The role of JAK2 inhibitors in MPNs 7 years after approval

Targeting leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein/LRPPRC by 5,7,4'-trimethoxyflavone suppresses esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression

JAK2/STAT3/MYC axis is dysregulated in nearly 70 % of human cancers, but targeting this pathway therapeutically remains a big challenge in cancer therapy. In this study, genes associated with JAK2, STAT3, and MYC were analyzed, and potential target genes were selected. Leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein (LRPPRC) whose function and regulation are not fully understood, emerged as one of top 3 genes in terms of RNA epigenetic modification. Here, we demonstrate LRPPRC may be an independent prognostic indicator besides JAK2, STAT3, and MYC. Mechanistically, LRPPRC impairs N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of JAK2, STAT3, and MYC to facilitate nuclear mRNA export and expression. Meanwhile, excess LRPPRC act as a scaffold protein binding to JAK2 and STAT3 to enhance stability of JAK2-STAT3 complex, thereby facilitating JAK2/STAT3/MYC axis activation to promote esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) progression. Furthermore, 5,7,4'-trimethoxyflavone was verified to bind to LRPPRC, STAT3, and CDK1, dissociating LRPPRC-JAK2-STAT3 and JAK2-STAT3-CDK1 interaction, leading to impaired tumorigenesis in 4-Nitroquinoline N-oxide induced ESCC mouse models and suppressed tumor growth in ESCC patient derived xenograft mouse models. In summary, this study suggests regulation of m6A modification by LRPPRC, and identifies a novel triplex target compound, suggesting that targeting LRPPRC-mediated JAK2/STAT3/MYC axis may overcome JAK2/STAT3/MYC dependent tumor therapeutic dilemma.

JAK2 inhibitors for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: current status and future directions

The overactivation of Janus kinases 2 (JAK2) by gain-of-function mutations in the JAK2, Myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene, or Calreticulin genes are the most important factor in the development of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation is a significant breakthrough in understanding the pathogenesis of MPNs, and inhibition of JAK2 abnormal activation has become one of the most effective strategies against MPNs. Currently, three JAK2 inhibitors for treating MPNs have been approved, and several are being evaluated in clinical trials. However, persistent challenges in terms of drug resistance and off-target effects remain unresolved. In this review, we introduce and classify the available JAK2 inhibitors in terms of their mechanisms and clinical considerations. Additionally, through an analysis of target points, binding modes, and structure-activity inhibitor relationships, we propose strategies such as combination therapy and allosteric inhibitors to overcome specific challenges. This review offers valuable insights into current trends and future directions for optimal management of MPNs using JAK2 inhibitors.

Discovery of N-(4-(Aminomethyl)phenyl)-5-methylpyrimidin-2-amine Derivatives as Potent and Selective JAK2 Inhibitors

The JAK2V617F mutation leads to JAK2 autophosphorylation and activation of downstream pathways, eventually resulting in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Selective inhibitors showed advantages in terms of side effects; therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel selective JAK2 inhibitors for treating MPNs. In this study, we described a series of N-(4-(aminomethyl)phenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine derivatives as selective JAK2 inhibitors. Systematic exploration through opening the tetrahydroisoquinoline based on the previous lead compound 13ac led to the discovery of the optimal compound A8. Compound A8 showed excellent potency on JAK2 kinase, with an IC50 value of 5 nM, and inhibited the phosphorylation of JAK2 and its downstream signaling pathway. Moreover, A8 exhibited 38.6-, 54.6-, and 41.2-fold selectivity for JAK1, JAK3, and TYK2, respectively. Compared to the lead compound, A8 demonstrated much better metabolic stabilities, with a bioavailability of 41.1%. These findings suggest that A8 is a relatively selective JAK2 inhibitor, deserving to be developed for treating MPNs.

A case of T-cell-Epstein-Barr virus-haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and sustained remission following ruxolitinib therapy

Objectives

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a common cause of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). While B cells are reservoirs for EBV, infection within T cells and NK cells in this disease can be difficult to treat.

Methods

A 19-year-old female presented with a 6-week history of coryzal symptoms on a background of Crohn's disease. On examination, she was febrile and tachycardic with mild tonsillar enlargement and splenomegaly. New trilineage cytopenias and elevation in liver enzymes were detected, with acute EBV subsequently confirmed on whole blood PCR. A diagnosis of EBV-associated HLH was supported further with elevated serum ferritin, triglycerides and soluble CD25, low fibrinogen and the presence of haemophagocytosis in the bone marrow.

