|
1
|
Oertel M, Schlusemann T, Shumilov E, Reinartz G, Bremer A, Rehn S, Lenz G, Khandanpour C, Eich HT. Radiotherapy in Combination with Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma-A Critical Toxicity Evaluation in the Modern Treatment Era. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112909. [PMID: 37296874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment modality in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), aiming at analgesia and stabilization of osteolytic lesions. As a multifocal disease, the combined use of RT, systemic chemotherapy, and targeted therapy (ST) is pivotal to achieve better disease control. However, adding RT to ST may lead to increased toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of ST given concurrently with RT. Overall, 82 patients treated at our hematological center with a median follow-up of 60 months from initial diagnosis and 46.5 months from the start of RT were evaluated retrospectively. Toxicities were recorded from 30 days before RT up to 90 days after RT. 54 patients (65.9%) developed at least one non-hematological toxicity, with 50 patients (61.0%) showing low-grade (grade I or II) and 14 patients (17.1%) revealing high-grade (grade III and IV) toxicities. Hematological toxicities were documented in 50 patients (61.0%) before RT, 60 patients (73.2%) during RT, and 67 patients (81.7%) following RT. After RT, patients who had received ST during RT showed a significant increase in high-grade hematological toxicities (p = 0.018). In summary, RT can be safely implemented into modern treatment regimens for MM, but stringent monitoring of potential toxicities even after completion of RT has to be ensured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Tom Schlusemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Evgenii Shumilov
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Gabriele Reinartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Anne Bremer
- Department of Oncology, St. Franziskus-Hospital, Hohenzollernring 70, 48145 Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephan Rehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Georg Lenz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Cyrus Khandanpour
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Guerini AE, Tucci A, Alongi F, Mataj E, Belotti A, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Pegurri L, Pedretti S, Bonù M, Tomasini D, Imbrescia J, Donofrio A, Facheris G, Singh N, Volpi G, Tomasi C, Magrini SM, Spiazzi L, Buglione M. RR Myelo POINT: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Assessing the Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Multiple Myeloma and Possible Interactions with Concurrent Systemic Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092273. [PMID: 35565401 PMCID: PMC9099690 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Although chemotherapy, biological agents, and radiotherapy (RT) are cornerstones of the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the literature regarding the possible interactions of concurrent systemic treatment (CST) and RT is limited, and the optimal RT dose is still unclear. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent RT for MM at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2020. The data of 312 patients and 577 lesions (treated in 411 accesses) were retrieved. Results: Most of the treated lesions involved the vertebrae (60%) or extremities (18.9%). Radiotherapy was completed in 96.6% of the accesses and, although biologically effective doses assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED 10) > 38 Gy and CST were significantly associated with higher rates of toxicity, the safety profile was excellent, with side effects grade ≥2 reported only for 4.1% of the accesses; CST and BED 10 had no impact on the toxicity at one and three months. Radiotherapy resulted in significant improvements in performance status and in a pain control rate of 87.4% at the end of treatment, which further increased to 96.9% at three months and remained at 94% at six months. The radiological response rate at six months (data available for 181 lesions) was 79%, with only 4.4% of lesions in progression. Progression was significantly more frequent in the lesions treated without CST or BED 10 < 15 Gy, while concurrent biological therapy resulted in significantly lower rates of progression. Conclusion: Radiotherapy resulted in optimal pain control rates and fair toxicity, regardless of BED 10 and CST; the treatments with higher BED 10 and CST (remarkably biological agents) improved the already excellent radiological disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Alessandra Tucci
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Italy;
| | - Eneida Mataj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Angelo Belotti
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0303995272
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Marco Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Jessica Imbrescia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Alessandra Donofrio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Giorgio Facheris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Navdeep Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Giulia Volpi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Cesare Tomasi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Section of Public Health and Human Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
König L, Herfarth K. [Benefits of radiotherapy for patients with solitary plasmacytoma or multiple myeloma]. Radiologe 2021; 62:30-34. [PMID: 34762165 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for patients with solitary plasmacytoma (SP) or multiple myeloma (MM) should be discussed in an interdisciplinary context. This systematic review focuses on the importance of radiotherapy in MM and SP. OBJECTIVE Summary of local radio-oncological treatment options for patients with SP and MM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on a systematic literature search, the current evidence on the topic was analyzed and summarized. RESULTS Patients with SP should be primarily treated with radiotherapy with or without surgery. Irradiation concepts may vary depending on risk factors and manifestation (solitary bone plasmacytoma vs. solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma). Although local control rates are high after radiotherapy, progression to multiple myeloma frequently occurs. In patients with MM, radiation is mainly used in palliative settings for pain relief, prevention of fractures or in patients who suffer from neurological symptoms due to spinal cord compression. Irradiation dose and fractionation should be selected based on treatment indication and general condition of the patient. CONCLUSION Although most patients receive systemic treatment at initial diagnosis, approximately 40% of patients with MM will require radiation during the course of their disease. While radiation is mainly used for palliation in patients with MM, it represents the primary and curative treatment option in patients with SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila König
