How I treat hypereosinophilic syndromes

Prevalence and management of eosinophilia based on periodic health examinations in primary care clinics

Background

Eosinophilia is a common, hematologic abnormality detected in periodic health checkups with diverse etiologies. There are a few clinical practice guidelines for the management of eosinophilia.

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of eosinophilia among patients undergoing periodic health examinations, evaluate its management and outcomes, and identify its associated factors.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with eosinophilia diagnosed during the 2018 periodic health examinations at Songklanagarind Hospital.

Results

The prevalence rate of eosinophilia was 9.6% (988/10,299), and most patients (52.6%) were male with a median age of 53.0 (42.0-61.0) years. Only 174 patients (17.6%) were diagnosed and further examined to identify the cause of eosinophilia; including an examination of medical history (18.4%), physical examination (93.1%), laboratory analysis (9.2%), and consultation with internists (14.9%). Empirical anthelmintic therapy was administered in 130 patients (74.7%), and 49.2% achieved resolution. The possible causes of eosinophilia were identified in 20.7% (204/988), the most common cause being atopic disease (51.5%). Patients with moderate-to-severe eosinophilia were significantly more likely to be diagnosed, undergo further laboratory tests, and proceed with consultations with internists (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 3.52 [1.97-6.32], 17.13 [5.74-51.11], and 6.38 [1.95-20.93], respectively).

Conclusions

Eosinophilia is commonly identified in periodic health examinations, and most primary physicians lack knowledge regarding the diagnostic work-up required to determine the cause of eosinophilia. Empirical anthelmintic therapy showed satisfactory efficacy for the management of eosinophilia in areas where parasite infection is endemic.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Hypereosinophilic Syndromes and Mast Cell Disorders: a Comprehensive Review

Hypereosinophilic syndrome and mastocytosis are relatively rare proliferative diseases encountered in the general population. However, allergists frequently consider these disorders in the differential of patients presenting with gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cutaneous, and allergic symptoms. Gastrointestinal symptoms are some of the most frequent and/or debilitating aspects of both disease states and in many cases lead to poor quality of life and functional limitation for the patient. They are the third most common clinical manifestation in hypereosinophilic syndrome and have been found to be the most distressful aspect of the disorder in those with systemic mastocytosis. Both eosinophils and mast cells play integral parts in normal gut physiology, but when and how exactly their effector functionality translates into clinically significant disease remains unclear, and the available literature regarding their pathophysiology remains sparse. Eosinophils and mast cells even, in fact, may not necessarily function in isolation from each other but can participate in bidirectional crosstalk. Both are affected by similar mediators and can also influence one another in a paracrine fashion. Their interactions include both production of soluble mediators for specific eosinophil and mast cell receptors (for example, eosinophil recruitment and activation by mast cells releasing histamine and eotaxin) as well as direct physical contact. The mechanistic relationship between clonal forms of hypereosinophilia and systemic mastocytosis has also been explored. The nature of gastrointestinal symptomatology in the setting of both hypereosinophilic syndrome and mast cell disease is frequently manifold, heterogeneous, and the lack of better targeted therapy makes diagnosis and management challenging, especially when faced with a substantial differential. Currently, the management of these gastrointestinal symptoms relies on the treatment of the overall disease process. In hypereosinophilia patients, systemic corticosteroids are mainstay, although steroid-sparing agents such as hydroxyurea, IFN-α, methotrexate, cyclosporine, imatinib, and mepolizumab have been utilized with varying success. In mastocytosis patients, anti-mediator therapy with antihistamines and mast cell stabilization with cromolyn sodium can be considered treatments of choice, followed by other therapies yet to be thoroughly studied, including the role of the low-histamine diet, corticosteroids, and treatment of associated IBS symptoms. Given that both eosinophils and mast cells may have joint pathophysiologic roles, they have the potential to be a combined target for therapeutic intervention in disease states exhibiting eosinophil or mast cell involvement.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia

OBJECTIVE

To describe key diagnostic considerations in patients with pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia, with a special emphasis on raising awareness of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), a disease that often involves the lungs and prompts investigation for clonal neoplastic processes that determine prognosis and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Studies and review articles were selected from PubMed and Scopus for relevance to pertinent topics.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The literature was screened for studies that described lung eosinophilia and HES. Studies relevant to the topic were included in this review.

