The treatment of adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Why Do Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Fare Better Than Adults?

It is a new and exciting time for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While nearly 50 years ago, only one in nine children with ALL survived with chemotherapy, nowadays nearly 90% of children have a chance of long-term survival. Adults with ALL, as well as the special category of adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients, are catching up with the new developments seen in children, but still their prognosis is much worse. A plethora of factors are regarded as responsible for the differences in treatment response, such as age, ethnicity, disease biology, treatment regimens and toxicities, drug tolerance and resistance, minimal residual disease evaluation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation timing and socio-economic factors. Taking these factors into account, bringing pediatric-like protocols to adult patient management and incorporating new agents into frontline treatment could be the key to improve the survival rates in adults and AYA.

The use of prophylactic anticoagulation during induction and consolidation chemotherapy in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults confers a high risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications. We describe the implementation and results of prophylactic anticoagulation guidelines in adults (18-50 years) treated on a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL pediatric inspired consortium protocol from 2007 to 2013. A high rate of asparaginase related toxicity events, including thrombosis, resulted in a protocol amendment adding guidelines for prophylactic anticoagulation and a modified asparaginase dose and schedule. After excluding patients with Philadelphia positive ALL, a cohort of 36 patients were treated after the protocol amendment with prophylactic anticoagulation and compared to 49 patients who received no prophylactic anticoagulation. Bleeding complications were not significantly different in those treated with prophylactic anticoagulation compared with those enrolled prior to the amendment (p = 0.26). No patients on prophylactic anticoagulation had grade ≥ 3 bleeding. Prior to the amendment, the 2 year cumulative incidence of VTE post-induction was 41% compared to 28% while on prophylactic anticoagulation (p = 0.32). The 2 year cumulative incidence pulmonary embolus pre-amendment was 16% compared with 8% post-amendment (p = 0.34). Prophylactic anticoagulation can be safely administered to adults with ALL without increasing the number or severity of bleeding events and, in addition to modifications in the asparaginase regimen, resulted in a reduction in the cumulative incidence of VTE.

MiR-146b negatively regulates migration and delays progression of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Previous results indicated that miR-146b-5p is downregulated by TAL1, a transcription factor critical for early hematopoiesis that is frequently overexpressed in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) where it has an oncogenic role. Here, we confirmed that miR-146b-5p expression is lower in TAL1-positive patient samples than in other T-ALL cases. Furthermore, leukemia T-cells display decreased levels of miR-146b-5p as compared to normal T-cells, thymocytes and other hematopoietic progenitors. MiR-146b-5p silencing enhances the in vitro migration and invasion of T-ALL cells, associated with increased levels of filamentous actin and chemokinesis. In vivo, miR-146b overexpression in a TAL1-positive cell line extends mouse survival in a xenotransplant model of human T-ALL. In contrast, knockdown of miR-146b-5p results in leukemia acceleration and decreased mouse overall survival, paralleled by faster tumor infiltration of the central nervous system. Our results suggest that miR-146b-5p is a functionally relevant microRNA gene in the context of T-ALL, whose negative regulation by TAL1 and possibly other oncogenes contributes to disease progression by modulating leukemia cell motility and disease aggressiveness.

Asparaginase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Cure rates in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia have significantly improved over the past decades. Now, almost 90% of children will survive the disease. The cure rates in adolescents, young adults, and adults have not kept pace with the improvements in younger patients, even though almost an equal proportion of adult patients achieve complete remission as their pediatric counterparts. Differences in treatment regimens might be important. Intensive use of asparaginase has been a key component of successful pediatric therapy. In this review, we focus on the use of asparaginase and the potential of optimizing asparaginase use via monitoring to minimize adverse drug events and improve efficacy of the drug.

Outcome of Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated by Pediatrics versus Adults Protocols

