Myelofibrosis: to transplant or not to transplant?

Presence of triple positive driver mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL in primary myelofibrosis: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most advanced subtype among the classic Philadelphia chromosomenegative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). A majority of patients carry one of three mutually-exclusive somatic driver mutations: JAK2 (60-65%), CALR (20-25%), or MPL (5%). Co-occurrence of these mutations is rarely reported. Here we report a case with a triple positive combination of JAK2, CALR and MPL driver mutations.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 69-year-old male was admitted to hospital for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and was found to have splenomegaly and leukocytosis. Nextgeneration revealed JAK2, CALR, MPL mutations, and additional variants in SF3B1, SRSF2, and STAG2. The patient was diagnosed with PMF and treated with ruxolitinib and COPD therapy. Due to nausea, the ruxolitinib dose was reduced. After therapy, spleen volume decreased and hematologic responses were poor. Another genetic mutation of ASXL1 was later found. After adjusting the medication and adding antiemetics, the patient's condition improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The rare coexistence of JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations challenges the assumption of their mutual exclusivity. Further study of these mutations is essential for developing better treatment strategies.

Myelofibrosis and allogeneic transplantation: critical points and challenges

New available drugs allow better control of systemic symptoms associated with myelofibrosis (MF) and splenomegaly but they do not modify the natural history of progressive and poor prognosis disease. Thus, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still considered the only available curative treatment for patients with MF. Despite the increasing number of procedures worldwide in recent years, HSCT for MF patients remains challenging. An increasingly complex network of the patient, disease, and transplant-related factors should be considered to understand the need for and the benefits of the procedure. Unfortunately, prospective trials are often lacking in this setting, making an evidence-based decision process particularly arduous. In the present review, we will analyze the main controversial points of allogeneic transplantation in MF, that is, the development of more sophisticated models for the identification of eligible patients; the need for tools offering a more precise definition of expected outcomes combining comorbidity assessment and factors related to the procedure; the decision-making process about the best transplantation time; the evaluation of the most appropriate platform for curative treatment; the impact of splenomegaly; and splenectomy on outcomes.

Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of a Pan-Canadian Cohort of Adolescents and Young Adults with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Canadian MPN Group Study

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of chronic hematologic malignancies that lead to morbidity and early mortality due to thrombotic complications and progression to acute leukemia. Clinical and mutational risk factors have been demonstrated to predict outcomes in patients with MPNs and are used commonly to guide therapeutic decisions, including allogenic stem cell transplant, in myelofibrosis. Adolescents and young adults (AYA, age ≤45 years) comprise less than 10% of all MPN patients and have unique clinical and therapeutic considerations. The prevalence and clinical impact of somatic mutations implicated in myeloid disease has not been extensively examined in this population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients evaluated at eight Canadian centers for MPN patients diagnosed at ≤45 years of age. In total, 609 patients were included in the study, with median overall survival of 36.8 years. Diagnosis of prefibrotic or overt PMF is associated with the lowest OS and highest risk of AP/BP transformation. Thrombotic complications (24%), including splanchnic circulation thrombosis (9%), were frequent in the cohort. Mutations in addition to those in JAK2/MPL/CALR are uncommon in the initial disease phase in our AYA population (12%); but our data indicate they may be predictive of transformation to post-ET/PV myelofibrosis.

