, 1-129) months. Fifteen (39%) and 10 (42%) patients underwent allo-SCT in the hyper-CVAD and BFM-like group, respectively. At the time of the last follow-up, 28 patients (74%) were in complete remission in the hyper-CVAD group versus 18 patients (75%) in the BFM-like group. Of those, 20 patients (53%) versus 11 patients (46%) were minimal residual disease-negative at the last follow-up, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate (71.9% vs. 76.9%; P = .808) and 3-year disease-free survival (54.7% vs. 76.4%; P = .435) were similar in hyper-CVAD group compared with the BFM-like group, respectively. Both chemotherapies were relatively well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Overall, despite the older age and a greater number of patients with high-risk category (including Philadelphia chromosome-positive) in the hyper-CVAD group, this did not translate into a difference in survival outcome between the 2 groups. The hyper-CVAD regimen appears to be feasible for adult patients with ALL in terms of tolerability and efficacy.

Expression of CD56 is a risk factor for acute lymphocytic leukemia with central nervous system involvement in adults

OBJECTIVE

To gain further insights into the predisposing risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), the impact of CD56 expression in these patients was investigated.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical features of CD56 expression in 588 consecutive ALL patients treated with systemic chemotherapy regimens between 2000 and 2014. The categorical data from CD56⁺ ALL patients were compared with those from CD56^- ALL patients.

RESULTS

Among the 588 patients studied, 18.9% showed CD56 expression. The expression was significantly associated with CD33⁺, CD10^-, CD15⁺, TdT^-, and CD5⁺ immunophenotypes. After systemic chemotherapy, 8.8% patients showed CNS involvement, of which 3.2% exhibited combined recurrences and 5.6% exhibited isolated CNS involvement. The 5-year event-free survival was significantly lower for patients with CD56⁺ immunophenotype compared with patients with CD56^- immunophenotype (22.5% vs. 32.7%, P = 0.04). Cumulative incidences of CNS involvement were significantly greater in the CD56⁺ cohort compared with the CD56^- cohort (14.4% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed CD56 expression to be statistically significant risk factors for CNS involvement.

CONCLUSION

CD56 expression should be regarded as an independent risk factor for ALL with CNS involvement in adults.

Impact of MRD and TKI on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for Ph+ALL: a study from the adult ALL WG of the JSHCT

To assess the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for Ph-positive ALL (Ph+ALL), we retrospectively analyzed data from a registry database for 432 adult Ph+ALL patients in first CR (CR1) who received pre-transplant TKI administration. Negative MRD (MRD(-)) at allo-HCT was achieved in 277 patients. OS in patients transplanted in MRD(-) was significantly better than that in patients transplanted in MRD(+) (MRD(-): 67% vs MRD(+): 55% at 4 years; P=0.001). MRD(-) at allo-HCT was a significant risk factor for survival along with age at allo-HCT in multivariate analyses. Incidence of relapse in patients transplanted in MRD(-) was significantly lower than that in patients transplanted in MRD(+) (MRD(-): 19% vs MRD(+): 29% at 4 years; P=0.006). In multivariate analyses, MRD(+) at allo-HCT was a significant risk factor for relapse. A post-transplant TKI was administered to 103 patients. In subanalyses regarding the effect of post-transplant TKI administration, post-transplant TKI administration was a significant risk factor for relapse in multivariate analyses (P<0.0001). MRD status at allo-HCT is one of the most important predictive factors for Ph+ALL patients transplanted in CR1.

Acute leukemia

Although great progress has been made in the understanding and treatment of acute leukemia, this disease has not been conquered. For emergency providers (EPs), the presentation of these patients to an emergency department presents a host of challenges. A patient may present with a new diagnosis of leukemia or with complications of the disease process or associated chemotherapy. It is incumbent on EPs to be familiar with the manifestations of leukemia in its various stages and maintain some suspicion for this diagnosis, given the nebulous and insidious manner in which leukemia can present.

Clinical efficacy and safety of imatinib in the management of Ph(+) chronic myeloid or acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Chinese patients

Imatinib mesylate is considered the standard first-line systemic treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and functions by targeting BCR-ABL tyrosine kinases. Imatinib has substantially changed the clinical management and improved the prognosis of CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). Here, we review the pharmacology, mode of action, and pharmacokinetics of imatinib; Chinese efficacy studies in CML and Ph⁺ ALL; safety and tolerability; patient-focused perspectives, such as quality of life, patient satisfaction, acceptability, and adherence; and uptake of imatinib.

Proceedings from the National Cancer Institute's Second International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: part III. Prevention and treatment of relapse after allogeneic transplantation

In the Second Annual National Cancer Institute's Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, the Scientific/Educational Session on the Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Transplantation highlighted progress in developing new therapeutic approaches since the first relapse workshop. Recent insights that might provide a basis for the development of novel, practical clinical trials were emphasized, including utilization of newer agents, optimization of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and investigation of novel cellular therapies. Dr. de Lima discussed pre-emptive and maintenance strategies to prevent relapse after transplantation, for example, recent promising results suggestive of enhanced graft-versus-tumor activity with hypomethylating agents. Dr. Schmid provided an overview of adjunctive strategies to improve cell therapy for relapse, including cytoreduction before DLI, combination of targeted agents with DLI, and considerations in use of second transplantations. Dr. Porter addressed strategies to enhance T cell function, including ex vivo activated T cells and T cell engineering, and immunomodulatory approaches to enhance T cell function in vivo, including exogenous cytokines and modulation of costimulatory pathways.