Results

Corticosteroids, IVIG and rituximab were given, and anakinra was subsequently added due to ongoing fevers. EBV infection was then demonstrated within CD8⁺ T cells on EBER Flow-FISH assay. Ruxolitinib was commenced and her fevers abated on day 5, with improvement in other HLH parameters. She was discharged after a 39-day hospital admission. To date, she has remained in remission of HLH, despite developing COVID-19 infection during the convalescence phase of HLH.

Conclusion

EBV viraemia requires adequate treatment to control EBV-associated HLH as rituximab may be insufficient, and corticosteroid resistance can result in continued EBV infection in CD8⁺ T cells. This entity is known as T-cell-EBV-HLH. Ruxolitinib is a novel treatment strategy in this specific context and has several advantages, including inhibition of corticosteroid resistance to promote apoptosis of EBV-infected T cells.

Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives

Classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), classified as primary (PMF), or secondary to PV or ET. All MPN, regardless of the underlying driver mutation in JAK2/CALR/MPL, are invariably associated with dysregulation of JAK/STAT pathway. The discovery of JAK2V617F point mutation prompted the development of small molecules inhibitors of JAK tyrosine kinases (JAK inhibitors-JAKi). To date, among JAKi, ruxolitinib (RUX) and fedratinib (FEDR) are approved for intermediate and high-risk MF, and RUX is also an option for high-risk PV patients inadequately controlled by or intolerant to hydroxyurea. While not yet registered, pacritinib (PAC) and momelotinib (MMB), proved to be effective particularly in thrombocytopenic and anemic MF patients, respectively. In most cases, JAKi are effective in reducing splenomegaly and alleviating disease-related symptoms. However, almost 50% lose response by three years and dose-dependent toxicities may lead to suboptimal dosing or treatment discontinuation. To date, although not being disease-modifying agents, JAKi represent the therapeutic backbone particularly in MF patient. To optimize therapeutic strategies, many trials with drug combinations of JAKi with novel molecules are ongoing. This review critically discusses the role of JAKi in the modern management of patients with MPN.

A Prognostic Model to Predict Survival After 6 Months of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis

RUX dose, spleen response, and transfusion requirement in the first 6 months of RUX treatment predict overall survival in MF.

The RR6 model overcomes conventional risk stratification in RUX-treated MF.

Ruxolitinib (RUX) is extensively used in myelofibrosis (MF). Despite its early efficacy, most patients lose response over time and, after discontinuation, have a worse overall survival (OS). Currently, response criteria able to predict OS in RUX-treated patients are lacking, leading to uncertainty regarding the switch to second-line treatments. In this study, we investigated predictors of survival collected after 6 months of RUX in 209 MF patients participating in the real-world ambispective observational RUXOREL-MF study (NCT03959371). Multivariable analysis identified the following risk factors: (1) RUX dose <20 mg twice daily at baseline, months 3 and 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.00; P = .03), (2) palpable spleen length reduction from baseline ≤30% at months 3 and 6 (HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.65; P = .0009), (3) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need at months 3 and/or 6 (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.95-2.88; P = .07), and (4) RBC transfusion need at all time points (ie, baseline and months 3 and 6; HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.19-4.54; P = .02). Hence, we developed a prognostic model, named Response to Ruxolitinib After 6 Months (RR6), dissecting 3 risk categories: low (median OS, not reached), intermediate (median OS, 61 months; 95% CI, 43-80), and high (median OS, 33 months; 95% CI, 21-50). The RR6 model was validated and confirmed in an external cohort comprised of 40 MF patients. In conclusion, the RR6 prognostic model allows for the early identification of RUX-treated MF patients with impaired survival who might benefit from a prompt treatment shift.

Effects of ruxolitinib on infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Infections in ruxolitinib-treated myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients were reported frequently. This work aimed to systematically estimate the risk of infection associated with ruxolitinib in MPN patients.

