Extracorporeal photopheresis in Sézary syndrome: hematologic parameters as predictors of response

What Does the Future Hold for Biomarkers of Response to Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome?

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an FDA-approved immunotherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, which can provide a complete response in some patients. However, it is still being determined who will respond well, and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to target patients for timely treatment and to monitor their response over time. The aim of this review is to analyze the current state of the diagnostic, prognostic, and disease state-monitoring biomarkers of ECP, and outline the future direction of the ECP biomarker discovery. Specifically, we focus on biomarkers of response to ECP in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. The review summarizes the current knowledge of ECP biomarkers, including their limitations and potential applications, and identifies key challenges in ECP biomarker discovery. In addition, we discuss emerging technologies that could revolutionize ECP biomarker discovery and accelerate the translation of biomarker research into clinical practice. This review will interest researchers and clinicians seeking to optimize ECP therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - part 1

Background

Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi‐disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.

Materials and methods

In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.

Results and conclusion

These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐versus‐host disease and acute graft‐versus‐host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4+ T cells in a human in-vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a widely used immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of various T cell-mediated disorders such as cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or systemic sclerosis. Although clinical benefits of ECP are already well described, the underlying mechanism of action of ECP is not yet fully understood. Knowledge on the fate of CD14⁺ monocytes in the context of ECP is particularly limited and controversial. Here, we investigated the immunoregulatory function of ECP treated monocytes on T cells in an in-vitro ECP model. We show that ECP-treated monocytes significantly induce proinflammatory T cell types in co-cultured T cells, while anti-inflammatory T cells remain unaffected. Furthermore, we found significantly reduced proliferation rates of T cells after co-culture with ECP-treated monocytes. Both changes in interleukin secretion and proliferation were dependent on cell-contact between monocytes and T cells. Interestingly, blocking interactions of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to programmed death 1 (PD-1) in the in-vitro model led to a significant recovery of T cell proliferation. These results set the base for further studies on the mechanism of ECP, especially the regulatory role of ECP-treated monocytes.

The role of extracorporeal photopheresis in the management of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease and organ transplant rejection: a consensus statement update from the UK Photopheresis Society

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 35 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic and acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) and solid organ transplant rejection. ECP for CTCL and GvHD is available at specialised centres across the UK. The lack of prospective randomised trials in ECP led to the development of UK Consensus Statements for patient selection, treatment schedules, monitoring protocols and patient assessment criteria for ECP. The recent literature has been reviewed and considered when writing this update. Most notably, the national transition from the UVAR XTS^® machine to the new CELLEX machine for ECP with dual access and a shorter treatment time has led to relevant changes in these schedules. This consensus statement updates the previous statement from 2007 on the treatment of CTCL and GvHD with ECP using evidence based medicine and best medical practise and includes guidelines for both children and adults.

Selective photodepletion of malignant T cells in extracorporeal photopheresis with selenorhodamine photosensitizers

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used successfully in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), and other T cell-mediated disorders. Not all patients obtain a significant or durable response from ECP. The design of a selective photosensitizer that spares desirable lymphocytes while targeting malignant T cells may promote cytotoxic T cell responses and improve outcomes after ECP. A series of selenorhodamines built with variations of the Texas red core targeted the mitochondria of malignant T cells, were phototoxic to malignant T cells presumably via their ability to generate singlet oxygen, and were transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). To determine the selectivity of the photosensitizers in the ECP milieu, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB)-stimulated and non-stimulated human lymphocytes were combined with HUT-78 cells (a CTCL) to simulate ECP. The amide-containing analogues of the selenorhodamines were transported more rapidly than the thioamide analogues in monolayers of MDCKII-MDR1 cells and, consequently, were extruded more rapidly from P-gp-expressing T cells than the corresponding thioamide analogues. Selenorhodamine 6 with the Texas red core and a piperidylamide functionality was phototoxic to >90% of malignant T cells while sparing >60% of both stimulated and non-stimulated T cells. In the resting T cells, (63±7)% of the CD4+ T cell compartment, and (78±2.5)% of the CD8+ cytotoxic T cell population were preserved, resulting in an enrichment of healthy and cytotoxic T cells after photodepletion.

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis

BACKGROUND

After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.

