1
|
Maan G, Keitoku K, Kimura N, Sawada H, Pham A, Yeo J, Hagiya H, Nishimura Y. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:2908-2921. [PMID: 35971666 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) has been well acknowledged among clinicians, although there are no clear diagnostic criteria or specific laboratory testing to help with its diagnosis. We aimed to summarize the existing evidence regarding CIN and provide future agendas for research. METHODS Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for all peer-reviewed articles using keywords including 'cefepime', 'neurotoxicity', 'encephalopathy' and 'seizure', from their inception to 20 January 2022. RESULTS We included 92 articles, including 23 observational studies and 69 cases from case reports and case series, in the systematic review. Among 119 patients with CIN, 23.5% were in the ICU at the time of diagnosis and nearly 90% of the cases showed renal dysfunction.Cefepime overdoses were described in 41%. The median latency period of developing CIN from cefepime initiation was 4 days, and about 12% developed CIN during empirical treatment. CIN patients commonly manifested altered mental status (93%), myoclonus (37%) and non-convulsive seizure epilepticus (28%). A serum cefepime trough level of >20 mg/L would put patients at risk for CIN. CIN-related symptoms were ameliorated in 97.5% by dose reduction or discontinuation of cefepime, with median time to improvement of 3 days. No CIN-associated deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarizes the current evidence and characteristics of CIN. In the current situation where there are no CIN diagnostic criteria and the drug monitoring platform is not routinely available, candidates for cefepime should be carefully selected. Also, based on these findings, it needs to be appropriately dosed to avoid the development of CIN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gozun Maan
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Koichi Keitoku
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Nobuhiko Kimura
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Haruki Sawada
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Andrew Pham
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Jihun Yeo
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Hideharu Hagiya
- Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Yoshito Nishimura
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
- Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9071401. [PMID: 34203510 PMCID: PMC8305961 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A fundamental step in the successful management of sepsis and septic shock is early empiric antimicrobial therapy. However, for this to be effective, several decisions must be addressed simultaneously: (1) antimicrobial choices should be adequate, covering the most probable pathogens; (2) they should be administered in the appropriate dose, (3) by the correct route, and (4) using the correct mode of administration to achieve successful concentration at the infection site. In critically ill patients, antimicrobial dosing is a common challenge and a frequent source of errors, since these patients present deranged pharmacokinetics, namely increased volume of distribution and altered drug clearance, which either increased or decreased. Moreover, the clinical condition of these patients changes markedly over time, either improving or deteriorating. The consequent impact on drug pharmacokinetics further complicates the selection of correct drug schedules and dosing during the course of therapy. In recent years, the knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and antimicrobial resistance in the critically ill patients has greatly improved, fostering strategies to optimize therapeutic efficacy and to reduce toxicity and adverse events. Nonetheless, delivering adequate and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is still a challenge, since pathogen resistance continues to rise, and new therapeutic agents remain scarce. We aim to review the available literature to assess the challenges, impact, and tools to optimize individualization of antimicrobial dosing to maximize exposure and effectiveness in critically ill patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Veiga RP, Paiva JA. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics issues relevant for the clinical use of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2018; 22:233. [PMID: 30244674 PMCID: PMC6151903 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2155-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of critically ill patients and beta-lactams are the most common antibiotic class used. Critically ill patient's pathophysiological factors lead to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams.A comprehensive bibliographic search in PubMed database of all English language articles published from January 2000 to December 2017 was performed, allowing the selection of articles addressing the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.In critically ill patients, several factors may increase volume of distribution and enhance renal clearance, inducing high intra- and inter-patient variability in beta-lactam concentration and promoting the risk of antibiotic underdosing. The duration of infusion of beta-lactams has been shown to influence the fT > minimal inhibitory concentration and an improved beta-lactam pharmacodynamics profile may be obtained by longer exposure with more frequent dosing, extended infusions, or continuous infusions.The use of extracorporeal support techniques in the critically ill may further contribute to this problem and we recommend not reducing standard antibiotic dosage since no drug accumulation was found in the available literature and to maintain continuous or prolonged infusion, especially for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.Prediction of outcome based on concentrations in plasma results in overestimation of antimicrobial activity at the site of infection, namely in cerebrospinal fluid and the lung. Therefore, although no studies have assessed clinical outcome, we recommend using higher than standard dosing, preferably with continuous or prolonged infusions, especially when treating less susceptible bacterial strains at these sites, as the pharmacodynamics profile may improve with no apparent increase in toxicity.A therapeutic drug monitoring-guided approach could be particularly useful in critically ill patients in whom achieving target concentrations is more difficult, such as obese patients, immunocompromised patients, those infected by highly resistant bacterial strains, patients with augmented renal clearance, and those undergoing extracorporeal support techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Pedro Veiga