Objective. Several studies showed better outcome in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with pediatrics protocols than similarly aged patients treated with adults protocols, while other studies showed similar outcome of both protocols. We conducted this study to compare the outcome of our pediatrics and adults therapeutic protocols in treatment of adolescents ALL. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed files of 86 consecutive adolescent ALL patients aged 15–18 years who attended to outpatients clinic from January 2003 to January 2010. 32 out of 86 were treated with pediatrics adopted BFM 90 high risk protocol while 54 were treated with adults adopted BFM protocol. We analyzed the effect of different treatment protocols on achieving complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results. The 2 patients groups have almost similar characteristics. The CR was significantly higher in pediatrics protocol 96% versus 89% (P = 0.001). Despite the fact that the toxicity profiles were higher in pediatrics protocol, they were tolerable. Moreover, the pediatrics protocol resulted in superior outcome in EFS 67% versus 39% (P = 0.001), DFS 65% versus 41% (P = 0.000), and OS 67% versus 45% (P = 0.000). Conclusion. Our study's findings recommend using intensified pediatrics inspired protocol to treat adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The treatment of adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 16-40 years of age, were historically not the focus of prospective studies on ALL treatment. This population has unique genetic, immunophenotypic, and clinical features, differing from both pediatric and older adult patients, with outcomes somewhere between these two populations. However, it has been suggested that outcomes (event-free and overall survival) for these patients are better when they are treated with pediatric-inspired therapeutic regimens. This has been attributed to increased dose and frequency of non-myelosuppressive therapy, earlier and more frequent central nervous system prophylaxis, and longer maintenance therapy. However, management by the treating oncologist and adherence by the patients are equally vital. Ultimately, the combination of improved treatment regimens and organizational management are required to improve outcomes of ALL in the AYA population.

An auto-SCT-based total therapy resulted in encouraging outcomes in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report from a single center of China

Application of auto-SCT in the post-remission therapy for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with ALL is controversial. We analyzed the outcomes of 79 AYAs (15-24 years) with ALL who received our designed total therapy protocol with auto-SCT in first CR from 1990 to 2009. The estimated OS and EFS at 5 years for the cohort were 62.8±5.9 and 61.5±5.7%. The cumulative non-relapse mortality and relapse rate at 5 years for the cohort were 7.2±3.1 and 33.6±5.8%. Time to CR >4 weeks was the only independent unfavorable factor associated with OS, EFS and relapse in multivariate analysis. Patients in standard risk (SR) group and high risk (HR) group had better OS (78.3±7.4, 63.8±10.2 vs 38.1±11.6%) and EFS (78.0±7.4, 63.4±9.4 vs 32.4±11.3%), and lower relapse rate (15.9±6.5, 31.5±9.5 vs 65.7±11.8%) compared with patients in very high risk (VHR) group. Our data confirmed that auto-SCT-based total therapy might be an optional treatment strategy for AYAs with ALL in SR. Patients in HR also could get benefit from such schedule. But for those in VHR, allogenetic SCT is still the prior recommendation for the frequent recurrence after auto-SCT.

Prevention and management of asparaginase/pegasparaginase-associated toxicities in adults and older adolescents: recommendations of an expert panel

The rapidly increasing use of pegasparaginase (pegASNase) in adults, after a half century of use of asparaginase (ASNase) in children, has prompted a need for guidelines in the management and prevention of toxicities of asparagine depletion in adults. Accordingly, an initial set of recommendations are provided herein. Major advantages of pegASNase are its 2-3-week duration of action, in contrast to less than 3 days with native ASNase, and the flexibility of intravenous or intramuscular administration of pegASNase and associated patient and physician convenience. The most frequent toxicities of both types of ASNase are hepatic and pancreatic, with pancreatitis being the most serious. Other toxicities are hypersensitivity reactions, thrombosis, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. Whether or not the replacement of one dose of pegASNase for 6-9 doses of native ASNase can be achieved in adults with similar efficacy and acceptable toxicities to those achieved in children remains to be established.

Use of recombinant cell-permeable small peptides to modulate glucocorticoid sensitivity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones induce apoptosis in T-cell and pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells. Steroid-mediated apoptosis requires a threshold level of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) protein, and increasing the intracellular GR levels in ALL cells would augment their hormone sensitivity. A protein transduction domain (PTD) approach was used to accomplish this. We produced an HIV Tat PTD domain fusion protein (Tat-GR(554-777)) that potentially competes for the degradation of GR protein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and should thus increase its intracellular levels by "stabilizing" the GR. We also designed a fusion peptide for the c-Myb DNA binding domain, Tat-c-Myb DBD, since the biological function of this peptide as a dominant negative inhibitor of the c-Myb protein was already known. Purified, bacterially expressed Tat-c-Myb DBD and Tat-GR(554-777) exhibited highly efficient transduction into cultured ALL cell lines including 697 (pre-B-ALL) and CEM-C7 (T-ALL) cells. As expected, the transduced Tat-c-Myb DBD peptide inhibited steroid-mediated stimulation of a GR promoter-luciferase reporter gene. Significantly, transduced Tat-GR(554-777) effectively increased intracellular GR levels in the GC-resistant T-ALL cell line, CEM-C1, and in the pre-B-ALL 697 cell line. Furthermore, transduction of Tat-GR(554-777) rendered GC-resistant CEM-C1 cells sensitive to steroid killing and further sensitized 697 cells to steroid. The use of Tat-fusion peptide transduction may eventually lead to innovative therapeutic modalities to improve the clinical response of patients suffering from T-cell and pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia by increasing steroid responsiveness and perhaps converting steroid-resistant leukemia to a hormone-responsive phenotype.

