Impact of CTLA4 genotype and other immune response gene polymorphisms on outcomes after single umbilical cord blood transplantation

Genetic Polymorphisms of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and clinical outcomes post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although HLA matching is considered as a key genetic predictor of allo-HSCT outcomes, genetic polymorphisms in non-HLA genes, especially in genes encoding immunoregulatory proteins, have also been proposed as additional risk factors linked to the occurrence of transplant complications. This study aimed to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis from all eligible cohort studies to determine the effect of CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms, including rs231775, rs3087243, rs4553808, rs5742909, and rs733618, on clinical outcomes in patients receiving an allo-HSCT.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed to identify the relevant studies, and related information was extracted. The effect size (ES) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the association.

RESULTS

16 studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that only the dominant models of rs3087243 were significantly associated with chronic GVHD (cGVHD), while other SNPs were not significantly associated with overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse, and GVHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study represents, for the first time, a comprehensive meta-analysis on the role of CTLA-4 polymorphisms on outcomes after allo-HSCT. The results indicate that the CT60 CTLA-4 polymorphism could be a significant risk factor for cGVHD.

Association of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) single nucleotide polymorphism in donors with clinical outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) polymorphisms at positions of +49 and CT60 in donors have been reported to influence clinical outcome following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), such as overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), relapse and the risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, the results still remain controversial. Thus, we conducted the first meta-analysis to get a more accurate estimation of the relationship between CTLA-4 genotype and the above end points.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library were searched to select eligible studies, data were extracted and then combined ORs/HRs together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Both the dominant and recessive models were employed to evaluate the associations between genetic variation in donor CTLA-4 and outcome after allo-HSCT.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included the pooled results indicated that +49 GG homozygote in donors was significantly associated with increased risk of chronic GVHD (OR=1.701, 95% CI, 1.124-2.573, P=0.012, I²=34.7%). With regard to CT60 polymorphism, donors with G allele correlated with worse OS (HR = 1.422, 95% CI, 1.080-1.872, P=0.012, I²=0%) and lower susceptibility to severe acute GVHD (HR=0.619, 95% CI, 0.426-0.899, P=0.012, I²=0%). There was no significant association between CTLA-4 polymorphism and DFS or the incidence of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggests that donors with CT60 G allele might be associated with worse OS but reduced severe aGVHD occurrence, while patients transplanted from donors with GG genotype at position of +49 are more likely to suffer from cGVHD.

The wider perspective: cord blood banks and their future prospects

Over the past three decades, cord blood transplantation (CBT) has established its role as an alternative allograft stem cell source. But the future of stored CB units should be to extend their use in updated transplant approaches and develop new CB applications. Thus, CBT will require a coordinated, multicentric, review of transplantation methods and an upgrade and realignment of banking resources and operations. Significant improvements have already been proposed to support the clinical perspective including definition of the cellular threshold for engraftment, development of transplantation methods for adult patients, engraftment acceleration with single cell expansion and homing technologies, personalised protocols to improve efficacy, use of adoptive cell therapy to mitigate delayed immune reconstitution, and further enhancement of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect using advanced therapies. The role of CB banks in improving transplantation results are also critical by optimizing the collection, processing, storage and characterization of CB units, and improving reproducibility, efficiency and cost of banking. But future developments beyond transplantation are needed. This implies the extension from transplantation banks to banks that support cell therapy, regenerative medicine and specialized transfusion medicine. This new "CB banking 2.0" concept will require promotion of international scientific and technical collaborations between bank specialists, clinical investigators and transplant physicians.

The Role of CTLA4 and Its Polymorphisms in Solid Organ and Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

HLA matching, transplantation technique, or underlying disease greatly influences the probability of long-term transplantation success. It has been hypothesised that genetic variation affecting antigen presentation also contributes to the outcomes of both solid organ transplantation and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Those genes, along with those responsible for innate and adaptive immunity, have become targets of investigation. In this review, we focus on the role of CTLA4 in the process of acute graft rejection and summarise the progress in our understanding of its role in predicting the outcome. We present the results of the latest studies investigating the link between CTLA4 gene variability and AHSCT, as well as organ transplantation outcomes. While some studies found a link between +49 A/G and −318 C/T and transplantation outcomes, comprehensive meta-analyses have failed to present any association. The most recent field reviews suggest that the −1772 T/C (rs733618) CC genotype is weakly associated with a lower risk of acute graft rejection, while +49 A/G might be clinically meaningful when investigated in the context of combinations with other polymorphisms. Studies verifying associations between 12 CTLA4 gene SNPs and AHSCT outcomes present inexplicit results. Some of the most commonly studied polymorphisms in this context include +49 A/G (rs231775) and CT60 A/G (rs3087243). The results signify that, in order to understand the role of CTLA4 and its gene polymorphisms in transplantology, further studies must be conducted.

