Continuous monitoring methods of cerebral compliance and compensatory reserve: a scoping review of human literature

Objective.Continuous monitoring of cerebrospinal compliance (CC)/cerebrospinal compensatory reserve (CCR) is crucial for timely interventions and preventing more substantial deterioration in the context of acute neural injury, as it enables the early detection of abnormalities in intracranial pressure (ICP). However, to date, the literature on continuous CC/CCR monitoring is scattered and occasionally challenging to consolidate.Approach.We subsequently conducted a systematic scoping review of the human literature to highlight the available continuous CC/CCR monitoring methods.Main results.This systematic review incorporated a total number of 76 studies, covering diverse patient types and focusing on three primary continuous CC or CCR monitoring metrics and methods-Moving Pearson's correlation between ICP pulse amplitude waveform and ICP, referred to as RAP, the Spiegelberg Compliance Monitor, changes in cerebral blood flow velocity with respect to the alternation of ICP measured through transcranial doppler (TCD), changes in centroid metric, high frequency centroid (HFC) or higher harmonics centroid (HHC), and the P2/P1 ratio which are the distinct peaks of ICP pulse wave. The majority of the studies in this review encompassed RAP metric analysis (n= 43), followed by Spiegelberg Compliance Monitor (n= 11), TCD studies (n= 9), studies on the HFC/HHC (n= 5), and studies on the P2/P1 ratio studies (n= 6). These studies predominantly involved acute traumatic neural injury (i.e. Traumatic Brain Injury) patients and those with hydrocephalus. RAP is the most extensively studied of the five focused methods and exhibits diverse applications. However, most papers lack clarification on its clinical applicability, a circumstance that is similarly observed for the other methods.Significance.Future directions involve exploring RAP patterns and identifying characteristics and artifacts, investigating neuroimaging correlations with continuous CC/CCR and integrating machine learning, holding promise for simplifying CC/CCR determination. These approaches should aim to enhance the precision and accuracy of the metric, making it applicable in clinical practice.

M-Sign in Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler Waveforms: A Sign of Fetal Vasoconstriction Before and After Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair

BACKGROUND

Increased pulse wave reflection in the fetal arterial system, illustrated by a second systolic peak (M-sign) in middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler waveforms, allows interpretation of fetal systemic vasoconstriction. Little is known about fetal vascular regulation during fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze MCA-Doppler waveform changes before, during, and after fSB repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

31 pregnant women who underwent fSB repair were included. Fetal MCA-Doppler waveforms were prospectively analyzed before, during and after fSB repair, and categorized as follows: normal systolic downslope, systolic shoulder, second systolic peak (M-sign), and concave systolic downslope. These MCA waveforms were related to maternal and fetal characteristics, to anesthetic medication, and to umbilical artery (UA) waveforms.

RESULTS

Before fSB repair, all fetuses repeatedly presented M-signs. After initiation of desflurane for general anesthesia, systolic shoulder and the M-sign vanished in 24/31 (78%) fetuses and 19/31 (61%) showed transient UA ARED flow. A significant association between these two Doppler findings was found (p=0.007). After fSB repair, signs of increased pulse wave reflection reappeared but resolved over time (23 days ± 20, SD) in all fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Both fSB and intrauterine repair influence fetal vascular regulation. This phenomenon can be illustrated by MCA-Doppler waveforms. While anesthetic agents transiently eliminated M-signs and often provoked a UA ARED flow, fSB repair finally led to normalization of MCA-Doppler waveforms indicating return to normal fetal vascular regulation.

Increased ICP and Its Cerebral Haemodynamic Sequelae

OBJECTIVES

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a pathological feature of many neurological diseases; however, the local and systemic sequelae of raised ICP are incompletely understood. Using an experimental paradigm, we aimed to describe the cerebrovascular consequences of acute increases in ICP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed cerebral haemodynamics [mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), ICP, laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), basilar artery Doppler flow velocity (Fv) and estimated vascular wall tension (WT)] in 27 basilar artery-dependent rabbits during experimental (artificial lumbar CSF infusion) intracranial hypertension. WT was estimated as the difference between critical closing pressure and ICP.

RESULTS

From baseline (~9 mmHg) to moderate increases in ICP (~41 mmHg), cortical LDF decreased (from 100 to 39.1%, p < 0.001), while mean global Fv was unchanged (from 47 to 45 cm/s, p = 0.38). In addition, MAP increased (from 88.8 to 94.2 mmHg, p < 0.01 and WT decreased (from 19.3 to 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). From moderate to high ICP (~75 mmHg), both global Fv and cortical LDF decreased (Fv, from 45 to 31.3 cm/s, p < 0.001; LDF, from 39.1 to 13.3%, p < 0.001) while MAP increased further (94.2 to 114.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and estimated WT was unchanged (from 9.7 to 9.6 mmHg, p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, we demonstrate a cortical vulnerability to increases in ICP and two ICP-dependent cerebro-protective mechanisms: with moderate increases in ICP, WT decreases and MAP increases to buffer cerebral perfusion, while with severe increases of ICP, an increased MAP predominates.

Critical Closing Pressure During a Controlled Increase in Intracranial Pressure

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to compare three methods of estimating critical closing pressure (CrCP) in a scenario of a controlled increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) induced during an infusion test in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 37 NPH patients who underwent infusion tests. Computer recordings of directly measured intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP) and transcranial Doppler cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) were used. The CrCP was calculated using three methods: first harmonics ratio of the pulse waveforms of ABP and CBFV (CrCP_A) and two methods based on a model of cerebrovascular impedance, as a function of cerebral perfusion pressure (CrCP_inv), and as a function of ABP (CrCP_ninv).