Updating ECP action mechanisms

Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy (ECP) consists in illumination of the patient's leukocytes in the presence of 8-Methoxy Psoralen (8-MOP) and its reinjection to the same patient. ECP is responsible for many cellular events, the most important being the induction of cell apoptosis. Apoptosis appears first in lymphocytes and activated lymphocytes (allo or auto) which are more sensitive and undergo faster apoptosis rather than other cells. Monocytes develop apoptosis later. The injection of apoptotic cells induces tolerance in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) and acute heart or lung graft rejection. In these patients, phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and in particular dendritic cells is responsible for a shift from Th1 to Th2 immune response, an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukine 10 (IL-10) and Tumor Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and finally, for the proliferation of regulatory cells. Among CD4/CD25 positive cells, only CD4(+)CD25(hi) are T-regulatory cells (T-regs). One subpopulation of T-regs produces IL-10 and inhibits Th1 CD4 cells, whereas other populations act as suppressors and inhibit the cytotoxic T-cells responsible for organ rejection and GvHD in an antigen specific fashion. It is not clear why the injection of early apoptotic cells induces tolerance in GvHD and organ graft rejection, but in Sézary syndrome, it induces up-regulation of anti-tumor immune response. Immune response modulation (up- or down-regulation) after ECP depends on many factors: early apoptotic cell injection; anti-inflammatory environment; impaired function of dendritic cells; dendritic type 2 cell dominance, lead to immune tolerance, whereas late apoptotic or necrotic cell injection and pro-inflammatory cytokines enhance immune response. Therefore, immune response to ECP depends on various factors responsible for the diversity of its mode of action in different diseases and further investigations are required.

The role of extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is an effective treatment modality for patients with erythrodermic myocosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). During ECP, a fraction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells is collected, incubated ex-vivo with methoxypsoralen, UVA irradiated, and finally reinfused to the patient. Although the mechanism of action of ECP is not well established, clinical and laboratory observations support the hypothesis of a vaccination-like effect. ECP induces apoptosis of normal and neoplastic lymphocytes, while enhancing differentiation of monocytes towards immature dendritic cells (imDCs), followed by engulfment of apoptotic bodies. After reinfusion, imDCs undergo maturation and antigenic peptides from the neoplastic cells are expressed on the surface of DCs. Mature DCs travel to lymph nodes and activate cytotoxic T-cell clones with specificity against tumor antigens. Disease control is mediated through cytotoxic T-lymphocytes with tumor specificity. The efficacy and excellent safety profile of ECP has been shown in a large number of retrospective trials. Previous studies showed that monotherapy with ECP produces an overall response rate of approximately 60%, while clinical data support that ECP is much more effective when combined with other immune modulating agents such as interferons or retinoids, or when used as consolidation treatment after total skin electron beam irradiation. However, only a proportion of patients actually respond to ECP and parameters predictive of response need to be discovered. A patient with a high probability of response to ECP must fulfill all of the following criteria: (1) SS or erythrodermic MF, (2) presence of neoplastic cells in peripheral blood, and (3) early disease onset. Despite the fact that ECP has been established as a standard treatment modality, no prospective randomized study has been conducted so far, to the authors' knowledge. Considering the high cost of the procedure, the role of ECP in the treatment of SS/MF needs to be clarified via well designed multicenter prospective randomized trials.

Predictors of response to extracorporeal photopheresis in advanced mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been utilized for more than 20 years to treat cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but a clinical response can take up to 9 months to manifest. This study was undertaken to determine whether clinical features, laboratory values, cytokine levels, or gene expression levels of tumor markers are useful to predict the subsequent response to ECP in CTCL patients with blood involvement.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with CTCL treated with ECP as monotherapy for at least 6 months were retrospectively identified. Laboratory and clinical data and blood obtained at baseline, 3, and 6 months of treatment were used for analysis.

RESULTS

In pretreatment blood specimens, a lower percentage of Sézary cells and a higher absolute eosinophil count were associated with a favorable clinical response. Clinical evidence of an early response after 3 months of ECP did not reliably predict a favorable response at 6 months or beyond. Comparison of cytokines, gene transcripts, and other laboratory measures of disease did not correlate with the subsequent clinical response, although lactate dehydrogenase levels tended to decrease progressively in ECP-responsive cases and increase progressively in ECP-non-responsive cases. Additionally, serum levels of TNF-alpha significantly increased from baseline to 6 months of ECP, but was not found to correlate with the clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we found that increased eosinophils and decreased percentage of Sézary cells were associated with a favorable clinical response to ECP, we were not able to identify the predictors of ECP response within the first 3 months of treatment.

Combination therapy with extracorporeal photopheresis, interferon-alpha, PUVA and topical corticosteroids in the management of Sézary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is recommended for the treatment of Sézary syndrome (SS), the leukemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Several combination therapies are used to increase response rates to ECP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report our experience with the combination therapy of ECP, interferon-alpha, PUVA and topical corticosteroids in SS.