Approaches to treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia affects infants, children, adolescents, and adults. Although most children have a high likelihood of cure, outcomes in adults have much room for improvement. In between lies the adolescent and young adult population, not only in terms of age but also in clinical success rates. This review describes biology, prognostic factors, and treatment approaches in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Assessing the outcomes in adult and pediatric clinical trials that enroll adolescents and young adults can be especially useful in determining how best to treat these patients. Current new treatment strategies are also discussed.

[Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Indications, foundations and perspective]

The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become a standard therapy for many inherited and acquired disorders of the bone marrow and immune system. Autologous HSCT is mainly done as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma and as part of relapse therapy in malignant lymphoma. In contrast, allogeneic HSCT is predominantly performed in patients with acute leukemias. The selection process for allogeneic HSCT takes disease-specific as well as patient-specific factors into account. Risk factors which can predict for poor response to chemotherapy can now be identified in acute myeloid as well as lymphoid leukemia, based on phenotype, cytogenetics, molecular genetics and response to therapy. In these patients allogeneic HSCT can improve overall survival from 0-20% to 30-60%. New conditioning protocols have now raised the upper age limit for transplantation to 70 years. In elderly patients the selection of patients based on absence of comorbidities becomes especially important. The increasing number of long-term survivors requires knowledge of organ-specific late toxicities including secondary malignancies.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is not recommended for all adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous disease, and outcomes vary by patient age, immunophenotype, and clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular features. Modern treatment strategies use a risk-adapted approach. The optimal postremission therapy for adults with ALL remains unclear. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality (TRM) are greater with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) than chemotherapy although relapses are less common. Available data indicate no clear consensus as to whether there is an advantage to allogeneic HCT over chemotherapy for adults with ALL with standard-risk features while in the first complete remission (CR1). However, allogeneic HCT is recommended in CR1 for patients with high-risk ALL and for those in a second CR.

Where should adolescents with ALL be treated?

Currently, 50% of adolescents with ALL are treated by adult teams and 50% by paediatric teams (following either adult or paediatric protocols). The aim of this paper is to review the results obtained with first-line chemotherapy and with haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in adolescents with ALL. Disease biology and host factors are responsible for the differences observed between adolescents and other age categories. The outcome of adolescents with ALL after first-line chemotherapy is poorer as compared with children, although better as compared with adults. Recent studies have shown that adolescents who were enrolled in paediatric trials achieved better results than those who were enrolled in adult trials. This is most likely because of several differences, including protocol design, dose intensity and use of HSCTs, as well as better compliance to treatment and better supportive care. Disparities in the attitude towards treatment between paediatric and adult wards might also contribute to the better outcome that is observed in paediatric institutions. Indications for HSCT in children with ALL are well defined by international protocols. Only very high-risk paediatric patients are eligible for HSCT in CR1, whereas in adult trials, allogeneic or autologous HSCT are frequently offered, even to standard-risk patients in CR1. The outcome of adolescents given HSCT is poorer than in children, though better than in adults. Improving both psychosocial support during therapy and physical exercise habits represent further challenges for teams involved in the treatment of adolescents. Cooperation between paediatric and adult haematologists would surely improve the ability to recruit as many patients as possible and would promote progress in the research on adolescents. In conclusion, redefining age limits according to risk-based strategies, as well as encouraging multi-centre cooperation, should be taken into consideration to improve the outcome of this age category. Adolescents should be referred to research treatment teams that have experience in the management of paediatric ALL and they should be enrolled in international cooperative studies.