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Practical Management Guide

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) frequently develop thrombocytopenia as a consequence of bone marrow fibrosis, splenic sequestration, and myelosuppression from an inflammatory microenvironmental milieu. Thrombocytopenia occurs frequently at diagnosis, worsens with disease progression, is an independent adverse prognostic factor, and limits effective dosing of JAK2 inhibitors. Recently, pacritinib was approved for patients with MF and extreme thrombocytopenia. However, this JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor is not primarily used to attain improvement in platelet count. In this narrative review, we discuss strategies to specifically address thrombocytopenia in MF patients including immunomodulatory drugs, synthetic androgens, hypomethylating agents and splenectomy, all of which have only modest efficacy in alleviating thrombocytopenia. We also detail transfusion approaches, including diagnostic and therapeutic consideration for platelet transfusion refractoriness. We end by discussing novel therapies, including TGFβ traps and recombinant pentraxin-2, which may increase platelet counts in MF patients. Despite recent therapeutic advancements in MF, there remains a near paucity of agents that can effectively alleviate thrombocytopenia.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis: phase II & III clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis is a clonal hematologic malignancy with clinical manifestations that include cytopenias, debilitating constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis and a propensity toward leukemic progression. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative, this therapy is not available for the majority of patients. Ruxolitinib and fedratinib are approved JAK2 inhibitors that have produced meaningful benefits in terms of spleen reduction and symptom improvement, but there remain several unmet needs.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss novel therapies based upon published data from phase II or III clinical trials. Specifically, we cover novel JAK inhibitors (momelotinib and pacritinib), and agents that target bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (pelabresib), the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2/BCL-xL (navitoclax), MDM2 (navtemadlin), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (parsaclisib), or telomerase (imetelstat).

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with disease related cytopenias are ineligible for currently approved JAK2 inhibitors. However, momelotinib and pacritinib may be able to fill this void. Novel therapies are being evaluated in the upfront setting to improve the depth and duration of responses with ruxolitinib. Future evaluation of agents must be judged on their potential to modify disease progression, which current JAK2 inhibitors lack. Combination therapy, possibly with an immunotherapeutic agent might serve as key components of future myelofibrosis treatment options.

New Horizons in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment: A Review of Current and Future Therapeutic Options

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are aggressive diseases characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid stem cells. The clonal process leads to excessive red cells production, platelets production, and bone marrow fibrosis. According to the phenotype, MPN can be classified as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN patients have shortened survival due to the increased risk of thrombosis, hemorrhages, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prognosis is variable, with a shorter life expectancy in myelofibrosis. Currently, drug therapy can reduce symptoms, splenomegaly, and risk of thrombosis. Still, some patients can be resistant or intolerant to the treatment. At the same time, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only treatment modality with the potential to cure the disease. Nevertheless, the ASCT is reserved for high-risk leukemic progression patients due to the risk of treatment-related death and comorbidity. Therefore, there is a need for new drugs that can eradicate clonal hematopoiesis and prevent progression to more aggressive myeloid neoplasms. Thanks to the better understanding of the disease’s molecular pathogenesis, many new potentially disease-modifying drugs have been developed and are currently in clinical trials. This review explores the most promising new drugs currently in clinical trials.

From cell to cell: Identification of actionable targets in bone marrow fibrosis using single-cell technologies

Single-cell technologies have rapidly developed in recent years and have already had a significant impact on the research of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The increasing number of publicly available data sets allows characterization of the bone marrow niche in patients and mouse models at unprecedented resolution. Single-cell RNA sequencing has successfully been used to identify and characterize disease-driving cell populations and to identify the alarmin S100A8/A9 as an important mediator of myelofibrosis and potent therapeutic target. It is now possible to execute a streamlined set of experiments to specifically identify and validate actionable target genes functionally with the advance of reliable in vivo models and the possibility of conducting single-cell analyses with a minimal amount of patient material. The advent of large-scale analyses of both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic bone marrow cells will allow comprehensive network analyses guiding an increasingly detailed mapping of the MPN interactome.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF). However, many patients are considered ineligible for allo-HCT, and transplant-related mortality can be substantial. Data on the efficacy and safety of allo-HCT are mixed and largely derived from retrospective studies. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of allo-HCT in MF and to identify patient, disease, and transplant characteristics with prognostic impact on outcomes of patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to October 11, 2020, for studies on allo-HCT in MF. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the co-primary outcomes of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). Rates of non-relapse mortality and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses on the effect of conditioning regimen intensity, baseline dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) score, and patient age were performed. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020188706). Forty-three studies with 8739 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year OS were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5%-69.8%), 64.4% (95% CI, 57.6%-70.6%), and 55.0% (95% CI, 51.8%-58.3%), respectively. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year nonrelapse mortality were 25.9% (95% CI, 23.3%-28.7%), 29.7% (95% CI, 24.5%-35.4%), and 30.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-35.5%), respectively. The combined rate of graft failure was 10.6% (95% CI, 8.9%-12.5%) with primary and secondary graft failure occurring in 7.3% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.4%) and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-8.0%) of patients, respectively. Rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 44.0% (95% CI, 39.6%-48.4%; grade III/IV: 15.2%) and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.2%-50.8%; extensive or moderate/severe: 26.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show any significant difference between conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity), median patient age, and proportion of DIPSS-intermediate-2/high patients. The quality of the evidence is limited by the absence of randomized clinical trials in the field and the heterogeneity of patient and transplant characteristics across included studies. Given the poor prognosis of patients not receiving transplants and in the absence of curative nontransplantation therapies, our results support consideration of allo-HCT for eligible patients with MF.

