Survival and therapy of burn patients at the threshold of the twenty-first century: a review

Increased burn patient survival with once-a-day high dose teicoplanin and netilmicin. An Italian multicenter study

This is the final report of a large, controlled, multicenter Italian study on immuno- and chemotherapy in adult patients with burns affecting 20 to 95% of total body surface area (mean 35%). The antibiotic treatment of burn patients consisted of topical silver sulfadiazine, short-term antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis with pefloxacin (800 mg i.v. qd) for the first 4 days and polychemotherapy with teicoplanin (800 mg i.v. qd) together with netilmicin (300 mg i.m. qd) in one or more cycles of 5-12 days. At random, half of the patients received thymostimulin, 70 mg i.m. qd for the first month and every other day thereafter. The analysis at completion of 634 valid cases showed that when the results are stratified by means of the Roi risk index, 396 of the 530 patients who contracted wound infection (84%) after chemoprophylaxis were in the first three categories and a mean of 95% survived. Of the remaining 134 patients (Roi index 4-5) only 50% survived. There was no difference in survival of the immunotherapy group in comparison with the parallel group without thymostimulin. The short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis prevented wound infection in only 104 of 634 patients (16%) and they were at low risk (84% Roi index 1). Of the bacterial pathogens involved in septic complications Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were prevalent (86%): eradication was achieved in 43% of patients and clinical cure or improvement were seen with combination chemotherapy in 64% of all patients, mainly with only one treatment cycle. This value increased to 79% for the 395 protocol-complying patients and went down to 20% in the 135 non-compliers. The total survival of complier and non-complier patients was 447 of the 530 valid patients (84%). The overall mortality of the 634 evaluable patients was 13.1%, ranging from less than 2% to 68%. Burn mortality was directly proportional to the percentage of burned body surface area, to increasing age and other variables of the Roi index, a 50% mortality being associated with a 72.5% total body surface area burned. Normoergic burn patients had a mortality rate of 9.1% versus 35.7% in anergic patients.

A closer look at vancomycin, teicoplanin, and antimicrobial resistance

The worldwide increase in the incidence of resistant Gram-positive infections has renewed interest in the glycopeptide class of antimicrobial agents. Two glycopeptides are available in many parts of the world--vancomycin and teicoplanin. These two agents appear to differ in several respects, including: potential for selecting microbial resistance, dosing convenience, safety, and efficacy in severe infection. Teicoplanin appears to have lower toxicity and greater convenience; however, its widespread acceptance has been plagued by concerns over antimicrobial resistance, efficacy, and appropriate dosing. A review of available studies suggests that teicoplanin, when dosed at 6 mg/kg/day, is better tolerated than vancomycin 15 mg/kg/q12h; however, at these doses, it appears to be somewhat less effective than vancomycin in serious Staphylococcus aureus infection, such as endocarditis. Although higher doses of teicoplanin, 12 mg/kg/day to 30 mg/kg/day, have been associated with efficacy comparable to that of vancomycin in serious S. aureus infections, such doses may eliminate some of the safety advantages conferred by lower teicoplanin doses. Teicoplanin has been associated with resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci and the selection of resistance in S. aureus. There is some evidence that widespread use of teicoplanin might accelerate the development of S. aureus resistance to both teicoplanin and vancomycin. The selection of an appropriate glycopeptide in an individual patient should be based not only on convenience, but also on a determination of optimal efficacy, safety at an efficacious dose, and the potential for resistance.