- Centro Hospitalar São João, EPE – Intensive Care Department, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine – University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Grupo Infeção e Sepsis, Porto, Portugal
| | - José-Artur Paiva
- Centro Hospitalar São João, EPE – Intensive Care Department, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine – University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Grupo Infeção e Sepsis, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deshayes S, Coquerel A, Verdon R. Neurological Adverse Effects Attributable to β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Literature Review. Drug Saf 2018; 40:1171-1198. [PMID: 28755095 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0578-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
β-lactam antibiotics are commonly prescribed antibiotic drugs. To describe the clinical characteristics, risk markers and outcomes of β-lactam antibiotic-induced neurological adverse effects, we performed a general literature review to provide updated clinical data about the most used β-lactam antibiotics. For selected drugs in each class available in France (ticarcillin, piperacillin, temocillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefpirome, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane, ertapenem and aztreonam), a systematic literature review was performed up to April 2016 via an electronic search on PubMed. Articles that reported original data, written in French, Spanish, Portuguese or English, with available individual data for patients with neurological symptoms (such as seizure, disturbed vigilance, confusional state, myoclonia, localising signs, and/or hallucinations) after the introduction of a β-lactam antibiotic were included. The neurological adverse effects of piperacillin and ertapenem are often described as seizures and hallucinations (>50 and 25% of cases, respectively). Antibiotic treatment is often adapted to renal function (>70%), and underlying brain abnormalities are seen in one in four to one in three cases. By contrast, the neurological adverse drug reactions of ceftazidime and cefepime often include abnormal movements but few hallucinations and seizures. These reactions are associated with renal insufficiency (>80%) and doses are rarely adapted to renal function. Otherwise, it appears that monobactams do not have serious neurological adverse drug reactions and that valproic acid and carbapenem combinations should be avoided. The onset of disturbed vigilance, myoclonus, and/or seizure in a patient taking β-lactam antibiotics, especially if associated with renal insufficiency or underlying brain abnormalities, should lead physicians to suspect adverse drug reactions and to consider changes in antibacterial therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Deshayes
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHU de Caen, 14000, Caen, France. .,Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU de Caen, Université de Caen-Normandie, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.
| | - Antoine Coquerel
- Department of Pharmacology, CHU de Caen, Regional Pharmacovigilance Center, 14000, Caen, France.,University of Caen-Normandy, INSERM Unit 1075, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Renaud Verdon
- Groupe de Recherche sur l'Adaptation Microbienne (GRAM 2.0), Normandie Université, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, GRAM, 14000, Caen, France. .,Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU de Caen, Université de Caen-Normandie, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Payne LE, Gagnon DJ, Riker RR, Seder DB, Glisic EK, Morris JG, Fraser GL. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2017; 21:276. [PMID: 29137682 PMCID: PMC5686900 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1856-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cefepime is a widely used antibiotic with neurotoxicity attributed to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and exhibit concentration-dependent ϒ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) antagonism. Neurotoxic symptoms include depressed consciousness, encephalopathy, aphasia, myoclonus, seizures, and coma. Data suggest that up to 15% of ICU patients treated with cefepime may experience these adverse effects. Risk factors include renal dysfunction, excessive dosing, preexisting brain injury, and elevated serum cefepime concentrations. We aimed to characterize the clinical course of cefepime neurotoxicity and response to interventions. METHODS A librarian-assisted search identified publications describing cefepime-associated neurotoxicity from January 1980 to February 2016 using the CINAHL and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included cefepime, neurotoxicity, encephalopathy, seizures, delirium, coma, non-convulsive status epilepticus, myoclonus, confusion, aphasia, agitation, and death. Two reviewers independently assessed identified articles for eligibility and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for data reporting. RESULTS Of the 123 citations identified, 37 (representing 135 patient cases) were included. Patients had a median age of 69 years, commonly had renal dysfunction (80%) and required intensive care (81% of patients with a reported location). All patients exhibited altered mental status, with reduced consciousness (47%), myoclonus (42%), and confusion (42%) being the most common symptoms. All 98 patients (73% of cohort) with electroencephalography had abnormalities, including non-convulsive status epilepticus (25%), myoclonic status epilepticus (7%), triphasic waves (40%), and focal sharp waves (39%). As per Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dosing guidance, 48% of patients were overdosed; however, 26% experienced neurotoxicity despite appropriate dosing. Median cefepime serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were 45 mg/L (n = 21) and 13 mg/L (n = 4), respectively. Symptom improvement occurred in 89% of patients, and 87% survived to hospital discharge. The median delay from starting the drug to symptom onset was 4 days, and resolution occurred a median of 2 days after the intervention, which included cefepime discontinuation, antiepileptic administration, or hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity is challenging to recognize in the critically ill due to widely varying symptoms that are common in ICU patients. This adverse reaction can occur despite appropriate dosing, usually resolves with drug interruption, but may require additional interventions such as antiepileptic drug administration or dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Payne
