Health-related quality of life in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with blinatumomab

Treatment of Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Adult Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

For adult patients diagnosed with relapsed B cell-ALL (B-ALL), there have been significant improvements in available treatment options following the FDA approval of novel cellular and immunotherapy approaches - blinatumomab, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy, and inotuzumab. For the last several years, research has focused on gaining a better understanding of the effects of specific disease and patient characteristics on long-term outcomes with each of the FDA-approved agents. In combination with the better prevention and management of unique, treatment-specific toxicities, providers can now select the best available treatment option for each individual patient diagnosed with relapsed, adult B-ALL needing therapy. This has allowed more patients to proceed to consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and long-term data has even brought into question the need for HSCT for long-term durable remission for all patients. However, with the adoption of blinatumomab, CAR T therapy, and inotuzumab in front-line treatment regimens, it remains unclear what effects this will have on patients with relapsed B-ALL following exposure to these novel cellular and immunotherapy therapies. Unlike B-ALL, similar advances have unfortunately not yet been realized in T cell-ALL (T-ALL). Currently, new therapeutic approaches are underway to utilize similar targeting strategies that have been successful in B-ALL - monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), and CAR T therapy. Like B-ALL, the only existing approved therapy for relapsed T-ALL, nelarabine, is now used in the upfront treatment setting potentially limiting its utility in relapsed disease. Over the next several years, the hope is for patients diagnosed with T-ALL to experience the drastic improvement in outcomes as has been seen for patients diagnosed with B-ALL over the last decade.

Immune therapies of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-cell ALL) is a common haematologic cancer in children and adults. About 10 percent of children and 50 percent of adults fail to achieve a histological complete remission or subsequently relapse despite current anti-leukaemia drug therapies and/or haematopoietic cell transplants. Several new immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells are proved safe and effective in this setting. We review data on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immune therapies for B-cell ALL in children and adults including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We also summarize pharmaco-dynamics, pharmaco-kinetics, and pharmaco-economics of these interventions.

Successful treatment with blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an older adult patient complicated with hepatocarcinoma

An 82-year-old man with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) complicated by hepatocarcinoma was presented. Remission induction therapy of hyper-CVAD with half dose reduction achieved hematological complete remission (CR), but accompanied with elevated alanine aminotransferase and hyperbilirubinemia. The patient was thought intolerable for hyper-CVAD with half dose reduction due to liver toxicity, and treatment was switched to blinatumomab. Hematological CR was sustained after nine cycles of blinatumomab without exacerbation of liver dysfunction. After five courses of blinatumomab, hepatocarcinoma was treated successfully by trans-arterial chemoembolization. Two years after the diagnosis of ALL, the patient was alive in CR status of ALL.

Cost-Effectiveness of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients with High-Risk First-Relapse B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in France

BACKGROUND

Based on the results of the phase III randomized 20120215 trial, the European Medicines Agency granted the approval of blinatumomab for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In France, blinatumomab received reimbursement for this indication in May 2022. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of blinatumomab compared with high-risk consolidation chemotherapy (HC3) in this indication from a French healthcare and societal perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with three health states (event-free, post-event and death) was developed to estimate life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs over a lifetime horizon. Patients who were alive after 5 years were considered to be cured. An excess mortality rate was applied to capture the late effects of cancer therapy. Utility values were based on the TOWER trial using French tariffs, and cost input data were identified from French national public health sources. The model was validated by clinical experts.

RESULTS

Treatment with blinatumomab over HC3 was estimated to provide gains of 8.39 LYs and 7.16 QALYs. Total healthcare costs for blinatumomab and HC3 were estimated to be €154,326 and €102,028, respectively, resulting in an increment of €52,298. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be €7308 per QALY gained from a healthcare perspective. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses, including analysis from the societal perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Blinatumomab administered as part of consolidation therapy in pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed ALL is cost effective compared with HC3 from the French healthcare and societal perspective.

Sequencing antigen-targeting antibodies and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The recent approvals of four CD19-or CD22-targeted therapies for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) disease. Adults with r/r B-ALL are usually eligible for all options, but there are no studies directly comparing these agents, and the treating physician must decide which to select. Each therapy has notable activity as a single agent but has limitations in particular settings, and the optimal choice varies. These therapies can be complementary and used either sequentially or concomitantly. Here, we review the current landscape of antigen-targeted therapies for r/r B-ALL and discuss considerations for their use.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Optimal Timing of Blinatumomab for the Treatment of B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab is a CD19 targeting bi-specific T-cell engager antibody construct developed for the treatment of CD19 expressing B-cell malignancies. Numerous adult and pediatric B-ALL clinical trials have demonstrated blinatumomab's efficacy in the relapse setting as well as in patients with residual disease after upfront chemotherapy. The safety profile of blinatumomab is also favorable, making it a feasible option for most patients. Several key questions remain, including the role of blinatumomab as a replacement for toxic elements of standard chemotherapy regimens in the upfront setting, its role as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or whether previous blinatumomab impacts the efficacy of subsequent CAR-T cell therapy.

A Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Considerations in Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meetings (2016-2021)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to gain insight into the role of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) reviews and recommendations by documenting PRO-related considerations that appear in transcripts of ODAC meetings over a 6-year period (2016-2021).

METHODS

ODAC meeting transcripts were reviewed for any mention of PRO-related concepts. Meetings that reviewed biosimilars and meetings that discussed conceptual matters were excluded. For each identified transcript, the meeting date, brand and generic names of the drug, and indication were collected from the meeting minutes. Comments by ODAC members, FDA reviewers, and study sponsors on PRO data were captured during the review. Qualitative review of transcripts included both reading and searching for key terms, including PROs, quality of life, and health-related quality of life. Discussion of PRO-related topics was captured verbatim, organized thematically, and analyzed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven transcripts of reviews were identified for 2016-2021. Topics related to PROs were included in 12 of those 27 reviews. The ODAC was satisfied with PROs included in 2 of those 12 reviews. Reasons for dissatisfaction in 10 of the 12 reviews included key concepts not assessed (5/12), missing data (5/12), and disagreement with sponsors' interpretation (3/12). The ODAC also expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of PRO data in 6 of 15 reviews that did not include PROs.

CONCLUSION

Less than half of ODAC reviews in 2016-2021 included PROs, and reviewers expressed frustration at the lack of PRO data. Even when included, evidence on the basis of PROs was rarely deemed adequate for benefit-risk assessments.

Switching from salvage chemotherapy to immunotherapy in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

About one-half of adults with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who do not achieve molecular complete remission or who subsequently relapse are not cured by current chemo- or targeted therapies. Previously, the sole therapeutic option for such persons was a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Recently, several immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CARs) have been shown safe and effective in this setting. In this manuscript, we summarize data on US FDA-approved immune therapies of advanced adult B-ALL including rituximab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We consider the results of clinical trials focusing on efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL). Real-world evidence is presented as well. We also briefly discuss pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacoeconomics followed by risk-benefit analyses. Lastly, we present future directions of immune therapies for advanced B-ALL in adults.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review

The inclusion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy research is critical for understanding the impact of this novel approach from a unique patient standpoint. We performed a scoping review to map the available literature on the use of PRO measures in CAR T-cell therapy studies of patients with hematologic malignancies published between January 2015 and July 2022. Fourteen studies were identified, of which 7 (50%) were investigational early-phase trials, 6 (42.9%) were observational studies, and 1 (7.1%) was a pilot study. The EQ-5D and the PROMIS-29 were the 2 most frequently used PRO measures, being included in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively. Despite differences in study designs, there seems to be evidence of improvements over time since CAR T-cell infusion in important domains such as physical functioning and fatigue, at least in patients who respond to therapy. Overall, the studies identified in our review have shown the added value of PRO assessment in CAR T-cell therapy research by providing novel information that complements the knowledge on safety and efficacy. However, there are several questions which remain to be answered in future research. For example, limited evidence exists regarding patient experience during important phases of the disease trajectory as only 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7%) studies provided information on PROs during the first 2 weeks from CAR T-cell infusion and after the first year, respectively. Time is ripe for a more systematic implementation of high-quality PRO assessment in future clinical trials and in real-life settings of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.

Clinical Development and Therapeutic Applications of Bispecific Antibodies for Hematologic Malignancies

Bispecific antibodies are composed of two monoclonal antibodies that engage T cells with tumor cell antigens and lead to tumor cell lysis. The most common types fall into the category of bispecific T cell engagers, or BiTEs, that have the canonical CD3-CD19 bispecific construct. Blinatumomab is the first bispecific antibody that received FDA approval for relapsed refractory B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blinatumomab has been shown to have robust clinical outcomes and is associated with adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Other bispecific antibodies are under clinical investigation for multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia. Along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen T cell receptor therapies, bispecific antibodies are considered a mainstay as a therapeutic option for cancer immunotherapies for Hematologic malignancies.

Long-term quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide vs chemotherapy

Patients with APL treated with ATRA-ATO reported better long-term quality of life outcomes than patients treated with chemotherapy.