Profile of nelarabine: use in the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Nelarabine is the prodrug of 9-beta-arabinofuranosylguanine (ara-G) and is therapeutically classified as a purine nucleoside analog. Nelarabine is converted to ara-G by adenosine deaminase and transported into cells by a nucleoside transporter. Ara-G is subsequently phosphorylated to ara-G triphosphate (ara-GTP), thereby initiating the therapeutic effect by inhibiting DNA synthesis. Nelarabine has been extensively studied in regards to its pharmacokinetics, and the data have demonstrated that ara-GTP preferentially accumulates in malignant T-cells. Clinical responses to nelarabine have been demonstrated in various T-cell malignancies and appear to correlate with a relatively high intracellular concentration of ara-GTP compared to nonresponders. Therefore, this unique drug feature of nelarabine accounts for clinical utilization in treating adult and pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Neuropathy is the most predominant adverse effect associated with nelarabine and the incidence correlates with the dose administered. Myelosuppression has been observed, with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as the most common hematologic complications. This article reviews the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetic properties of nelarabine, as well as nelarabine's clinical efficacy in T-ALL, T-LBL, and other hematologic malignancies. The toxicity profile, dosage, and administration, and areas of ongoing and future research, are also presented.

Oral mucositis in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: analysis of 169 paediatric patients

Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis is a frequent therapeutic challenge in cancer patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to estimate the prevalence and risk factors of oral mucositis in 169 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients treated according to different chemotherapeutic trials at the Darcy Vargas Children's Hospital from 1994 to 2005. Demographic data, clinical history, chemotherapeutic treatment and patients' follow-up were recorded. The association of oral mucositis with age, gender, leucocyte counts at diagnosis and treatment was assessed by the chi-squared test and multivariate regression analysis. Seventy-seven ALL patients (46%) developed oral mucositis during the treatment. Patient age (P = 0.33), gender (P = 0.08) and leucocyte counts at diagnosis (P = 0.34) showed no correlation with the occurrence of oral mucositis. Multivariate regression analysis showed a significant risk for oral mucositis (P = 0.009) for ALL patients treated according to the ALL-BFM-95 protocol. These results strongly suggest the greater stomatotoxic effect of the ALL-BFM-95 trial when compared with Brazilian trials. We concluded that chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis should be systematically analysed prospectively in specialized centres for ALL treatment to establish the degree of toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs and to improve the quality of life of patients based on more effective therapeutic and prophylactic approaches for prevention of its occurrence.

Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The intent of this study was to examine supportive care needs and preferences among young adult cancer survivors.

METHOD

Eight hundred seventy-nine young adults aged 18-39 years at time of study and diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 15-35 completed an online survey. Questions assessed the extent to which subjects had utilized various information and supportive care services and/or expressed a desire to use those services either now or in the past.

RESULTS

Upwards of 60% of respondents expressed a desire or need for age-appropriate cancer information, information about diet, exercise, nutrition, complementary and alternative health services, infertility information, mental health counseling, and camp or retreat programs for young adults. In most cases, more than 50% of respondents indicated that their needs for information and services have been unmet. In addition, unmet needs were more likely reported by respondents who were younger at age of diagnosis, of poor physical health status, and less likely to be advanced in work, school, or a committed/marital relationship. Other significant differences in unmet need were observed across sociodemographic and health status variables.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest a need to enhance the provision of supportive care services to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors along a continuum of care, from diagnosis through treatment and on to off-treatment survivorship.

Comparison of the results of the treatment of adolescents and young adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematología pediatric-based protocol ALL-96

PURPOSE

Retrospective studies have shown that adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with pediatric protocols have better outcomes than similarly aged patients treated with adult protocols, but prospective studies comparing adolescents and young adults using pediatric schedules are scarce. The ALL-96 protocol was addressed to compare the toxicity and results of a pediatric-based protocol in adolescents (age 15-18 years) and young adults (age 19-30 years) with standard-risk (SR) ALL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adolescents (n = 35) and young adults (n = 46) received a standard five-drug/5-week induction course followed by two cycles of early consolidation, maintenance with monthly reinforcement cycles up to 1 year in continuous complete remission (CR) and 1 year with standard maintenance chemotherapy up to 2 years in CR.

RESULTS

Adolescents and young adults were comparable in the main pretreatment ALL characteristics. The CR rate was 98% and. after a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 6-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 61% (95% CI, 51% to 72%) and 69% (95% CI, 59% to 79%), respectively, with no differences between adolescents and young adults. The hematologic toxicity in consolidation and reinforcement cycles was higher in young adults than in adolescents. Slow response to induction therapy was the only parameter associated with poor EFS (34% v 67%) and OS (40% v 76%).

