Pre-PMF emerging as important subgroup of MPN

A lasso and random forest model using flow cytometry data identifies primary myelofibrosis

Thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF), and overt fibrotic PMF (overt PMF) are classical Philadelphia-Negative (Ph-negative) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Differentiating between these types based on morphology and molecular markers is challenging. This study aims to clarify the application of flow cytometry in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of classical MPNs. This study retrospectively analyzed the immunophenotypes, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings of 211 Ph-negative MPN patients, including ET, PV, pre-PMF, overt PMF, and 47 controls. Compared to ET and PV, PMF differed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, blast cells in the peripheral blood, abnormal karyotype, and WT1 gene expression. PMF also differed from controls in CD34+ cells, granulocyte phenotype, monocyte phenotype, percentage of plasma cells, and dendritic cells. Notably, the PMF group had a significantly lower plasma cell percentage compared with other groups. A lasso and random forest model select five variables (CD34+CD19+cells and CD34+CD38- cells on CD34+cells, CD13dim+CD11b- cells in granulocytes, CD38str+CD19+/-plasma, and CD123+HLA-DR-basophils), which identify PMF with a sensitivity and specificity of 90%. Simultaneously, a classification and regression tree model was constructed using the percentage of CD34+CD38- on CD34+ cells and platelet counts to distinguish between ET and pre-PMF, with accuracies of 94.3% and 83.9%, respectively. Flow immunophenotyping aids in diagnosing PMF and differentiating between ET and PV. It also helps distinguish pre-PMF from ET and guides treatment decisions.

International Consensus Classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms: myeloproliferative neoplasms

The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms summarized the results of an in-depth effort by pathologists, oncologists, and geneticists aimed to update the 2017 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. Along these lines, several important modifications were implemented in the classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). For chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR::ABL1-positive, the definition of accelerated and blast phase was simplified, and in the BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs, the classification was slightly updated to improve diagnostic specificity with a more detailed and better validated morphologic approach and the recommendation of more sensitive molecular techniques to capture in particular early stage diseases. In this regard, high sensitive single target (RT-qPCR, ddPCR) or multi-target next-generation sequencing assays with a minimal sensitivity of VAF 1% are now important for a proper diagnostic identification of MPN cases with low allelic frequencies at initial presentation. This review discusses the updated diagnostic criteria of MPN according to the ICC, particularly by highlighting the new concepts and how they can be applied in clinical settings to obtain an appropriate prognostic relevant diagnosis.

The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms

A group of international experts, including hematopathologists, oncologists, and geneticists were recently summoned (September 2021, Chicago, IL, USA) to update the 2016/17 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. After careful deliberation, the group introduced the new International Consensus Classification (ICC) for Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias. This current in-depth review focuses on the ICC-2022 category of JAK2 mutation-prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and MPN, unclassifiable. The ICC MPN subcommittee chose to preserve the primary role of bone marrow morphology in disease classification and diagnostics, while also acknowledging the complementary role of genetic markers for establishing clonality, facilitating MPN subtype designation, and disease prognostication.

The different variant allele frequencies of type I/type II mutations and the distinct molecular landscapes in CALR-mutant essential thrombocythaemia and primary myelofibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Calreticulin (CALR) mutations have been identified as driver mutations in a quarter of patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), which are subgroups of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). A 52-bp deletion (type I mutation) and a 5-bp insertion (type II mutation) are the most frequent variants. To better understand the impact of different CALR mutant variants, with or without nondriver mutations, on the clinical subtypes of MPN needs further investigation.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters and genetic mutation statuses were analysed in a cohort of 77 MPN patients with CALR mutations (ET = 24, prePMF = 33, and overt PMF = 20). Targeted NGS using a 38-gene panel was performed to evaluate the variant allele frequency (VAF) of CALR type I/type II mutations and assess the molecular landscape of nondriver gene mutations.

