Are lopinavir and efavirenz serum concentrations in HIV-infected children in the therapeutic range in clinical practice?

Is Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-Retroviral Agents Warranted in Children Living with HIV?

OBJECTIVE

The utility of routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in children living with HIV has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to assess this strategy.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective observational study of routine TDM for protease inhibitors (PIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in children living with HIV who were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) between February and December 2014. Outcome measures included the proportion of serum antiretroviral (ARV) medication concentrations in the therapeutic range (target values extrapolated from adult data) and the effect of serum concentrations on virologic control, medication adherence, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Forty-eight children with a median age of 13 years (interquartile range, 3–18) were included. Median viral load (VL) and CD4% were <40 copies/mL (range, <40–124) and 37.4% (range, 8.4–47.9), respectively. Adherence was considered excellent in 95.8% of patients. Of the 50 serum trough concentrations (PI n = 19 [38%]; NNRTI n = 27 [54%]; INSTI n = 4 [8%]), 66% (n = 33) were in the therapeutic range, 12% (n = 6) were subtherapeutic, and 22% (n = 11) were supratherapeutic. There was no statistically significant correlation between serum ARV concentrations and patient demographics, VL, CD4%, or adherence. No clinically significant adverse events were noted. One dose adjustment was made for a subtherapeutic serum raltegravir concentration, likely attributable to interaction with ritonavir.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support routine TDM in healthy children living with HIV who are well controlled on antiretroviral medication regimens. A more targeted strategy, such as when adherence is questioned or when there are suspected drug interactions, may be more appropriate.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral and tuberculosis drugs in children with HIV/TB co-infection: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Management of concomitant use of ART and TB drugs is difficult because of the many drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the medications. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ART and TB treatment in children with HIV/TB co-infection, and identifies knowledge gaps.

METHODS

We searched Embase and PubMed, and systematically searched abstract books of relevant conferences, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies not reporting PK parameters, investigating medicines that are not available any longer or not including children with HIV/TB co-infection were excluded. All studies were assessed for quality.

RESULTS

In total, 47 studies met the inclusion criteria. No dose adjustments are necessary for efavirenz during concomitant first-line TB treatment use, but intersubject PK variability was high, especially in children <3 years of age. Super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir (ratio 1:1) resulted in adequate lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-administration. Double-dosed raltegravir can be given with rifampicin in children >4 weeks old as well as twice-daily dolutegravir (instead of once daily) in children older than 6 years. Exposure to some TB drugs (ethambutol and rifampicin) was reduced in the setting of HIV infection, regardless of ART use. Only limited PK data of second-line TB drugs with ART in children who are HIV infected have been published.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas integrase inhibitors seem favourable in older children, there are limited options for ART in young children (<3 years) receiving rifampicin-based TB therapy. The PK of TB drugs in HIV-infected children warrants further research.

Lopinavir serum concentrations of critically ill infants: a pharmacokinetic investigation in South Africa

The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric antiretroviral therapy is unclear. A little pharmacokinetic datum from clinical practice exists beyond controlled approval studies including clinically stable children. The aim of this study is to quantify LPV exposure of critically ill infants in an ICU and-by identifying risk factors for inadequate exposure-to define sensible indications for TDM in pediatric HIV care; in addition, assume total drug adherence in ICU to compare LPV exposure with a setting of unknown adherence. In this prospective investigation, 15 blood samples from critically ill infants in the pediatric ICU at Tygerberg Hospital were analyzed for LPV-serum concentrations. They were then compared to those of 22 blood samples from out-patient children. Serum-level measurements were performed with an established high-performance liquid chromatography method. All LPV-serum levels of ICU patients were higher than a recommended C_trough (= 1.000 ng/ml), 60% of levels were higher than C_max (8.200 ng/ml). Partly, serum levels reached were extremely high (Maximum: 28.778 ng/ml). Low bodyweight and age correlated significantly with high LPV concentrations and were risk factors for serum levels higher than C_max. Significantly fewer serum levels from infants in ICU care (mean: 11.552 ng/ml ± SD 7760 ng/ml) than from out-patient children (mean: 6.756 ng/ml ± SD 6.003 ng/ml) were subtherapeutic (0 vs. 28%, p = 0.008). Under total adherence in the ICU group, there were no subtherapeutic serum levels, while, in out-patient, children with unknown adherence 28% of serum levels were found subtherapeutic. Low bodyweight and age are risk factors for reaching potentially toxic LPV levels in this extremely fragile population. TDM can be a reasonable tool to secure sufficient and safe drug exposure in pediatric cART.