METHODS

The PUBMED, CNKI, EMBASE, Cochrane and CBM databases were searched to identify all related studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to express the difference between groups. I² was calculated to evaluate heterogeneity. Revman software was used to conduct the analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized control trials were included in this analysis. The risk of overall infections was not different at the early stage of ruxolitinib use (OR, 95%CI: 1.23, [0.91, 1.67]). In the extension phase, overall infection was significantly lower in patients receiving ruxolitinib (OR, 95%CI: 0.53, [0.36, 0.79]). Herpes zoster infection was at higher risk both at early stage and in the extension phase (OR, 95%CI: 7.39, [1.33, 41.07]), (OR, 95%CI: 5.23, [1.46, 18.79]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that ruxolitinib increased the risk of herpes zoster infection. However, current studies were not enough to estimate the effects of ruxolitinib on the risk of overall infection in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Small-Molecule Anti-Cancer Drugs From 2016 to 2020: Synthesis and Clinical Application

Malignant tumors have become a significant public health problem that severely threatens human health. Drug-targeting therapy is essential for tumor therapy, along with surgery and radiotherapy. Of the 378 novel drugs approved over the past five years, those for oncological therapy remains at the top (25%). These drugs are used to treat patients with various cancers by acting on corresponding targets, such as EGFR, JAK, BTK, IDH, and FLT3. This review examines anti-tumor agents approved between 2016 and 2020, classifying them according to indication (such as lung cancer, leukemia, breast cancer, and myeloma). These drugs are reviewed according to their route of administration, first-in-class designation, approval dates, and expedited review categories. Furthermore, this paper summarizes the targets and modes of action of the approved anti-tumor drugs while systematically discussing their synthetic routes for medicinal chemistry or industrial use, which will benefit next-generation drug discovery.

PPARγ agonists promote the resolution of myelofibrosis in preclinical models

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a non-BCR-ABL myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with poor outcomes. Current treatment has little effect on the natural history of the disease. MF results from complex interactions between (a) the malignant clone, (b) an inflammatory context, and (c) remodeling of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Each of these points is a potential target of PPARγ activation. Here, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PPARγ agonists in resolving MF in 3 mouse models. We showed that PPARγ agonists reduce myeloproliferation, modulate inflammation, and protect the BM stroma in vitro and ex vivo. Activation of PPARγ constitutes a relevant therapeutic target in MF, and our data support the possibility of using PPARγ agonists in clinical practice.

N-(Pyrimidin-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolin-6-amine Derivatives as Selective Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

In this study, we described a series of N-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolin-6-amine derivatives as selective JAK2 (Janus kinase 2) inhibitors. Systematic exploration of the structure-activity relationship though cyclization modification based on previously reported compound 18e led to the discovery of the superior derivative 13ac. Compound 13ac showed excellent potency on JAK2 kinase, SET-2, and Ba/F3^V617F cells (high expression of JAK2^V617F mutation) with IC₅₀ values of 3, 11.7, and 41 nM, respectively. Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that compound 13ac could downregulate the phosphorylation of downstream proteins of JAK2 kinase in cells. Compound 13ac also showed good selectivity in kinase scanning and potent in vivo antitumor efficacy with 82.3% tumor growth inhibition in the SET-2 xenograft model. Moreover, 13ac significantly ameliorated the disease symptoms in a Ba/F3-JAK2^V617F allograft model, with 77.1% normalization of spleen weight, which was more potent than Ruxolitinib.

Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myelofibrosis (MF) is an advanced form of a group of rare, related bone marrow cancers termed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Some patients develop myelofibrosis from the outset, while in others, it occurs as a complication of the more indolent MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients with PV or ET who require drug treatment are typically treated with the chemotherapy drug hydroxyurea, while in MF, the targeted therapies termed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment. However, these and other drugs (e.g., interferons) have important limitations. No drug has been shown to reliably prevent the progression of PV or ET to MF or transformation of MPNs to acute myeloid leukemia. In PV, it is not conclusively known if JAK inhibitors reduce the risk of blood clots, and in MF, these drugs do not improve low blood counts. New approaches to treating MF and related MPNs are, therefore, necessary.

Abstract

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET.