Late comorbidity and health problem prevalence was similar between patients with APL previously treated with ATRA-ATO or chemotherapy.

The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term health-related quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) vs ATRA plus standard chemotherapy. Patients previously enrolled in the randomized controlled trial APL0406 were considered eligible for this follow-up study. The following patient-reported outcome measures were used: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (QLQ-CIPN20), and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The prevalence of late comorbidities and health problems was also assessed. The clinical significance of differences was evaluated based on predefined thresholds. A total of 161 of 232 potentially eligible patients were analyzed, of whom 83 were treated with ATRA-ATO and 78 were treated with ATRA chemotherapy. The median time since diagnosis of the study sample was 8 years. The 2 largest clinically meaningful differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were observed for role functioning (Δ = 8.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 16.3) and dyspnea (Δ = −8.5; 95% CI, −16.4 to −0.7), favoring patients treated with ATRA-ATO. With regard to the SF-36 results, a clinically relevant better physical component score (Δ = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.8) was observed in patients treated with ATRA-ATO, but this was not the case for the mental component score. The 2 groups showed similar profiles in the scores of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scales and in the prevalence of late comorbidities. Overall, our findings suggest that the greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATRA-ATO is also associated with better long-term patient-reported outcomes than ATRA chemotherapy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03096496.

International perspectives on suboptimal patient-reported outcome trial design and reporting in cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

Evidence suggests that the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of cancer trial protocols is frequently inadequate and non-reporting of PRO findings is widespread. This qualitative study examined the factors influencing suboptimal PRO protocol content, implementation, and reporting, and use of PRO data during clinical interactions.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four stakeholder groups: (1) trialists and chief investigators; (2) people with lived experience of cancer; (3) international experts in PRO cancer trial design; (4) journal editors, funding panelists, and regulatory agencies. Data were analyzed using directed thematic analysis with an iterative coding frame.

RESULTS

Forty-four interviews were undertaken. Several factors were identified that could influenced effective integration of PROs into trials and subsequent findings. Participants described (1) late inclusion of PROs in trial design; (2) PROs being considered a lower priority outcome compared to survival; (3) trialists' reluctance to collect or report PROs due to participant burden, missing data, and perceived reticence of journals to publish; (4) lack of staff training. Strategies to address these included training research personnel and improved communication with site staff and patients regarding the value of PROs. Examples of good practice were identified.

CONCLUSION

Misconceptions relating to PRO methodology and its use may undermine their planning, collection, and reporting. There is a role for funding, regulatory, methodological, and journalistic institutions to address perceptions around the value of PROs, their position within the trial outcomes hierarchy, that PRO training and guidance is available, signposted, and readily accessible, with accompanying measures to ensure compliance with international best practice guidelines.

Health-related quality of life in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a systematic literature review

Introduction: Remarkable advances have been made in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) research over the past decades and many patients can now also be cured without traditional chemotherapy. Therefore, the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other types of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is highly relevant in the current APL treatment landscape.Areas covered: A systematic literature review was performed to identify APL studies assessing HRQoL that were published over the last 15 years. Eligible studies were evaluated on a predetermined data extraction form including information on the study design, PRO measure used, as well patient characteristics and summary of HRQoL findings. For descriptive purposes, selected studies were grouped and discussed based on the type of treatment: standard chemotherapy only versus those also including more recent targeted arsenic trioxide (ATO)-based strategies.Expert opinion: Inclusion of HRQoL in APL research was important to better understand the benefit-risk profile of intravenous ATO compared to traditional chemotherapy. While some information on HRQoL and symptoms in APL survivors treated with standard chemotherapy is available, the long-term effects of ATO therapy on patients' HRQoL are largely unknown. Additionally, future studies are needed to evaluate the potential advantages of oral ATO over intravenous administration.

A Systematic Review of Blinatumomab in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Engaging an Old Problem With New Solutions

