Approach to the treatment of the older, unfit patient with myeloma from diagnosis to relapse: perspectives of a US hematologist and a geriatric hematologist

Ixazomib Versus Placebo as Post-Induction Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: An Analysis by Age and Frailty Status of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study

BACKGROUND

The TOURMALINE-MM4 trial demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with ixazomib versus placebo as postinduction maintenance in nontransplant, newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, with a manageable and well-tolerated toxicity profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this subgroup analysis, efficacy and safety were assessed by age (< 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) and frailty status (fit, intermediate-fit, and frail).

RESULTS

In this analysis, PFS benefit with ixazomib versus placebo was seen across age subgroups, including patients aged < 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.576; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.299-1.108; P = .095), 65-74 years (HR, 0.615; 95% CI, 0.467-0.810; P < .001), and ≥ 75 years (HR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.537-1.019; P = .064). PFS benefit was also seen across frailty subgroups, including fit (HR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.387-0.727; P < .001), intermediate-fit (HR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.526-1.058; P = .098), and frail (HR, 0.733; 95% CI, 0.481-1.117; P = .147) patients. With ixazomib versus placebo, rates of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 28-44% vs. 10-36%), serious TEAEs (15-29% vs. 3-29%), and discontinuation due to TEAEs (7-19% vs. 5-11%) were higher or similar across age and frailty subgroups, and generally somewhat higher in older age groups and intermediate-fit/frail patients in both arms. Treatment with ixazomib versus placebo did not adversely affect patient-reported quality-of-life scores across age and frailty status subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Ixazomib is a feasible and effective maintenance option for prolonging PFS across this heterogeneous patient population.

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Recommendations from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium

Although the availability of effective novel treatments has positively impacted the quality of life and survival of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, benefits in the transplant ineligible MM population may be limited by functional/frailty status. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium proposes consensus recommendations for the first-line treatment of transplant ineligible MM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document further focuses on eligibility for transplant, frailty assessment, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Opportunities for Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Trial Access Depends on Restrictive Eligibility Criteria and Patient Expectations

Simple Summary

Over the past decade, randomized controlled trials as an established instrument of evidence-based medicine have contributed fundamentally to the development and approval of new substances. However, it has been frequently shown that less than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Barriers to trial participation have been extensively studied, but the rate of trial participation has not changed substantially. In this retrospective analysis, we found that 53% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients met the eligibility criteria, while only 38% of relapsed refractory patients were eligible. Moreover, our data show for the first time that eligible patients tend to become more reluctant to participate over the course of the disease, with 42% of newly diagnosed patients consenting, and only 7% of relapsed/refractory patients consenting. Thus, our results may assist with trial design improvements and address patient expectations and priorities in order to increase enrollment.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the driver of therapeutic innovations. However, it has been frequently shown that less than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials, although 70% of patients are considered as being willing to participate. Barriers to trial participation have been extensively studied. Although there is evidence that trial participation correlates with improved survival and reduced mortality, the rate of participation has not changed substantially. We provide retrospective data from a single-center analysis of 411 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were treated at the University Hospital Duesseldorf in Germany between January 2014 and December 2016. Each patient was analyzed for the real-world possibility of participating in a clinical study, based on the inclusion and exclusion (I/E) criteria and the recruiting period of open studies. The overall rate of study participation was 19%. A total of 53% of NDMM patients were eligible for first-line studies (GMMG-HD6, LenaMain). Of these, 80% consented to enrolment (42% of all). In contrast, only 38% of the RRMM population was eligible (GMMG-Relapse, Castor, Tourmaline, Admyre). Of these, only 22% (7% of all) consented. This was confirmed by virtual analysis, showing that only 29% of all RRMM patients would have been eligible for six internationally recruiting trials leading to later drug approval. The majority of cases were rendered ineligible by only one I/E criterion. The most common criteria were study-specific (prior therapies or refractory disease to a specific drug), kidney disease, and previous malignancy, followed by internal, neurologic, and infectious disease. In summary, this single-center analysis showed that I/E criteria permit study participation for most NNDM patients, with a dramatic decrease in the RRMM population. This is aggravated by the fact that the willingness for study participation also significantly declines in RRMM. Thus, addressing patient expectations and priorities seems to be the most promising approach to increasing patient enrollment in clinical trials.

