Induction of Fas (Apo-1, CD95)-Mediated Apoptosis of Activated Lymphocytes by Polyclonal Antithymocyte Globulins

Update on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

The standard therapy for decompensated end-stage chronic liver disease of any etiology and acute fulminant hepatic failure is liver transplantation (LT). Advances in immunosuppressive therapy decreased the rates of acute and chronic rejections. Thus, graft and patient survivals have significantly improved. However, long-term adverse effects of prolonged use of immunosuppressive agents such as malignancies, opportunistic infections, metabolic disorders, and other organ toxicities have now become a major concern. Consequently, alternative approaches are needed to deescalate the customary drugs and their side effects. Therapy must be individualized and additional preventive measures should be taken by patients with particular risk factors or predisposed to certain adverse effects. Current opinion favors a combination of agents with different mechanism of actions and toxicity profiles. Corticosteroids are employed in immediate and early postoperative period. Although they have a pronounced side effect profile, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are still the backbone of early and late phase immunosuppressive regimens because of their proved efficacy. Antimetabolites are frequent choices for steroid and/or CNI-sparing strategies. Studies also have established a role for mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in specific groups of recipients. Biologic agents are a hot topic of interest and made their way into current strategies for induction. Agents extrapolated from other transplantation or immunologic experience are being evaluated.

Prevention of acute rejection with antithymocyte globulin, avoiding corticosteroids, and delaying cyclosporin after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite their well-known side-effects, corticosteroids (Cs) are currently used after kidney transplantation. Avoidance of Cs may improve patient quality of life and eventual long-term survival. We report on a regimen using antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for induction, and cyclosporin (CsA) plus MMF for maintenance treatment of recipients of primary kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We studied 11 consecutive, non-sensitized renal transplant patients (nine cadaver and two living donors). Initial immunosuppression consisted of ATG (1.5 mg/kg/day, i.v.) given for 10 days and MMF (1.0 g/b.i.d.). CsA (8 mg/kg, in two divided doses) was started on post-operative day 11. Cs were only allowed in the case of MMF discontinuation, for the treatment of acute rejection, and in the event of recurrence of the primary glomerulonephritis.

RESULTS

All patients completed the entire 10-day ATG course. Main side-effects included fever (>38 degrees C) and serum sickness, observed in 73 and 27% of the patients respectively. The incidence of acute rejection was 27% (three of 11 patients). In two patients with acute rejection, serum sickness was concomitantly diagnosed and renal histology was partially compatible with immune-complex disease. The remaining patient had two episodes of low-grade rejection. All rejection episodes were rapidly reversed. Two patients (18%) were treated with ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Two patients (18%) are currently receiving Cs for recurrence of the native glomerulonephritis and two rejection episodes respectively. All patients are currently alive with functioning kidneys (average follow-up of 8.4 months; average creatinine level of 128 micromol/l).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that ATG induction in combination with MMF and delayed introduction of CsA, in the absence of Cs, is not well tolerated in recipients of kidney transplants. An earlier introduction of calcineurin inhibitors and/or a shorter course of ATG may reduce the incidence of fever and serum sickness secondary to ATG.