Meningioma 1 (MN1) expression: refined risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics (CN-AML)

Prognostic impact of PRDM16 expression in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics

PURPOSE

Cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical outcomes. The identification of potential biomarkers to better classify the patients with unfavorable prognoses who may require more aggressive therapies is an emergent demand. PRDM16 is a transcriptional cofactor and histone methyltransferase, playing a critical role in maintaining hematopoietic stem cells, and MLL fusion-induced leukemogenesis. However, the prognostic value of PRDM16 in CN-AML is still unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the PRDM16 expression and its association with gene mutations in CN-AML. Then the prognostic value of PRDM16 and its comparison with WT1 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The results showed that about 73.6% of CN-AML patients harbored higher expression of PRDM16 than the healthy controls. Furthermore, CN-AML patients with high PRDM16 expression had a lower survival rate than the low PRDM16 expression group (50.5% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.0339). Interestingly, hemopoietic stem cell transplantation significantly improved the prognosis of CN-AML with high PRDM16 expression but not those with low PRDM16 expression. In terms of molecular genetics, high PRDM16 expression was significantly associated with a lower rate of CEBPA mutation (p = 0.01) and a higher rate of FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutation (p = 0.032 and p = 0.004, respectively). In addition, PRDM16 expression was significantly correlated with WT1 expression in CN-AML (r = 0.7, p < 0.001). These data suggested PRDM16 expression could be used to predict the outcome of patients with CN-AML.

CONCLUSION

PRDM16 is significantly associated with FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutation and WT1 expression and serves as a potential prognostic biomarker in CN-AML.

BMI1-Inhibitor PTC596 in Combination with MCL1 Inhibitor S63845 or MEK Inhibitor Trametinib in the Treatment of Acute Leukemia

Simple Summary

Prognosis for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is poor, particularly in TP53 mutated AML, secondary, relapsed, and refractory AML, and in patients unfit for intensive treatment, thus highlighting an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. Targeting the stem cell oncoprotein BMI1 in leukemic cells may represent a promising novel treatment option for poor risk AML patients, especially in combination with other targeted therapies. Here we tested the BMI1 inhibitor PTC596 in combination with a variety of targeted therapies in AML cell lines and patient samples in vitro. In addition, we defined the biomarkers of response to the combination treatments in the leukemic cells. The combination treatment with the BMI1 inhibitor PTC596 and the MCL1 inhibitor S63845 may be an effective treatment in CD34+ adverse risk AML with elevated MN1 gene expression and MCL1 protein levels, while combination treatment with BMI1 inhibitor PTC596 and the MEK inhibitor trametinib may be more effective in CD34+ adverse risk AML with elevated BMI1 gene expression and MEK protein levels. The determination of gene and protein expression levels in leukemic cells as biomarkers of response to targeted combination therapies may be helpful to optimize treatment efficacy.

Abstract

Purpose: Prognosis for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is poor, particularly in TP53 mutated AML, secondary, relapsed, and refractory AML, and in patients unfit for intensive treatment, thus highlighting an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. The combined use of compounds targeting the stem cell oncoprotein BMI1 and activating the tumor suppressor protein p53 may represent a promising novel treatment option for poor risk AML patients. Experimental Design: The BMI1 inhibitor PTC596, MCL1 inhibitor S63845, and MEK inhibitor trametinib, as well as the p53 activator APR-246 were assessed as single agents and in combination for their ability to induce apoptosis and cell death in leukemic cells. AML cells represented all major morphologic and molecular subtypes including FLT3-ITD and FLT3 wild type, NPM1 mutant and wild type, as well as TP53 mutant and wild type AML cell lines and a variety of patient derived AML cells. Results: AML cell lines were variably susceptible to PTC596 and to combination treatments with PTC596 and MCL1 inhibitor S63845, MEK inhibitor trametinib, or TP53 activator APR-246, independent of TP53 mutational status. Susceptibility of patient samples for PTC596 in combination with S63845 or trametinib was significant for the majority of adverse risk primary and secondary AML with minimal efficacy in favorable risk AML, and correlated significantly with CD34 positivity of the samples. BMI1 and MN1 gene expression, and MCL1 and MEK1 protein levels were identified as biomarkers for response to PTC596 combination treatments. Conclusions: The combination of PTC596 and S63845 may be an effective treatment in CD34+ adverse risk AML with elevated MN1 gene expression and MCL1 protein levels, while PTC596 and trametinib may be more effective in CD34+ adverse risk AML with elevated BMI1 gene expression and MEK protein levels.