RESULTS

The treatment outcome in 12 SS patients was retrospectively analyzed and showed an overall response rate to this combination treatment of 42 % with 4/12 patients achieving a partial remission and 1/12 patients a stable disease. The median overall survival time was 42 months. We investigated several clinical and laboratory parameters as an indicator for a response to treatment in our patient cohort. A combined analysis of the erythroderma assessment scale, WBC, LDH, CD4/CD8 ratio and the number of Sézary cells revealed that a reduction of several parameters significantly correlated with response to treatment. The parameters which correlated best with response were number of Sézary cells, CD4/CD8 ratio and WBC.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated combination therapy was effective and well-tolerated in a subgroup of SS patients but needs to be evaluated in a larger patient population.

Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy as a Challenging Treatment for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease, Organ Rejection and T-Lymphocyte-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases

SUMMARY: 20 years ago, in 1987, Edelson and co-workers published their first report on the effectiveness of a new procedure, called extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), in patients with advanced stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The positive response (>70% overall) achieved in those patients encouraged several groups to try out this new technology in other T-lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune diseases and a number of dermatological diseases, which sometimes gave conflicting results. In the following years, ECP obtained FDA approval as first line treatment in CTCL. In the 1990s ECP was applied to acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and proved to be effective in >60% of cases of this larger patient population. Today, although the effectiveness of ECP in GvHD is generally acknowledged, this is mainly based on retrospective or observational studies, as data from large, randomized multicenter trials, has yet to be published. Moreover, ECP's real mechanism of action and optimal treatment schedule are still under investigation. The aim of this review is to summarize knowledge acquired to date about ECP.

Extracorporeal photopheresis for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: does it work?

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to be major limitations to successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A variety of different immunosuppressive and immunomodulating modalities have been tested in chronic GVHD, among them extracorporeal photopheresis. Photopheresis is currently indicated and Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of skin manifestations of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, where the response rate has proved to be considerably high. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy has been evaluated in small cohorts of patients with both acute and chronic GVHD. In steroid-refractory acute GVHD of the skin and liver, the reported response rate is more than 60%, especially in patients with less severe forms of the disease. There is more extensive experience in the treatment of chronic GVHD; overall response rates of 50% and higher have been reported in patients with skin, oral, eye, liver, gastrointestinal, or lung involvement. At our center, we analyzed 63 patients who had 3 or fewer lines of immunosuppressant, including tacrolimus and steroids, to avoid the confounding effects of numerous immunosuppressive therapies. The overall response rate was 59% (n=37), and complete responses were seen in 13 patients. The best responses were observed in GVHD of the skin, liver, oral mucosa, and eye. Our results in chronic GVHD support previous reports of objective responses of skin and visceral GVHD to extracorporeal photopheresis. All of these results indicate activity of extracorporeal photopheresis in acute and chronic GVHD, which warrants further evaluation of this therapy in well-designed, prospective, controlled studies.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for the treatment of steroid-resistant chronic GVHD

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major limitation of successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) has been tested extensively in small cohorts of patients with chronic GVHD. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 71 patients with severe chronic GVHD treated with ECP. Response rate was 61% (n = 43), and 14 patients had complete responses (CRs). The best responses were observed in skin, liver, oral mucosa, and eye. Factors affecting outcomes were assessed in the less heavily pretreated subgroup (n = 63). Thrombocytopenia was associated with a lower response rate (P = .04), and there was a trend toward a higher response rate in de novo chronic GVHD. At 6 months, a total of 27 (69%) of 39 patients who were alive continued to have a sustained response (CR 4 [10%] of 39, and partial response [PR] 23 [59%] of 39). The cumulative incidence of steroid discontinuation at 1 year was 22%. The overall survival since initiation of therapy was 53% at 1 year. Response to ECP and platelet count at initiation of therapy were the strongest predictors of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) on univariate analysis. Objective responses were observed in a substantial number of patients with both skin and visceral chronic GVHD failing corticosteroids and other immunosuppression.

EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome

Several reviews and guidelines on the management of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) have been published; however, treatment strategies for patients with MF/SS vary from institution to institution and no European consensus has yet been established. There are few phase III trials to support treatment decisions for MF/SS and treatment is often determined by institutional experience. In order to summarise the available evidence and review 'best practices' from each national group, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force met in September 2004 to establish European guidelines for the treatment of MF/SS. This article reviews the treatment regimens selected for inclusion in the guidelines and summarises the clinical data for treatments appropriate for each stage of MF/SS. Guideline recommendations are presented according to the quality of supporting data, as defined by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF/SS and most patients can look forward to a normal life expectancy. Patients with advanced disease should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials and maintenance of quality of life should be paramount.

