BTG1 inactivation drives lymphomagenesis and promotes lymphoma dissemination through activation of BCAR1

miR-17-92 cluster-BTG2 axis regulates B-cell receptor signaling in mantle cell lymphoma

B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is critically activated and stable for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but the underlying mechanism of the activated BCR signaling pathway is not clear. The pathogenic basis of miR-17-92 cluster remains unclear although the oncogenic microRNA (miRNA) miR-17-92 cluster is highly expressed in patients with MCL. We revealed that miR-17-92 cluster overexpression is partly dependent on SOX11 expression and chromatin acetylation of MIR17HG enhancer regions. Moreover, miR-17-92 cluster regulates not only cell proliferation but BCR signaling activation in MCL cell lines. To comprehensively identify miR-17-92 cluster target genes, we performed pulldown-seq, where target RNA of miRNA was captured using the biotinylated miRNA mimics and magnetic bead-coated streptavidin, and quantified using next-generation sequencing. The pulldown-seq identified novel miRNA target genes, including tumor suppressors such as BTG2 (miR-19b), CDKN2A (miR-17), SYNE1 (miR-20a), TET2 (miR-18, miR-19b, and miR-92a), TNFRSF10A (miR-92a), and TRAF3 (miR-17). Notably, the gene expression profile data of patients with MCL revealed that BTG2 expression was negatively associated with that of BCR signature genes, and low BTG2 expression was associated with poor overall survival. Moreover, BTG2 silencing in MCL cell lines significantly induced BCR signaling overactivation and cell proliferation. Our results suggest an oncogenic role of miR-17-92 cluster-activating BCR signaling throughout BTG2 deregulation in MCL. Furthermore, this may contribute to the prediction of the therapeutic efficacy and improved outcomes of MCL.

A pan-cancer analysis of anti-proliferative protein family genes for therapeutic targets in cancer

The recently discovered APRO (anti-proliferative protein) family encodes a group of trans-membrane glycoproteins and includes 6 members: TOB1, TOB2, BTG1, BTG2, BTG3 and BTG4. The APRO family is reportedly associated with the initiation and progression of cancers. This study aims to undertake a comprehensive investigation of the APRO family of proteins as a prognostic biomarker in various human tumors. We performed a pan-cancer analysis of the APRO family based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). With the bioinformatics methods, we explored the prognostic value of the APRO family and the correlation between APRO family expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy in numerous cancers. Our results show that the APRO family was primarily down-regulated in cancer samples. The expression of APRO family members was linked with patient prognosis. In addition, APRO family genes showed significant association with immune infiltrate subtypes, tumor microenvironment, and tumor cell stemness. Finally, our study also demonstrated the relationship between APRO family genes and drug sensitivity. This study provides comprehensive information to understand the APRO family's role as an oncogene and predictor of survival in some tumor types.

Clonal Relationship and Mutation Analysis in Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma/Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Associated With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) occasionally develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This mostly results from LPL/WM transformation, although clonally unrelated DLBCL can also arise. LPL/WM is characterized by activating MYD88L265P (>95%) and CXCR4 mutations (~30%), but the genetic drivers of transformation remain to be identified. Here, in thirteen LPL/WM patients who developed DLBCL, the clonal relationship of LPL and DLBCL together with mutations contributing to transformation were investigated. In 2 LPL/WM patients (15%), high-throughput sequencing of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements showed evidence of >1 clonal B-cell population in LPL tissue biopsies. In the majority of LPL/WM patients, DLBCL presentations were clonally related to the dominant clone in LPL, providing evidence of transformation. However, in 3 patients (23%), DLBCL was clonally unrelated to the major malignant B-cell clone in LPL, of which 2 patients developed de novo DLBCL. In this study cohort, LPL displayed MYD88L265P mutation in 8 out of eleven patients analyzed (73%), while CXCR4 mutations were observed in 6 cases (55%). MYD88WT LPL biopsies present in 3 patients (27%) were characterized by CD79B and TNFAIP3 mutations. Upon transformation, DLBCL acquired novel mutations targeting BTG1, BTG2, CD79B, CARD11, TP53, and PIM1. Together, we demonstrate variable clonal B-cell dynamics in LPL/WM patients developing DLBCL, and the occurrence of clonally unrelated DLBCL in about one-quarter of LPL/WM patients. Moreover, we identified commonly mutated genes upon DLBCL transformation, which together with preserved mutations already present in LPL characterize the mutational landscape of DLBCL occurrences in LPL/WM patients.