1
|
Topsakal V, Heuninck E, Matulic M, Tekin AM, Mertens G, Van Rompaey V, Galeazzi P, Zoka-Assadi M, van de Heyning P. First Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear Implantation. Front Neurol 2022; 13:804507. [PMID: 35386404 PMCID: PMC8979022 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.804507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided and robot-assisted surgeries have found their applications in skullbase surgery. Technological improvements in terms of accuracy also opened new opportunities for robotically-assisted cochlear implantation surgery (RACIS). The HEARO® robotic system is an otological next-generation surgical robot to assist the surgeon. It first provides software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during otological and neurosurgical procedures. Second, it executes a preplanned drill trajectory through the temporal bone. Here, we report how safe the HEARO procedure can provide an autonomous minimally invasive inner ear access and the efficiency of this access to subsequently insert the electrode array during cochlear implantation. In 22 out of 25 included patients, the surgeon was able to complete the HEARO® procedure. The dedicated planning software (OTOPLAN®) allowed the surgeon to reconstruct a three-dimensional representation of all the relevant anatomical structures, designate the target on the cochlea, i.e., the round window, and plan the safest trajectory to reach it. This trajectory accommodated the safety distance to the critical structures while minimizing the insertion angles. A minimal distance of 0.4 and 0.3 mm was planned to facial nerve and chorda tympani, respectively. Intraoperative cone-beam CT supported safe passage for the 22 HEARO® procedures. The intraoperative accuracy analysis reported the following mean errors: 0.182 mm to target, 0.117 mm to facial nerve, and 0.107 mm to chorda tympani. This study demonstrates that microsurgical robotic technology can be used in different anatomical variations, even including a case of inner ear anomalies, with the geometrically correct keyhole to access to the inner ear. Future perspectives in RACIS may focus on improving intraoperative imaging, automated segmentation and trajectory, robotic insertion with controlled speed, and haptic feedback. This study [Experimental Antwerp robotic research otological surgery (EAR2OS) and Antwerp Robotic cochlear implantation (25 refers to 25 cases) (ARCI25)] was registered at clinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03746613 and NCT04102215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Vedat Topsakal
| | - Emilie Heuninck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Ahmet M. Tekin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum Bad Salzungen, Bad Salzungen, Germany
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review. Hear Res 2022; 414:108425. [PMID: 34979455 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mueller F, Hermann J, Weber S, O'Toole Bom Braga G, Topsakal V. Image-Based Planning of Minimally Traumatic Inner Ear Access for Robotic Cochlear Implantation. Front Surg 2021; 8:761217. [PMID: 34901143 PMCID: PMC8655094 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.761217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: During robotic cochlear implantation, an image-guided robotic system provides keyhole access to the scala tympani of the cochlea to allow insertion of the cochlear implant array. To standardize minimally traumatic robotic access to the cochlea, additional hard and soft constraints for inner ear access were proposed during trajectory planning. This extension of the planning strategy aims to provide a trajectory that preserves the anatomical and functional integrity of critical intra-cochlear structures during robotic execution and allows implantation with minimal insertion angles and risk of scala deviation. Methods: The OpenEar dataset consists of a library with eight three-dimensional models of the human temporal bone based on computed tomography and micro-slicing. Soft constraints for inner ear access planning were introduced that aim to minimize the angle of cochlear approach, minimize the risk of scala deviation and maximize the distance to critical intra-cochlear structures such as the osseous spiral lamina. For all cases, a solution space of Pareto-optimal trajectories to the round window was generated. The trajectories satisfy the hard constraints, specifically the anatomical safety margins, and optimize the aforementioned soft constraints. With user-defined priorities, a trajectory was parameterized and analyzed in a virtual surgical procedure. Results: In seven out of eight cases, a solution space was found with the trajectories safely passing through the facial recess. The solution space was Pareto-optimal with respect to the soft constraints of the inner ear access. In one case, the facial recess was too narrow to plan a trajectory that would pass the nerves at a sufficient distance with the intended drill diameter. With the soft constraints introduced, the optimal target region was determined to be in the antero-inferior region of the round window membrane. Conclusion: A trend could be identified that a position between the antero-inferior border and the center of the round window membrane appears to be a favorable target position for cochlear tunnel-based access through the facial recess. The planning concept presented and the results obtained therewith have implications for planning strategies for robotic surgical procedures to the inner ear that aim for minimally traumatic cochlear access and electrode array implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Mueller
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hermann