TGFβR-SMAD3 Signaling Induces Resistance to PARP Inhibitors in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Synthetic lethality triggered by PARP inhibitor (PARPi) yields promising therapeutic results. Unfortunately, tumor cells acquire PARPi resistance, which is usually associated with the restoration of homologous recombination, loss of PARP1 expression, and/or loss of DNA double-strand break (DSB) end resection regulation. Here, we identify a constitutive mechanism of resistance to PARPi. We report that the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) facilitates DSB repair activity in leukemia cells to protect them against PARPi-mediated synthetic lethality. This effect depends on the hypoxia-induced overexpression of transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFβR) kinase on malignant cells, which is activated by bone marrow stromal cells-derived transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). Genetic and/or pharmacological targeting of the TGF-β1-TGFβR kinase axis results in the restoration of the sensitivity of malignant cells to PARPi in BMM and prolongs the survival of leukemia-bearing mice. Our finding may lead to the therapeutic application of the TGFβR inhibitor in patients receiving PARPis.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with haematological malignancies in Italy: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Several small studies on patients with COVID-19 and haematological malignancies are available showing a high mortality in this population. The Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 aimed to collect data from adult patients with haematological malignancies who required hospitalisation for COVID-19.

METHODS

This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with diagnosis of a WHO-defined haematological malignancy admitted to 66 Italian hospitals between Feb 25 and May 18, 2020, with laboratory-confirmed and symptomatic COVID-19. Data cutoff for this analysis was June 22, 2020. The primary outcome was mortality and evaluation of potential predictive parameters of mortality. We calculated standardised mortality ratios between observed death in the study cohort and expected death by applying stratum-specific mortality rates of the Italian population with COVID-19 and an Italian cohort of 31 993 patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19 (data up to March 1, 2019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556, and the prospective part of the study is ongoing.

FINDINGS

We enrolled 536 patients with a median follow-up of 20 days (IQR 10-34) at data cutoff, 85 (16%) of whom were managed as outpatients. 440 (98%) of 451 hospitalised patients completed their hospital course (were either discharged alive or died). 198 (37%) of 536 patients died. When compared with the general Italian population with COVID-19, the standardised mortality ratio was 2·04 (95% CI 1·77-2·34) in our whole study cohort and 3·72 (2·86-4·64) in individuals younger than 70 years. When compared with the non-COVID-19 cohort with haematological malignancies, the standardised mortality ratio was 41·3 (38·1-44·9). Older age (hazard ratio 1·03, 95% CI 1·01-1·05); progressive disease status (2·10, 1·41-3·12); diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (3·49, 1·56-7·81), indolent non-Hodgin lymphoma (2·19, 1·07-4·48), aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (2·56, 1·34-4·89), or plasma cell neoplasms (2·48, 1·31-4·69), and severe or critical COVID-19 (4·08, 2·73-6·09) were associated with worse overall survival.

INTERPRETATION

This study adds to the evidence that patients with haematological malignancies have worse outcomes than both the general population with COVID-19 and patients with haematological malignancies without COVID-19. The high mortality among patients with haematological malignancies hospitalised with COVID-19 highlights the need for aggressive infection prevention strategies, at least until effective vaccination or treatment strategies are available.

FUNDING

Associazione italiana contro le leucemie, linfomi e mieloma-Varese Onlus.

Modification of the Histone Landscape with JAK Inhibition in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Dysregulation of epigenetic processes is increasingly understood to play a role in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Ruxolitinib, a JAK/STAT inhibitor, has proved a useful addition to the therapeutic arsenal for these disorders, but has limited disease modifying activity. We determined the effect of JAK inhibition on the histone landscape of MPN cells in cell line models of MPNs and validated using samples from the MAJIC randomised clinical trial of ruxolitinib in polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia. We demonstrated an epigenetic modifying effect of ruxolitinib using a histone modification assay. The majority of 21 histone H3 modifications were upregulated, with H3K27me3 and H3K36me2 significant in the combined cell line results. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (CHIP-seq) for three marks of interest, H3K4me1, H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, was consistent with the histone modification assay showing a significant increase in H3K4me3 and H3K27ac peaks at promoter regions, both marks of active transcription. In contrast, RNA sequencing demonstrates a coordinated reduction in gene expression in a number of cell pathways including PI3K-AKT signalling, transcriptional misregulation in cancer and JAK-STAT signalling in spite of these histone changes. This highlights the complex mechanisms of transcriptional control within the cells which was reflected in analysis of the histone landscape in patient samples following ruxolitinib treatment.

Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to

Ruxolitinib is a targeted drug to treat myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib has significant advantages in spleen reduction and increasing 5-year overall survival (OS), and ruxolitinib-based combinations might provide more benefits than ruxolitinib monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and safety. We analyzed and summarized the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone + thalidomide + danazol (TPD), panobinostat, pracinostat, azacytidine, or hydroxyurea has well reduced spleen. Ruxolitinib combined with danazol or TPD had well therapies in improvement of hemoglobin (Hgb) and platelets (PLT). Most ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies showed a superior benefit on reduced treatment-related AEs than ruxolitinib monotherapy. Treatment-related AEs and dose modification affect the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Genetic testing before treatment is recommended. To provide better clinical guidance, comparisons of these randomized controlled trials with the trials of ruxolitinib alone are necessary. This review suggests that the clinical application of ruxolitinib-based combinations is worth waiting for.

Current and future therapies for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and array of often challenging clinical manifestations can frequently make therapeutic decisions challenging. Despite many advances in therapy with targeted and combination approaches, following an enhanced understanding of underlying disease pathogenesis, cure only remains achievable with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This option is often limited to a small group of younger transplant-eligible patients with more advanced disease who have both a suitable donor and no or few co-morbidities. In this article, we will discuss up-to-date disease prognostication, common clinical challenges associated with myelofibrosis and both standard and novel therapeutic approaches. Increasingly complex prognostic modelling utilises patient-specific, haematological and genomic parameters to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and predict disease progression. We will also focus on difficult clinical scenarios such as disease-associated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and extremes of age. Future and evolving therapies within this field are highly anticipated and novel JAK inhibitor and non-JAK inhibitor-based therapy will also be discussed, including the new challenge of how to switch from one JAK inhibitor therapy to another.

Drug-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Literature Review

Since myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) pose a significant risk for vascular and thrombotic complications, cytoreductive therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU), interferon (IFN) inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are recommended for patients at high risk. However, these agents also place patients at increased risk for drug-related cutaneous adverse events. Herein, we review the literature on skin toxicity related to the use of drugs for the treatment of MPN. Overall, the cytoreductive agents used for MPN are generally well tolerated and considered to be safe, except IFN, for which dropout rates as high as 25% have been reported. While IFN is known to give rise to flu syndrome, it rarely leads to hematological alterations. The most common hematological side effects of HU are mild and include granulocytopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib has been associated with cytopenia and a higher incidence of viral infections, as well as increased risk for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Based on the present analysis, it can be concluded that cutaneous toxicity is not a negligible complication of commonly used treatments for MPN. While further research is needed, patients on these agents, and especially those with a history of cutaneous malignancies, should undergo thorough skin examination before and during therapy. In addition, detailed history is critical since many patients who develop non-melanoma skin cancer have multiple preexisting risk factors for cutaneous carcinogenesis.

Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL1–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, progressive splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, constitutional symptoms, leukemic progression, and shortened survival. Constitutive activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway, and other cellular pathways downstream, leads to myeloproliferation, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and bone marrow remodeling. Transplant is the only curative option for myelofibrosis, but high rates of morbidity and mortality limit eligibility. Several prognostic models have been developed to facilitate treatment decisions. Until the recent approval of fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib was the only available JAK inhibitor for treatment of intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib reduces splenomegaly to some degree in almost all treated patients; however, many patients cannot tolerate ruxolitinib due to dose-dependent drug-related cytopenias, and even patients with a good initial response often develop resistance to ruxolitinib after 2–3 years of therapy. Currently, there is no consensus definition of ruxolitinib failure. Until fedratinib approval, strategies to overcome ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance were mainly different approaches to continued ruxolitinib therapy, including dosing modifications and ruxolitinib rechallenge. Fedratinib and two other JAK2 inhibitors in later stages of clinical development, pacritinib and momelotinib, have been shown to induce clinical responses and improve symptoms in patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. Fedratinib induces robust spleen responses, and pacritinib and momelotinib may have preferential activity in patients with severe cytopenias. Reviewed here are strategies to ameliorate ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance, and outcomes of clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis receiving second-line JAK inhibitors after ruxolitinib treatment.

Thrombocytopenia in patients with myelofibrosis: management options in the era of JAK inhibitor therapy

Myelofibrosis (MF), either appearing de novo (primary MF, PMF) or after a previous diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia or of polycythemia vera, is a progressive disease burdened by symptomatic splenomegaly, debilitating systemic symptoms, ineffective hematopoiesis, and overall reduced survival. Patients often present worsening cytopenias, including thrombocytopenia, secondary to progression of the disease as well as to cytoreductive treatment. Patients with MF and thrombocytopenia have few therapeutic options and there is limited information regarding the management of disease in these settings. This article reviews current evidence for the management of patients with MF and thrombocytopenia, in the era of JAK inhibitors.

