1
|
Daptomycin in Combination with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam or Cefazolin against Daptomycin-Susceptible and -Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro, Hollow-Fiber Model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60:3970-5. [PMID: 27090172 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01666-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor with activity against several Gram-negative pathogens. Daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergistic activity with beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with reduced lipopeptide and glycopeptide susceptibilities. Our objective was to determine if DAP and TOL-TAZ possess synergy in hollow-fiber pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. One isogenic pair of daptomycin-susceptible and daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA strains was evaluated. DAP, TOL-TAZ, and cefazolin (CFZ) MIC determinations were performed. DAP MIC determinations were also performed in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of TOL-TAZ and CFZ. Ninety-six-hour in vitro models were run, simulating DAP at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day; TOL-TAZ at 1,500 mg every 8 h; TOL at 1,000 mg every 8 h; and DAP combined with TOL-TAZ (DAP+TOL-TAZ), DAP+TOL, DAP+TAZ, and DAP+CFZ at 2,000 mg every 8 h. DAP MICs were 0.5 and 4 μg/ml for strains R8845 and R8846, respectively. In the presence of CFZ, R8845 and R8846 DAP MICs were reduced 8-fold and 16-fold, respectively. TOL and TAZ had no effect on DAP MICs. PK/PD models demonstrated bactericidal activity with DAP+CFZ against both strains. The combination of DAP+TOL-TAZ was bactericidal against R8845 but was not bactericidal against daptomycin-nonsusceptible strain R8846. DAP+TOL and DAP+TAZ were not bactericidal. No other regimens were bactericidal. DAP+TOL-TAZ did not demonstrate synergistic activity against daptomycin-nonsusceptible S. aureus but prevented daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence. Because DAP+TOL or TAZ alone did not prevent daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence, the combination TOL-TAZ may be necessary for synergy with DAP. DAP+CFZ demonstrated enhancement against both strains. The combination of DAP+CFZ warrants further clinical study.
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith JR, Yim J, Raut A, Rybak MJ. Oritavancin Combinations with β-Lactams against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60:2352-8. [PMID: 26833159 PMCID: PMC4808215 DOI: 10.1128/aac.03006-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Oritavancin possesses activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA).In vitrodata suggest synergy between beta-lactams (BLs) and vancomycin or daptomycin, agents similar to oritavancin. We evaluated the activities of BLs combined with oritavancin against MRSA and VRE. Oritavancin MICs were determined for 30 strains, 5 each of MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis, and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium Oritavancin MICs were determined in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of BLs. Oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, cefazolin, or nafcillin was evaluated for lethal synergy against MRSA, and oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, ampicillin, or ertapenem was evaluated for lethal synergy against VRE in 24-h time-kill assays. Oritavancin at 0.5× the MIC was combined with BLs at 0.5× the MIC or the biological free peak concentration, whichever one was lower. Synergy was defined as a ≥2-log10-CFU/ml difference between the killing achieved with the combination and that achieved with the most active single agent at 24 h. Oritavancin MICs were ≤0.125 μg/ml for all MRSA isolates except three VISA isolates with MICs of 0.25 μg/ml. Oritavancin MICs for VRE ranged from 0.03 to 0.125 μg/ml. Oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline was synergistic against all MRSA phenotypes and statistically superior to all other combinations against DNS MRSA, hVISA, and MRSA isolates (P< 0.02). Oritavancin in combination with cefazolin and oritavancin in combination with nafcillin were also synergistic against all MRSA strains. Synergy between oritavancin and all BLs was revealed against VRE strain 8019, while synergy between oritavancin and ampicillin or ertapenem but not ceftaroline was demonstrated against VRE strain R7164. The data support the potential use of oritavancin in combination with BLs, especially oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline, for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. The data from the present study are not as strong for oritavancin in combination with BLs for VRE. Further study of both MRSA and VRE in more complex models is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan R Smith
- Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Juwon Yim
- Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Animesh Raut
- Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael J Rybak
- Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tong SYC, Nelson J, Paterson DL, Fowler VG, Howden BP, Cheng AC, Chatfield M, Lipman J, Van Hal S, O’Sullivan M, Robinson JO, Yahav D, Lye D, Davis JS. CAMERA2 - combination antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:170. [PMID: 27029920 PMCID: PMC4815121 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1295-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia is a serious infection resulting in 20-50 % 90-day mortality. The limitations of vancomycin, the current standard therapy for MRSA, make treatment difficult. The only other approved drug for treatment of MRSA bacteraemia, daptomycin, has not been shown to be superior to vancomycin. Surprisingly, there has been consistent in-vitro and in-vivo laboratory data demonstrating synergy between vancomycin or daptomycin and an anti-staphylococcal β-lactam antibiotic. There is also growing clinical data to support such combinations, including a recent pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) that demonstrated a trend towards a reduction in the duration of bacteraemia in patients treated with vancomycin plus flucloxacillin compared to vancomycin alone. Our aim is to determine whether the addition of an anti-staphylococcal penicillin to standard therapy results in improved clinical outcomes in MRSA bacteraemia. METHODS/DESIGN We will perform an open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial at 