Clinical events in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures based on semiological seizure classification

Translating Phenomenology of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures Into Nosology: Insights From Patients' and Caregivers' Profiles

BACKGROUND

Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) can be semiologically dichotomized into those with hyperkinetic and those with paucikinetic events. The objective of this study was to compare characteristics of patients with diverse phenomenology and their caregivers to evaluate for differences that could inform about disease nosology.

METHODS

Patients and caregivers monitored at the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit completed surveys about sociodemographic and disease characteristics, treatment and health care utilization, physical and psychosocial impact, and epilepsy knowledge. Patients were classified into hyperkinetic versus paucikinetic based on their recorded events. Comparison of the 2 populations was performed using Student t test for continuous variables and Fischer exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with Epilepsy Monitoring Unit confirmed PNES and 28 caregivers were enrolled. Patients with hyperkinetic events were more commonly non-White patients and necessitated greater caregiving time. Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were seen between the 2 semiologically diverse groups of patients and caregivers in their sociodemographic (age, sex, employment, income, marital, and education) and disease (age of onset, duration, seizures frequency) characteristics, treatment (number of antiseizure medications before diagnosis, side effects) and health care utilization (emergency room visits, hospitalizations, clinic visits), physical (injuries) and psychosocial (depression, anxiety, quality of life, stigma, burden) characteristics, nor in their knowledge about seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperkinetic events were more frequently encountered in non-White patients and required more caregiving time. Further research is required to elucidate if phenomenological dichotomy of PNES can inform about their nosological basis, and if it can guide treatment and define prognosis.

Updated Review on the Diagnosis and Primary Management of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizure Disorders

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are paroxystic and episodic events associated with motor, sensory, mental or autonomic manifestations, which resemble epileptic seizures (ES), but are not caused by epileptogenic activity. PNES affect between 20% and 30% of patients attending at epilepsy centers and constitute a serious mental health problem. PNES are often underdiagnosed, undertreated and mistaken with epilepsy. PNES are diagnosed after medical causes (epilepsy, syncope, stroke, etc.) have been ruled out, and psychological mechanisms are involved in their genesis and perpetuation. For psychiatry, there is not a single definition for PNES; the DSM-IV and ICD-10/11 describe the conversion and dissociative disorders, and the DSM-5 describes the functional neurological disorders. However, patients with PNES also have a high frequency of other comorbidities like depression, particularly trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. It has been postulated that PNES are essentially dissociations that operate as a defensive psychological mechanism that use the mind as a defense to deal with traumas. With the advent of VEEG in the 90s, the recognition of PNES has significantly increased, and several psychological treatments have been developed. In this manuscript, we carried out a state-of-the-art review, with the aim to provide a critical approach to the extensive literature about PNES, focusing on diagnostic aspects, the primary management, and the available treatments that have been shown to be effective for the improvement of PNES.

Semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A systematic review and a new proposal

PURPOSE

A semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) may help address proper diagnosis and management and also provide standardization for future studies. The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the literature on the proposed classification systems for the semiology of PNES and to provide a new proposal based on the best available evidence.

METHODS

I searched the electronic database PubMed on May 16, 2019 for articles that included the following search terms: "psychogenic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "nonepileptic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "pseudoseizure" AND "semiology" or "classification" since 1940. I applied the same methodology using the electronic database Scopus, though I limited the search to the title, abstract, and keywords.

RESULTS

I could identify 15 classification systems through this search strategy using the electronic database PubMed. Searching the Scopus did not yield any additional relevant papers.

CONCLUSION

I proposed a new semiological classification system for PNES based on this systematic review. This includes three major classes of motor seizures, nonmotor seizures, and mixed semiology. A universally accepted and appropriate semiological classification system for PNES may lead to better standardization of future studies and may also help in better understanding of the pathophysiological basis of this condition.