CONCLUSION

The response to the pediatric ALL-96 protocol was identical in adolescents and young adults despite a slight increase in hematologic toxicity observed in adults. This justifies the age-unrestricted use of pediatric regimens to treat patients with SR ALL.

Biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of cancer in children, is a heterogeneous disease in which many genetic lesions result in the development of multiple biologic subtypes. Today, with intensive multiagent chemotherapy, most children who have ALL are cured. The many national or institutional ALL therapy protocols in use tend to stratify patients in a multitude of different ways to tailor treatment to the rate of relapse. This article discusses the factors used in risk stratification and the treatment of pediatric ALL.

Survival from adolescent cancer

BACKGROUND

Adolescent cancer is the leading cause of non-accidental mortality in young people. The tumour types occurring most commonly in this age group are distinctive and differ markedly from those developing in younger children and older adults.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to present survival data for the major types of cancer and for all malignancies combined in adolescents aged from 15 to 19 years, highlighting intercountry differences, temporal trends, and age/treatment regimen comparisons of survival rates.

RESULTS

Results from European and American data show that 5-year overall survival among adolescents with cancer is approximately 73-78%, close to that observed among children. As in paediatric series, there are geographical differences, with lower survival rates in Eastern European countries. Adolescents have substantially lower survival than children for acute lymphoid leukaemia, malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Ewing's tumour, osteosarcoma, soft-tissue sarcoma. Temporal improvement in survival from children cancer is twice higher than survival from adolescents malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Several reasons could explain these geographical differences, such as better referral, greater availability of complex and expensive treatment regimens, reflecting variations in health care systems and resources. Age-group variations could be explained by differences in biology and in treatment regimen, and lack of participation in clinical trials. Some are inherent in the psychosocial characteristics of these patients, such as delays in seeking medical attention, poor compliance with treatment. It is necessary to focus on cancer in adolescence, as the new frontier in oncology, and adolescents with cancer must be now the subject of specific survival analyses.

Long-term effects of chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia on the medial olivocochlear bundle: effects of different cumulative doses of gentamicin

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) often combines a neurotoxic chemotherapeutic protocol such as Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster-95 (BFM-95) with gentamicin, an antibiotic known to have an early and quickly reversed impact on olivocochlear reflex in animal studies. This study investigates whether this combination has any long-term side effects on the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB).

METHODS

In all 47 children of the study suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) by contralateral application of white noise (WN) was used to assess the function of the MOCB. The population was divided into three groups depending on the time interval between the end of therapy and examination. The group examined shortly after chemotherapy included 12 children who had received low gentamicin doses (less than 13 days). The group evaluated 2 years after therapy involved another 12 children who had required medium gentamicin doses (more than 13, less than 23 days). The group examined 3 years after therapy included a subgroup of 12 children to whom low gentamicin doses were infused and another 11 children with high gentamicin doses (more than 23 days).

RESULTS

Three years after therapy the olivocochlear reflex was efficiently produced in both subgroups of low and high gentamicin doses. Two years after therapy, contralateral WN induced increase of DPOAEs at 4 of the 12 examined frequencies. Shortly after therapy, WN increased, instead of suppressing, DPOAEs at five frequencies.

CONCLUSION

This abnormal result of contralateral noise application perceived as impaired cochlear efferent innervation may indicate that ALL-BFM-95 exerts a toxic effect on the MOCB, which is slowly reversed within the first 3 years after chemotherapy and does not seem to be affected in the long term by different cumulative doses of gentamicin.

Phase II study of chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9004

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported, post-remission chemotherapy (Cx) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) was evaluated. One hundred and forty-three eligible patients (median age, 41 years) including 126 ALL and 17 LBL receiving induction Cx (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone [PSL], doxorubicin, L-asparaginase, intrathecal-methotrexate [IT-MTX]) were analyzed. For patients achieving complete response (CR), two courses of post-remission Cx (course A of daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, vindesine, PSL plus IT-MTX; course B of mitoxantrone, etoposide, vincristine, PSL plus IT-MTX) with the use of G-CSF were repeated alternately; thereafter, maintenance Cx including MTX and 6-mercaptopurine was given for 2 years. One hundred and nineteen (83%) patients achieved CR, while 14 (10%) died during induction. Among the 119 patients achieving CR, five died in remission, 76 relapsed, and the remaining 38 were alive without disease. The median survival time of the 143 eligible patients was 26 months (95% confidence interval, 19-34). At a median follow-up time of 9 years, the 5-year survival rate was 32% and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 26%. The 5-year survival rate of 36 patients who underwent autologous (n = 20) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT; n = 16) in the first CR group was 58%. Compared with the authors' previous trials, survival and PFS were markedly improved. In conclusion, G-CSF-supported, intensive post-remission Cx and subsequent SCT are worthy of further investigation for the treatment of adult ALL and LBL.

