Zebras and hen's teeth: recognition and management of rare T and NK lymphomas

Intensive Induction Therapy Compared With CHOP for Hepatosplenic T-cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma that disproportionately affects individuals with a clinical history of immunosuppression. It carries a poor prognosis, and, owing to its rarity, there is no single or well-established treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted the largest-to-date individual-level meta-analysis based on literature searches to determine the best induction therapy for HSTCL. We compared response rates and survival among patients who received "non-CHOP-based" induction with regimens containing cytarabine, etoposide, and/or platinum-based treatment to those receiving treatment with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or CHOP-like therapy. We also review additional regimens including alemtuzumab and pentostatin, and assessed the role of consolidation with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT).

RESULTS

We identified 166 patients with HSTCL, 118 of whom had sufficient information on induction treatment and survival. Eighty-four patients received non-CHOP-based (N = 34) or CHOP/CHOP-like (N = 50) induction treatment. Non-CHOP-based induction was associated with a complete/partial response rate of 82% compared with 52% (P = .006) with CHOP/CHOP-like and increased median overall survival (P = .00014). Our data showed that maximum survival among patients with HSTCL was achieved with non-CHOP-based induction followed by consolidation with HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-CHOP-based induction appears superior to CHOP/CHOP-like induction in both achieving complete/partial response and durable survival. Induction therapy of HSTCL should be intensified with non-CHOP-based regimens and followed by consolidation with HSCT in eligible patients.

New/Revised Entities in Gastrointestinal Lymphoproliferative Disorders

The gastrointestinal tract is a common extranodal site of involvement by lymphomas. These may be diagnostically challenging because they can mimic a variety of benign conditions and may be difficult to subclassify when malignant. The classification of gastrointestinal lymphomas is an evolving area with some recent changes. Although some of these entities are rare, they are important to recognize because of the variable clinical presentations, comorbidities, and treatment implications. This article explores new and revised entities in gastrointestinal lymphoproliferative disorders.