29 sites in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Israel. Adults (aged 18 years or older) with MRSA grown from at least one blood culture and able to be randomised within 72 hours of the index blood culture collection will be eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomised to vancomycin or daptomycin (standard therapy) given intravenously or to standard therapy plus 7 days of an anti-staphylococcal β-lactam (flucloxacillin, cloxacillin, or cefazolin). The primary endpoint will be a composite outcome at 90 days of (1) all-cause mortality, (2) persistent bacteraemia at day 5 or beyond, (3) microbiological relapse, or (4) microbiological treatment failure. The recruitment target of 440 patients is based on an expected failure rate for the primary outcome of 30 % in the control arm and the ability to detect a clinically meaningful absolute decrease of 12.5 %, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a power of 80 %, and assuming 10 % of patients will not be evaluable for the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION Key potential advantages of adding anti-staphylococcal β-lactams to standard therapy for MRSA bacteraemia include their safety profile, low cost, and wide availability. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02365493 . Registered 24 February 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Y. C. Tong
- />Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
- />Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT Australia
| | - Jane Nelson
- />Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
| | - David L. Paterson
- />University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, QLD Australia
| | - Vance G. Fowler
- />Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
- />Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
| | - Benjamin P. Howden
- />Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, at The Doherty Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Allen C. Cheng
- />Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- />Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Mark Chatfield
- />Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
| | - Jeffrey Lipman
- />Burns, Trauma Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- />Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Sebastian Van Hal
- />Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Matthew O’Sullivan
- />Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
- />Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - James O. Robinson
- />Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine WA, Royal Perth Hospital and Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA Australia
- />Australian Collaborating Centre for Enterococcus and Staphylococcus Species (ACCESS) Typing and Research, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Dafna Yahav
- />Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
- />Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - David Lye
- />Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- />Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joshua S. Davis
- />Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
- />John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - for the CAMERA2 study group and the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network
- />Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT Australia
- />Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT Australia
- />University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, QLD Australia
- />Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
- />Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
- />Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, at The Doherty Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- />Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- />Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- />Burns, Trauma Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- />Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- />Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
- />Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
- />Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- />Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine WA, Royal Perth Hospital and Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA Australia
- />Australian Collaborating Centre for Enterococcus and Staphylococcus Species (ACCESS) Typing and Research, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, WA Australia
- />Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
- />Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- />Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- />Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- />John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
In vitro activity of daptomycin in combination with β-lactams, gentamicin, rifampin, and tigecycline against daptomycin-nonsusceptible enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:4279-88. [PMID: 25963982 DOI: 10.1128/aac.05077-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 05/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Enterococci that are nonsusceptible (NS; MIC > 4 μg/ml) to daptomycin are an emerging clinical concern. The synergistic combination of daptomycin plus beta-lactams has been shown to be effective against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) species in vitro. This study systematically evaluated by in vitro time-kill studies the effect of daptomycin in combination with ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, ceftaroline, ertapenem, gentamicin, tigecycline, and rifampin, for a collection of 9 daptomycin-NS enterococci that exhibited a broad range of MICs and different resistance-conferring mutations. We found that ampicillin plus daptomycin yielded the most consistent synergy but did so only for isolates with mutations to the liaFSR system. Daptomycin binding was found to be enhanced by ampicillin in a representative isolate with such mutations but not for an isolate with mutation to the yycFGHIJ system. In contrast, ampicillin enhanced the killing of the LL-37 human antimicrobial peptide against daptomycin-NS E. faecium with either the liaFSR or yycFGHIJ mutation. Antagonism was noted only for rifampin and tigecycline and only for 2 or 3 isolates. These data add support to the growing body of evidence indicating that therapy combining daptomycin and ampicillin may be helpful in eradicating refractory VRE infections.