RESULTS

There is good agreement among the three methods of CrCP calculation, with correlation coefficients being greater than 0.8 (p < 0.0001). For the CrCP_A method, negative values were found for about 20% of all results. Negative values of CrCP were not observed in estimators based on cerebrovascular impedance. During the controlled rise of ICP, all three estimators of CrCP increased significantly (p < 0.05). The strongest correlation between ICP and CrCP was found for CrCP_inv (median R = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Invasive CrCP is most sensitive to variations in ICP and can be used as an indicator of the status of the cerebrovascular system during infusion tests.

Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure: Is the Multiparameter Model Better Suited to Estimate Physiology of Cerebral Hemodynamics?

BACKGROUND

Cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) is the level of arterial blood pressure (ABP) at which small brain vessels close and blood flow stops. This value is always greater than intracranial pressure (ICP). The difference between CrCP and ICP is explained by the tone of the small cerebral vessels (wall tension). CrCP value is used in several dynamic cerebral autoregulation models. However, the different methods for calculation of CrCP show frequent negative values. These findings are viewed as a methodological limitation. We intended to evaluate CrCP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a new multiparameter impedance-based model and compare it with results found earlier using a transcranial Doppler (TCD)-ABP pulse waveform-based method.

METHODS

Twelve severe TBI patients hospitalized during September 2005-May 2007. Ten men, mean age 32 years (16-61). Four had decompressive craniectomies (DC); three presented anisocoria. Patients were monitored with TCD cerebral blood flow velocity (FV), invasive ABP, and ICP. Data were acquired at 50 Hz with an in-house developed data acquisition system. We compared the earlier studied "first harmonic" method (M1) results with results from a new recently developed (M2) "multiparameter method."

RESULTS

M1: In seven patients CrCP values were negative, reaching -150 mmHg. M2: All positive values; only one lower than ICP (ICP 60 mmHg/ CrCP 57 mmHg). There was a significant difference between M1 and M2 values (M1 < M2) and between ICP and M2 (M2 > ICP).

CONCLUSION

M2 results in positive values of CrCP, higher than ICP, and are physiologically interpretable.

Cerebral haemodynamics during experimental intracranial hypertension

Intracranial hypertension is a common final pathway in many acute neurological conditions. However, the cerebral haemodynamic response to acute intracranial hypertension is poorly understood. We assessed cerebral haemodynamics (arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, laser Doppler flowmetry, basilar artery Doppler flow velocity, and vascular wall tension) in 27 basilar artery-dependent rabbits during experimental (artificial CSF infusion) intracranial hypertension. From baseline (∼9 mmHg; SE 1.5) to moderate intracranial pressure (∼41 mmHg; SE 2.2), mean flow velocity remained unchanged (47 to 45 cm/s; p = 0.38), arterial blood pressure increased (88.8 to 94.2 mmHg; p < 0.01), whereas laser Doppler flowmetry and wall tension decreased (laser Doppler flowmetry 100 to 39.1% p < 0.001; wall tension 19.3 to 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). From moderate to high intracranial pressure (∼75 mmHg; SE 3.7), both mean flow velocity and laser Doppler flowmetry decreased (45 to 31.3 cm/s p < 0.001, laser Doppler flowmetry 39.1 to 13.3%, p < 0.001), arterial blood pressure increased still further (94.2 to 114.5 mmHg; p < 0.001), while wall tension was unchanged (9.7 to 9.6 mmHg; p = 0.35).This animal model of acute intracranial hypertension demonstrated two intracranial pressure-dependent cerebroprotective mechanisms: with moderate increases in intracranial pressure, wall tension decreased, and arterial blood pressure increased, while with severe increases in intracranial pressure, an arterial blood pressure increase predominated. Clinical monitoring of such phenomena could help individualise the management of neurocritical patients.

Middle cerebral artery flow, the critical closing pressure, and the optimal mean arterial pressure in comatose cardiac arrest survivors-An observational study

AIM

This study estimated the critical closing pressure (CrCP) of the cerebrovascular circulation during the post-cardiac arrest syndrome and determined if CrCP differs between survivors and non-survivors. We also compared patients after cardiac arrest to normal controls.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed at the ICU of a tertiary university hospital in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. We studied 11 comatose patients successfully resuscitated from a cardiac arrest and treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia and 10 normal control subjects. Mean flow velocity (MFV) in the middle cerebral artery was measured by transcranial Doppler at several time points after admission to the ICU. CrCP was determined by a cerebrovascular impedance model.

RESULTS

MFV was similar in survivors and non-survivors upon admission to the ICU, but increased stronger in non-survivors compared to survivors throughout the observation period (P<0.001). MFV was significantly lower in survivors immediately after cardiac arrest compared to normal controls (P<0.001), with a gradual restoration toward normal values. CrCP decreased significantly from 61.4[51.0-77.1]mmHg to 41.7[39.9-51.0]mmHg in the first 48h, after which it remained stable (P<0.001). CrCP was significantly higher in survivors compared to non-survivors (P=0.002). CrCP immediately after cardiac arrest was significantly higher compared to the control group (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

CrCP is high after cardiac arrest with high cerebrovascular resistance and low MFV. This suggests that cerebral perfusion pressure should be maintained at a sufficient high level to avoid secondary brain injury. Failure to normalize the cerebrovascular profile may be a parameter of poor outcome.