SDF-1 directs megakaryocyte relocation

The impact of different forms of exercise on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular and metabolic disease

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to vascular repair and their monitoring could have prognostic clinical value. Exercise is often prescribed for the management of cardiometabolic diseases, however, it is not fully understood how it regulates EPCs.

OBJECTIVES

to systematically examine the acute and chronic effects of different exercise modalities on circulating EPCs in patients with cardiovascular and metabolic disease.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

six electronic databases and reference lists of eligible studies were searched to April 2021. Thirty-six trials met the inclusion criteria including 1731 participants. Acute trials: in chronic heart failure (CHF), EPC mobilisation was acutely increased after high intensity interval or moderate intensity continuous exercise training, while findings were inconclusive after a cardiopulmonary cycling exercise test. Maximal exercise tests acutely increased EPCs in ischaemic or revascularized coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. In peripheral arterial disease (PAD), EPC levels increased up to 24 h post-exercise. In patients with compromised metabolic health, EPC mobilisation was blunted after a single exercise session. Chronic trials: in CHF and acute coronary syndrome, moderate intensity continuous protocols, with or without resistance exercise or calisthenics, increased EPCs irrespective of EPC identification phenotype. Findings were equivocal in CAD regardless of exercise mode, while in severe PAD disease EPCs increased. High intensity interval training increased EPCs in hypertensive metabolic syndrome and heart failure reduced ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

the clinical condition and exercise modality influence the degree of EPC mobilisation and magnitude of EPC increases in the long term.

The impact of different forms of exercise on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular and metabolic disease

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to vascular repair and their monitoring could have prognostic clinical value. Exercise is often prescribed for the management of cardiometabolic diseases, however, it is not fully understood how it regulates EPCs.

OBJECTIVES

to systematically examine the acute and chronic effects of different exercise modalities on circulating EPCs in patients with cardiovascular and metabolic disease.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

six electronic databases and reference lists of eligible studies were searched to April 2021. Thirty-six trials met the inclusion criteria including 1731 participants. Acute trials: in chronic heart failure (CHF), EPC mobilisation was acutely increased after high intensity interval or moderate intensity continuous exercise training, while findings were inconclusive after a cardiopulmonary cycling exercise test. Maximal exercise tests acutely increased EPCs in ischaemic or revascularized coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. In peripheral arterial disease (PAD), EPC levels increased up to 24 h post-exercise. In patients with compromised metabolic health, EPC mobilisation was blunted after a single exercise session. Chronic trials: in CHF and acute coronary syndrome, moderate intensity continuous protocols, with or without resistance exercise or calisthenics, increased EPCs irrespective of EPC identification phenotype. Findings were equivocal in CAD regardless of exercise mode, while in severe PAD disease EPCs increased. High intensity interval training increased EPCs in hypertensive metabolic syndrome and heart failure reduced ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

the clinical condition and exercise modality influence the degree of EPC mobilisation and magnitude of EPC increases in the long term.

Analysis of genetic and clinical risk factors of post-transplant thrombocytopenia in kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Hematological abnormalities after transplantation are complications that may arise after renal transplantation, of which thrombocytopenia is associated with increased risk of bleeding and other complications. The development of thrombocytopenia is affected by various clinical conditions, and the stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF1) and platelet factor 4 (PF4) genes are known to be involved in the production or destruction of platelets. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of posttransplant thrombocytopenia and its association with other clinical conditions and genetic polymorphisms of SDF1 and PF4 genes a long time after transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that includes a total of 305 kidney transplant (KT) recipients between 2008 and 2012 at St. Vincent Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. In this study, posttransplant thrombocytopenia was defined as a 30% reduction in platelet count from the baseline in the first week or a decrease of <100 (×10³/μL) within 1 year after KT. The subjects were divided into posttransplant thrombocytopenia and control groups. The chi-square test, t-test, and logistic regression were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

In the first week, 65 patients had a 30% reduction in platelet count (21.3%). Gender, simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation, induction therapy (IT), and only alleles of rs2297630 of SDF1, among the SDF1 and PF4 genes, showed statistically significant differences. The rs2297630 alleles were consistently significant risk factors (non G vs. G: odds ratio = 0.445; 95% confidence interval, 0.224-0.884; p = .021) in the multiple logistic regression. In the 1-year study, 61 patients (20.0%) had platelet counts of <100 × 10³/μL and had statistically significant differences in patients who had delayed graft function and induction therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, non-G group of rs2297630 in SDF1 significantly increased the risk of post-transplant thrombocytopenia in the first week of kidney transplantation.