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current literature for blinatumomab in the treatment of adult and pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a PubMed (inception to December 11, 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov systematic literature search using the following terms: blinatumomab, Blincyto, lymphoblastic leukemia, and bispecific T-cell engager.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant published articles, package inserts, and meeting abstracts evaluating the use of blinatumomab in ALL were considered for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Blinatumomab, a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager monoclonal antibody, facilitates cytotoxic T-cell activation and subsequent eradication of CD19-positive B cells. The confirmatory phase III TOWER trial demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) with blinatumomab compared with standard chemotherapy (7.7 months vs 4.0 months) in relapsed and refractory (R/R) B-cell ALL. In the phase II BLAST trial, blinatumomab achieved a complete measurable residual disease (MRD) response in 78% of evaluable patients, with a median OS of 36.5 months. Potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in approximately 15% and 65% of patients, respectively.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Following initial Food and Drug Administration approval in 2014, blinatumomab gained expanded approval in pediatric patients and in Philadelphia chromosome-positive R/R ALL. In 2018, blinatumomab became the first and only drug approved for the treatment of persistent MRD in any hematologic malignancy. Emerging data demonstrate promising efficacy with blinatumomab in specific ALL settings, including frontline therapy, as a bridge to transplantation, and in "chemotherapy-free" combination regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Blinatumomab provides a paradigm-shifting treatment option; however, many questions surrounding optimal patient selection, sequencing, and cost-effectiveness remain.

Time to health-related quality of life improvement analysis was developed to enhance evaluation of modern anticancer therapies

OBJECTIVES

Major advances have recently been made in the treatments of cancer, which now also have the potential to improve patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We propose the time to HRQOL improvement (TTI) and the time to sustained HRQOL improvement (TTSI) as potentially important cancer outcomes to be used in longitudinal HRQOL analyses.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

As proof of principle, we defined TTI and TTSI, using the Fine-Gray model to include competing risks in estimates, in a case study in real life of a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with cancer receiving a targeted therapy. HRQOL was evaluated before and during therapy with six assessments over a 24-month period, using the well-validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30.

RESULTS

For each assessed HRQOL domain, we assessed TTI and TTSI and estimated the cumulative incidence of patients' clinically meaningful improvements, also accounting for the occurrence of competing events.

CONCLUSION

TTI and TTSI are potentially important outcomes in the era of modern anticancer therapies. The analysis of TTI and TTSI by competing risks approach will further add to the statistical methods that can be used to inform on the impact of cancer therapies on patients' HRQOL.

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia

Acute leukemia is a constellation of rapidly progressing diseases that affect a wide range of patients regardless of age or gender. Traditional treatment options for patients with acute leukemia include chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. The advent of cancer immunotherapy has had a significant impact on acute leukemia treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have efficacy and have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline composed of consensus recommendations on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.

New monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are characterized by an unfavorable outcome in the majority of adult cases. Several clinical trials have confirmed the usefulness of a pediatric-type therapy applied to adult patients. Adults present with higher risk features at diagnosis that predispose them to chemotherapy resistance and disease relapse after an initial achievement of complete remission. The recent introduction of novel immune-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) targeting B cell-associated antigens such as CD19 (blinatumumab) and CD22 (inotuzumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase, bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T- cell therapy (CAR-T), circumvent B-ALL cell chemo-refractoriness through novel mechanisms of action, potentially eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD) and enabling more patients to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to achieve a better clinical outcome.

The use of bispecific antibodies to optimize the outcome of patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma after SCT

One of the remaining and unresolved problems in allogeneic stem cell transplantation, especially following a T cell-depleted transplant as often performed in the setting of haploidentical transplantation, is the relapse of the underlying hematological malignancy. It has been demonstrated that in the last years we have made major progress in controlling infections, acute and chronic GvHD and making stem cell transplantation available to elderly patients. However, little improvement has been made to achieve better tumor control and to lower the relapse rate. Thus, novel immunotherapeutic strategies are increasingly used prior to or even following allogeneic stem cell transplantation to better control the underlying malignancy and thus, to reduce the relapse rate. These novel immunotherapeutic strategies comprise monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins and even more effective T cell redirecting strategies like bispecific antibodies and T cells transduced with either chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or (affinity-tuned) T cell receptors (TCR).

Concepts in immuno-oncology: tackling B cell malignancies with CD19-directed bispecific T cell engager therapies

The B cell surface antigen CD19 is a target for treating B cell malignancies, such as B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The BiTE® immuno-oncology platform includes blinatumomab, which is approved for relapsed/refractory B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with minimal residual disease. Blinatumomab is also being evaluated in combination with other agents (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and chemotherapy) in various treatment settings, including frontline protocols. An extended half-life BiTE molecule is also under investigation. Patients receiving blinatumomab may experience cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity; however, these events may be less frequent and severe than in patients receiving other CD19-targeted immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. We review BiTE technology for treating malignancies that express CD19, analyzing the benefits and limitations of this bispecific T cell engager platform from clinical experience with blinatumomab.

Reducing minimal residual disease with blinatumomab prior to HCT for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Children treated with blinatumomab for B-ALL with MRD had few side effects and proceeded to hematopoietic cell transplant without delay. Blinatumomab given prior to transplant reduces MRD and results in favorable leukemia-free survival, toxicity, and overall survival.

Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemias: focus on blinatumomab

Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies are constructs engineered to bind to two different antigens, one to a tumor-specific target and the other to CD3-positive T cells or natural killer (NK) cells. Blinatumomab engages CD19 and CD3, performing effective serial lysis. The clinical development program in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) includes clinical trials in relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients and in B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL patients with measurable residual disease. Several trials are currently being conducted in de novo BCP-ALL, either in induction, consolidation, or before or after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Combination with other targeted therapies or with other immunotherapeutic approaches are also underway. Several strategies are aimed to optimize the use of blinatumomab either by overcoming the mechanisms of resistance (e.g. inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1) or by improvements in the route of application, among others.

Cutting to the Front of the Line: Immunotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Although many children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are cured with modern, risk-adapted chemotherapy regimens, 10% to 15% of patients will experience relapse or have refractory disease. Recent efforts to further intensify cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens in the frontline setting have failed as a result of excessive toxicity or lack of improvement in efficacy. As a result, novel approaches will be required to achieve cures in more newly diagnosed patients. Multiple immune-based therapies have demonstrated considerable efficacy in the setting of relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease, including CD19 targeting with blinatumomab and tisagenlecleucel and CD22 targeting with inotuzumab ozogamicin. These agents are now under investigation by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) in clinical trials for newly diagnosed B-ALL, with integration into standard chemotherapy regimens based on clinically and biology-based risk stratification as well as disease response.

Safety and efficacy of blinatumomab: a real world data

Despite improvement in survival of newly diagnosed adult precursor B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL), the results of relapsed/refractory disease are poor. Blinatumomab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody directed against CD19/CD3 show clinical activity against relapsed/refractory B-ALL and in minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive patients.We report our "real-world" experience with blinatumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.Twenty-one patients, at a median age 52 years with median disease duration of 10 months, were included. Indications for treatment were hematological relapse (n = 17), MRD positivity (n = 2), inability to continue intensive chemotherapy (n = 1), and bridging to a second alloSCT (n = 1). Blinatumomab was given as first salvage in 11 patients and after at least one prior salvage treatment in eight.Complete response (CR) was newly achieved in 47% and was maintained in 75% of patients with baseline CR. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months, 13 patients were alive, and 11 in CR. Median leukemia-free survival was 8.7 months, and median overall survival was 15.2 months. Median leukemia-free survival and overall survival were not reached in patients proceeding to alloSCT compared to 5.1 and 15.2 months, respectively, for patients who did not receive stem cell transplantation.Treatment was well tolerated with neurological events reported in two patients (10%) and GI events in three patients (14%). Cytokine storm was reported in four patients (19%).In conclusion, treatment with blinatumomab is effective and tolerable in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL outside of a clinical trial stetting.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Blinatumomab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab is the first-and-only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cluster of differentiation (CD) 19-directed CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE^®) immunotherapy. It is currently FDA approved for the treatment of adults and children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) and Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and B-cell precursor ALL with minimal residual disease. Similarly, initial marketing authorization for blinatumomab in the European Union was granted for the treatment of adults with Ph- R/R B-cell precursor ALL. The benefits of treating R/R B-cell precursor ALL patients with blinatumomab include increased overall survival, more favorable hematologic remission and molecular response rates, and a lower incidence rate of selected adverse events when compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy. The key risks associated with blinatumomab treatment include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and medication errors. Here, we review the benefits and risks of blinatumomab treatment and describe how these risks can be mitigated.

Let's Talk About BiTEs and Other Drugs in the Real-Life Setting for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are currently initially efficient, but even if a high percentage of patients have an initial complete remission (CR), most of them relapse. Recent data shows that immunotherapy with either bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can eliminate residual chemotherapy-resistant B-ALL cells.

Objective: The objective of the manuscript is to present improvements in the clinical outcome for chemotherapy-resistant ALL in the real-life setting, by describing Romania's experience with bispecific antibodies for B-cell ALL.

Methods: We present the role of novel therapies for relapsed B-cell ALL, including the drugs under investigation in phase I-III clinical trials, as a potential bridge to transplant. Blinatumomab is presented in a critical review, presenting both the advantages of this drug, as well as its limitations.

Results: Bispecific antibodies are discussed, describing the clinical trials that resulted in its approval by the FDA and EMA. The real-life setting for relapsed B-cell ALL is described and we present the patients treated with blinatumomab in Romania.