RESULTS

Pulmonary eosinophil infiltrates in lung biopsy specimens present a broad differential diagnosis, including eosinophilic pneumonia; hypersensitivity reactions, such as allergic bronchopulmonary fungal disease; and pulmonary manifestations of systemic diseases, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. An additional important consideration in the differential diagnosis is pulmonary involvement by HES. HES is a rare syndrome that comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by persistent blood and/or tissue eosinophilia associated with organ dysfunction. Approximately one-third of HES cases are caused by neoplastic diseases, with the remaining cases classified as reactive or idiopathic. Lung involvement is seen in up to 67% of cases and may be the presenting manifestation of the disorder.

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of pulmonary eosinophilia is broad and requires a multidisciplinary approach with clinicopathologic-radiologic correlation.

Eosinophilic Liver Abcesses and Pyrexia of Unknown Origin in Idiopathic Hypereosinphilic Syndrome: Myeloproliferative or Mimic?

We report a case which presented with pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) with eosinophilia and multiple hypoechoic lesions in the liver resembling secondaries. After secondary causes were ruled out, aspiration of liver lesions revealed eosinophilic abcesses. A diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) was made and the patient responded to steroid therapy. HES remains a diagnosis of exclusion. HES presenting with PUO and liver abcesses is very rare. A high index of suspicion is required to recognize the involvement of different organ systems due to HES.

Biological Modulators in Eosinophilic Diseases

Eosinophils can regulate local and systemic inflammation, and their presence in higher numbers appears to play an important role in the pathology of various atopic and inflammatory diseases. Eosinophil maturation, recruitment, and survival depend on several cytokine regulators, including interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13 as well as growth factors such as GM-CSF. Over the last decade, the approach to treating eosinophilic diseases has changed greatly. A number of biologic modulators have been developed to target eosinophilic inflammatory pathways, and their usage has resulted in variable clinical improvement in the treatment of eosinophilic-associated conditions. Novel targeted therapies that are safe and effective for treating these disorders are being investigated. This review summarizes the clinical use of biologic agents that have been studied in clinical trials or approved for treating eosinophilic diseases.

Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in idiopathic hypereosinophilia with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses numerous diverse conditions resulting in peripheral hypereosinophilia that cannot be explained by hypersensitivity, infection, or atopy and that is not associated with known systemic diseases with specific organ involvement. HES is often attributed to neoplastic or reactive causes, such as chronic eosinophilic leukemia, although a majority of cases remains unexplained and are considered idiopathic. Here, we review the current diagnosis and management of HES and present a unique case of profound hypereosinophilia associated with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia requiring intensive management. This case clearly illustrates the limitations of current knowledge with respect to hypereosinophilia syndrome as well as the challenges associated with its classification and management.

FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Positive Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia: A Low-Burden Disease with Dramatic Response to Imatinib - A Report of 5 Cases from South India

Objective: Eosinophilia associated with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement represents a subset of chronic eosinophilic leukemia and affected patients are sensitive to imatinib treatment. This study was undertaken to learn the prevalence and associated clinicopathologic and genetic features of FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement in a cohort of 26 adult patients presenting with profound eosinophilia (>1.5x10⁹/L).

Materials and Methods: Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis were used for the detection of FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement.

Results: Five male patients with splenomegaly carried the FIP1L1-PDGFRA gene rearrangement. All patients achieved complete hematological response within 4 weeks of starting imatinib. One patient had previous deep vein thrombosis and 1 patient had cardiomyopathy, which improved with steroids and imatinib. Conventional cytogenetics was normal in all these patients. No primary resistance to imatinib was noted.

Conclusion: This study indicates the need to do the FIP1L1-PDGFRA assay in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Prompt treatment of this condition with imatinib can lead to complete hematological response and resolution of the organ damage that can be seen in this setting.