Beyond Ruxolitinib: Fedratinib and Other Emergent Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells leading to bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias and extramedullary hematopoiesis. In late 2019, the FDA approved the highly selective JAK2 inhibitor, fedratinib, for intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary MF, making it the second drug approved for MF after ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, which was approved for MF in 2011. The approval of fedratinib was based on phase II trials and the phase III JAKARTA trial, in which the drug significantly reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden compared to placebo, including some patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. The main side effects of fedratinib include anemia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and elevations in liver transaminases. Fedratinib also has ablack box warning for encephalopathy, although this occurred only in about 1% of the treated patients, most of which were ultimately felt not to represent Wernicke’s encephalopathy. Nonetheless, monitoring of thiamine levels and supplementation are recommended especially in high-risk patients. This concern has led to a prolonged clinical hold and delayed the drug approval by several years during which the drug exchanged manufacturers, highlighting the need for meticulous investigation and adjudication of serious, but rare, adverse events in drug development that could end up preventing drugs with favorable risk/benefit ratio from being approved. In this review, we discuss the pharmacokinetic data and efficacy, as well as the toxicity results of clinical trials of fedratinib. We also review ongoing trials of JAK inhibitors in MF and explore future treatment options for MF patients who are refractory to ruxolitinib.

The pan-PIM inhibitor INCB053914 displays potent synergy in combination with ruxolitinib in models of MPN

Aberrant JAK2 tyrosine kinase signaling drives the development of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. However, JAK2 kinase inhibitors have failed to significantly reduce allele burden in MPN patients, underscoring the need for improved therapeutic strategies. Members of the PIM family of serine/threonine kinases promote cellular proliferation by regulating a variety of cellular processes, including protein synthesis and the balance of signaling that regulates apoptosis. Overexpression of PIM family members is oncogenic, exemplified by their ability to induce lymphomas in collaboration with c-Myc. Thus, PIM kinases are potential therapeutic targets for several malignancies such as solid tumors and blood cancers. We and others have shown that PIM inhibitors augment the efficacy of JAK2 inhibitors by using in vitro models of MPNs. Here we report that the recently developed pan-PIM inhibitor INCB053914 augments the efficacy of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in both in vitro and in vivo MPN models. INCB053914 synergizes with ruxolitinib to inhibit cell growth in JAK2-driven MPN models and induce apoptosis. Significantly, low nanomolar INCB053914 enhances the efficacy of ruxolitinib to inhibit the neoplastic growth of primary MPN patient cells, and INCB053914 antagonizes ruxolitinib persistent myeloproliferation in vivo. These findings support the notion that INCB053914, which is currently in clinical trials in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, in combination with ruxolitinib may be effective in MPN patients, and they support the clinical testing of this combination in MPN patients.

Ruxolitinib binding to human serum albumin: bioinformatics, biochemical and functional characterization in JAK2V617F+ cell models

Ruxolitinib is a type I JAK inhibitor approved by FDA for targeted therapy of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), all characterized by mutations activating the JAK2/STAT signaling pathway. Treatment with ruxolitinib improves constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. However, patients can become resistant to treatment and chronic therapy has only a mild effect on molecular/pathologic remissions. Drugs interaction with plasma proteins, i.e. human serum albumin (HSA), is an important factor affecting the intensity and duration of their pharmacological actions. Here, the ruxolitinib recognition by the fatty acid binding sites (FAs) 1, 6, 7, and 9 of HSA has been investigated from the bioinformatics, biochemical and/or biological viewpoints. Docking simulations indicate that ruxolitinib binds to multiple sites of HSA. Ruxolitinib binds to the FA1 and FA7 sites of HSA with high affinity (K_r = 3.1 μM and 4.6 μM, respectively, at pH 7.3 and 37.0 °C). Moreover, HSA selectively blocks, in a dose dependent manner, the cytotoxic activity of ruxolitinib in JAK2V617F⁺ cellular models for MPN, in vitro. Furthermore this event is accompanied by changes in the cell cycle, p27^Kip1 and cyclin D3 levels, and JAK/STAT signaling. Given the high plasma concentration of HSA, ruxolitinib trapping may be relevant in vivo.