RESULTS

A lower VAF of type I vs. type II was observed in CALR-mutant ET, prePMF and overt PMF, and a higher frequency of type I vs. type II was found in CALR-mutant overt PMF. Additional somatic mutations were indicated to be useful in understanding the pathogenesis of MPN. In this study, the mutation landscape was more complex in overt PMF than in ET or in prePMF. Mutations in epigenetic regulators (ASXL1, EZH2 and TET2) were more common in overt PMF.

CONCLUSIONS

The two different subtypes of CALR mutations may have different impacts on MPN. A lower VAF of CALR type I indicates a greater contribution to disease progression in MPN, and increased nondriver mutations may be important in myelofibrosis progression.

The differences of hemogram, myelogram, and driver gene mutations in classic myeloproliferative neoplasms

The aim of this study was to explore and compare routine blood features and pathological characteristics of bone marrow tissues in essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis, prefibrotic stage (prePMF) and overt fibrotic stage (overtPMF), and the correlation between common driver gene mutations and clinical manifestations of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Methods: We analyzed 259 MPN patients treated at Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2016 to December 2020. Results: Among ET, PV, prePMF, and overtPMF, the median leukocyte counts of PV and prePMF were significantly higher than those of ET. The average hemoglobin level of overtPMF was significantly lower than that of ET, PV, and prePMF. ET and prePMF had higher platelet counts than PV and overtPMF, whereas ET had the lowest platelet distribution width. Regarding hematopoietic tissues in the bone marrow, enlarged megakaryocytes were easily found in ET, PV, and prePMF, whereas the average diameter of megakaryocytes in prePMF was smaller than in ET, and PV showed various sizes of megakaryocytes. An increased M/E ratio and dilation of sinus were seen more frequently in PMF. Additionally, JAK2-positive patients tended to have significantly higher leukocyte counts than CALR-positive patients in ET and PMF.

A multistate model of survival prediction and event monitoring in prefibrotic myelofibrosis

Among 382 patients with WHO-defined prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) followed for a median of 6.9 years, fibrotic or leukemic transformation or death accounts for 15, 7, and 27% of cases, respectively. A multistate model was applied to analyze survival data taking into account intermediate states that are part of the clinical course of pre-PMF, including overt PMF and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Within this multistate framework, multivariable models disclosed older age (>65 years) and leukocytosis (>15 × 10⁹/L) as predictors of death and leukemic transformation. The risk factors for fibrotic progression included anemia and grade 1 bone marrow fibrosis. The outcome was further affected by high molecular risk (HMR) but not driver mutations. Direct transition to overt PMF, AML, or death occurred in 15.2, 4.7, and 17.3% of patients, respectively. The risk of AML was the highest in the first 5 years (7%), but leveled off thereafter. Conversely, the probability of death from overt PMF or AML increased more rapidly over time, especially when compared to death in the pre-PMF state without disease progression. The probability of being alive with pre-PMF status decreased to 70 and 30% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. This study highlights the aspects of the clinical course and estimates of disease progression in pre-PMF.

The new WHO classification for essential thrombocythemia calls for revision of available evidences

In the 2016 revised classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity, distinct from essential thrombocythemia (ET). Owing that the majority of cases falling in the pre-PMF category were previously diagnosed as ET, one may question about the need to re-evaluate the results of epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular studies, and the results of clinical trials in the two entities. Based on a critical review of recently published studies, pre-PMF usually presents with a distinct clinical and hematological presentation and higher frequency of constitutional symptoms. JAK2V617F and CALR mutations in pre-PMF patients are superimposable to ET, whereas non-driver high-risk mutations are enriched in pre-PMF compared with ET. Thrombosis is not significantly different, whereas bleeding is more frequent in pre-PMF. Median survival is significantly shorter in pre-PMF and 10-year cumulative rates progression to overt myelofibrosis is 0-1% vs. 10-12%, and leukemic transformation is 1-2% vs. 2-6%, in ET and pre-fibrotic-PMF, respectively. Most patients fall in the lower prognostic IPSS group in which observation alone can be recommended. Patients at intermediate risk may require a symptom-driven treatment for anemia, splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms while cytoreductive drugs are indicated in the high-risk category.