Clinical impacts of frailty, poor performance status, and advanced age in carfilzomib-containing treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc investigation of the KOTOSG multicenter pilot prospective observational study

We conducted a post hoc analysis of our previous pilot observational study on the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib (CFZ)-containing therapy in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine practice to clarify the relationships between three major criteria for vulnerability (frailty, poor performance status [PS], and advanced age [≥ 75 years]) and their clinical impact on efficacy and adverse events (AEs). Sixteen patients fulfilled at least one and five patients fulfilled all three criteria. The overall response rate was not significantly affected by frailty, poor PS, and/or advanced age; however, frailty and advanced age were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, no significant difference in PFS was observed between patients with PS0-1 or PS2-4. The three criteria for vulnerability were associated with more frequent hematologic AEs: frailty, poor PS, and/or advanced age significantly increased the risk of grade 3-4 anemia and lymphopenia. However, these criteria were not associated with increased risk of other non-hematologic AEs except infection. Collectively, these results demonstrate the need to carefully manage severe hematologic AEs in vulnerable patients and perform disease-specific assessment of frailty to predict prognosis.

Treatment of older adult or frail patients with multiple myeloma

Older adults with multiple myeloma (MM) are a growing population, and personalizing treatment based on disease and health status is imperative. Similar to MM staging systems that provide disease-related prognostic information, myeloma-specific frailty tools can better identify subgroups at greatest risk for treatment-related toxicity and early treatment discontinuation, as well as predict overall survival. Several myeloma-specific validated tools are well studied. Although these fitness/frailty scores have shaped our understanding of the heterogeneity among older adults with myeloma, the application of such scores in treatment decision making (ie, transplant considerations, relapse) is an unmet need. Here we outline how to incorporate frailty assessments in the evaluation of older adults with MM in the clinical setting with consideration of other factors such as patient preferences, treatment risks/benefits, life expectancy, and disease biology.

Management of patients with difficult-to-treat multiple myeloma

Newer treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved response rates and survival for many patients. However, MM remains challenging to treat due to the propensity for multiple relapses, cumulative and emergent toxicities from prior therapies and increasing genomic complexity that arises due to clonal evolution. In particular, patients with relapsed/refractory MM often require increased complexity of treatment, yet still experience poorer outcomes compared with patients who are newly diagnosed. Additionally, several patient subgroups, including those with extramedullary disease and patients who are frail and/or have multiple comorbidities, have an unfavorable prognosis and remain undertreated. This review (based on an Updates-in-Hematology session at the 25th European Hematology Association Annual Congress 2020) discusses the management of these difficult-to-treat patients with MM.

Management of patients with multiple myeloma beyond the clinical-trial setting: understanding the balance between efficacy, safety and tolerability, and quality of life

Treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) are increasing with the introduction of complex multi-novel-agent-based regimens investigated in randomized clinical trials. However, application in the real-world setting, including feasibility of and adherence to these regimens, may be limited due to varying patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors. Furthermore, approximately 40% of real-world MM patients do not meet the criteria for phase 3 studies on which approvals are based, resulting in a lack of representative phase 3 data for these patients. Therefore, treatment decisions must be tailored based on additional considerations beyond clinical trial efficacy and safety, such as treatment feasibility (including frequency of clinic/hospital attendance), tolerability, effects on quality of life (QoL), and impact of comorbidities. There are multiple factors of importance to real-world MM patients, including disease symptoms, treatment burden and toxicities, ability to participate in daily activities, financial burden, access to treatment and treatment centers, and convenience of treatment. All of these factors are drivers of QoL and treatment satisfaction/compliance. Importantly, given the heterogeneity of MM, individual patients may have different perspectives regarding the most relevant considerations and goals of their treatment. Patient perspectives/goals may also change as they move through their treatment course. Thus, the 'efficacy' of treatment means different things to different patients, and treatment decision-making in the context of personalized medicine must be guided by an individual's composite definition of what constitutes the best treatment choice. This review summarizes the various factors of importance and practical issues that must be considered when determining real-world treatment choices. It assesses the current instruments, methodologies, and recent initiatives for analyzing the MM patient experience. Finally, it suggests options for enhancing data collection on patients and treatments to provide a more holistic definition of the effectiveness of a regimen in the real-world setting.

Transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Current and future approaches to clinical care: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematological malignancy in the USA and Europe. Despite improvements in the 5-year and overall survival rates over the past decade, older adults (aged ≥65 years) with multiple myeloma continue to experience disproportionately worse outcomes than their younger counterparts. These differences in outcomes arise from the increased prevalence of vulnerabilities such as medical comorbidities and frailty seen with advancing age that can influence treatment-delivery and tolerance and impact survival. In general, geriatric assessments can help identify those patients more likely to benefit from enhanced toxicity risk-prediction and aid treatment decision-making. Despite the observed benefits of geriatric assessments and other screening frailty tools, provider and systems-level barriers continue to influence the overall perception of the feasibility of geriatric assessments in clinical practice settings. Clinical trials are underway evaluating the efficacy and safety of various multiple myeloma therapies in less fit/frail older adults, with a minority examining fitness-based/risk-adapted approaches. Thus, significant gaps exist in knowing which myeloma therapies are most appropriate for older and more vulnerable adults with multiple myeloma. The purpose of this Review is to discuss how geriatric assessments can be used to guide the management of transplant-ineligible patients; and to highlight frontline therapies for standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [i.e., t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p)] associated with multiple myeloma. We also discuss the current shortcomings of the existing clinical approaches to care and highlight ongoing clinical trials evaluating newer fitness-based approaches to managing transplant-ineligible patients.

Disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes among younger and older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma, a cancer of older adults, has seen significant improvement in therapeutic options over the past two decades. Uncovering disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes is imperative in order to ensure older adults, who are underrepresented in clinical trials, are benefitting from these advances.

METHODS

Adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) were identified using linked provincial administrative databases between 2007 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Trends in rate of no treatment, novel drug and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) usage was evaluated within one year following diagnosis along with the associated early mortality (<12 months) for the aforementioned cohorts among younger (≤65 years) and older adults (>65 years) with NDMM.

RESULTS

A total of 8841 adults with NDMM were identified. Rates of no treatment decreased in both age groups during the study period; however still remain considerably high among older patients (from 34.9% in 2007 to 27.4% in 2017) with high associated early mortality in the older untreated group (54.1% 1 yr mortality over study period). Despite increased usage of novel drugs in both age groups, early mortality decreased among younger patients utilizing novel drugs (16.1% to 5.6%) but remained high and stagnant in older patients using novel drugs (18.2% 1 yr mortality over study period). ASCT utilization increased in both age groups during the study period with decreasing early mortality among older patients undergoing ASCT (from 26.3% in 2007 to 1.1% in 2017).

CONCLUSION

While several improvements have been made, rates of no treatment and early mortality among patients not treated and those started on novel drugs remains a concern in older adults with NDMM.

Re-defining Prognosis of Hematological Malignancies by Dynamic Response Assessment Methods: Lessons Learnt in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

Risk-stratification is an essential management tool in defining prognosis of haematological neoplasms, both from patient and physician perspective. We define a new prognostic term "Dynamic Response Assessment Method(s) (DRAM)" as "method(s) used for re-stratifying disease prognosis at fixed intervals during the treatment course". The risk stratification is done after a fixed duration of treatment or chemotherapy cycles using sensitive techniques. The information obtained then can be used for further therapeutic decisions and prognostication. Currently, there is enough evidence that response to treatment improves the prognostic value of baseline disease variables in the management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma. Through this review, we discuss the current evidence based application of "DRAM" to guide therapeutic decisions in these malignancies. We also discuss how the results of "DRAM" can be incorporated for redefining prognosis and counselling the patients with these selected hematologic malignancies.

Geriatric assessment and quality of life changes in older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma undergoing treatment

OBJECTIVE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of older adults with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. Our study aimed to understand the changes that occurred in geriatric domains and quality of life parameters as older adults underwent treatment for MM over 6-months following initial diagnosis.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 40 adults aged ≥65 with newly-diagnosed MM who completed the Cancer and Aging Research Group geriatric assessment and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (General and subscale Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity) quality of life tool at baseline and at 6 months following treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Thirty-six participants completed 6-months of follow-up. There was no significant change in geriatric domains, including dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Compared to baseline, mental health improved at 6-months of follow-up (Mental Health Inventory-17 score, median 77.1 versus 84.3 at baseline and 6-months respectively, p < .001). Objective physical performance as measured by the Timed Up and Go test showed a trend towards improvement (12.3 versus 11.0 s, p = .057) and remained stable or improved in almost all (30/32, 93.8%) of the adults using the minimum clinically important difference threshold.

CONCLUSION

From baseline to 6-months of follow-up, older adults with MM showed improvement in mental health but otherwise remained stable with regards to function and overall quality of life. Timed Up and Go Test may provide a dynamic indicator of functional status and needs to be further evaluated in future studies.

How I treat a refractory myeloma patient who is not eligible for a clinical trial

Myeloma patients not eligible for clinical trials have many treatment options. Choosing the next best therapy starts with careful assessment of the biology and dynamics of the disease at relapse, as well as the condition and situation of the patient. Fit patients should be considered for triplet regimens, whereas intermediate and frail patients warrant dose-reduced triplets or doublets. An indolent serologic relapse may be treated with dose intensification, especially in a maintenance situation, whereas a rapid relapse requires a more aggressive approach with drug class change or a second-generation immunomodulatory drug (IMID) or proteasome inhibitor (PI). Monoclonal antibodies, in combination with PIs and IMIDs, have proven highly efficacious in early and late relapse. Key elements of supportive care include infection prevention, bone health, thromboprophylaxis, and management of active symptoms, such as pain and distress.

Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of multiple myeloma to practicing physicians and others.

METHODS

ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and some phase II studies published from 2005 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed for patients with multiple myeloma who are transplantation eligible and those who are ineligible and for patients with relapsed or refractory disease.