Efficacy of teicoplanin, administered in two different regimens, in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis

C-terminal deletion of RelA protein is suggested as a possible cause of infective endocarditis recurrence with Enterococcus faecium

Infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Enterococcus spp. represents the third most common cause of IE, with high rates of relapse compared with other bacteria. Interestingly, late relapses (>6 months) have only been described in Enterococcus faecalis, but here we describe the first reported IE relapse with Enterococcus faecium more than a year (17 months) after the initial endocarditis episode. Firstly, by multi locus sequence typing (MLST), we demonstrated that both isolates (EF646 and EF641) belong to the same sequence type (ST117). Considering that EF641 was able to overcome starvation and antibiotic treatment conditions surviving for a long period of time, we performed bioinformatic analysis in identifying potential genes involved in virulence and stringent response. Our results showed a 13-nucleotide duplication (positions 1638-1650) in the gene relA, resulting in a premature stop codon, with a loss of 167 amino acids from the C-terminal domains of the RelA enzyme. RelA mediates the stringent response in bacteria, modulating levels of the alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp). The relA mutant (EF641) was associated with lower growth capacity, the presence of small colony variants, and higher capacity to produce biofilms (compared with the strain EF646), but without differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns according to standard procedures during planktonic growth. Instead, EF641 demonstrated tolerance to high doses of teicoplanin when growing in a biofilm. We conclude that all these events would be closely related to the long-term survival of the E. faecium and the late relapse of the IE. These data represent the first clinical evidence of mutations in the stringent response (relA gene) related with E. faecium IE relapse.

Efficacy of teicoplanin monotherapy following initial standard therapy in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Teicoplanin is often used in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis as a relay in case of penicillin side effects, or in outpatients. We assessed the efficacy of teicoplanin used as continuation therapy after initial standard treatment of E. faecalis endocarditis.

METHODS

All adult patients consecutively diagnosed between 1997 and 2016 for E. faecalis endocarditis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received standard therapy (ST) were compared to those switched to teicoplanin to complete the treatment (teicoplanin therapy, TT).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled: 34 in the ST group and 37 in the TT group. Amoxicillin was replaced by teicoplanin after a median duration of 18 days (IQ_25 - 75 12-21). Teicoplanin (5.8 ± 2.3 mg/kg) was administered for a median duration of 29 days (IQ_25 - 75 25-34). Gentamicin therapy was similar. Overall duration of antimicrobial therapy was 42 days (IQ_25 - 75 35-43) in the ST group, and 46 days (IQ_25 - 75 43-49) in the TT group (p = 0.001). Global and endocarditis-related mortality rates were 22/34 (65%) and 13/34 (38%) in the ST group, and 14/37 (38%) and 3/37 (8%) in the TT group (p ≤ 0.05). Relapses occurred in 2/26 patients who survived the treatment phase in the ST group (8%) and in 3/37 in the TT group (8%, p = 0.68). All relapses in the TT group occurred in patients presenting prosthetic valve endocarditis. Finally, 20 patients were cured in the ST group (59%), and 33 patients in the TT group (89%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In E. faecalis endocarditis, the switch to teicoplanin in selected patients following an initial phase of standard treatment represents an alternative, particularly for outpatient therapy. Caution should be exercised in cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis: A retrospective observational study from a referral centre in Spain

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis (EIE). A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of definite EIE patients treated with teicoplanin in a Spanish referral centre (2000-2017) was performed. The primary outcome was mortality during treatment. Secondary outcomes were mortality during 3-month follow-up, adverse effects and relapse. A total of 22 patients received teicoplanin, 9 (40.9%) as first-line (8 Enterococcus faecium and 1 Enterococcus faecalis) and 13 (59.1%) as salvage therapy (13 E. faecalis). Median (IQR) age was 71.5 (58.3-78) years and Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 (3-7). Five (22.7%) affected prosthetic valves. Median duration of treatment in survivors was 53 (42.5-61) days for antibiotics and 27 (17-41.5) days for teicoplanin [median dose 10 (10-10.8) mg/kg/day]. Reasons for teicoplanin use were resistance to β-lactams (40.9%), adverse events with previous regimens (31.8%) and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) (27.3%). Teicoplanin was withdrawn due to adverse events in 2 patients (9.1%). Five patients (22.7%) died during treatment: four in the first-line (three with surgery indicated but not performed) and one in the salvage therapy group (surgery indicated but not performed). Two deaths (11.8%) occurred over the 3-month follow-up. There were no relapses during a median of 43.2 (22.1-69.1) months. Teicoplanin can be used as an alternative treatment for susceptible E. faecium IE and as a salvage therapy in selected patients with E. faecalis IE when adverse events develop with standard regimens or to allow OPAT.