Initial Hodgkin treatment of the frail elderly

The outcome of older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma in British Columbia

Outcomes in older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have traditionally been poor, in part, related to poor tolerance to standard chemotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the survival of patients with cHL aged ≥60 years in British Columbia in a population-based analysis. From 1961 to 2019, 744 patients with newly diagnosed cHL were identified. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) have improved by decade comparison (both P < .001), remaining stable in the past 20 years (DSS, P = .35; OS, P = .26). In the modern management era (2000-present), 361 of 401 patients (90%) received active therapy for cHL and had a 5-year OS of 60%. For those who received curative-intent therapy (n = 327), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and DSS were 60%, 65%, and 76%, respectively, and estimates were superior in those who were 60 to 69 years of age (72%, 77%, and 83%, respectively) compared with those who were 70 to 79 years of age (54%, 57%, and 70%, respectively) and ≥80 years of age (28%, 39%, and 63%, respectively) (P < .05 for all). Overall, pulmonary toxicity occurred in 58 of 279 patients (21%) treated with bleomycin, with 22 of 58 (38%) occurring after cycles 1 or 2, accounting for 8 of 20 (40%) treatment-related deaths. Outcomes in older adults with cHL have improved in recent decades; however, they remain poor for those aged ≥70 years, even in the modern treatment era. Furthermore, treatment-related toxicity remains a significant concern and use of bleomycin should be avoided in most patients.

Cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy as frontline treatment of stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

The ECHELON-1 trial demonstrated efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) vs doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as frontline therapy for stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of A + AVD from a US healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, was estimated using a non-homogenous semi-Markov cohort model with health states defined on progression following frontline treatment, and for those with progression, receipt of autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT), and progression after ASCT. Patients undergoing ASCT were classified as refractory or relapsed based on timing of progression. Probabilities of progression/death with frontline therapy were based on parametric survival distributions fit to data on modified progression-free survival (mPFS) from ECHELON-1. Duration of frontline treatment and incidence of adverse events were from ECHELON-1. Utility values for patients in the frontline mPFS state were based on EQ-5D data from ECHELON-1. Other inputs were from published sources. A lifetime time horizon was used. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3%. Analyses were conducted alternately using data on mPFS for the overall and North American populations of ECHELON-1.

RESULTS

The ICER for A + AVD vs ABVD was $172,074/QALY gained in the analysis using data on mPFS for the overall population and $69,442/QALY gained in the analysis using data on mPFS for the North American population of ECHELON-1. The ICER is sensitive to estimated costs of ASCT and frontline failure.

CONCLUSION

The ICER for A + AVD vs ABVD based on ECHELON-1 is within the range of threshold values for cost-effectiveness in the US. A + AVD is, therefore, likely to be a cost-effective frontline therapy for patients with stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma from a US healthcare payer perspective.