McLornan D, Yakoub‐Agha I. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older myelofibrosis patients: A study of the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT and the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is increasingly used in older myelofibrosis (MF) patients, but its risk/benefit ratio compared to non-transplant approaches has not been evaluated in this population. We analyzed the outcomes of allo-HCT in 556 MF patients aged ≥65 years from the EBMT registry, and determined the excess mortality over the matched general population of MF patients ≥65 years managed with allo-HCT (n = 556) or conventional drug treatment (n = 176). The non-transplant cohort included patients with intermediate-2 or high risk DIPSS from the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the estimated 5-year survival rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence after transplantation was 40%, 37%, and 25%, respectively. Busulfan-based conditioning was associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) whereas the recipient CMV+/donor CMV- combination (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) and the JAK2 mutated genotype (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.5) predicted higher mortality. Busulfan-based conditioning correlated with improved survival due to less NRM, despite its higher relapse rate when compared with melphalan-based regimens. Excess mortality was higher in transplanted patients than in the non-HCT cohort in the first year of follow-up (ratio: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.13-2.80), whereas the opposite occurred between the fourth and eighth follow-up years (ratio: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53). Comparing the excess mortality of the two treatments, male patients seemed to benefit more than females from allo-HCT, mainly due to their worse prognosis with non-transplant approaches. These findings could potentially enhance counseling and treatment decision-making in elderly transplant-eligible MF patients.

Disease modifying agents of myeloproliferative neoplasms: a review

The identification of driver mutations in Janus kinase (JAK) 2, calreticulin (CALR), and myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) has contributed to a better understanding of disease pathogenesis by highlighting the importance of JAK signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling in classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This has led to the therapeutic use of novel targeted treatments, such as JAK2 inhibitors. More recently, with the development of next-generation sequencing, additional somatic mutations, which are not restricted to MPNs, have been elucidated. Treatment decisions for MPN patients are influenced by the MPN subtype, symptom burden, and risk classification. Although prevention of vascular events is the main objective of therapy for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients, disease-modifying drugs are needed to eradicate clonal hematopoiesis and prevent progression to more aggressive myeloid neoplasms. JAK inhibitors are a valuable therapeutic strategy for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who have splenomegaly and/or disease-related symptoms, but intolerance, refractory, resistance, and disease progression still present challenges. Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment for MF, but it is typically limited by age-related comorbidities and high treatment-related mortality. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and potential new therapies with the aim of modifying the natural history of the disease is important. In this article, I review the current understanding of the molecular basis of MPNs and clinical studies on potential disease-modifying agents.

MPN: The Molecular Drivers of Disease Initiation, Progression and Transformation and their Effect on Treatment

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) constitute a group of disorders identified by an overproduction of cells derived from myeloid lineage. The majority of MPNs have an identifiable driver mutation responsible for cytokine-independent proliferative signalling. The acquisition of coexisting mutations in chromatin modifiers, spliceosome complex components, DNA methylation modifiers, tumour suppressors and transcriptional regulators have been identified as major pathways for disease progression and leukemic transformation. They also confer different sensitivities to therapeutic options. This review will explore the molecular basis of MPN pathogenesis and specifically examine the impact of coexisting mutations on disease biology and therapeutic options.

Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, progressive splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, constitutional symptoms, leukemic progression, and shortened survival. Constitutive activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway, and other cellular pathways downstream, leads to myeloproliferation, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and bone marrow remodeling. Transplant is the only curative option for myelofibrosis, but high rates of morbidity and mortality limit eligibility. Several prognostic models have been developed to facilitate treatment decisions. Until the recent approval of fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib was the only available JAK inhibitor for treatment of intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib reduces splenomegaly to some degree in almost all treated patients; however, many patients cannot tolerate ruxolitinib due to dose-dependent drug-related cytopenias, and even patients with a good initial response often develop resistance to ruxolitinib after 2-3 years of therapy. Currently, there is no consensus definition of ruxolitinib failure. Until fedratinib approval, strategies to overcome ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance were mainly different approaches to continued ruxolitinib therapy, including dosing modifications and ruxolitinib rechallenge. Fedratinib and two other JAK2 inhibitors in later stages of clinical development, pacritinib and momelotinib, have been shown to induce clinical responses and improve symptoms in patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. Fedratinib induces robust spleen responses, and pacritinib and momelotinib may have preferential activity in patients with severe cytopenias. Reviewed here are strategies to ameliorate ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance, and outcomes of clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis receiving second-line JAK inhibitors after ruxolitinib treatment.

Investigational non-JAK inhibitors for chronic phase myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) have no effective treatment option after the failure of approved JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy. Non-JAK inhibitors (non-JAKi) that target non-canonical molecular pathways are undergoing clinical evaluations to optimize efficacy and/or to reduce hematological toxicity of JAKi.

AREA COVERED

This article reviews the efficacy data from completed and ongoing early phase clinical trials of non-JAKi agents for chronic phase MF. The article also illuminates some of the challenges of myelofibrosis drug development.

EXPERT OPINION

Most non-JAKi agents tested so far have shown modest benefit in improving the efficacy of ruxolitinib. Several novel agents such as BET inhibitor- CPI-0610, activin receptor ligand trap- luspatercept, recombinant pentraxin-PRM-151, telomerase inhibitor- imetelstat and bcl-2 inhibitor- navitoclax, have shown promising activity; however, they require vigorous evaluation in randomized controlled trials to understand the clinical benefit. Drugs that target new molecular pathways (MDM2, p-selectin, TIM-3, TGF-β, aurora kinase) and immune-based strategies (CALR vaccine, anti-PD-1, allogeneic cord blood regulatory T cells) are in early phase trials. Further translational studies to target leukemic stem cells, improvement in trial designs by incorporating control arm and survival endpoints, and patient-focused collaborations among all stakeholders could pave a way for future success in MF drug development.

Determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We aimed to evaluate the determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and to describe factors predicting the main post-HCT complications. This retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 2916 myelofibrosis patients who underwent first allo-HCT from an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor between 2000 and 2016. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years from transplant, projected median survival of the series was 5.3 years. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were age ≥ 60 years and Karnofsky Performance Status <90% at transplant, and occurrence of graft failure, grades III-IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (aGVHD), and disease progression/relapse during follow-up. The opposing effects of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) on non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence resulted in a neutral influence on survival. Graft failure increased in unrelated donor recipients and decreased with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and negative donor/recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus. Risk of grades III-IV aGVHD was higher with unrelated donors and decreased with MAC. Relapse incidence tended to be higher in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk DIPSS categories and to decrease in CALR-mutated patients. Acute and chronic GVHD reduced the subsequent risk of relapse. This information has potential implications for patient counseling and clinical decision-making.

