Should Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis to Detect Minimal Residual Disease in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Be Used in Clinical Decision Making?

Eradication of leukemia stem cells as a new goal of therapy in leukemia

Leukemias have traditionally been classified and treated on the basis of phenotypic characteristics, such as morphology and cell-surface markers, and, more recently, cytogenetic aberrations. These classification systems are flawed because they do not take into account cellular function. The leukemia cell population is functionally heterogeneous: it consists of leukemia stem cells (LSC) and mature leukemia cells that differentiate abnormally to varying extents. Like normal hematopoietic stem cells, LSCs are quiescent and have self-renewal and clonogenic capacity. Because they are quiescent, LSCs do not respond to cell cycle-specific cytotoxic agents used to treat leukemia and so contribute to treatment failure. These cells may undergo mutations and epigenetic changes, further leading to drug resistance and relapse. Recent data suggest that mature leukemia cells may acquire LSC characteristics, thereby evading chemotherapeutic treatment and sustaining the disease. Ongoing research is likely to reveal the molecular mechanisms responsible for LSC characteristics and lead to novel strategies for eradicating leukemia.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia in T cell lymphoid blastic phase achieving durable complete cytogenetic and molecular remission with imatinib mesylate (STI571; Gleevec) therapy

BACKGROUND

A T cell lymphoid blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a rare occurrence, with only a few reported cases worldwide. Standard therapy for such patients is undetermined. Imatinib mesylate, a Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown activity in CML.

METHODS

The authors report on a patient with CML and marrow as well as extramedullary nodal T cell lymphoid blastic phase who was treated with imatinib mesylate.

RESULTS

The patient achieved complete morphologic and cytogenetic remission within two months of therapy. Competitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of marrow cells was negative after 15 months. Response had lasted for 26+ months at the time of writing.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data suggest that imatinib mesylate may produce long-term event free survival in patients with T-cell lymphoid blastic phase CML. Its potential role alone or in combinations should be further explored in this condition.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization: a highly efficient technique of molecular diagnosis and predication for disease course in patients with myeloid leukemias

The accuracy of cytogenetic diagnosis in the management of hematological malignancies has improved significantly over the past 10 years. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a technique of molecular cytogenetics, has played a pivotal role in the detection of unique sub-microscopic chromosomal rearrangements that helped in the identification of chromosomal loci, which contain genes involved in leukemogenesis. We studied the feasibility and sensitivity of the FISH technique for molecular analysis of translocations markers, t(9;22) and t(15;17) for accurate molecular diagnosis and for monitoring the disease in 21 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who received interferon-alpha and/or chemotherapy (7 patients), bone marrow transplantation (14 patients), and 14 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) who received all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and/or chemotherapy. We also applied conventional karyotyping (CK) for identification of t(9;22) and t(15;17) at diagnosis. All CML cases had a Ph; t(9;22) and except for two cases all APL had t(15;17). The FISH studies on CML marrows in complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) (100% Ph- by CK) achieved by IFN-alpha, showed 0-2.5% of cells with BCR-ABL fusion in first cytogenetic remission (Controls, range 0.5-1.5%). Repeat follow-up FISH studies could be done in two cases in remission, which demonstrated 0-10% of cells with BCR-ABL fusion. Evaluation of Ph positive status of CML marrow at diagnosis by CK (100% Ph+ cells) and FISH (80-92% BCR-ABL fusion) pointed the existence of dormant clone of normal residual hematopoietic cells along with actively proliferating clones of Ph positive cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of post-BMT CML marrows in CCR (0% Ph+ mitoses) could detect MRD with range of 1-6%. Among 14 patients, 9 who showed percentage of BCR-ABL positive cells (0.0-1.5%) almost similar to normal controls, 6 patients had comparatively good prognosis (disease-free survival 7-14 months). Of five patients with residual leukemic cells in the range of 2-6%, 4 relapsed within a period of 3-24 months. Fourteen APL patients in CCR [100% t(15;17) negative cells by CK] were evaluated by FISH to check the presence of residual leukemic cells. In these patients FISH could efficiently detect 1-14.5% of residual cells with PML-RARA (patients mean MRD 5%, controls mean MRD 3.5%, P=.02). Since the time of FISH analysis, 5 to 7 patients with higher fraction of leukemic cells (5-11%) relapsed within a short period (1-7 months). On the contrary, 5 of 7 patients with either absence or low percentage of PML-RARA positive cells remained in complete remission for 11-24 months. Our data show that FISH has a potential to detect and measure the fraction of aberrant malignant cells in remission marrows, induced by BMT in CML and chemotherapy in APL. These findings encourage the investigations on a large scale to merit its potential for identification of patients at high risk. In the present studies, FISH on interphase cells also demonstrated its efficiency in the molecular diagnosis by its ability to detect BCR-ABL and PML-RARA fusion in CML with masked/variant Ph and t(15;17) negative APL, respectively. The efficiency of technique in molecular diagnosis was also proved in one of the CML patients who progressed to myeloid blastic phase where interphase FISH could identify an extra BCR-ABL fusion on both chromosomes 9 indicating insertion of BCR into ABL and its duplication.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia: laboratory diagnosis and monitoring