Prognostic significance of combined BAALC and MN1 gene expression level in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype (AML-NK) is the largest group of AML patients with very heterogeneous disease outcome. In order to ensure more precise risk stratification new molecular markers have been introduced, like expression level for BAALC (Brain and Acute Leukemia, Cytoplasmic) and MN1 (Meningioma 1) genes.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated expression level of both genes in 111 adult AML-NK at diagnosis and examined their prognostic potential.

RESULTS

BAALC and MN1 expression were detected in about one third of the patients, and positive correlation between these two genes was found. The BAALC⁺ /or MN1⁺ status was not associated with the presence of FLT3-ITD mutations, but exhibited strong correlation with NPM1^wt status (P < .001). Therefore, among BAALC⁺ /or MN1⁺ patients the most frequent ones were FLT3-ITD^- /NPM1^- double negative patients with intermediate prognosis. When BAALC⁺ /or MN1⁺ patients were divided into BAALC^high /BAALC^low (21/21) and MN1^high /MN1^low (21/22) groups, we detected that BAALC^high /or MN1^high patients had a tendency toward lower complete remission rate. Also, survival analysis showed that BAALC^high /or MN1^high patients had shorter disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). The most pronounced influence on prognosis was detected in FLT3-ITD^- /NPM1^- group of patients that are lacking reliable prognostic markers, where OS in BAALC^high /or MN1^high was only 5 months vs 25 months in BAALC^low /or MN1^low .

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that BAALC and MN1 expression level could be used for more precise risk stratification of AML-NK patients and especially FLT3-ITD^- /NPM1^- patients, transforming this intermediate-risk group, into a group with an adverse prognosis.

High expression of meningioma 1 is correlated with reduced survival rates in colorectal cancer patients

The identification of prognostic markers for colorectal cancer (CRC) has important clinical implications. However, the association between meningioma 1 (MN1) expression and clinical outcomes of CRC has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of MN1 in the clinical context of CRC. We first used immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining to examine and compare MN1 expression between multiple human cancer tissues and normal tissues. Initial screening revealed that the expression of MN1 proteins was significantly higher in tumor tissues of the breast, colon, and liver than in normal tissues. In further testing conducted on 59 paired CRC samples, we observed that the expression of MN1 in CRC tissue samples was significantly higher than in adjacent normal tissues. Moreover, high MN1 expression was not significantly associated with clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that high expression of MN1 mRNA or MN1 protein was significantly associated with poor CRC prognosis. Furthermore, univariate Cox analysis revealed that a high MN1 score was significantly associated with prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox analysis further indicated that gender, histologic grade, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and a high MN1 score were independent factors of overall CRC survival rates. Finally, MN1 and PCNA protein levels were positively correlated, which suggests that MN1 may be involved in the cell proliferation process during CRC formation. Our results, which confirm those of other studies, indicate that (1) high levels of MN1 expression contribute to poor CRC prognosis and (2) MN1 can serve as a novel potential biomarker in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients.

Overexpression of TEL-MN1 Fusion Enhances Resistance of HL-60 Cells to Idarubicin

BACKGROUND

The translocation t(12; 22) (p13;q12) is a recurrent but infrequent chromosome abnormality in human myeloid malignancies. To date, the role of TEL-MN1 fusion in leukemogenic process and drug resistance is still largely unknown.

METHODS

In the present study, the TEL-MN1 fusion was transfected into HL-60 cells to upregulate TEL-MN1 expression via a retroviral vector. MTT assay was employed to examine cell viability and flow cytometry was performed to evaluate cell apoptosis. Idarubicin was used to treat HL-60 cells for estimating the effect of TEL-MN1 fusion on the chemotherapy resistance.

RESULTS

The results showed that overexpression of TEL-MN1 in HL-60 cells could promote cell proliferation, suggesting that TEL-MN1 may be involved in the leukemogenesis process. HL-60 cells treated with idarubicin showed a weakened cell viability, whereas TEL-MN1 overexpression attenuated the idarubicin-induced inhibition of cell viability and acceleration of cell apoptosis of HL-60 cells.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results indicated that TEL-MN1 fusion is an oncogene involved in the leukemogenesis process and TEL-MN1 overexpression enhanced resistance of HL-60 cells to idarubicin, which may provide a useful tool for studying the mechanism of leukemogenesis and drug resistance.