Conclusion: In the current manuscript, we present blinatumomab as a therapeutic alternative in the bridge-to-transplant setting for refractory or relapsed ALL, to gain a better understanding of the available therapies and evidence-based data for these patients in 2019.

EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for haematological malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Value frameworks in oncology have not been validated for the assessment of treatments in haematological malignancies, but to avoid overlaps and duplications it appears reasonable to build up experience on existing value frameworks, such as the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).

METHODS

Here we present the results of the first feasibility testing of the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 for haematological malignancies based on the grading of 80 contemporary studies for acute leukaemia, chronic leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes. The aims were (1) to evaluate the scorability of data, (2) to evaluate the reasonableness of the generated grades for clinical benefit using the current version and (3) to identify shortcomings in the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 that require amendments to improve the efficacy and validity of the scale in grading new treatments in the management of haematological malignancies.

RESULTS

In general, the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 was found to be widely applicable to studies in haematological malignancies, generating scores that were judged as reasonable by European Hematology Association (EHA) experts. A small number of studies could either not be graded or were not appropriately graded. The reasons, related to the differences between haematological and solid tumour malignancies, are identified and described.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, ESMO and EHA are committed to develop a version of the ESMO-MCBS that is validated for haematological malignancies. This development process will incorporate all of the usual stringencies for accountability of reasonableness that have characterised the development of the ESMO-MCBS including field testing, statistical modelling, evaluation for reasonableness and openness to appeal and revision. Applying such a scale will support future public policy decision-making regarding the value of new treatments for haematological malignancies and will provide insights that could be helpful in the design of future clinical trials.

Immunotherapeutic options for management of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: how to select newly approved agents?

Recently, immunotherapeutic agents such as inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), blinatumomab (BLIN), and tisagenlecleucel (TISA) have been approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). No head to head trials have compared these agents. Thus, various factors influence the decision to choose an appropriate treatment for R/R ALL. INO may be preferred in patients with high tumor burden; BLIN is preferred in patients with low tumor burden or to eradicate minimal residual disease (MRD). Both INO and BLIN, compared to standard chemotherapy, increase the probability of receiving subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). TISA, approved for patients ≤25 years of age, is effective regardless of tumor burden or prior receipt of HSCT and can be used as a definite treatment in some patients. Further studies comparing the efficacy, safety, and other outcomes related to different immunotherapeutic options in combination with other treatment modalities and among themselves are needed.

Bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy

Among antibody-based cancer therapies, bispecific antibodies (biAbs) have gained momentum in preclinical and clinical investigations following the regulatory approvals of the trailblazing T-cell engaging biAb (T-biAb) blinatumomab. Discussed herein are recent strategies that aim at boosting the potency and mitigating the toxicity of T-biAbs, broadening their therapeutic utility from hematologic to solid malignancies, and generating T-biAbs in situ. In cancer immunotherapy, T-biAbs are facing fierce competition with chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts), a battle for clinical and commercial viability that will be closely watched. However, innovative combinations of T-biAbs and CAR-Ts have also transpired. NK-cell engaging biAbs (NK-biAbs) are reemerging as an alternative that addresses liabilities of T-biAbs. Beyond NK-biAbs, other biAbs designed to recruit cellular and molecular components of the innate immune system will be covered in this reflection on new tools, technologies, and targets.

Immunotherapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The 5-year survival rate for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved to more than 90% in high-income countries. However, further increases in the intensity of conventional chemotherapy would be associated with significant adverse effects; therefore, novel approaches are necessary. The last decade has seen significant advances in targeted therapy with immunotherapy and molecular therapeutics, as well as advances in risk stratification for therapy based on somatic and germline genetic analysis and monitoring of minimal residual disease. For immunotherapy, the approval of antibody-based therapy (with blinatumomab in 2014 and inotuzumab ozogamicin in 2017) and T cell-based therapy (with tisagenlecleucel in 2017) by the US Food and Drug Administration has significantly improved the response rate and outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. These strategies have also been tested in the frontline setting, and immunotherapy against a new ALL-associated antigen has been developed. Incorporating effective immunotherapy into ALL therapy would enable the intensity of conventional chemotherapy to be decreased and thereby reduce associated toxicity, leading to further improvement in survival and quality of life for patients with ALL.

Patient-reported quality of life after tisagenlecleucel infusion in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a global, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The ELIANA trial showed that 61 (81%) of 75 paediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia achieved overall remission after treatment with tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor targeted against the CD19 antigen. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported quality of life in these patients before and after tisagenlecleucel infusion.