Myeloproliferative hypereosinophilic syndrome presenting as cardiac failure and response to imatinib

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome was first defined by Chursid et al in 1975; however, following the advances in molecular biology, the World Health Organization has proposed a classification in 2008. Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a heterogeneous group of uncommon disorders characterized by marked peripheral eosinophilia and end-organ manifestation. The authors describe a case of sudden-onset cardiac failure in a young individual who had marked peripheral eosinophilia and detection of FIP1L1/PDGFRA fusion gene. A diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasm with eosinophilia and eosinophilic endocarditis was made. His clinical and laboratory parameters showed a dramatic response to imatinib and prednisone.

The Differential Diagnosis of Eosinophilia in Neoplastic Hematopathology

Eosinophilia in the peripheral blood is classified as primary (clonal) hematologic neoplasms or secondary (nonclonal) disorders, associated with hematologic or nonhematologic disorders. This review focuses on the categories of hematolymphoid neoplasms recognized by the 2008 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours and Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues that are characteristically associated with eosinophilia. We provide a systematic approach to the diagnosis of these neoplastic proliferations via morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular-based methodologies, and provide the clinical settings in which these hematolymphoid neoplasms occur. We discuss recommendations that eosinophilia working groups have published addressing some of the limitations of the current classification scheme.

Eosinophils affect functions of in vitro-activated human CD3-CD4+ T cells

BACKGROUND

The recent development of eosinophil-targeting agents has raised enthusiasm for management of patients with hypereosinophilic syndromes. Roughly half of anti-IL-5-treated patients with corticosteroid-responsive lymphocytic (L-HES) and idiopathic disease variants can be tapered off corticosteroids. Potential consequences of corticosteroid-withdrawal on clonal expansion of pre-malignant CD3⁻CD4⁺ T-cells associated with L-HES are a subject of concern. Indeed, corticosteroid treatment inhibits T-cell activation and may lower blood CD3⁻CD4⁺ cell counts. On the other hand, previous studies have shown that eosinophils support CD4 T-cell activation, suggesting that targeted eosinophil depletion may negatively regulate these cells.

OBJECTIVES

Effects of eosinophils on CD4 T-cell activation in vitro were investigated as an indirect means of exploring whether treatment-induced eosinophil depletion may affect pathogenic T-cells driving L-HES.

METHODS

Helper (CD4) T-cells and CD3⁻CD4⁺ cells from healthy controls and L-HES patients, respectively, were cultured in vitro in presence of anti-CD3/CD28 or dendritic cells. Effects of eosinophils on T-cell proliferation and cytokine production were investigated.

RESULTS

Eosinophils enhanced CD3-driven proliferation of CD4 T-cells from healthy subjects in vitro, while inhibiting TCR-independent proliferation and IL-5 production by CD3⁻CD4⁺ T-cells.

CONCLUSIONS

While this study confirms previous work showing that eosinophils support activation of normal helper T-cells, our in vitro findings with CD3⁻CD4⁺ T-cells suggest that eosinophil-depletion may favor activation and expansion of this pathogenic lymphocyte subset. With the ongoing development of eosinophil-targeted therapy for various eosinophilic conditions, the indirect consequences of treatment on the underlying immune mechanisms of disease should be investigated in detail in the setting of translational research programs.

Clinical overview of cutaneous features in hypereosinophilic syndrome

The hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a heterogeneous group of disorders defined as persistent and marked blood eosinophilia of unknown origin with systemic organ involvement. HES is a potentially severe multisystem disease associated with considerable morbidity. Skin involvement and cutaneous findings frequently can be seen in those patients. Skin symptoms consist of angioedema; unusual urticarial lesions; and eczematous, therapy-resistant, pruriginous papules and nodules. They may be the only obvious clinical symptoms. Cutaneous features can give an important hint to the diagnosis of this rare and often severe illness. Based on advances in molecular and genetic diagnostic techniques and on increasing experience with characteristic clinical features and prognostic markers, therapy has changed radically. Current therapies include corticosteroids, hydroxyurea, interferon-α, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate, and (in progress) the monoclonal anti-interleukin-5 antibodies. This article provides an overview of current concepts of disease classification, different skin findings, and therapy for HES.