Umbilical cord blood transplantation and the impact of the CTLA4 genotype on outcomes

Background: Umbilical cord blood transplantation is an effective method of curing multiple diseases when there is no donor available for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). It has been recently suggested that polymorphisms in genes affecting antigen presentation could potentially affect cord blood transplantation (CBT) outcomes.Areas covered: In this review, we present the results of the latest studies investigating the link between CTLA4 gene variability and umbilical cord blood transplantation outcomes.Expert opinion: The search for genetic variants that influence the immune response, both innate and adaptive immunity, may lead to more optimal therapies. Promising candidate genes are those that regulate the expression of proteins associated with T-cell activation. Many genetic variants could be therapeutically important, including those related to innate and adaptive immunity, cytokines, chemokines, drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and inflammatory enzymes. The development of an algorithm that includes the determination of selected genetic variants could be helpful for an appropriate donor-recipient CBT matching.

Biomarkers for checkpoint inhibition in hematologic malignancies

In the past few years we have seen remarkable paradigm shifts in the treatment of many solid tumors due to the introduction of inhibitors targeting immune checkpoints such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Recent results indicate that checkpoint inhibition also represents a very promising approach for certain types of hematologic malignancies. Unfortunately, treatment with checkpoint inhibitors is also associated with substantial toxicities and high costs and only a subset of patients appears to derive clinical benefit from these treatments. This demonstrates the urgent need for biomarkers for the identification of patient populations that are likely to respond to this type of therapy and/or have fewer side effects. Here, we have reviewed available information on the prognostic and predictive value of biomarkers for anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as the most commonly used checkpoint inhibitors. There are currently no reliable biomarkers capable of predicting responses to anti-CTLA-4 agents, such as ipilimumab, in hematologic malignancies. Certain polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene, however, seem to have an impact on the patients' outcome, especially in the case of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). There is now sufficient data supporting PD-L1 expression levels in the tumor tissue as an independent prognostic factor in B cell lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Overexpression of PD-L1 in the tumor tissue and elevated serum levels of soluble PD-L1 may also represent adverse prognostic factors in certain subtypes of T cell lymphomas. Finally, expression levels of PD-L1 also seem to predict responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 approaches in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Future studies will have to further delineate the prognostic/predictive role of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker in hematologic malignancies and may be able to identify confounding variables, which will hopefully to some extent be generalizable to other types of anti-tumor immunotherapies.

Optimal Practices in Unrelated Donor Cord Blood Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

Unrelated donor cord blood transplantation (CBT) results in disease-free survival comparable to that of unrelated adult donor transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies. Extension of allograft access to racial and ethnic minorities, rapid graft availability, flexibility of transplantation date, and low risks of disabling chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse are significant advantages of CBT, and multiple series have reported a low risk of late transplantation-related mortality (TRM) post-transplantation. Nonetheless, early post-transplantation morbidity and TRM and the requirement for intensive early post-transplantation management have slowed the adoption of CBT. Targeted care strategies in CBT recipients can mitigate early transplantation complications and reduce transplantation costs. Herein we provide a practical "how to" guide to CBT for hematologic malignancies on behalf of the National Marrow Donor Program and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation's Cord Blood Special Interest Group. It shares the best practices of 6 experienced US transplantation centers with a special interest in the use of cord blood as a hematopoietic stem cell source. We address donor search and unit selection, unit thaw and infusion, conditioning regimens, immune suppression, management of GVHD, opportunistic infections, and other factors in supportive care appropriate for CBT. Meticulous attention to such details has improved CBT outcomes and will facilitate the success of CBT as a platform for future graft manipulations.