A provider's guide to primary myelofibrosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular biology of primary myelofibrosis continues to improve, treatment options are limited, and several biological features remain unexplained. With an appropriate clinical history, exam, laboratory evaluation, and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis can often be established. Recent studies have better characterized prognostic factors and driver mutations in myelofibrosis, facilitated by use of next-generation sequencing. These advances have facilitated development of a management strategy that is based on both risk factors and clinical phenotype. For low-risk patients, treatment will depend on symptom severity. For patients with higher-risk disease, several treatments are available including JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and clinical trials using novel molecularly targeted therapies and rational drug combinations. In this review, we outline what is known about the disease pathogenesis, discuss an approach to reaching the diagnosis, review the prognosis of myelofibrosis, and detail current therapeutic strategies.

Patterns of Ruxolitinib Therapy Failure and Its Management in Myelofibrosis: Perspectives of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group

Ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and other disease-related symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis, but over time, many patients lose this benefit. It is difficult to determine whether this is due to resistance or intolerance to the drug; thus, we have used the more inclusive term of ruxolitinib failure. The survival of patients with myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure is poor but varies significantly by the pattern of the failure, underlining the need for a clinically appropriate classification. In this review, we propose diagnostic guidance for early recognition of the pattern of ruxolitinib failure and we recommend treatment options. The most frequent patterns of ruxolitinib failure are loss or failure to obtain a significant reduction in splenomegaly or symptom response, and the development or persistence of clinically significant cytopenias. Ruxolitinib dose modification and other ancillary therapies are sometimes helpful, and splenectomy is a palliative option in selected cases. Stem-cell transplantation is the only curative option for these patterns of failure, but its restricted applicability due to toxicity highlights the importance of ongoing clinical trials in this area. Recent approval of fedratinib by the US Food and Drug Administration provides an alternative option for patients with suboptimal or loss of spleen response. The transformation of myelofibrosis to accelerated or blast phase is an infrequent form of failure with an extremely poor prognosis, whereby patients who are ineligible for transplantation have limited treatment options.

Clinico-biological characteristics of patients with myelofibrosis: an analysis of 1,000 cases from the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE MYELOFIBROSIS: is an infrequent chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm. We aimed to describe the clinico-biological characteristics, treatment, and evolutive course of myelofibrosis patients in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1,000 patients from the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis diagnosed with primary (n=641) or secondary (n=359) myelofibrosis were analysed.

RESULTS

Median age was 68 years. The frequency of constitutional symptoms, moderate to severe anaemia (Hb<10g/dL), and symptomatic splenomegaly was 35%, 36%, and 17%, respectively. The rate of thrombosis and haemorrhage was 1.96 and 1.6 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of leukaemia at 10 years was 15%. The most frequent therapies for the anaemia were the erythropoiesis stimulating agents and danazol. From 2010, a progressive increase in the use of ruxolitinib was noticed. A total of 7.5% of patients were transplanted. During the observation period, 42% of patients died mainly due to the clinical deterioration caused by myelofibrosis or leukaemic transformation. The median survival of the series was 5.7 years. Four different risk categories were identified by the IPSS: median survival was not reached in the low risk group and was 8.8 years, 5.3 years, and 2.8 years in the intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Myelofibrosis is a disabling condition mainly affecting elderly people. Its treatment is mostly driven by symptom control. Despite its clinical heterogeneity, several prognostic models are useful to select candidates for transplantation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis harboring the MPL mutation

INTRODUCTION

Primary and post-ET/PV myelofibrosis are myeloproliferative neoplasms harboring in most cases driving mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL, and a variable number of additional mutations in other genes. Molecular analysis represents a powerful tool to guide prognosis and clinical management. Only about 10% of patients with myelofibrosis harbor alterations in MPL gene. No data are available about the transplantation outcome in the specific MPL-mutated group.

PATIENTS

We collected the data of 18 myelofibrosis patients(primary: 14; post-ET: 4) transplanted in 4 EBMT centers (Hamburg, Paris, Essen, and Hannover) between 2005 and 2016.

RESULTS

Before the transplant, we explored the molecular profile by NGS and reported the frequency of mutations occurring in a panel of genes including JAK2, MPL, CALR, U2AF1, SRSF2, SF3B1, ASXL1, IDH1, IDH2, CBL, DNMT3A, TET2, EZH2, TP53, IKZF1, NRAS, KRAS, FLT3, SH2B3, and RUNX1. The 1-year transplant-related mortality was 16.5%, 5-years overall survival and 5-y relapse-free survival 83.5%. The only relapse occurred in a patient who harbored mutations in both ASXL1 and EZH2 genes.