Evidence-based practice of photopheresis 1987-2001: a report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group and the U.K. Skin Lymphoma Group

Photopheresis or extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is a novel immunomodulatory therapy which involves separation of the patient's leucocyte-rich plasma, followed by ex vivo administration of a photosensitizer and ultraviolet A radiation, before reinfusion. ECP has been used successfully for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL: Sézary syndrome), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cardiac transplant rejection. ECP has a dose-sparing effect on concurrent immunosuppressive therapy. The procedure induces apoptosis of the irradiated lymphocytes, but the exact mechanism by which ECP exerts its therapeutic effect in these different conditions is uncertain. The treatment has very few adverse effects and in particular is not associated with an increased incidence of opportunistic infections. The evidence for the efficacy of ECP has been appraised by a combined British Photodermatology Group and U.K. Skin Lymphoma Group workshop on the basis of evidence published up to the end of 2001 and on the consensus of best practice. There is fair evidence for the use of ECP in erythrodermic CTCL and steroid-refractory GVHD, but randomized controlled studies are needed. There is good evidence supporting the use of ECP in preventing cardiac rejection following transplantation. Randomized controlled trials have also shown a therapeutic benefit in type 1 diabetes mellitus, but the inconvenience associated with the procedure outweighed the clinical benefit. There is fair evidence not to use ECP for the treatment of systemic sclerosis and multiple sclerosis, and good evidence not to use ECP for other forms of CTCL.

Small-scale extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A report of 3 cases

Extracorporeal photopheresis is an accepted method for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and much progress has recently been achieved in therapy and understanding of its mechanism. In general large numbers of white blood cells are collected by a cell separator and irradiated in the presence of 8-MOP. In contrast to this practice, data from an animal model showed that as few as 0.2% of the body's blood volume irradiated are sufficient to achieve an immune response after photopheresis. Based on these data we developed a small-scale photopheresis procedure and applied the method in 3 end-stage T-cell lymphoma patients who were not eligible for apheresis. The mononuclear cells from 50 ml of blood were separated by density gradient centrifugation, irradiated with UV-light in the presence of 8-Methoxy-Psoralen (MOP) with 2J/cm(2) and reinjected. 2-3 treatments per week were conducted. The three patients-2 male and 1 female, age 63-86, Sezary syndrome (1x) and mycosis fungoides in tumour stage (2x)-showed no side effects on cell injection. The two patients with mycosis fungoides showed a prompt regression and softening of the tumours. The patient with Sezary syndrome developed numerous necrotic spots on the skin after 6 weeks of therapy that turned normal within a few days. Patient 1 died of pneumonia 4 weeks after the start of therapy and patient 3 died of heart failure 8 weeks after start of therapy, both during regression of the tumours. Patient 2 was treated over a period of 11 months, with an initial regression in the first weeks followed by a slow progression of the tumours after she rejected any form of further treatment. The small-scale extracorporeal photopheresis therapy presented is effective in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. But questions regarding the optimal number of cells irradiated per treatment, the conditions of cell incubation after irradiation and the number of treatment cycles are still open. Therefore further studies are required to establish a method that is effective and circumvents the use of apheresis technology.

The effect of extracorporeal photopheresis on intracellular cytokine expression in chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Cytokines derived from T helper (Th)1 lymphocytes are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been reported to affect Th1/Th2 lymphocyte ratios. It may also influence the balance of cytotoxic Tcells (Tc1/Tc2).

OBJECTIVES

This study was formulated to assess the effect of ECP on the cytokine profiles of peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes from patients with chronic GVHD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine patients were studied. Peripheral blood was sampled at baseline and between 3 and 4 months of therapy when clinical effects are demonstrable. Intracellular cytokine production was assessed in vitro by stimulating PB lymphocytes with phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), inhibiting cytokine release and staining with fluorescein-labelled monoclonal antibodies to interleukin (IL)-2, interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) and IL-4. Flow cytometry analysis gave the absolute number and the percentage of cells expressing a particular cytokine within each lymphocyte subset.