- University of New England College of Pharmacy, 716 Stevens Ave, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
| | - David J Gagnon
- Department of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| | - Richard R Riker
- Department of Critical Care, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St., Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| | - David B Seder
- Department of Critical Care, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St., Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Glisic
- Department of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| | - Jane G Morris
- Maine Medical Partners Neurology, 49 Spring St, Scarborough, ME, 04074, USA
| | - Gilles L Fraser
- Department of Pharmacy and Critical Care, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall St, Portland, ME, 04102, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paul M, Yahav D, Bivas A, Fraser A, Leibovici L. Cochrane Review: Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/ebch.879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
7
|
Paul M, Yahav D, Bivas A, Fraser A, Leibovici L. Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2015:CD005197. [PMID: 21069685 PMCID: PMC9022089 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005197.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several beta-lactams are recommended as single agents for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of different anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams as single agents in the treatment of febrile neutropenia. To compare the development of bacterial resistance, bacterial and fungal superinfections during or following treatment with the different beta-lactams. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 3, 2010. MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, FDA drug applications, conference proceedings and ongoing clinical trial databases up to August 2010. References of included studies were scanned. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing an antipseudomonal beta-lactam to another antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotic, both given alone or with the addition of the same glycopeptide to both study arms, for the initial treatment of fever and neutropenia among cancer patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors applied inclusion criteria and extracted the data independently. Missing data were sought. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and pooled using the fixed effect model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using a domain-based evaluation and its effect of results was assessed through sensitivity analyses. MAIN RESULTS Forty-four trials were included. The antibiotics assessed were cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem and meropenem. Adequate allocation concealment and generation were reported in about half of the trials and only two trials were double-blinded. The risk for all-cause mortality was significantly higher with cefepime compared to other beta-lactams (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.86, 21 trials, 3471 participants), without heterogeneity and with higher RRs in trials at low risk for bias. There were no differences in secondary outcomes but for a non-significantly higher rate of bacterial superinfections with cefepime. Mortality was significantly lower with piperacillin-tazobactam compared to other antibiotics (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.92, 8 trials, 1314 participants), without heterogeneity. Carbapenems resulted in similar all-cause mortality and a lower rate of clinical failure and antibiotic modifications as compared to other antibiotics, but a higher rate of diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Current evidence supports the use of piperacillin-tazobactam in locations where antibiotic resistance profiles do not mandate empirical use of carbapenems. Carbapenems result in a higher rate of antibiotic-associated and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. There is a high level of evidence that all-cause mortality is higher with cefepime compared to other beta-lactams and it should not be used as monotherapy for patients with febrile neutropenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mical Paul
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 49100
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shorvon S, Trinka E. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus and the postictal state. Epilepsy Behav 2010; 19:172-5. [PMID: 20692208 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2010] [Accepted: 06/17/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Postictal symptoms, because of activation of inhibitory systems, have to be distinguished from ongoing ictal activity. The categorical concept of pure ictal and pure postictal symptoms cannot be supported by clinical observation alone. Differentiation between postictal and ictal behavioral phenomena can be difficult even with the use of electroencephalography, as clear-cut definitions of ictal and postictal changes are not available. Five different aspects can be considered: (1) hallucinatory symptoms recorded during and after a seizure, (2) prolonged postictal confusional states, (3) prolonged postictal psychotic states, (4) epileptic and other encephalopathies, and (5) coma with or without clinical signs of nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Presenting symptoms and conceptual considerations are presented in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Shorvon
- UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|