CONCLUSION

These retrospective data suggest that MPL-mutated myelofibrosis patients have a favorable outcome after allogeneic transplantation with very low rate of disease relapse (5.5%) in comparison with the available historical controls regarding myelofibrosis in all.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade Enhances Shared Neoantigen-Induced T-cell Immunity Directed against Mutated Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Somatic frameshift mutations in the calreticulin (CALR) gene are key drivers of cellular transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). All patients carrying these mutations (CALR ⁺ MPN) share an identical sequence in the C-terminus of the mutated CALR protein (mut-CALR), with the potential for utility as a shared neoantigen. Here, we demonstrate that although a subset of patients with CALR ⁺ MPN develop specific T-cell responses against the mut-CALR C-terminus, PD-1 or CTLA4 expression abrogates the full complement of responses. Significantly, blockade of PD-1 and CLTA4 ex vivo by mAbs and of PD-1 in vivo by pembrolizumab administration restores mut-CALR-specific T-cell immunity in some patients with CALR ⁺ MPN. Moreover, mut-CALR elicits antigen-specific responses from both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, confirming its broad applicability as an immunogen. Collectively, these results establish mut-CALR as a shared, MPN-specific neoantigen and inform the design of novel immunotherapies targeting mut-CALR. SIGNIFICANCE: Current treatment modalities for MPN are not effective in eliminating malignant cells. Here, we show that mutations in the CALR gene, which drive transformation in MPN, elicit T-cell responses that can be further enhanced by checkpoint blockade, suggesting immunotherapies could be employed to eliminate CALR ⁺ malignant cells in MPN.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1143.

Comparison of Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation for Primary Myelofibrosis among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Source Groups

The choice of alternative donor is a major issue in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) without an HLA-matched related donor. We conducted this retrospective study using the Japanese national registry data for 224 PMF patients to compare the outcomes of first allogeneic HSCT from HLA-matched related donor bone marrow (Rtd-BM), HLA-matched related donor peripheral blood stem cells (Rtd-PB), HLA-matched unrelated donor bone marrow (UR-BM), unrelated umbilical cord blood (UR-UCB), and other hematopoietic stem cell grafts. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates at 1 year after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantations were 16%, 36%, 30%, 41%, and 48%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified UR-UCB transplantation, other transplantation, frequent RBC transfusion before transplantation, and frequent platelet (PLT) transfusion before transplantation as predictive of higher NRM. Relapse rates at 1 year after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantation were 14%, 17%, 11%, 14%, and 15%, respectively. No specific factor was associated with the incidence of relapse. Overall survival (OS) at 1 and 4 years after Rtd-BM, Rtd-PB, UR-BM, UR-UCB, and other transplantation were 81% and 71%, 58% and 52%, 61% and 46%, 48% and 27%, and 48% and 41%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified older patient age, frequent RBC transfusion before transplantation, and frequent PLT transfusion before transplantation as predictive of lower OS. In conclusion, UR-UCB transplantation, as well as UR-BM transplantation, can be selected for PMF patients without an HLA-identical related donor. However, careful management is required for patients after UR-UCB transplantation because of the high NRM. Further studies including more patients after HLA-haploidentical related donor and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation would provide more valuable information for patients with PMF when making decisions regarding the choice of alternative donor.