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Michel G, Salunkhe DH, Bordure P, Chablat D. Literature Review on Endoscopic Robotic Systems in Ear and Sinus Surgery. J Med Device 2021. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4052516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
In otolaryngologic surgery, endoscopy is increasingly used to provide a better view of hard-to-reach areas and to promote minimally invasive surgery. However, the need to manipulate the endoscope limits the surgeon's ability to operate with only one instrument at a time. Currently, several robotic systems are being developed, demonstrating the value of robotic assistance in microsurgery. The aim of this literature review is to present and classify current robotic systems that are used for otological and endonasal applications. For these solutions, an analysis of the functionalities in relation to the surgeon's needs will be carried out to produce a set of specifications for the creation of new robots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Michel
- ENT Department, CHU de Nantes, 1, place A. Ricordeau, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Durgesh Haribhau Salunkhe
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6004, 1 rue de la Noë, Nantes 44321, France
| | - Philippe Bordure
- ENT Department, CHU de Nantes, 1, place A. Ricordeau, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Damien Chablat
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes, UMR CNRS 6004, 1 rue de la Noë, Nantes 44321, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Panara K, Shahal D, Mittal R, Eshraghi AA. Robotics for Cochlear Implantation Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e825-e835. [PMID: 33993143 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent advancements in robotics have set forth a growing body of evidence for the clinical application of the robotic cochlear implantation (RCI), with many potential benefits. This review aims to summarize these efforts, provide the latest developments in this exciting field, and explore the challenges associated with the clinical implementation of RCI. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. STUDY SELECTION A search was conducted using the keywords "robotics otolaryngology," "robotic cochlear implant," "minimally-invasive cochlear implantation," "minimally-invasive mastoidectomy," and "percutaneous cochlear implant" with all of their synonyms. Literature selection criteria included articles published in English, and articles from 1970 to present. RESULTS The use of robotics in neurotology is a relatively new endeavor that continues to evolve. Robotics is being explored by various groups to facilitate in the various steps of cochlear implant surgery, including drilling a keyhole approach to the middle ear for implants, inner ear access, and electrode insertion into the cochlea. Initial clinical trials have successfully implanted selected subjects using robotics. CONCLUSIONS The use of robotics in cochlear implants remains in its very early stages. It is hoped that robotics will improve clinical outcomes. Although successful implants with robots are reported in the literature, there are some challenges that need to be addressed before this approach can become an acceptable option for the conventional cochlear implant surgery, such as safety, time, efficiency, and cost. However, it is hoped that further advancements in robotic technology will help in overcoming these barriers leading to successful implementation for clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kush Panara
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - David Shahal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - Rahul Mittal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - Adrien A Eshraghi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
- Department of Neurological Surgery
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Noise Exposure on Human Cochlea During Cochleostomy Formation Using Conventional and a Hand Guided Robotic Drill. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e829-e835. [PMID: 32558760 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the disturbance induced in the cochlea during cochleostomy using conventional drill and a hand guided robotic drill. STUDY DESIGN The study is based on experimental measurements using the Laser Doppler Vibrometer during the drilling processes converted to Sound Pressure Levels (SPL) for comparison. SETTING The study is based on experimental results of three sets of cochleostomies on human cadaver heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Robotic drilling, in comparison to the conventional drilling method, creates a consistently lower level of disturbance in cochlea across the hearing frequency range. RESULTS Robotic drilling, in comparison to the conventional drilling method, creates a consistently lower level of disturbance in cochlea across the hearing frequency range. CONCLUSIONS It is reasonable to conclude that robotic drilling has a lower possibility of creating acoustic trauma in cochlea that endangers the residual hearing of patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring drilled bore depth in bone is an important part of osteosynthesis surgery. Current methods have substantial limitations in terms of reliability, leading to placement of incorrectly sized screws and unsatisfactory user experience. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Can a prototype laser range-finder measure bore depth in bone as well as or better than a conventional depth gauge in terms of accuracy and precision (that is, variability)? METHODS A conventional analog orthopaedic surgical depth gauge was compared with a laser range-finder-based prototype. Experiments were conducted on four pig hind limbs, with bicortical holes drilled in the femur and the tibia. Two surgeons alternated drilling bores in three different clinically relevant conditions: straight drilling through the diaphysis, angled drilling through the diaphysis, and straight drilling through the metaphysis. Depth measurements were taken with the laser range-finder-based prototype, and the conventional depth gauge and compared against depth measurements obtained from a CT image that served as the reference measurement. RESULTS In straight diaphyseal drilling the laser range-finder-based prototype had a larger mean error of 1.34 mm (± 0.7 mm) compared with a mean error of -0.06 mm (± 1.38 mm) using the conventional gauge (95% CI 0.824 to 1.976; p < 0.001). In angled diaphyseal drilling, there was no difference in mean error between the laser range-finder-based prototype (1.66 ± 0.86 mm) and the conventional gauge (2.36 ± 3.79 mm [95% CI -2.338 to 0.938]; p = 0.393). In straight metaphyseal drilling, there was no difference in mean error between the laser range-finder-based prototype (2.11 ± 0.8 mm) and the conventional gauge (1.51 ± 3.19 mm [95% CI -0.500 to 1.700]; p = 0.280). The laser range-finder-based prototype had greater precision (smaller variance) than the conventional depth gauge in straight diaphyseal drilling (p < 0.001), angled diaphyseal drilling (p < 0.001), and straight metaphyseal drilling (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A laser range-finder-based prototype mounted on a conventional surgical drill demonstrated overall similar accuracy and better precision in measuring drilled bore depth in bone compared with the conventional depth gauge. CLINICAL RELEVANCE A device based on this concept could improve the reliability of bore depth measurement in surgical practice and could therefore reduce the frequency of screw replacement and associated complications.
Collapse
|
9
|
Du X, Brett PN, Zhang Y, Begg P, Mitchell-Innes A, Coulson C, Irving R. A hand-guided robotic drill for cochleostomy on human cadavers. ROBOTIC SURGERY : RESEARCH AND REVIEWS 2019; 5:13-18. [PMID: 30697569 PMCID: PMC6193445 DOI: 10.2147/rsrr.s142562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background An arm supported robotic drill has been recently demonstrated for preparing cochleostomies in a pilot research clinical trial. In this paper, a hand-guided robotic drill is presented and tested on human cadaver trials. Methods The innovative smart tactile approach can automatically detect drilling mediums and decided when to stop drilling to prevent penetrating the endosteum. The smart sensing scheme has been implemented in a concept of a hand guided robotic drill. Results Experiments were carried out on two adult cadaveric human bodies for verifying the drilling process and successfully finished cochleostomy on three cochlea. The advantage over a system supported by a mechanical arm includes the flexibility in adjusting the trajectory to initiate cutting without slipping. Using the same concept as a conventional drilling device, the user will also be benefit from the lower setup time and cost, and lower training overhead. Conclusion The hand-guided robotic drill was recently developed for testing on human cadavers. The robotic drill successfully prepared cochleostomies in all three cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinli Du
- Brunel Institute for Bioengineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK,
| | - Peter N Brett
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Yu Zhang
- Brunel Institute for Bioengineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK,
| | - Philip Begg
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Chris Coulson
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard Irving
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Drug delivery to the inner ear is an ideal method to treat a wide variety of otologic conditions. A broad range of potential applications is just beginning to be explored. New approaches combine principles of inner ear pharmacokinetics with emerging technologies of drug delivery including novel delivery systems, drug-device combinations, and new categories of drugs. Strategies include cell-specific targeting, manipulation of gene expression, local activation following systemic delivery, and use of stem cells, viral vectors, and gene editing systems. Translation of these therapies to the clinic remains challenging given the potential risks of intracochlear and intralabyrinthine trauma, our limited understanding of the etiologies of particular inner ear disorders, and paucity of accurate diagnostic tools at the cellular level. This review provides an overview of future methods, delivery systems, disease targets, and clinical considerations required for translation to clinical medicine.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen Y, Bernardeschi D, Sterkers O. Potential of Robot-Based Surgery for Otosclerosis Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51:475-485. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
12
|
