Finding Neo (antigens, that is)

Biological Therapies in the Treatment of Cancer-Update and New Directions

Biological therapies have changed the face of oncology by targeting cancerous cells while reducing the effect on normal tissue. This publication focuses mainly on new therapies that have contributed to the advances in treatment of certain malignancies. Immunotherapy, which has repeatedly proven to be a breakthrough therapy in melanoma, as well as B-ALL therapy with CAR T cells, are of great merit in this progress. These therapies are currently being developed by modifying bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells to improve their efficiency and bioavailability. Work on improving the therapy with oncolytic viruses is also progressing, and efforts are being made to improve the immunogenicity and stability of cancer vaccines. Combining various biological therapies, immunotherapy with oncolytic viruses or cancer vaccines is gaining importance in cancer therapy. New therapeutic targets are intensively sought among neoantigens, which are not immunocompromised, or antigens associated with tumor stroma cells. An example is fibroblast activation protein α (FAPα), the overexpression of which is observed in the case of tumor progression. Universal therapeutic targets are also sought, such as the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusion, a key genetic driver present in many types of cancer. This review also raises the problem of the tumor microenvironment. Stromal cells can protect tumor cells from chemotherapy and contribute to relapse and progression. This publication also addresses the problem of cancer stem cells resistance to treatment and presents attempts to avoid this phenomenon. This review focuses on the most important strategies used to improve the selectivity of biological therapies.

Transcriptional configurations of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is an umbrella term for several heterogenous diseases, which are characterized by their stem cell origin, clonal hematopoiesis and increase of blood cells of the myeloid lineage. The focus will be on BCR-ABL1 negative MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET). Seminal findings in the field of MPN were driven by genomic analysis, focusing on dissecting genomic changes MPN patients. This led to identification of major MPN driver genes, JAK2, MPL and CALR. Transcriptomic analysis promises to bridge the gap between genetic and phenotypic characterization of each patient's tumor and with the advent of single cell sequencing even for each MPN cancer cell. This review will focus on efforts to mine the bulk transcriptome of MPN patients, including analysis of fusion genes and splicing alterations which can be addressed with RNA-seq technologies. Furthermore, this paper aims to review recent endeavors to elucidate tumor heterogeneity in MPN hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using single cell technologies. Finally, it will highlight current shortcoming and future applications to advance the field in MPN biology and improve patient diagnostics using RNA-based assays.

Vaccine Therapies for Cancer: Then and Now

There are strong biologic and preclinical rationales for the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines; however, the clinical translation of this treatment strategy has been challenging. It is now understood that many previous clinical trials of cancer vaccines used target antigens or vaccine designs that inherently lacked sufficient immunogenicity to induce clinical responses. Despite the historical track record, breakthrough advances in cancer immunobiology and vaccine technologies have supported continued interest in therapeutic cancer vaccinations, with the hope that next-generation vaccine strategies will enable patients with cancer to develop long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. There has been substantial progress identifying antigens and vaccine vectors that lead to strong and broad T cell responses, tailoring vaccine designs to achieve optimal antigen presentation, and finding combination partners employing complementary mechanisms of action (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors) to overcome the diverse methods cancer cells use to evade and suppress the immune system. Results from randomized, phase 3 studies testing therapeutic cancer vaccines based on these advances are eagerly awaited. Here, we summarize the successes and failures in the clinical development of cancer vaccines, address how this historical experience and advances in science and technology have shaped efforts to improve vaccines, and offer a clinical perspective on the future role of vaccine therapies for cancer.