Rapid developments have occurred both in laboratory medicine and in therapeutic interventions for the management of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). With a wide array of laboratory tests available, selecting the appropriate test for a specific diagnostic or therapeutic setting has become increasingly difficult. In this review, we first discuss, from the point of view of laboratory medicine, the advantages and disadvantages of several commonly used laboratory assays, including cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We then discuss, from the point of view of clinical care, the test(s) of choice for the most common clinical scenarios, including diagnosis and monitoring of the therapeutic response and minimal residual disease in patients treated with different therapies. The purpose of this review is to help clinicians and laboratory physicians select appropriate tests for the diagnosis and monitoring of CML, with the ultimate goal of improving the cost-effective usage of clinical laboratories and improving patient care.

Molecular evolution of chronic myeloid leukaemia

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a clonal disorder of the pluripotent haematopoietic stem cell. The typical triphasic course of CML starts with the premalignant chronic phase initiated by BCR-ABL hybrid oncogene formation. Secondary genetic and epigenetic aberrations accompany the progression to the accelerated phase and fatal blastic crisis. Properly timed bone marrow transplantation in eligible patients can result in durable remissions or cure. Both of these states are often accompanied by a long-term persistence of quiescent leukaemic cells. Accordingly, a "functional cure" (i.e. tumour dormancy induction), rather than complete eradication of the malignant cells, is an adequate therapeutical goal. The level of the residual BCR-ABL-positive clones should be monitored and salvage treatment initiated whenever these quiescent leukaemic cells exit their dormant state.

Durability of responses following donor lymphocyte infusions for patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia

An analysis was performed of the response to treatment with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and the survival in 66 consecutive patients who relapsed after primary treatment by allogeneic stem cell transplantation for BCR-ABL–positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The transplant donor was an HLA-identical sibling (n = 35) or a “matched” unrelated volunteer (n = 31). Fifty-seven patients were transplanted in chronic phase, eight in accelerated phase, and one in second chronic phase. The recognition of relapse was based on precise molecular, cytogenetic, or hematologic criteria. The median interval from transplant to relapse was 12 months (range 3-85). The median interval from relapse to initiation of DLI was 9.4 months (range 1-70). Patients received DLI from their original transplant donors on a bulk-dose (n = 34) or on an escalating-dose (n = 32) regimen. Patients were monitored serially by hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria. Molecular remission was defined by the finding of negative results by nested primer reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR-ABL transcripts on two consecutive occasions, subject to satisfactory controls. Forty-four patients (67%) achieved molecular remission. Patients who had relapsed to advanced phase disease and patients with short intervals between transplant and relapse had significantly lower probabilities of achieving molecular remission. Of the 44 patients who achieved molecular remission, 4 reverted to a PCR-positive status at 15, 18, 37, and 87 weeks after remission. The probability of survival for patients who achieved molecular remission was significantly better than for those who failed to do so (95% versus 53% at 3 years post-DLI,P = .0001). We conclude that the majority of molecular remissions after DLI are durable, and thus the majority of responding patients may prove to have been cured.

Therapeutic choices in younger patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and interferon (IFN)-alpha therapy have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Both therapies may be suitable for younger patients. The authors reviewed current data to assist in prioritizing these modalities in an individual patient.

METHODS

The authors reviewed and summarized current data on outcomes of SCT and IFN-alpha therapy in patients with early chronic phase CML.

RESULTS

Several disease-, patient-, and physician-related factors affect outcomes with both modalities. Interferon-alpha does not induce myelofibrosis. The course of CML is predictable in most patients; sudden emergence of blastic phase; disease is unusual. There is no significant adverse impact of delaying SCT for the 12 months usually necessary to assess cytogenetic response to an IFN-alpha-based regimen. Interferon-alpha may be discontinued some months before SCT and is not associated with an adverse impact on post-SCT outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An individualized risk assessment-based approach is of value in prioritizing SCT and IFN-alpha in younger patients with chronic phase CML. The authors recommend a risk-based therapy algorithm based on the expected SCT associated 1-year mortality for an individual patient.