Collapse
|
5
|
Activity of daptomycin or linezolid in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against biofilm-forming Enterococcus faecalis or E. faecium in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model using simulated endocardial vegetations and an in vivo survival assay using Galleria mellonella larvae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:4612-20. [PMID: 24867993 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02790-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Enterococci are the third most frequent cause of infective endocarditis. A high-inoculum stationary-phase in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations was used to simulate the human pharmacokinetics of daptomycin at 6 or 10 mg/kg of body weight/day or linezolid at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h), alone or in combination with gentamicin at 1.3 mg/kg q12h or rifampin at 300 mg q8h or 900 mg q24h. Biofilm-forming, vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (vancomycin-resistant enterococcus [VRE]) strains were tested. At 24, 48, and 72 h, all daptomycin-containing regimens demonstrated significantly more activity (decline in CFU/g) than any linezolid-containing regimen against biofilm-forming E. faecalis. The addition of gentamicin to daptomycin (at 6 or 10 mg/kg) in the first 24 h significantly improved bactericidal activity. In contrast, the addition of rifampin delayed the bactericidal activity of daptomycin against E. faecalis, and the addition of rifampin antagonized the activities of all regimens against VRE at 24 h. Also, against VRE, the addition of gentamicin to linezolid at 72 h improved activity and was bactericidal. Rifampin significantly antagonized the activity of linezolid against VRE at 72 h. In in vivo Galleria mellonella survival assays, linezolid and daptomycin improved survival. Daptomycin at 10 mg/kg improved survival significantly over that with linezolid against E. faecalis. The addition of gentamicin improved the efficacy of daptomycin against E. faecalis and those of linezolid and daptomycin against VRE. We conclude that in enterococcal infection models, daptomycin has more activity than linezolid alone. Against biofilm-forming E. faecalis, the addition of gentamicin in the first 24 h causes the most rapid decline in CFU/g. Of interest, the addition of rifampin decreased the activity of daptomycin against both E. faecalis and VRE.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pankey GA, Ashcraft DS, Dornelles A. Comparison of 3 Etest® methods and time-kill assay for determination of antimicrobial synergy against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 77:220-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2013] [Revised: 07/03/2013] [Accepted: 07/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
7
|
Abstract
Enterococci have the potential for resistance to virtually all clinically useful antibiotics. Their emergence as important nosocomial pathogens has coincided with increased expression of antimicrobial resistance by members of the genus. The mechanisms underlying antibiotic resistance in enterococci may be intrinsic to the species or acquired through mutation of intrinsic genes or horizontal exchange of genetic material encoding resistance determinants. This paper reviews the antibiotic resistance mechanisms in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis and discusses treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Hollenbeck
- Department of Medicine, Lifespan/Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Almirante B, Miró JM. Retos en el tratamiento antimicrobiano de la endocarditis infecciosa. Papel de la daptomicina. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2012; 30 Suppl 1:26-32. [DOI: 10.1016/s0213-005x(12)70068-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Ampicillin enhances daptomycin- and cationic host defense peptide-mediated killing of ampicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 56:838-44. [PMID: 22123698 DOI: 10.1128/aac.05551-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We studied an ampicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolate from a patient with endocarditis and bacteremia refractory to treatment with daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight) plus linezolid. Blood cultures cleared within 24 h of changing therapy to daptomycin (12 mg/kg) plus ampicillin. We examined the effects of ampicillin on daptomycin-induced growth inhibition and killing, surface charge, and susceptibility to several prototypical host defense cationic antimicrobial peptides. MICs and time-kill curves with daptomycin were assessed in the presence and absence of ampicillin. The impact of ampicillin on surface charge was assessed by flow cytometry and a poly-l-lysine binding assay. The effects of ampicillin preexposures upon VRE killing by five distinct cationic peptides of different structure, charge, origin, and mechanism of action were analyzed using the epidermal cathelicidin LL-37, thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal proteins (tPMPs), and a synthetic congener modeled after tPMP microbicidal domains (RP-1), human neutrophil peptide-1 (hNP-1), and polymyxin B (bacteria derived). Fluoroscein-Bodipy-labeled daptomycin was used to evaluate daptomycin binding to VRE membranes in the presence or absence of ampicillin. In media containing ampicillin (25 to 100 mg/liter), daptomycin MICs decreased from 1.0 to 0.38 mg/liter. Based on time-kill analysis and an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, ampicillin enhanced daptomycin activity against the study VRE from a bacteriostatic to a bactericidal profile. VRE grown in ampicillin (25 to 150 mg/liter) demonstrated an incremental reduction in its relative net positive surface charge. When grown in the presence (versus absence) of ampicillin (25 and 100 mg/liter), the VRE strain (i) was more susceptible to killing by LL-37, tPMPs, hNP-1, and RP-1 but not to polymyxin B and (ii) exhibited greater binding to Bodipy-labeled daptomycin. We conclude that ampicillin induces reductions in net positive bacterial surface charge of VRE, correlating with enhanced bactericidal effects of cationic calcium-daptomycin and a diverse range of other cationic peptides in vitro. While the mechanism(s) of such β-lactam-mediated shifts in surface charge remains to be defined, these finding suggest a potential for β-lactam-mediated enhancement of activity of both daptomycin and innate host defense peptides against antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Collapse
