Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Bacteremia of Unknown Source Due to Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase ProducingEscherichia coli

Carbapenem-sparing beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenems for bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) have become a worldwide public health threat, and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) are considered as one reliable carbapenem-sparing antibiotic. However, it is still controversial whether BLBLIs are truly noninferior to carbapenems. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of BLBLIs with carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted until December 2021 to enroll studies comparing BLBLIs with carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the choice of therapy (empirical, definitive, and mixed therapy). The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42022316011).

RESULTS

A total of 2786 patients from one randomized clinical trial and 25 cohorts were included. There was no statistically significant difference between BLBLIs and carbapenems groups in therapeutical response (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, P = 0.45) and mortality (OR = 1.06, P = 0.68). Furthermore, although the statistical difference was also not found in the subgroup analysis, BLBLIs performed better in definitive therapy than empirical therapy than carbapenems, with a numerically higher therapeutical response (OR = 1.42 vs 0.89) and a mildly lower mortality (OR = 0.85 vs 1.14).

CONCLUSION

BLBLIs were noninferior to carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs, especially in definitive therapy. BLBLIs may be a valid alternative to spare the use of carbapenems.

Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenem for bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae pose a major public health threat due to poor outcomes and high mortality rates. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of intravenous beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLI), including piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ), on mortality of participants with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections compared with carbapenem.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were electronically searched for studies through June 15, 2017 that have provided data for mortality and addressed the terms "ESBL" and "PTZ or BL-BLI" and "carbapenem". Data extraction on study design, characteristics of the population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes was performed. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 observational studies describing 3842 participants were included and analyzed. Within 30-day mortality of BL-BLI or PTZ for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections treatment was not statistically different from carbapenem (pooled odds ratios (OR): 1.07, 95% CI 0.81; 1.82 and 1.18, 95% CI 0.93; 1.5, respectively). No statistically significant differences in mortality were found between BL-BLI or PTZ and carbapenem administered as definitive (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.59; 1.86 and 0.97, 95% CI 0.59; 1.6, respectively) or empirical (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.87; 1.48 and 1.27, 95% CI 0.96; 1.66) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that there is no significant difference in 30-day mortality between BL-BLI, including PTZ and carbapenems, in treating ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections. Moreover, intravenous BL-BLI, especially PTZ, may be considered as an alternative treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections. Future studies are needed to validate these findings.

Comparison Between Carbapenems and β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in the Treatment for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Carbapenems are widely used for the management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). However, the wide use of carbapenems has been associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae development.

Methods

We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases (last search date was on June 1, 2016) looking for studies that reported mortality in adult patients with ESBL-PE BSIs that were treated with carbapenems or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs).

Results

Fourteen studies reported mortality data in adult patients with ESBL-PE BSI that were treated with carbapenems or BL/BLIs. Among them, 13 studies reported extractable data on empiric therapy, with no statistically significant difference in mortality of patients with ESBL-PE BSI that were treated empirically with carbapenems (22.1%; 121 of 547), compared with those that received empiric BL/BLIs (20.5%; 109 of 531; relative risk [RR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–1.37; I² = 20.7%; P = .241). In addition, 7 studies reported data on definitive therapy. In total, 767 patients (79.3%) received carbapenems and 199 patients (20.6%) received BL/BLIs as definitive therapy, and there was again no statistically significant difference (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.25–1.52; I² = 84.6%; P < .001). Regarding specific pathogens, the use of empiric BL/BLIs in patients with BSI due to ESBL-Escherichia coli was not associated with a statistically significant difference in mortality (RR, 1.014; 95% CI, 0.491–2.095; I² = 62.5%; P = .046), compared with the use of empiric carbapenems.

Conclusions

These data do not support the wide use of carbapenems as empiric therapy, and BL/BLIs might be effective agents for initial/empiric therapy for patients with BSI caused by likely ESBL-PE, and especially ESBL-E coli.

Factors influencing the early mortality in haematological malignancy patients with nosocomial Gram negative bacilli bacteraemia: a retrospective analysis of 154 cases

Background

The aim of this study is to assess the factors influencing the early mortality (7-day after index blood culture) in haematological malignancy patients with Gram negative bacilli (GNB) bacteraemia.

Methods

Infection control committee records were reviewed to identify the cases between March 2006 and June 2011. Only one bacteraemic episode per patient was included in the study.

Results

A total of 154 patients with GNB bacteraemia were identified. The early mortality rate was 19.5% (30 out of 154). Blood cultures revealed Enterobacteriacea in 120 patients (Escherichia coli; 86, Klebsiella spp.; 28, Enterobacter cloacea; 6) and glucose non-fermenting GNB in 34 patients (Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 15, Acinetobacter baumannii; 11, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; 7, Burkholderia cepacia; 1). Forty (33.3%) out of 120 Enterobacteriaceae were extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers and 18 (52.9%) out of 34 glucose non-fermenting GNB were multidrug resistant. Carbapenems were administered as first line therapy in 139 out of 154 patients. In univariate analysis Pitt's bacteraemia score, presence of aplastic anaemia, bacteraemia caused by glucose non-fermentating GNB, inappropriate empirical antibacterial treatment, presence of severe sepsis or septic shock, unable to achieve microbiological cure, and intensive care unit (ICU) acquired bacteraemia were associated with mortality. Multivariate analysis showed ICU acquired bacteraemia (OR, 12.55; 95% CI, 2.34–67.38, p = 0.003) as an independent factor associated with early mortality.

Conclusion

Haematological malignancy patients who require ICU care are at high risk for early mortality related to GNB bacteraemia. Based on the local findings pointing out high rate of multidrug resistance, carbapenems combined with colistin seems to be a reasonable approach as empirical treatment of these patients. However, increasing carbapenem resistance rate is of concern.

Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To study the comparative mortality associated with carbapenems and alternative antibiotics for the treatment of patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia.

METHODS

We searched systematically PubMed and Scopus databases for studies providing data for mortality among patients treated with carbapenems, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLIs) or non-BL/BLIs (mainly cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones), preferably as monotherapy. Studies focusing on patients of all ages with community- and healthcare-associated bacteraemia were eligible. Data were pooled using the technique of meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles, studying 1584 patients, were included. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most commonly studied bacteria. Delay in appropriate treatment up to 6 days was reported. Carbapenems were used mainly as definitive therapy. Carbapenems were associated with lower mortality than non- BL/BLIs for definitive [risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91] and empirical (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.77) treatment. No statistically significant differences in mortality were found between carbapenems and BL/BLIs administered as definitive (RR 0.52, 95% 0.23-1.13) or empirical (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66-1.25) treatment. BL/BLIs were not associated with lower mortality than non-BL/BLIs administered either definitively (RR 1.59, 95% 0.83-3.06) or empirically (RR 0.82, 95% 0.48-1.41). Data regarding subgroups according to the setting, comorbidity and bacterial species could not be extracted.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from non-randomized studies, carbapenems may be considered the treatment of choice for empirical treatment of patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia. The role of BL/BLIs should be further evaluated for definitive treatment. Further research should focus on faster identification of ESBL-positive pathogens and potential differences in the treatment of each bacterial species.