Yoo MH, Lee HS, Yang CJ, Lee SH, Lim H, Lee S, Yi BJ, Chung JW. A cadaver study of mastoidectomy using an image-guided human-robot collaborative control system. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2017; 2:208-214. [PMID: 29094065 PMCID: PMC5655553 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Surgical precision would be better achieved with the development of an anatomical monitoring and controlling robot system than by traditional surgery techniques alone. We evaluated the feasibility of robot‐assisted mastoidectomy in terms of duration, precision, and safety. Study Design Human cadaveric study. Materials and Methods We developed a multi‐degree‐of‐freedom robot system for a surgical drill with a balancing arm. The drill system is manipulated by the surgeon, the motion of the drill burr is monitored by the image‐guided system, and the brake is controlled by the robotic system. The system also includes an alarm as well as the brake to help avoid unexpected damage to vital structures. Experimental mastoidectomy was performed in 11 temporal bones of six cadavers. Parameters including duration and safety were assessed, as well as intraoperative damage, which was judged via pre‐ and post‐operative computed tomography. Results The duration of mastoidectomy in our study was comparable with that required for chronic otitis media patients. Although minor damage, such as dura exposure without tearing, was noted, no critical damage to the facial nerve or other important structures was observed. When the brake system was set to 1 mm from the facial nerve, the postoperative average bone thicknesses of the facial nerve was 1.39, 1.41, 1.22, 1.41, and 1.55 mm in the lateral, posterior pyramidal and anterior, lateral, and posterior mastoid portions, respectively. Conclusion Mastoidectomy can be successfully performed using our robot‐assisted system while maintaining a pre‐set limit of 1 mm in most cases. This system may thus be useful for more inexperienced surgeons. Level of Evidence NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung Hoon Yoo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Daegu Republic of Korea
| | - Hwan Seo Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Joo Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology School of Medicine, Hanyang University Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Hoon Lim
- Department of Electronic Systems Engineering Hanyang University Ansan Republic of Korea
| | - Seongpung Lee
- Department of Robotics Engineering DGIST Daegu Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Ju Yi
- Department of Electronic Systems Engineering Hanyang University Ansan Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Woo Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Direct Acoustic Stimulation at the Lateral Canal: An Alternative Route to the Inner Ear? PLoS One 2016; 11:e0160819. [PMID: 27500399 PMCID: PMC4976884 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe to profound mixed hearing loss is associated with hearing rehabilitation difficulties. Recently, promising results for speech understanding were obtained with a direct acoustic cochlear implant (DACI). The surgical implantation of a DACI with standard coupling through a stapedotomy can however be regarded as challenging. Therefore, in this experimental study, the feasibility of direct acoustic stimulation was investigated at an anatomically and surgically more accessible inner ear site. DACI stimulation of the intact, blue-lined and opened lateral semicircular canal (LC) was investigated and compared with standard oval window (OW) coupling. Additionally, stapes footplate fixation was induced. Round window (RW) velocity, as a measure of the performance of the device and its coupling efficiency, was determined in fresh-frozen human cadaver heads. Using single point laser Doppler vibrometry, RW velocity could reliably be measured in low and middle frequency range, and equivalent sound pressure level (LE) output was calculated. Results for the different conditions obtained in five heads were analyzed in subsequent frequency ranges. Comparing the difference in RW membrane velocity showed higher LE in the LC opened condition [mean: 103 equivalent dB SPL], than in LC intact or blue-lined conditions [63 and 74 equivalent dB SPL, respectively]. No difference was observed between the LC opened and the standard OW condition. Inducing stapes fixation, however, led to a difference in the low frequency range of LE compared to LC opened. In conclusion, this feasibility study showed promising results for direct acoustic stimulation at this specific anatomically and surgically more accessible inner ear site. Future studies are needed to address the impact of LC stimulation on cochlear micromechanics and on the vestibular system like dizziness and risks of hearing loss.
Collapse
|
14
|
Feasibility study of a hand guided robotic drill for cochleostomy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:656325. [PMID: 25110684 PMCID: PMC4109386 DOI: 10.1155/2014/656325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The concept of a hand guided robotic drill has been inspired by an automated, arm supported robotic drill recently applied in clinical practice to produce cochleostomies without penetrating the endosteum ready for inserting cochlear electrodes. The smart tactile sensing scheme within the drill enables precise control of the state of interaction between tissues and tools in real-time. This paper reports development studies of the hand guided robotic drill where the same consistent outcomes, augmentation of surgeon control and skill, and similar reduction of induced disturbances on the hearing organ are achieved. The device operates with differing presentation of tissues resulting from variation in anatomy and demonstrates the ability to control or avoid penetration of tissue layers as required and to respond to intended rather than involuntary motion of the surgeon operator. The advantage of hand guided over an arm supported system is that it offers flexibility in adjusting the drilling trajectory. This can be important to initiate cutting on a hard convex tissue surface without slipping and then to proceed on the desired trajectory after cutting has commenced. The results for trials on phantoms show that drill unit compliance is an important factor in the design.
Collapse
|