Antibiotic management of febrile neutropenia: current developments and future directions

Delay in Time to Antibiotics for De Novo Inpatient Neutropenic Fever May Not Impact Overall Survival for Patients With a Cancer Diagnosis

Neutropenic fever (NF) is an oncologic emergency for which expert consensus recommends that anti-pseudomonas antibiotics be administered within 60 minutes of detection. This study investigated whether delays in time to antibiotics (TTA) impacted overall survival (OS) for patients with hematological malignancies who developed inpatient NF via a retrospective cohort study of 187 de novo NF cases categorized by TTA (<1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 and >4 hours). OS at 180 days post-NF episode was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. TTA did not significantly affect OS (P = 0.420). Patients with Charleston Comorbidity Indexes ≥3, a measure of overall health, had higher hazard (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.728, 95% confidence interval, 1.265-5.882, P = 0.010). TTA delays in the hospital may not be long enough to cause significant patient harm. Larger studies may be needed to detect small, but significant mortality differences.

Effect of serum uric acid level and Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk score on febrile neutropenia mortality

PURPOSE

The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of uric acid (UA) on the 30-day mortality of patients admitted to the tertiary referral hospital with a complaint of febrile neutropenia (FEN). The secondary aim was to evaluate the use of combining serum UA levels with the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk score.

METHODS

A retrospective study in which the MASCC score and serum UA levels were used to evaluate the mortality risk within 30 days among patients with FEN.

RESULTS

A total of 118 FEN episodes were included in the study and 17 (14%) of these patients died. While this rate is 23% in the high-risk group according to the MASCC score, it is 7% in the low-risk group (p = 0.011). In multivariate analysis of the parameters that significantly affect the 30-day FEN mortality, MASCC risk score (OR, 4.28; CI 95% 1.19-15.39, p = 0.013) and having a level of serum UA > 7 mg/dL (OR, 4.46; CI 95% 1.19-15.38, p = 0.032) was significantly increased the risk of in 30-day mortality of FEN. The rate of 30-day mortality of FEN was 0% in patients with a low MASCC risk score and UA level compared with 50% in the high MASCC risk score and high UA level group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Increased level of UA at the time of FEN diagnosis was independently associated with an increased rate of 30-day mortality of FEN. The combination of the MASCC risk score and serum UA level might thoroughly predict the 30-day mortality of FEN.

Antibacterial Resistance in Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at substantial risk of bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic infections depending on the time elapsed since transplantation, presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and the degree of immunosuppression. Infectious complications in HSCT recipients are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Bacterial infections constitute the major cause of infectious complications, especially in the early post-transplant period. The emergence of antibacterial resistance complicates the management of bacterial infections in this patient group. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in this group of patients have attracted considerable interest and may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Empirical antibacterial therapy in patients with HSCT and febrile neutropenia has a critical role for survival and should be based on local epidemiology. This review attempts to provide an overview of risk factors and epidemiology of emerging resistant bacterial infections and their management in HSCT recipients.

Clinical research in febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: Past achievements and perspectives for the future

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. It can also be the reason for delaying or changing potentially effective treatments and generates substantial costs. It has been recognized for more than 50 years that empirical administration of broad spectrum antibiotics to patients with FN was associated with much improved outcomes; that has become a paradigm of management. Increase in the incidence of microorganisms resistant to many antibiotics represents a challenge for the empirical antimicrobial treatment and is a reason why antibiotics should not be used for the prevention of neutropenia. Prevention of neutropenia is best performed with the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). Prophylactic administration of G-CSFs significantly reduces the risk of developing FN and consequently the complications linked to that condition; moreover, the administration of G-CSF is associated with few complications, most of which are not severe. The most common reason for not using G-CSF as a prophylaxis of FN is the relatively high cost. If FN occurs, in spite of prophylaxis, empirical therapy with broad spectrum antibiotics is mandatory. However it should be adjusted to the risk of complications as established by reliable predictive instruments such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer. Patients predicted at a low level of risk of serious complications, can generally be treated with orally administered antibiotics and as out-patients. Patients with a high risk of complications should be hospitalized and treated intravenously. A short period of time between the onset of FN and beginning of empirical therapy is crucial in those patients. Persisting fever in spite of antimicrobial therapy in neutropenic patients requires a special diagnostic attention, since invasive fungal infection is a possible cause for it and might require the use of empirical antifungal therapy.