Standard care and investigational drugs in the treatment of myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, ineffective hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of leukemic transformation. The ongoing research in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease has allowed for the development of targeted drugs optimizing patient management. Furthermore, disease prognostication has significantly improved. Current therapeutic interventions are only partially effective with only allogeneic stem cell transplant potentially curative. Ruxolitinib is the only approved therapy for MF by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, despite efficacy in reducing splenomegaly and controlling symptomatology, it is not associated with consistent molecular or pathologic responses. Drug discontinuation is associated with a dismal outcome. The therapeutic landscape in MF has significantly improved, and emerging drugs with different target pathways, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, seem promising.

Aurora Kinase A Inhibition Provides Clinical Benefit, Normalizes Megakaryocytes, and Reduces Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Phase I Trial

PURPOSE

Myelofibrosis is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, atypical megakaryocytes, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, and a risk of evolution to acute leukemia. The JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib provides therapeutic benefit, but the effects are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether targeting AURKA, which has been shown to increase maturation of atypical megakaryocytes, has potential benefit for patients with myelofibrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with myelofibrosis were enrolled in a phase I study at three centers. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib. Correlative studies involved assessment of the effect of alisertib on the megakaryocyte lineage, allele burden, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

In addition to being well tolerated, alisertib reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden in 29% and 32% of patients, respectively, despite not consistently reducing the degree of inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, alisertib normalized megakaryocytes and reduced fibrosis in 5 of 7 patients for whom sequential marrows were available. Alisertib also decreased the mutant allele burden in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of ruxolitinib, novel therapies are needed for myelofibrosis. In this study, alisertib provided clinical benefit and exhibited the expected on-target effect on the megakaryocyte lineage, resulting in normalization of these cells and reduced fibrosis in the majority of patients for which sequential marrows were available. Thus, AURKA inhibition should be further developed as a therapeutic option in myelofibrosis.See related commentary by Piszczatowski and Steidl, p. 4868.

Vitamin D receptor-mediated skewed differentiation of macrophages initiates myelofibrosis and subsequent osteosclerosis

Myelofibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) with mutations such as JAK2V617F is an unfavorable sign for uncontrollable disease progression in the clinic and is complicated with osteosclerosis whose pathogenesis is largely unknown. Because several studies have revealed that macrophages are an indispensable supporter for bone-forming osteoblasts, we speculated that macrophages might play a significant role in the proliferation of collagen-producing myofibroblasts in marrow fibrotic tissues. Here, we show that myelofibrosis critically depends on macrophages whose differentiation is skewed by vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling. In our novel myelofibrosis model established by transplantation of VDR^+/+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells into VDR^-/- mice, donor-derived F4/80⁺ macrophages proliferated together with recipient-derived α-smooth muscle actin-positive myofibroblasts, both of which comprised fibrotic tissues with an indistinguishable spindle-shaped morphology. Interfering VDR signals, such as low vitamin D diet and VDR deficiency in donor cells as well as macrophage depletion prevented myelofibrosis in this model. These interventions also ameliorated myelofibrosis in JAK2V617F-driven murine MPNs likely in a transforming growth factor-β1- or megakaryocyte-independent manner. These results suggest that VDR and macrophages may be novel therapeutic targets for MPNs with myelofibrosis.

The ruxolitinib effect: understanding how molecular pathogenesis and epigenetic dysregulation impact therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), polycythaemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are linked by a propensity to thrombosis formation and a risk of leukaemic transformation. Activation of cytokine independent signalling through the JAK/STAT cascade is a feature of these disorders. A point mutation in exon 14 of the JAK2 gene resulting in the formation of the JAK2 V617F transcript occurs in 95% of PV patients and around 50% of ET and PMF patients driving constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Mutations in CALR or MPL are present as driving mutations in the majority of remaining ET and PMF patients. Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which inhibits JAK1 and JAK2. It is approved for use in intermediate and high risk PMF, and in PV patients who are resistant or intolerant to hydroxycarbamide. In randomised controlled trials it has demonstrated efficacy in spleen volume reduction and symptom burden reduction with a moderate improvement in overall survival in PMF. In PV, there is demonstrated benefit in haematocrit control and spleen volume. Despite these benefits, there is limited impact to induce complete haematological remission with normalisation of blood counts, reduce the mutant allele burden or reverse bone marrow fibrosis. Clonal evolution has been observed on ruxolitinib therapy and transformation to acute leukaemia can still occur. This review will concentrate on understanding the clinical and molecular effects of ruxolitinib in MPN. We will focus on understanding the limitations of JAK inhibition and the challenges to improving therapeutic efficacy in these disorders. We will explore the demonstrated benefits and disadvantages of ruxolitinib in the clinic, the role of genomic and clonal variability in pathogenesis and response to JAK inhibition, epigenetic changes which impact on response to therapy, the role of DNA damage and the role of inflammation in these disorders. Finally, we will summarise the future prospects for improving therapy in MPN in the JAK inhibition era.