Favorable Outcome for Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Consortium Protocols

Purpose

Historically, adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have had inferior outcomes when compared with younger children. We report the outcome of adolescents treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI; Boston, MA) ALL Consortium Protocols conducted between 1991 and 2000.

Patients and Methods

A total of 844 patients aged 1 to 18 years, with newly diagnosed ALL were enrolled onto two consecutive DFCI-ALL Consortium Protocols. We compared outcomes in three age groups: children aged 1 to 10 years (n = 685), young adolescents aged 10 to 15 years (n = 108), and older adolescents aged 15 to 18 years (n = 51).

Results

With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) for those aged 1 to 10 years was 85% (SE, 1%), compared with 77% (SE, 4%) for those aged 10 to 15 years, and 78% (SE, 6%) for those aged 15 to 18 years (P = .09). Adolescents were more likely to present with T-cell phenotype (P < .001) and less likely to have the TEL-AML1 fusion (P = .05). The incidence of pancreatitis and thromboembolic complications, but not asparaginase allergy, was higher in patients ≥ 10 years of age compared with those younger than 10 years. However, there was no difference in the rate of treatment-related complications between the 10- to 15-year and 15- to 18-year age groups.

Conclusion

Adolescents were more likely to present at diagnosis with biologically higher risk disease (T-cell phenotype and absence of the TEL-AML1 fusion) and more likely to experience treatment-related complications than younger children. However, the 5-year EFS for older adolescents was 78% ± 6%, which is superior to published outcomes for similarly aged patients treated with other pediatric and adult ALL regimens. Based on this experience, we currently are piloting our regimen in patients aged 18 to 50 years.

Should Adolescents with NHL Be Treated as Old Children or Young Adults?

The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) data for the years 1975–1998 show that children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have a better treatment outcome than do adults. Many factors may contribute to this age-related difference. Some factors are related to the patient (e.g., drug distribution and clearance, performance status, compliance, sex) whereas others pertain to tumor histology and biology. The spectrum of NHL subtypes is well known to differ in children and adults. From ages 5 through 14 years, Burkitt lymphoma is the predominant histologic subtype, whereas diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is most common in the 15- to 29-year age range. Because different treatment strategies are often used in children and adults with NHL, the choice of therapy for adolescents and young adults (ages 15 through 29 years) is challenging and somewhat controversial. It is reasonable to consider pediatric strategies for some adolescents and very young adults with NHL, and pediatric strategies are currently used to treat adults with certain subtypes of NHL (Burkitt lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma). However, the use of pediatric strategies in adults does not guarantee a comparable outcome, as illustrated by trials for adult lymphoblastic lymphoma. There is clearly a need for further biologic study of NHL in children, adolescents, and young adults. Age-related differences in tumor biology have been demonstrated in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Additional biologic data will not only improve prognosis and treatment stratification but, more important, will lead to the identification of specific molecular targets for therapy.

Nelarabine: efficacy in the treatment of clinical malignancies

Nelarabine is a nucleoside analog prodrug of 9-β-D-arabinofuranosylguanine. Nelarabine is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma whose disease has not responded to, or has relapsed after treatment with, at least two chemotherapy regimens. Nelarabine was granted Orphan Medical Product Status in Europe in June 2005, and accelerated approval by the US FDA in October 2005. The most common adverse events associated with nelarabine are neurotoxic in nature and have been dose-limiting.

Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

In the early 1980s, adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was a rarely curable disease with overall survival < 10%. After adapting combinations employed by pediatric groups, the outcome improved to 30–40%. A period of stagnation followed with improvement only in distinct subgroups. In the past 5 years, however, striking new developments have been noticeable. Progress has been made in molecular diagnostics of ALL. Improvements to standard therapy including stem cell transplantation (SCT) have occurred and a variety of new drugs for ALL are under evaluation. Rapid diagnosis and classification of ALL is increasingly important to identify prognostic factors and molecular genetic subsets that will be the focus of “targeted” therapies as we enter the era of subset specific treatment. In the following review we will discuss treatment of adult ALL (excluding elderly patients,1 adolescents2 and patients with Ph/BCR-ABL positive ALL3).