- Abteilung RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Abteilung RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Resende Salgado L, Wang S, Adler A, Chang S, Ru M, Moshier E, Dharmarajan K, Jay Cho H, Bakst R. The Safety Profile of Concurrent Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in the Modern Era. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:112-117. [PMID: 30706018 PMCID: PMC6349658 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The management of multiple myeloma has evolved in the modern era, partially owing to the increasing number of biologic therapeutics. Nonetheless, radiation remains an important treatment in the management of painful lytic lesions from multiple myeloma. The goal of this study is to evaluate the side effect profile of radiation therapy (RT) while patients are concurrently treated with biologic agents. Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective study based on data collected from patients receiving RT at our institute from 2007 to 2017. A total of 130 patients (279 treatment sites) were included in this study with a median follow-up time of 14 months. Patients were required to be receiving a biological agent at least within 1 month before starting and up to 1 month after RT. Generalized estimating equations with a log link function and binomial distribution were used to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and compare the side effects between patients with RT alone and RT + biologic agent. Results The median age of all patients in our cohort was 64 years, with 53 men (58.9%) and 37 women (41.1%). The mean Karnofsky performance status score of all cohorts was 80. No significant difference in incidence of acute (PR: 1.33; 95% CI, 0.80-2.22; P = .2660) or subacute (PR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.49-1.67; P = .7464) toxicities was found between patients with or without biologic agents who were treated concurrently with RT. No significant difference was found in reduction in laboratory values between patients with or without biologic agents treated concurrently with RT for white blood cells (P = .6916), platelets (P = .7779), or hematocrit (P = .0858). Conclusions Our study did not detect any significant toxicity rates from palliative radiation while patients were concurrently treated with biologic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shutao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ava Adler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Sanders Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Meng Ru
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kavita Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Hearn Jay Cho
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Tsang RW, Campbell BA, Goda JS, Kelsey CR, Kirova YM, Parikh RR, Ng AK, Ricardi U, Suh CO, Mauch PM, Specht L, Yahalom J. Radiation Therapy for Solitary Plasmacytoma and Multiple Myeloma: Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:794-808. [PMID: 29976492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guidelines for the work-up and radiation therapy (RT) management of patients with plasma cell neoplasms. METHODS AND MATERIALS A literature review was conducted covering staging, work-up, and RT management of plasma cell neoplasms. Guidelines were developed through consensus by an international panel of radiation oncologists with expertise in these diseases, from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. RT volume definitions are based on the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. RESULTS Plasma cell neoplasms account for approximately one-fifth of mature B-cell neoplasms in the United States. The majority (∼95%) are diagnosed as multiple myeloma, in which there has been tremendous progress in systemic therapy approaches with novel drugs over the last 2 decades, resulting in improvements in disease control and survival. In contrast, a small proportion of patients with plasma cell neoplasms present with a localized plasmacytoma in the bone, or in extramedullary (extraosseous) soft tissues, and definitive RT is the standard treatment. RT provides long-term local control in the solitary bone plasmacytomas and is potentially curative in the extramedullary cases. This guideline reviews the diagnostic work-up, principles, and indications for RT, target volume definition, treatment planning, and follow-up procedures for solitary plasmacytoma. Specifically, detailed recommendations for RT volumes and dose/fractionation are provided, illustrated with specific case scenarios. The role of palliative RT in multiple myeloma is also discussed. CONCLUSIONS The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group presents a standardized approach to the use and implementation of definitive RT in solitary plasmacytomas. The modern principles outlining the supportive role of palliative RT in multiple myeloma in an era of novel systemic therapies are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Belinda A Campbell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayant S Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Chris R Kelsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Peter M Mauch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Liu YC, Chiang IT, Hsu FT, Hwang JJ. Using NF-κB as a molecular target for theranostics in radiation oncology research. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2014; 12:139-46. [DOI: 10.1586/erm.12.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
|
7
|
Yang H, Zonder JA, Dou QP. Clinical development of novel proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009; 18:957-71. [PMID: 19505187 PMCID: PMC3758888 DOI: 10.1517/13543780903002074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence demonstrates that targeting the tumor proteasome is a promising strategy for cancer therapy. OBJECTIVE This review summarizes recent results from cancer clinical trials using specific proteasome inhibitors or some natural compounds that have proteasome-inhibitory effects. METHODS A literature search was carried out using PubMed. Results about the clinical application of specific proteasome inhibitors and natural products with proteasome-inhibitory activity for cancer prevention or therapy were reviewed. RESULTS/CONCLUSION Bortezomib, the reversible proteasome inhibitor that first entered clinical trials, has been studied extensively as a single agent and in combination with glucocorticoids, cytotoxic agents, immunomodulatory drugs and radiation as treatment for multiple myeloma and other hematological malignancies. The results in some cases have been impressive. There is less evidence of bortezomib's efficacy in solid tumors. Novel irreversible proteasome inhibitors, NPI-0052 and carfilzomib, have also been developed and clinical trials are underway. Natural products with proteasome-inhibitory effects, such as green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), soy isoflavone genistein, and the spice turmeric compound curcumin, have been studied alone and in combination with traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy against various cancers. There is also interest in developing these natural compounds as potential chemopreventive agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanjie Yang
- The Prevention Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, and the Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 540.1 HWCRC, 4100 John R. Road, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Berges O, Decaudin D, Servois V, Kirova YM. Concurrent radiation therapy and bortezomib in myeloma patient. Radiother Oncol 2008; 86:290-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2007] [Accepted: 12/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
|
9
|
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006. [DOI: 10.1002/pds.1174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|