Extramedullary blast crisis in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic and molecular remission on interferon-alpha therapy

We report the previously undescribed occurrence of extramedullary blast crisis in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic and molecular remission on interferon-alpha. Development of bilateral testicular swelling prompted a biopsy showing stromal infiltration with CD20 and TdT positive immature cells. On repeated examinations, the bone marrow remained BCR/ABL negative by RT-PCR analysis. However, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) contained atypical lymphocytes positive for the P210 BCR-ABL product. Following treatment with testicular irradiation, intrathecal methotrexate, systemic chemotherapy and an unrelated donor transplant, the patient showed no evidence of disease until 9 months post-transplant, when he relapsed in lymphoid blast crisis in both bone marrow and CSF.

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Disease Biology and Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Over the last 2 decades, four major therapeutic approaches have drastically changed the prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML): 1) allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT); 2) interferon alpha (IFN-α) based regimens; 3) donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI); and 4) and the revolutionary BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as STI571 (signal transduction inhibitor 571). Each modality has exploited and targeted different aspects of CML biology, and is associated with different risk-benefit ratios.

In Section I of this review, Dr. Melo reviews the molecular pathophysiology of CML and potential new targets for therapy including anti-sense strategies to disrupt the BCR-ABL gene and inhibition of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity.

In Section II, Dr. Tura, addresses important questions in the use of IFN-α for the treatment of CML, including the mechanism of action and the development of resistance, the optimal dose and duration of therapy and the prediction of response based on clinical features. An approach to the choice of therapy based on the predicted mortality is presented.

In Section III Dr. Giralt presents an update on the results of unrelated donor transplantion, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and non-ablative stem cell transplantation (NST) in CML. The roles of CD8-depletion, dose escalation and the transduction of suicide genes in treatment with DLI are addressed. Early results of NST in CML show that it is feasible and can result in long-term disease control.

In Section IV Drs. Kantarjian and Talpaz review the results of IFN-α plus low-dose cytosine arabinoside and other promising modalities for CML including homoharringtonine, decitabine, and polyethylene glycol-interferon. In Section V they present an update on the recent experience with STI571. Objective but transient responses have been seen in 40% to 50% of patients in CML blastic phase. In accelerated phase, the response rate with STI571 exceeds 70%, and these responses are durable. In chronic phase CML, STI571 at 300 mg daily in patients who failed IFN-α produces a complete hematologic response (CHR) in over 90% of patients. Early results suggest cytogenetic response rates of approximately 50%, which may be major in approximately 30%. The maturing results with STI571 may soon change current recommendations regarding the relative roles of established modalities such as allogeneic SCT and IFN-α. Important questions include 1) whether STI571 therapy alone may be sufficient to induce long-term survival and event-free survival in CML, or whether it needs to be combined simultaneously or sequentially with IFN-α and cytosine arabinoside; and 2) what should the indications for frontline allogeneic SCT be in relation to STI571 therapy.

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Disease Biology and Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Over the last 2 decades, four major therapeutic approaches have drastically changed the prognosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML): 1) allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT); 2) interferon alpha (IFN-α) based regimens; 3) donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI); and 4) and the revolutionary BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as STI571 (signal transduction inhibitor 571). Each modality has exploited and targeted different aspects of CML biology, and is associated with different risk-benefit ratios.

In Section I of this review, Dr. Melo reviews the molecular pathophysiology of CML and potential new targets for therapy including anti-sense strategies to disrupt the BCR-ABL gene and inhibition of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity.

In Section II, Dr. Tura, addresses important questions in the use of IFN-α for the treatment of CML, including the mechanism of action and the development of resistance, the optimal dose and duration of therapy and the prediction of response based on clinical features. An approach to the choice of therapy based on the predicted mortality is presented.

In Section III Dr. Giralt presents an update on the results of unrelated donor transplantion, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and non-ablative stem cell transplantation (NST) in CML. The roles of CD8-depletion, dose escalation and the transduction of suicide genes in treatment with DLI are addressed. Early results of NST in CML show that it is feasible and can result in long-term disease control.

In Section IV Drs. Kantarjian and Talpaz review the results of IFN-α plus low-dose cytosine arabinoside and other promising modalities for CML including homoharringtonine, decitabine, and polyethylene glycol-interferon. In Section V they present an update on the recent experience with STI571. Objective but transient responses have been seen in 40% to 50% of patients in CML blastic phase. In accelerated phase, the response rate with STI571 exceeds 70%, and these responses are durable. In chronic phase CML, STI571 at 300 mg daily in patients who failed IFN-α produces a complete hematologic response (CHR) in over 90% of patients. Early results suggest cytogenetic response rates of approximately 50%, which may be major in approximately 30%. The maturing results with STI571 may soon change current recommendations regarding the relative roles of established modalities such as allogeneic SCT and IFN-α. Important questions include 1) whether STI571 therapy alone may be sufficient to induce long-term survival and event-free survival in CML, or whether it needs to be combined simultaneously or sequentially with IFN-α and cytosine arabinoside; and 2) what should the indications for frontline allogeneic SCT be in relation to STI571 therapy.