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: treatment algorithm 2018

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) is a distinct entity among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm diagnosed according to the revised 2016 WHO classification. The clinical picture is heterogeneous, ranging from isolated thrombocytosis, mimicking essential thrombocythemia (ET), to symptoms of high-risk PMF. Retrospective studies showed that survival of patients with pre-PMF is worse than that of ET and better than overt PMF. Whilst a specific prognostic score is lacking, the International Prognostic Scoring System is able to predict survival in pre-PMF patients, yet failing to separate intermediate-1 and -2 groups, and can be used in clinical practice. Each patient should be evaluated for, and interventions adapted to, both life-expectancy and the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. In low-risk patients with expected long survival, observation only is recommended; in cumulated intermediate-1 and -2 risk cases, whose median survival is projected at more than 10 years, treatment is based on symptoms; in high risk cases, with median survival lower than 5 years, intensive management is required. A pragmatic approach to address the risk of bleeding and thrombosis includes: no treatment or low-dose aspirin in asymptomatic patients; aspirin or oral anticoagulation if previous arterial or venous thrombosis, and hydroxyurea as first-line cytoreduction in case of thrombocytosis or leukocytosis.

Diagnosis and management of prefibrotic myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

The 2016 WHO classification comprises two stages of primary myelofibrosis (PMF): early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) and overt fibrotic PMF (overt PMF). Diagnostic criteria rely on bone marrow morphology, fibrosis grade (0-1 in pre-PMF, 2-3 in overt PMF), and clinical features (leukoerythroblastosis, anemia, leucocytosis, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and palpable splenomegaly). An accurate differentiation from essential thrombocythemia (ET) is pivotal because the two entities show different clinical presentation and outcome, in terms of survival, leukemic evolution, and rates of progression to overt myelofibrosis. Areas covered: The current review provides an overview on how to diagnose and stratify patients with pre-PMF, taking into account their definite and peculiar risk of vascular event, which is often neglected, and their milder disease course, compared with overt PMF, with the aim of improving and individualizing their counseling and management. Expert commentary: Pre-PMF is a new entity characterized by a unique combination of both a thrombo-hemorrhagic risk (that brings it closer to PV and ET) and a definite risk of disease evolution (that places pre-PMF somewhat closer to the overt PMF variant).

The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion

The new edition of the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was published in September 2017. Under the category of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), the revised document includes seven subcategories: chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), chronic eosinophilic leukemia-not otherwise specified and MPN, unclassifiable (MPN-U); of note, mastocytosis is no longer classified under the MPN category. In the current review, we focus on the diagnostic criteria for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutation-related MPNs: PV, ET, and PMF. In this regard, the 2016 changes were aimed at facilitating the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET and between prefibrotic/early and overtly fibrotic PMF. In the current communication, we (i) provide practically useful resource tables and graphs on the new diagnostic criteria including outcome, (ii) elaborate on the rationale for the 2016 changes, (iii) discuss the complementary role of mutation screening, (iv) address ongoing controversies and propose solutions, (v) attend to the challenges of applying WHO criteria in routine clinical practice, and (vi) outline future directions from the perspectives of the clinical pathologist.

The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion

The new edition of the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was published in September 2017. Under the category of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), the revised document includes seven subcategories: chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), chronic eosinophilic leukemia-not otherwise specified and MPN, unclassifiable (MPN-U); of note, mastocytosis is no longer classified under the MPN category. In the current review, we focus on the diagnostic criteria for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutation-related MPNs: PV, ET, and PMF. In this regard, the 2016 changes were aimed at facilitating the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET and between prefibrotic/early and overtly fibrotic PMF. In the current communication, we (i) provide practically useful resource tables and graphs on the new diagnostic criteria including outcome, (ii) elaborate on the rationale for the 2016 changes, (iii) discuss the complementary role of mutation screening, (iv) address ongoing controversies and propose solutions, (v) attend to the challenges of applying WHO criteria in routine clinical practice, and (vi) outline future directions from the perspectives of the clinical pathologist.