Cognitive dysfunction and associated neuroimaging biomarkers in antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review

Objectives

Cognitive dysfunction is common in patients with aPL (including primary APS or APS associated with SLE). Neuroimaging biomarkers may contribute to our understanding of mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in these cohorts. This review aimed to investigate: (i) the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in studies including neuroimaging biomarkers; and (ii) associations between cognition and neuroimaging biomarkers in patients with APS/aPL.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and PsycINFO, and included studies with descriptions of neuroimaging findings, cognitive dysfunction or both, in patients with aPL positivity (LA, IgG and IgM aCL and anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies).

Results

Of 120 search results we included 20 eligible studies (6 APS, 4 SLE with APS/aPL and 10 NPSLE). We identified a medium risk of bias in 6/11 (54%) of cohort studies and 44% of case–control studies, as well as marked heterogeneity in cognitive assessment batteries, APS and aPL definitions, and neuroimaging modalities and protocols. The prevalence of cognitive dysfunction ranged between 11 and 60.5%. Structural MRI was the most common imaging modality, reporting cognitive dysfunction to be associated with white matter hyperintensities, ischaemic lesions and cortical atrophy (four with cerebral atrophy, two with white matter hyperintensities and two with cerebral infarcts).

Conclusion

Our findings confirm that cognitive impairment is commonly found in patients with aPL (including APS, SLE and NPSLE). The risk of bias, and heterogeneity in the cognitive and neuroimaging biomarkers reported does not allow for definitive conclusions.

Management of Non-criteria Manifestations in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To review the available evidence on the management of a variety of non-criteria manifestations in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), including valvular disease, alveolar hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, APS nephropathy, skin ulcers, livedo reticularis, cognitive dysfunction, and epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current treatment relies on low-level evidence and mainly on expert consensus due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of non-criteria APS manifestations and the diversity in management approaches. Conventional anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet APS treatment do not adequately control most of non-criteria manifestations. Increasing knowledge about the contribution of inflammatory in addition to, or independently of, thrombotic mechanisms in non-criteria APS manifestations provides insight into the potential effect of novel therapies targeting B-cells, mammalian target of rapamycin, neutrophil, and complement or interferon pathways. Existing evidence is limited by lack of high-quality studies. Better understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical phenotypes of APS and well-designed prospective studies of homogenous populations are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of non-criteria APS manifestations.