Lack of relationship between the expression of Hsp27 heat shock estrogen receptor-associated protein and estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor status in male breast carcinoma

Estrogen, through estrogen receptors (ERs), may regulate the synthesis of progesterone receptors (PRs) and of a heat shock estrogen receptor-associated protein (hsp27). In female breast carcinoma (FBC) both proteins serve as surrogate indicators for the presence of functional ERs. In addition, the expression of these proteins was related to other prognostic indicators of value in female breast tumours. Endocrine disorders, hormone therapy and altered estrogen metabolism have been associated with the development of male breast cancer (MBC), suggesting that evaluation of the expression of ER, PR and hsp27 might improve our understanding of the biology of this tumour. ER and PR status and hsp27 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 16 primary MBC patients. The interrelationships between these parameters were established and compared with the clinicopathological data on the tumours. Ten (56%) MBC patients were ER-positive, 69% were PR-positive and all samples were hsp27-positive. Our series of MBC patients showed a positive correlation between ERs and PRs, however there was a lack of correlation between hsp27 and ERs or PRs. MBCs did not exhibit any correlation between the biomarkers studied and known prognostic indicators for females (e.g. Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) or modified SBR (MSBR) grade, T stage, lymph node status). This is the first published series reporting the incidence of hsp27 in MBC. The lack of association between the expression of ERs and hsp27 found in MBC differs from the results reported for FBC, moreover the expression of ERs, PRs or hsp27 did not correlate with the clinicopathological parameters that have prognostic value in females. Although the data were obtained from a relatively small sample population, our findings suggest that MBC and FBC are biologically different tumours with respect to the expression of the studied proteins.

Clinical and Histological Prognostic Factors in Axillary Node-Negative BreastCancer: Univariate and Multivariate Analysis with Relation to 5-Year Recurrence

In the recent years several studies have shown that about 30% of cases with axillary node-nagative breast cancer suffer relapse of the disease. Our attempt was made to evaluate the most significant prognostic factors to predict this high risk group which may be benefited from adjuvant treatment. For this purpose, we selected 9 patients out of 80 cases of node-negative breast cancer who had been followed up at least for 5 years and had the recurrence of the disease. For comparison, 16 patients from the same group who did not have relapse were selected on a random basis. Histology, receptor status, AgNOR, DNA flow cytometry and various immunohistochemical parameters were compared between the groups with recurrence and that without recurrence. On univariate analysis, tumor size, immunohistochemical expressions of PCNA, MIB-1, c-erbB-2 and S-phase fraction were significantly different between the above two groups. By multivariate analysis, immunohistochemical c-erbB-2 expression (more than 50% of cancer cells) was an independent parameter. As a summary from our studies, c-erbB-2 immunohistochemical staining on paraffin sections might be the best independent prognostic factor in axillary node-negative breast cancers.

Effects of selected chemotherapeutic agents on PCNA expression in prostate carcinoma cell lines

Bivariate flow cytometric analysis of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was performed on prostate carcinoma cell lines (PC-3, DU-145). For both cell lines 100% methanol fixation provided optimal fluorescence intensity of PCNA. The ratio of PCNA/DNA increased in late G1 through early S/phase, followed by a decrease in mid- and late S and enhancement in G2/M phase. PCNA expression was increased in G2/M phase cells treated for 48 h with vinblastine. A slight decrease in PCNA expression was observed with cyclohexamide treatment. Hydroxyurea induced an increase in S-phase fraction along with enhanced PCNA expression. Methotrexate and Adriamycin had little effect on the cell cycle compartments of PC-3 or DU-145; however, methotrexate decreased PCNA expression, while Adriamycin enhanced it. Cisplatin increased S-phase in both cell lines, increasing PCNA expression in PC-3 and decreasing it in DU-145 cells. The data on the effects of drug treatment point to a dissociation between PCNA expression and S-phase fraction as calculated from the DNA distribution. In some cases, e.g., the cisplatin studies, different effects were obtained in the two different cell lines treated with the same drugs. Whether changes in PCNA expression will provide more useful information than S-phase fraction for evaluation of potential antitumor drugs is not known.