Mutation landscape in patients with myelofibrosis receiving ruxolitinib or hydroxyurea

Refractoriness to ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) was associated with clonal evolution; however, whether genetic instability is promoted by ruxolitinib remains unsettled. We evaluated the mutation landscape in 71 MF patients receiving ruxolitinib (n = 46) and hydroxyurea (n = 25) and correlated with response. A spleen volume response (SVR) was obtained in 57% and 12%, respectively. Highly heterogenous patterns of mutation acquisition/loss and/or changes of variant allele frequency (VAF) were observed in the 2 patient groups without remarkable differences. In patients receiving ruxolitinib, driver mutation type and high-molecular risk profile (HMR) at baseline did not impact on response rate, while HMR and sole ASXL1 mutations predicted for SVR loss at 3 years. In patients with SVR, a decrease of ≥ 20% of JAK2V617F VAF predicted for SVR duration. VAF increase of non-driver mutations and clonal progression at follow-up correlated with SVR loss and treatment discontinuation, and clonal progression also predicted for shorter survival. These data indicate that (i) ruxolitinib does not appreciably promote clonal evolution compared with hydroxyurea, (ii) VAF increase of pre-existing and/or (ii) acquisition of new mutations while on treatment correlated with higher rate of discontinuation and/or death, and (iv) reduction of JAK2V617F VAF associated with SVR duration.

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: focus on mutations and JAK2 inhibitors

Classical Philadelphia- negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) encompass three main myeloid malignancies: polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). Phenotype-driver mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), and myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (MPL) genes are mutually exclusive and occur with a variable frequency. Driver mutations influence disease phenotype and prognosis. PV patients with JAK2 exon 14 mutation do not differ in number of thrombotic events, risk of leukemic and fibrotic transformation, and overall survival to those with JAK2 exon 12 mutation. Type 2-like CALR-mutated ET patients have lower risk of thrombosis if compared with those carrying JAK2 or type 1-like CALR mutation. For ET, overall survival is comparable between patients with JAK2 and either type 1-like and type 2-like CALR mutations. For MF, better OS is demonstrated for patients harboring a type 1-like CALR mutation than those with type 2-like CALR or JAK2. The discovery of driver mutations in MPNs has prompted the development of molecularly targeted therapy. Among JAK2 inhibitors, ruxolitinib (RUX) has been approved for (1) treatment of intermediate-2 and high-risk MF and (2) PV patients who are resistant to or intolerant to hydroxyurea. RUX reduces spleen size and alleviates disease symptoms in a proportion of MF patients. RUX in MF leads to prolonged survival and reduces risk of death. RUX controls hematocrit, reduces spleen size and alleviates symptoms in PV. Adverse events of RUX are moderate, however, its long-term use may be associated with opportunistic infections. Trials with other JAK2 inhibitors are ongoing.

"Do We Know Jack" About JAK? A Closer Look at JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK) family of proteins have been identified as crucial proteins in signal transduction initiated by a wide range of membrane receptors. Among the proteins in this family JAK2 has been associated with important downstream proteins, including signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), which in turn regulate the expression of a variety of proteins involved in induction or prevention of apoptosis. Therefore, the JAK/STAT signaling axis plays a major role in the proliferation and survival of different cancer cells, and may even be involved in resistance mechanisms against molecularly targeted drugs. Despite extensive research focused on the protein structure and mechanisms of activation of JAKs, and signal transduction through these proteins, their importance in cancer initiation and progression seem to be underestimated. This manuscript is an attempt to highlight the role of JAK proteins in cancer biology, the most recent developments in targeting JAKs, and the central role they play in intracellular cross-talks with other signaling cascades.