How I conduct the family meeting to discuss the limitation of life-sustaining interventions: a recipe for success

How to communicate with family members of the critically ill in the intensive care unit: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map the existing approaches to communication with family members of the critically ill in the intensive care unit and the corresponding implementation requirements and benefits.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review in February 2022 by searching PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library for articles published between 2000 and 2022. We included records of all designs that met our inclusion criteria and applied frequency counts and qualitative coding.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3749 records, 63 met inclusion criteria. The included records were of an interventional (43 %) or observational (14 %) study design or review articles (43 %), and provided information in three categories: communication platforms, strategies, and tools. For implementation in the intensive care unit, the approaches required investing time and resources. Their reported benefits were an increased quality of communication and satisfaction among all parties involved, improved psychological outcome among family members, and reduced intensive care unit length of stay and costs.

CONCLUSION

The current approaches to communication with patients' family members offer insights for the development and implementation of communication pathways in the intensive care unit of which the benefits seem to outweigh the efforts. Structured interprofessional frameworks with standardised tools based on empathic communication strategies are encouraged.

[Recommendations for the Use of Family Conferences in Family Medicine - a Scoping Review]

Background

Family conferences are pre-planned meetings between the treatment team, patient, family members and representatives of other involved disciplines on an agreed topic. There is no review of family conferences in family medicine. The aim of the scoping review is to compile the available recommendations on the use, implementation and documentation of family conferences in family medicine and other medical fields that can be transferred to the family practice setting.

Methods

Systematic literature search in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library. Articles published in German or English up to 31.12.2021 were included. The fields of family therapy, paediatrics and neonatology were excluded.

Results

The search yielded 1,557 hits; after deducting duplicates and reviewing the abstracts, 108 hits were used for the full-text review. Of these, 53 hits were included in the review. Many recommendations on the use, preparation and implementation of family conferences can be transferred to the FM setting. For successful family conferences, a structured procedure is recommended, which includes good preparation of all participants, a multi-stage procedure during the family conference itself, as well as good documentation and follow-up of the agreements. The use of proven patient-centred communication models is recommended.

Conclusions

Although there are no validated concepts for the procedure of family conferences in the FM setting, practice recommendations can be derived that should be empirically tested in practice and in studies.

Impact of Structured and Scheduled Family Meetings on Satisfaction in Patients Admitted to Hospitalist Service

Effective communication is key to patient satisfaction. Family meetings been shown to be effective in other settings such as critical care and palliative medicine. We evaluated the impact of scheduled and structured family meetings on patients admitted to the hospitalist service in terms of satisfaction with care delivery. More patients in the intervention group reported better understanding of their diagnosis, treatment plan, medications, and discharge plan. Based on these results, we advocate for structured and scheduled family meetings to be implemented as a communication tool for selected patients on the hospital medicine service to improve patient experience and satisfaction.

New concepts in palliative care in the intensive care unit

Some patients admitted to an intensive care unit may face a terminal illness situation, which usually leads to death. Knowledge of palliative care is strongly recommended for the health care providers who are taking care of these patients. In many situations, the patients should be evaluated daily as the introduction of further treatments may not be beneficial to them. The discussions among health team members that are related to prognosis and the goals of care should be carefully evaluated in collaboration with the patients and their families. The adoption of protocols related to end-of-life patients in the intensive care unit is fundamental. A multidisciplinary team is important for determining whether the withdrawal or withholding of advanced care is required. In addition, patients and families should be informed that palliative care involves the best possible care for that specific situation, as well as respect for their wishes and the consideration of social and spiritual backgrounds. Thus, the aim of this review is to present palliative care as a reasonable option to support the intensive care unit team in assisting terminally ill patients. Updates regarding diet, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis in these patients will be presented. Additionally, the hospice-model philosophy as an alternative to the intensive care unit/hospital environment will be discussed.

Electronic Goals of Care Alerts: An Innovative Strategy to Promote Primary Palliative Care

CONTEXT

Given the shortage of palliative care specialists, strategies are needed to promote primary palliative care by nonpalliative care providers. Electronic reminders are frequently used in medicine to standardize practice, but their effectiveness in encouraging goals of care discussions is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether brief education and electronic alerts increase the frequency of goals of care discussions.

METHODS

All general medicine services at a large academic medical center were included. Each medicine team received brief education on rounds about goals of care communication tool. When a newly admitted patient met predefined criteria, an electronic alert that included the tool was sent to the patient's resident and attending physicians within 48 hours.

RESULTS

Of 352 admissions screened over a four-week period, 18% met one or more criteria. The combination of alerts and education increased documentation of goals of care in the medical record from 20.5% (15/73) to 44.6% (25/56) of patients (risk ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.23-3.72). There were no significant changes in code status, noncode status limitations in care, or palliative care consultation.

CONCLUSION

The combination of brief education and electronic goals of care alerts significantly increased documented goals of care discussions. This intervention is simple and feasible in many settings, but larger studies are needed to determine impact on patient outcomes.

Communication and Trust in the Care Provided to a Dying Parent: A Nationwide Study of Cancer-Bereaved Youths

Purpose

To assess children's trust in the care provided to a dying parent during the final week of life in relation to end-of-life medical information about disease, treatment, and death.

Methods

This nationwide population-based survey included 622 (73%) of 851 youths who, 6 to 9 years earlier, at age 13 to 16 years, lost a parent to cancer. We asked about the children's reception of end-of-life professional information and trust in the care provided. We also asked about depression and several potential risk factors of distrust in the care provided.

Results

A majority (82%) reported moderate/very much trust in the care provided. Compared with children who received end-of-life medical information before their loss, the risk of distrust in the care provided was higher in those who received no information (risk ratio [RR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5 to 4.1), in those who only received information afterward (RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 5.9), and in those who did not know or remember if end-of-life medical information was provided (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5). Those reporting distrust in the care provided had an RR of 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.5) for depression. Furthermore, the risk of distrust in the care provided was higher among children reporting poor efforts to cure (RR, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.6 to 7.3), and/or a poor relationship with the surviving parent (RR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0 to 4.1).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that children's trust in the care provided to a dying parent was highest when they received end-of-life medical information before their loss.

End-of-Life Decisions about Withholding or Withdrawing Therapy: Medical, Ethical, and Religio-Cultural Considerations

Towards the end of life, physicians face dilemmas of discontinuing life-sustaining treatments or interventions. In some circumstances, these treatments are no longer of benefit, while in others the patient or family no longer want them. The physician plays an essential role in clarifying the goals of medical treatment, defining the care plan, initiating discussions about life-sustaining therapy, educating patients and families, helping them deliberate, making recommendations, and implementing the treatment plan. Communication is key. It should be clarified that when inevitable death is imminent, it is legitimate to refuse or limit forms of treatment that would only secure a precarious and burdensome prolongation of life, for as long as basic humane, compassionate care is not interrupted. Agreement to DNR status does not preclude supportive measures that keep patients free from pain and suffering as possible. Acceptable clinical practice on withdrawing or withholding treatment is based on an understanding of the medical, ethical, cultural, and religious issues. There is a need to individualize care option discussions to illness status, and patient and family preferences, beliefs, values, and cultures. The process of shared decision making between the patient, the family, and the clinicians should continue as goals evolve and change over time.