Myeloid neoplasms with t(12;22)(p13;q12)/MN1-EVT6: a systematic review of 12 cases

t(12;22)(p13;q12) is a rare but recurrent chromosomal abnormality involving the ETS transcription factor ETV6 and meningioma 1 (MN1) genes. In this study, we analyzed the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular features of five new patients with the t(12;22)/MN1-EVT6 who presented with acute myeloid leukemia or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. We subsequently reviewed the literature and identified seven additional cases reported with t(12;22)/MN1-EVT6. Our data suggest that neoplasms carrying the t(12;22)/MN1-ETV6, although rare, can commonly present as myeloid neoplasms at the initial diagnosis, including acute myeloid leukemia (n = 8), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (n = 2). There were five men and seven women with a median age of 43 years (range, 15-63 years) at initial diagnosis. Cytogenetics revealed t(12;22) as the sole abnormality in five patients, with the remaining seven patients harboring additional chromosomal aberrations. Of the five patients who received known therapy regimens, all of them had poor response to the idarubicin/mitoxantrone + cytarabine regimen. Of the seven patients with follow-up information, six patients died with a median overall survival time of only 5 months (range, 1-12 months) after the emergence of t(12;22). In summary, patients with t(12;22) are frequently associated with myeloid neoplasms, poor response to chemotherapy, and inferior outcome.

MN1 and PTEN gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE

Multiple genetic alterations with prognostic significance have been discovered in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We studied the expression level of two genes, Meningioma1 (MN1) and Phosphatase and Tensin homolog (PTEN) to determine their expression in AML patients and their role as prognostic markers.

METHODS

The study included 50 cytogenetic normal de novo AML cases and 10 controls, Their level was detected by Real time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

RESULT

Relative mRNA expression of MN1 was significantly higher (p value < 0.001) and PTEN expression was significantly lower (p value = 0.002). No correlation was found between neither MN1 nor PTEN mRNA expression and overall survival (p value = 0.212 and 0.310) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although our study suggests a role for MN1 gene and PTEN genes in AML, we could not recommend their use as routine diagnostic and prognostic markers for AML in Egyptian population.

The Meningioma 1 (MN1) Gene is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor in Adult Egyptian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Aim:

To determine the prognostic importance of meningioma 1 (MN1) gene expression levels in the context of other predictive markers for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases.

Methods:

MN1 expression was measured in 85 newly diagnosed adults younger than 60 years by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Results:

At diagnosis 67.4% of cases had elevated MN1 expression, this being associated with a worse prognosis, higher incidence of lymphadenopathy and CD34 transcript expression (p=0.02 and <0.001, respectively). No other molecular or clinical characteristics were significantly associated with MN1expression. Patients with high MN1 expression had lower complete response rate at day 15 compared to patients with low MN1 expression (p=0.09) and a significantly higher relapse rate (21.1% versus 7.7%, respectively, p=0.04). Patients with high MN1 expression had shorter TTP compared to those with low expression, p= 0.07.

Conclusion:

MN1 expression may predict outcome in AML patients. The MN1 gene and micro RNA expression suggest a biological feature that could be used as therapeutic targets.

Identification of differentially methylated markers among cytogenetic risk groups of acute myeloid leukemia

Aberrant DNA methylation is known to occur in cancer, including hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, less is known about whether specific methylation profiles characterize specific subcategories of AML. We examined this issue by using comprehensive high-throughput array-based relative methylation analysis (CHARM) to compare methylation profiles among patients in different AML cytogenetic risk groups. We found distinct profiles in each group, with the high-risk group showing overall increased methylation compared with low- and mid-risk groups. The differentially methylated regions (DMRs) distinguishing cytogenetic risk groups of AML were enriched in the CpG island shores. Specific risk-group associated DMRs were located near genes previously known to play a role in AML or other malignancies, such as MN1, UHRF1, HOXB3, and HOXB4, as well as TRIM71, the function of which in cancer is not well characterized. These findings were verified by quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing and by comparison with results available at the TCGA cancer genome browser. To explore the potential biological significance of the observed methylation changes, we correlated our findings with gene expression data available through the TCGA database. The results showed that decreased methylation at HOXB3 and HOXB4 was associated with increased gene expression of both HOXB genes specific to the mid-risk AML, while increased DNA methylation at DCC distinctive to the high-risk AML was associated with increased gene expression. Our results suggest that the differential impact of cytogenetic changes on AML prognosis may, in part, be mediated by changes in methylation.