Ruxolitinib Therapy Followed by Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 114 Study

We evaluated the feasibility of ruxolitinib therapy followed by a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing transplantation in a 2-stage Simon phase II trial. The aims were to decrease the incidence of graft failure (GF) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) compared with data from the previous Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 101 Study. The plan was to enroll 11 patients each in related donor (RD) and unrelated donor (URD) arms, with trial termination if ≥3 failures (GF or death by day +100 post-transplant) occurred in the RD arm or ≥6 failures occurred in the URD. A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 7 in the RD arm and 14 in the URD arm. The RD arm did not meet the predetermined criteria for proceeding to stage II. Although the URD arm met the criteria for stage II, the study was terminated owing to poor accrual and a significant number of failures. In all 19 transplant recipients, ruxolitinib was tapered successfully without significant side effects, and 9 patients (47%) had a significant decrease in symptom burden. The cumulative incidences of GF, NRM, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and chronic GVHD at 24 months were 16%, 28%, 64%, and 76%, respectively. On an intention-to-treat basis, the 2-year overall survival was 61% for the RD arm and 70% for the URD arm. Ruxolitinib can be integrated as pretransplantation treatment for patients with MF, and a tapering strategy before transplantation is safe, allowing patients to commence conditioning therapy with a reduced symptom burden. However, GF and NRM remain significant.

Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Ruxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59 years (r: 28-74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n = 23), matched (n = 86) or mismatched (n = 50) unrelated donors. Forty-six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT. The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30 mg (range 10-40 mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.9 months (range 0.4-39.1 months).

RESULTS

Primary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non-ruxolitinib group. Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non-relapse mortality at 2 years (23% vs 23%). A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P = .2), resulting in a similar 2 year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively). No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Clinical Utility of Next-generation Sequencing in the Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has helped characterize the complex genomic landscape of myeloid malignancies, its clinical utility remains undefined. This has resulted in variable funding for NGS testing, limiting its accessibility. At our center, targeted sequencing (TAR-SEQ) using a 54-gene NGS myeloid panel is offered to all new patients referred for myeloid malignancies, as part of a prospective observational study. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic, prognostic, and potential therapeutic utility of clinical grade TAR-SEQ in the routine workflow of 179 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).

Of 13 patients with triple negative (TN) MPN, who lacked driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL, TAR-SEQ confirmed clonal hematopoiesis in 8 patients. In patients with intermediate-risk myelofibrosis (MF), TAR-SEQ helped optimize clinical decisions in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)-eligible patients through identifying a high molecular risk (HMR) mutation profile. The presence of an HMR profile favored HCT in 9 patients with intermediate-1 risk MF. Absence of an HMR profile resulted in a delayed HCT strategy in 10 patients with intermediate-2 risk MF, 7 of which were stable at the last follow-up. Finally, TAR-SEQ identified patients with various targetable mutations in IDH1/2 (4%), spliceosome genes (28%), and EZH2 (7%). Some of these patients can be potential candidates for future targeted therapy trials.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that TAR-SEQ improves the characterization of TN MPN, can be integrated in clinical practice as an additional tool to refine decision making in HCT, and has the potential to identify candidates for future targeted therapy trials.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis. The number of HSCTs performed for this indication has been steadily increasing over the past years, even after the approval of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, ruxolitinib. This increase may be attributed to improved patient selection based on new prognostic molecular markers, more frequent use of matched unrelated donors, secondary to better (high-resolution) human leukocyte antigen typing and supportive care. Ruxolitinib approval raises new questions regarding the role of JAK inhibitors in the transplant setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current review summarizes recent updates on HSCT in myelofibrosis. Predictors for transplant outcomes, and specific considerations related to myelofibrosis patient selection for HSCT (e.g. molecular risk stratification) are reviewed. In addition, this review will consider management of myelofibrosis patients in the peritransplant period, including the role of ruxolitinib in the pretransplant period, pre and posttransplant splenomegaly, transplant protocols, posttransplant follow-up of minimal residual disease and interventions in the event of poor engraftment.

SUMMARY

HSCT remains a highly relevant treatment option for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Recent advances may contribute to a refined definition of HSCT eligibility and identification of the optimal transplantation time, conditioning protocols and posttransplant management.