METHODS

ELIANA, a global, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial, was done in 25 hospitals across Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Spain, and the USA. Patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia aged at least 3 years at the time of screening and 21 years or younger at the time of initial diagnosis who were in second or greater bone marrow relapse, chemorefractory, relapsed after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, or were otherwise ineligible for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation were enrolled. Patients received a single intravenous administration of a target dose of 0·2-5 × 10⁶ transduced viable T cells per kg for patients weighing 50 kg or less or 0·1-2·5 × 10⁸ transduced viable T cells for patients weighing more than 50 kg. The primary outcome, reported previously, was the proportion of patients who achieved remission. A prespecified secondary endpoint, reported here, was patient-reported quality of life measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline, day 28, and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after treatment. The data collected were summarised using descriptive statistics and post-hoc mixed models for repeated measures. Change from baseline response profiles were illustrated with cumulative distribution function plots. The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and normative mean value were reported. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02435849.

FINDINGS

Between April 8, 2015, and April 25, 2017, 107 patients were screened, 92 were enrolled, and 75 received tisagenlecleucel. 58 patients aged 8-23 years were included in the analysis of quality of life. At baseline, 50 (86%) patients had completed the PedsQL questionnaire and 48 (83%) had completed the EQ-5D VAS. Improvements in patient-reported quality-of-life scores were observed for all measures at month 3 after tisagenlecleucel infusion (mean change from baseline to month 3 was 13·3 [95% CI 8·9-17·6] for the PedsQL total score and 16·8 [9·4-24·3] for the EQ-5D visual analogue scale). 30 (81%) of 37 patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference at month 3 for the PedsQL total score and 24 (67%) of 36 patients achieved this for the EQ-5D visual analogue scale.

INTERPRETATION

These findings, along with the activity and safety results of ELIANA, suggest a favourable benefit-risk profile of tisagenlecleucel in the treatment of paediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Quality of Life of Patients With Osteosarcoma in the European American Osteosarcoma Study-1 (EURAMOS-1): Development and Implementation of a Questionnaire Substudy

BACKGROUND

The quality of life (QoL) of patients with osteosarcoma (OS) may be adversely affected by the disease or its treatment. Therefore, it is important to understand the QoL of patients undergoing treatment for OS to improve the QoL. We report on the first prospective international QoL study that was embedded within a large randomized clinical trial from 4 national study groups.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to describe the QoL study development, methodology, accrual details, and characteristics of the QoL cohort.

METHODS

A total of 2260 patients registered in the EURopean AMerican Osteosarcoma Study-1 (EURAMOS-1), of whom 97.92% (2213/2260) were eligible for the optional QoL assessment and could participate in terms of questionnaire availability. Overall, 61.86% (1369/2213) of patients and/or proxies completed the QoL evaluation at the first assessment time point (E1) after the start of preoperative treatment. The QoL measures used (self- and/or proxy reports) depending on the patient's age and national study group. Participants and nonparticipants in the ancillary QoL study were compared regarding relevant demographic and disease-related characteristics at registration in the trial.

RESULTS

The participation rate at time point E1 did not differ with regard to age, gender, the occurrence of pathological fracture, or the presence of any metastases at diagnosis. No differences were found regarding the primary tumor site. Only the national study group affiliation had an influence on participation. Participation decreased linearly with trial progress up to 20% at the final time point of QoL assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of international cooperation for the purpose of assessing and understanding the QoL of pediatric and adolescent/young adult patients with cancer. Future outcomes of this QoL substudy will help to adapt interventions to improve QoL.

Cost Effectiveness of Blinatumomab Versus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The TOWER and INO-VATE-ALL trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab), respectively, versus standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The cost effectiveness of blinatumomab versus inotuzumab has not previously been examined.

METHODS

Cost effectiveness of blinatumomab versus inotuzumab in R/R B-cell precursor ALL patients with one or no prior salvage therapy from a United States (US) payer perspective was estimated using a partitioned survival model. Health outcomes were estimated based on published aggregate data from INO-VATE-ALL and individual patient data from TOWER weighted to match patients in INO-VATE-ALL using matching adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Analyses were conducted using five approaches relating to use of anchored versus unanchored comparisons of health outcomes and, for the anchored comparisons, the reference treatment to which treatment effects on health outcomes were applied. Estimates from TOWER including the probabilities of complete remission and allogeneic stem-cell transplant (allo-SCT), overall and event-free survival, utilities, duration of therapy, and use of subsequent therapies were MAIC adjusted to match INO-VATE-ALL. Costs of treatment, adverse events, allo-SCT, subsequent therapies, and terminal care were from published sources. A 50-year time horizon and 3% annual discount rate were used.