Which Multidrug-Resitant Bacteria are Emerging in Patients with Hematological Malignancies?: One-Year Report

The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the outcomes of bacteremia attacks during neutropenic episodes caused by chemotherapy in patients with hematological cancers by assessing mortality, involved pathogens, antimicrobial therapy and treatment responses. Patients who were older than 14 years of age and developed at least one neutropenic episode after chemotherapy to treat hematological cancer between November 2011 and November 2012 were included in the study. We retrospectively collected demographic, treatment, and survival data for 68 patients with 129 neutropenic episodes. The mean age was 59.36 ± 15.22 years (range 17-80 years), and 41 cases were male. The mean Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer score was 19.56 ± 9.04. A total of 37 (28 %) bacteremia attacks were recorded in 20 cases (29 %). Fatality rates were 50 % in the six cases with bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; death occurred in two patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and in one patient with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical and microbiological responses were achieved using PIP-TAZ or CEP-SUL treatment in 80 % (16/20) of the cases with bacteremia caused by carbapenem-sensitive Gram-negative bacteria (CS-GNB). During 547 colonization-days in 21 (30 %) vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)-colonized cases among 68 patients, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia developed in two patients. Non-carbapenem-based therapy can cure most bacteremia attacks caused by CS-GNB in patients with hematological cancer. However, bacteremia and other infections caused by drug-resistant pathogens, such as A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and VRE, are a growing concern in hematological patients.

Management of febrile neutropenia in the era of bacterial resistance

Managing cancer patients with fever and neutropenia must be considered as a medical emergency since any delay in initiating appropriate empirical antibacterial therapy may result in high rates of mortality and morbidity. Emerging antibacterial resistance in bacterial pathogens infecting febrile neutropenic patients complicates management, and choosing the type of empirical antimicrobial therapy has become a challenge. To further complicate the decision process, not all neutropenic patients are in same category of susceptibility to develop severe infection. While low-risk patients may be treated with oral antibiotics in the outpatient setting, high-risk patients usually need to be admitted to hospital and receive parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotics until the neutrophil levels recover. These strategies have recently been addressed in two international guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL). This review gives a brief overview of current antimicrobial resistance problems and their effects in febrile neutropenic cancer patients by summarizing the suggestions from the IDSA and ECIL guidelines.

The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index score developed, through a multinational collaboration, was published in 2000 with the aim to identify patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia at low risk of serious medical complication development. It has been endorsed as a reliable tool since 2002 by Infectious Diseases Society of America. Ten years after, we thought worth to review its use, its characteristics in the external validations that occurred after the initial publication and also to review how the recognition of a group of patients at low risk has changed the management of febrile neutropenia. We also raise the issue of identification of high-risk patients that remains a challenge today.

Molecular analysis of ciprofloxacin resistance and clonal relatedness of clinical Escherichia coli isolates from haematology patients receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

Widespread use of fluoroquinolones has led to increased levels of resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. We investigated the evolution of ciprofloxacin susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of clinical E. coli isolates in haematology patients receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis on the population and individual patient level.

METHODS

From August 2006 through December 2007 we collected all E. coli isolates (n = 404) from surveillance and infection-site cultures from 169 haematology patients receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Analysis of the gyrase A (gyrA) gene was performed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in 364 isolates and clonal relatedness was determined by the single-enzyme amplified fragment length polymorphism (seAFLP) technique in 162 isolates. One hundred of these isolates were also subjected to qnrA analysis.

RESULTS

The average number of samples per patient was 2.4 (maximum 20) and 122 (30%) of 404 E. coli isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. In 124 patients only ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains were detected. DGGE revealed 11 different gyrA sequence patterns and, based on AFLP analysis, there was evidence of selection of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains under antibiotic pressure, as well as the occurrence of genetically indistinguishable ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible E. coli isolates within one patient. Clonal dissemination of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli was observed, but did not predominate.

CONCLUSIONS

The genetic evolution of clinical E. coli isolates in haematology patients receiving ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is characterized by selection of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains. However, we did find evidence for de novo resistance mutation in ciprofloxacin-susceptible E. coli in individual patients under selective pressure.