|
10
|
Entenza JM, Giddey M, Vouillamoz J, Moreillon P. In vitro prevention of the emergence of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci following combination with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ampicillin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 35:451-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2009] [Accepted: 12/29/2009] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Ramón Azanza J, García-Quetglas E, Sádaba B. Efectos adversos e interacciones de los nuevos antibióticos activos frente a cocos grampositivos. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2008. [DOI: 10.1157/13123568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
12
|
Almirante B. Bacteriemia e infecciones endovasculares por grampositivos: nuevas opciones terapéuticas. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2008. [DOI: 10.1157/13123565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
13
|
Enoch DA, Bygott JM, Daly ML, Karas JA. Daptomycin. J Infect 2007; 55:205-13. [PMID: 17629567 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.05.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2007] [Revised: 05/24/2007] [Accepted: 05/25/2007] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
There has been a steady rise in the prevalence of resistant Gram-positive pathogens and concerns about the clinical effectiveness of glycopeptides in treating infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. Daptomycin is a novel lipopeptide antimicrobial agent with activity against Gram-positive organisms, including multi-resistant strains. It is licensed in the USA and Europe for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by Gram-positive organisms at a dose of 4mg/kg once daily. It has also been licensed in the USA for the treatment of S. aureus bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis at 6mg/kg once daily. It is a safe and well-tolerated antibiotic, particularly at the current dosing regimen. Antimicrobial resistance, whilst being increasingly reported, still remains relatively rare. Further studies are required to determine the role of daptomycin for the treatment of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, as well as its use in combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Enoch
- Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency East of England, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baltch AL, Ritz WJ, Bopp LH, Michelsen PB, Smith RP. Antimicrobial activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and oxacillin in human monocytes and of daptomycin in combination with gentamicin and/or rifampin in human monocytes and in broth against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:1559-62. [PMID: 17283190 PMCID: PMC1855516 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00973-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We investigated the antistaphylococcal activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, oxacillin, gentamicin, and rifampin in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Compared with vancomycin and oxacillin, daptomycin had the most rapid and greatest antibacterial activity, but that of oxacillin was most sustained. The combination of daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin was most effective intracellularly, while daptomycin plus gentamicin and the three-drug combination were most effective extracellularly, completely eliminating viable Staphylococcus aureus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldona L Baltch
- Infectious Disease Research Laboratory, Stratton VA Medical Center, and Albany Medical College, NY 12208, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Daptomycin in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia in neutropenic patients. J Infect 2006; 54:567-71. [PMID: 17188750 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2006] [Revised: 10/30/2006] [Accepted: 11/03/2006] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vancomycin resistant enterococcal (VRE) blood stream infection (BSI) in neutropenic patients is associated with poor outcome. We report our experience in treating VRE BSI in febrile, neutropenic patients with daptomycin, a recently licensed lipopeptide with bactericidal activity against VRE. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with fever, neutropenia and VRE BSI were treated with more than one dose of daptomycin (either 6 mg/kg/day or 4 mg/kg/day) in an open label, emergency-use trial. Patients were then assessed for clinical and microbiological cures and survival. MIC's of isolates to daptomycin were determined. RESULTS Nine febrile, neutropenic patients with VRE BSI received daptomycin. Four of 9 courses (44%) had clinical and/or microbiologic cure. Two of the 5 who failed cure died within 3 days of initiation of daptomycin. Five subjects survived to 30 days after the onset of BSI. CONCLUSIONS Use of daptomycin in neutropenic patients with VRE BSI deserves further study as a treatment for VRE BSI in neutropenic patients.
Collapse
|