Distinguishing myelofibrosis from polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: The utility of enumerating circulating stem cells with aberrant hMICL expression by flow cytometry

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) may be challenging due to overlapping features and lack of robust discriminatory parameters, especially between essential thrombocythemia (ET) and prefibrotic myelofibrosis (MF). Circulating immature hematopoietic cells are variably present in polycythemia vera (PV), ET, and MF. The C-type lectin hMICL is aberrantly expressed on hematopoietic stem cells in the majority of acute myeloid leukemia patients. However, the hMICL expression in MPN, having varying propensity of leukemic transformation, is unsettled. We hypothesized that enumeration of immature cells by flow cytometry (FCM) could be a discriminatory tool in MPN diagnostics.

METHODS

By FCM, we quantified circulating stem cells with aberrant hMICL expression in 39 MPN patients, 10 age-matched controls, and in leukapheresis products from 10 patients with lymphoproliferative neoplasms. The utility of the FCM assay for discriminating MPN entities was evaluated by applying ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

While hMICL was absent in control samples, MF patients had significantly more hMICL+ stem cells (median 15.2%) than PV and ET (0.0%, P = .001 and 0.0%, P = .002, respectively). By ROC curve analysis, the presence of hMICL+ stem cells (>0 cells) in peripheral blood reliably discriminates MF from ET and PV with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 97%.

CONCLUSION

Enumeration of circulating hMICL+ stem cells by FCM can discriminate between MPN phenotypes and holds potential for monitoring disease evolution.

Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy

In myelofibrosis (MF), driver mutations in JAK2, MPL, or CALR impact survival and progression to blast phase, with the greatest risk conferred by triple-negative status. Subclonal mutations, including mutations in high-molecular risk (HMR) genes, such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, and SRSF2 have also been associated with inferior prognosis. However, data evaluating the impact of next-generation sequencing in MF patients treated with JAK1/2 inhibitors are lacking. Using a 54-gene myeloid panel, we performed targeted sequencing on 100 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib (n = 77) or momelotinib (n = 23) and correlated mutational profiles with treatment outcomes. Ninety-nine patients had at least 1 mutation identified, 46 (46%) had 2 mutations, and 34 (34%) patients had ≥3 mutations. Seventy-nine patients carried a mutation in JAK2V617F, 14 patients had mutations in CALR, 6 patients had an MPL mutation, and 2 patients were triple negative. No mutation was significantly associated with spleen or anemia response. A high Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score and pretreatment transfusion dependence were associated with a shorter time to treatment failure (TTF), and this association retained significance on multivariable analysis. Patients with ASXL1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; P = .03) and EZH2 mutations (HR, 2.94; P = .009) and an HMR profile (HR, 2.06; P = .01) had shorter TTF. On multivariate analysis, ASXL1 or EZH2 mutations were independently associated with shorter TTF and overall survival. These findings help identify patients unlikely to have a durable response with current JAK1/2 inhibitors and provide a framework for future studies.

Mutations in MPNs: prognostic implications, window to biology, and impact on treatment decisions

The last decade has witnessed tremendous scientific advances, ushered in by the JAK2 V617F discovery, contributing to enhanced diagnostic capability and understanding of the biology of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Discovery of the calreticulin mutations filled a diagnostic gap; more recent work sheds light on its contribution to disease pathogenesis, and prognosis. Recent studies have also identified novel JAK2 and MPL mutations in patients with essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis (MF). Especially in MF, the driver mutational profile has prognostic implications, with additive contributions from the acquisition of additional somatic mutations. The hope is that sophisticated molecular profiling will not only aid in prognostication, but also guide selection of therapy for patients with MPNs.

Mutations in MPNs: prognostic implications, window to biology, and impact on treatment decisions

The last decade has witnessed tremendous scientific advances, ushered in by the JAK2 V617F discovery, contributing to enhanced diagnostic capability and understanding of the biology of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Discovery of the calreticulin mutations filled a diagnostic gap; more recent work sheds light on its contribution to disease pathogenesis, and prognosis. Recent studies have also identified novel JAK2 and MPL mutations in patients with essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis (MF). Especially in MF, the driver mutational profile has prognostic implications, with additive contributions from the acquisition of additional somatic mutations. The hope is that sophisticated molecular profiling will not only aid in prognostication, but also guide selection of therapy for patients with MPNs.