Targeting eosinophils in allergy, inflammation and beyond

Eosinophils can regulate local immune and inflammatory responses, and their accumulation in the blood and tissue is associated with several inflammatory and infectious diseases. Thus, therapies that target eosinophils may help control diverse diseases, including atopic disorders such as asthma and allergy, as well as diseases that are not primarily associated with eosinophils, such as autoimmunity and malignancy. Eosinophil-targeted therapeutic agents that are aimed at blocking specific steps involved in eosinophil development, migration and activation have recently entered clinical testing and have produced encouraging results and insights into the role of eosinophils. In this Review, we describe recent advances in the development of first-generation eosinophil-targeted therapies and highlight strategies for using personalized medicine to treat eosinophilic disorders.

Spontaneous resolution of hypereosinophilic syndrome in an infant without treatment

We report on a 4-month-old boy with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and spontaneous progressive resolution without treatment. Differential diagnosis excluded myeloproliferative, lymphocytic, familiar, associated, and overlap HES. The final diagnosis was undefined HES. Repeated measurements of blood eosinophil counts, monitoring of clonal T cells, and observation of skin lesions and organ involvement were carefully performed as an outpatient.

Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field

Eosinophils and their products play an essential role in the pathogenesis of various reactive and neoplastic disorders. Depending on the underlying disease, molecular defect and involved cytokines, hypereosinophilia may develop and may lead to organ damage. In other patients, persistent eosinophilia is accompanied by typical clinical findings, but the causative role and impact of eosinophilia remain uncertain. For patients with eosinophil-mediated organ pathology, early therapeutic intervention with agents reducing eosinophil counts can be effective in limiting or preventing irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to approach eosinophil disorders and related syndromes early by using established criteria, to perform all appropriate staging investigations, and to search for molecular targets of therapy. In this article, we review current concepts in the pathogenesis and evolution of eosinophilia and eosinophil-related organ damage in neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. In addition, we discuss classifications of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes as well as diagnostic algorithms and standard treatment for various eosinophil-related disorders.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) in a patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome showing multiple nodules on chest computed tomography

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses both myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative diseases. We encountered a rare case of lymphocytic HES followed by malignant T cell lymphoma, who was diagnosed as eosinophilic pneumonia upon the first visit. During the clinical course, the transition of the chest CT findings from bilateral multifocal ground-glass opacities and consolidations to bilateral scattered multiple small nodules was impressive and suggestive. Given the increased risk of developing T-cell lymphoma, patients with HES (especially lymphocytic-HES) should be monitored on a regular basis to detect this complication as early as possible.

Beyond hairy cell: the activity of cladribine in other hematologic malignancies

Before the contemporary development of rationally designed antineoplastic therapies, cladribine was identified as a lymphocyte-specific agent. Its profound impact on the natural history of hairy cell leukemia, with responses approaching 100% and a median duration of response of nearly a decade after only a single 7-day course, is well known and revolutionized the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. However, cladribine's impressive activity in other lymphoproliferative disorders has been generally underappreciated. Multiple single-arm phase 2 trials have demonstrated cladribine's potency across the full spectrum of lymphoid malignancies. In a limited number of phase 3 trials and cross-study analyses, cladribine compared favorably with fludarabine, another purine nucleoside analog that is more commonly used in the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancies. Cladribine has been noted to have particular activity among lymphoid disorders with few effective therapies, specifically, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. Recently approved novel agents may act in synergy with cladribine for these conditions and should be incorporated into future clinical studies.

FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-associated systemic mastocytosis

Since the identification of the FIP1L1/PDGFRA fusion gene as a pathogenic cause of the hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), the importance of the molecular classification of HES leading to the diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) has been recognized. As a result, a new category, 'myeloid and lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and abnormalities in PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1', has recently been added to the new WHO criteria for myeloid neoplasms. FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-positive disorders are characterized by clonal hypereosinophilia, multiple organ dysfunctions due to eosinophil infiltration, systemic mastocytosis (SM) and a dramatic response to treatment with imatinib mesylate. A murine HES/CEL model by the introduction of FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha and IL-5 overexpression also shows SM, representing patients with FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-positive HES/CEL/SM. The murine model and the in vitro development system of FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-positive mast cells revealed the interaction between FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha, IL-5 and stem cell factor in the development of HES/CEL/SM. Current findings of FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-positive HES/CEL are reviewed focusing on aberrant mast cell development leading to SM.