RESULTS

Incremental costs for blinatumomab versus inotuzumab ranged from US$7023 to US$36,244, depending on the approach used for estimating relative effectiveness. Incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) ranged from 0.54 to 1.78. Cost effectiveness for blinatumomab versus inotuzumab ranged from US$4006 to US$20,737 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Blinatumomab is estimated to be cost effective versus inotuzumab in R/R B-cell precursor ALL adults who have received one or no prior salvage therapy from a US payer perspective.

Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: The dawn of a new era?

Immunotherapy has revolutionized therapy in both solid and liquid malignancies. The ability to cure acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is proof of concept for the application of immunotherapy in AML and MDS. However, outside of HSCT, only the anti-CD33 antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin is currently approved as an antibody-targeted therapy for AML. Several avenues of immunotherapeutic drugs are currently in different stages of clinical development. Here, we review recent advances in antibody-based therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines and adoptive cell-based therapy for patients with AML and MDS. First, we discuss different antibody constructs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and CD47 as well as peptide, dendritic cell and dendritic/AML cell-based vaccines are reviewed next. Lastly, adoptive cell-based therapy including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell and NK cell therapy is discussed.

Patient-Reported Outcomes with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important tool to assess the impact of a new therapy on symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies have been approved for use in relapsed or refractory leukemia and lymphoma based on promising efficacy in clinical trials. However, data are lacking on patient-reported toxicity and impact on HRQoL. This review provides an overview of the incorporation of PROs in CAR-T cell therapy and the specific challenges in this context. The first step is to demonstrate feasibility of PRO monitoring in the acute phase after CAR-T cell infusion. Apart from core PRO domains like physical functioning, disease-related symptoms, and symptomatic adverse effects, important measures to consider are cognitive functioning and financial toxicity. Because there are no validated PRO instruments in the setting of CAR-T cell therapy, universally validated measures like Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) could be considered, which is also recommended in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the timeline of toxicities with CAR-T cell therapy, PRO instruments should be administered at baseline and at least weekly in the first 30 days. Subsequently, frequent monitoring of PROs in the first year might be helpful in identifying short- and intermediate-term toxicities, functional limitations, and neuropsychiatric effects. The major potential challenge in acute phase would be missing data when patients develop severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. Designing a strategy for handling missing data is crucial. The long-term safety of CAR-T cell therapy is not well characterized because of short follow-up in most studies reported thus far. PROs should be measured at least yearly after the first year to identify potential late effects like cognitive deficit or autoimmune manifestations. Collaboration between institutions performing cellular therapy and engagement with patients, clinicians, and statisticians with expertise in PROs are crucial for setting a comprehensive agenda on integration of PROs with CAR-T cell therapy.

Blinatumomab, a bispecific B-cell and T-cell engaging antibody, in the treatment of B-cell malignancies

Blinatumomab (Blincyto, Amgen), a bi-specific antibody, is a first-in-class, targeted immunotherapy agent for treatment of B-cell malignancies with a novel mechanism of action which involves in-vivo engagement of the patient's T cells with CD19-expressing tumour cells. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in relapsed B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (B-ALL) and B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma including in patients who are refractory to chemotherapy. This review summarises the development and design of Blinatumomab, the outcome of clinical studies demonstrating its efficacy and how to manage the administration, practically, including relevant toxicities. We compare and contrast it to other emerging agents for treatment of B-cell malignancies.

Impact of blinatumomab on patient outcomes in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: evidence to date

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both children and adults. Traditionally, there were limited options for salvage therapy, which consisted mostly of conventional chemotherapy. However, in the past 5 years, novel agents have changed our treatment strategies in this population. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD19 directed CD3 T-cell engager, has shown to be effective in both minimal residual disease and R/R B-cell ALL. In R/R B-cell ALL, blinatumomab was associated with an improved median overall survival of 7.7 months vs 4.0 months with traditional chemotherapy (HR for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.93; P=0.01). It has distinctive side effects as compared to chemotherapy, specifically cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicities. When compared to standard of care chemotherapy, patients have higher quality of life scores and less financial burden. Using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, blinatumomab-treated patients fared better and had a longer time to deterioration or death (global health status/quality of life subscale: HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48–0.92; P=0.009) compared to conventional chemotherapy. Using an incremental cost effective ratio threshold of US$150,000 per quality adjusted life year, blinatumomab was determined to be more cost effective compared to chemotherapy with a probability of 73.7%. This review summarizes the current and future data with blinatumomab in R/R B-cell ALL in the adult and pediatric population.