RESULTS

Absolute counts of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD16+ cells per microlitre were recorded before and after ECP. There was a small but non-significant reduction in all subsets after 3 months of ECP. The percentage of cells expressing IL-2 and IFN-gamma rose following ECP in both the CD4 and CD8 subsets. However, only the percentage of CD4 cells expressing IFN-gamma reached statistical significance (P = 0.02; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.6-15.6). There were no significant changes in the percentage of CD4 cells expressing IL-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings appear to be inconsistent with current theories regarding the pathogenesis of GVHD as increased production of Th1 or Tc1 cytokines might be expected to exacerbate GVHD. However, chronic GVHD is characterized by a relative deficiency of IL-2 and IFN-gamma producing cells compared with other patients post-bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This indicates that Th1 and Tc1 cytokines are depleted in chronic GVHD. Thus, by reducing disease activity, ECP could allow cytokine production by these cells to recover. This indicates that the therapeutic effect of ECP is mediated by a different mechanism, and that the changes observed in this study are epiphenomena.

A randomized cross-over study to compare PUVA and extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of plaque stage (T2) mycosis fungoides

PUVA is a well-established and effective treatment for plaque stage mycosis fungoides (MF) but its use is limited on a long-term basis because of the risk of cutaneous carcinogenesis. A further disadvantage is that nonexposed areas (sanctuary sites) often develop persistent disease. Therefore it is important to find alternative methods of treatment. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a form of photochemotherapy that involves exposure of white blood cells to UVA with psoralens and can be effective in Sézary syndrome and erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of PUVA and ECP in the treatment of patients with T2 plaque stage (Stage 1B) MF who had a detectable peripheral blood T-cell clone. The study was of a cross-over design. Sixteen patients were randomized to receive either PUVA twice weekly for 3 months followed by ECP once monthly for 6 months at relapse, or vice-versa. Response was assessed by monthly skin scores and peripheral blood T-cell clonality. Ten patients received PUVA initially and six ECP initially. Eight patients completed the study. Skin scores taken at the completion of each treatment arm in patients who completed the study were 113 units better (confidence interval, 42-184 units) following 3 months PUVA than 6 months ECP (P = 0.002). Peripheral blood T-cell clones were detectable in all patients post-treatment. This study indicates that ECP is not effective in the treatment of plaque stage (1B/T2) MF even in patients with molecular evidence of a peripheral blood T-cell clone. Although PUVA was more effective than ECP, neither treatment modality cleared malignant T-cells from the peripheral blood.

Treatment of advanced mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome with fludarabine and potential adjunctive benefit to subsequent extracorporeal photochemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Purine analogues [fludarabine monophosphate (FAMP); deoxycoformycin and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) have been suggested to be active agents in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients.

OBJECTIVES

To explore further the clinical efficacy and safety of FAMP monochemotherapy in advanced CTCL and to evaluate if the sequential association of ECP to FAMP in selected patients may improve the response rate (RR) and/or lengthen the remission duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four CTCL patients [17 Sézary syndrome (SS); 26 mycosis fungoides (MF), stage IIB-IV or with peripheral blood involvement; one MF associated with lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP)] were enrolled in this pilot cohort study. All the patients received FAMP 25 mg m(-2) 5 days monthly; 19 patients (43.2%) underwent ECP after FAMP was discontinued. The majority of patients with erythrodermic CTCL or peripheral blood involvement underwent the combined FAMP-ECP schedule.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the overall FAMP RR was 29.5% (13/44); a higher RR was obtained in SS (35.3%) than in MF patients (25.9%). According to the treatment group, the RR of the FAMP-ECP group (63.2%) was significantly higher than that of the FAMP monotherapy group (24%; P=0.021). No statistically significant difference was found in time-to-progression (TTP) or survival by therapy group, even if the TTP of the patients treated with the FAMP-ECP combination therapy was higher (median 13 vs. 7 months). A decrease or a normalization in the CD4+CD26- circulating subset was observed in responding patients, paralleling the reduction in the circulating Sézary cells.

CONCLUSIONS

FAMP confirms its clinical activity as a single agent in SS; conversely, FAMP results do not compare favourably with other therapeutic approaches for advanced stage MF patients. The sequential association of ECP after FAMP seems to increase the RR, even if future randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Management of the primary cutaneous lymphomas

Cutaneous lymphomas are rare and, although some are a manifestation of systemic lymphoma, the majority arise primarily from the skin. These primary cutaneous lymphomas comprise both T- and B-cell subtypes and represent a wide spectrum of disorders, which at times can be difficult to diagnose and classify. Classical therapeutic strategies include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, radiotherapy, retinoids, extracorporeal photopheresis, topical chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and biological response modifiers. Newer therapies include the synthetic retinoid bexarotene, the immunotoxin conjugate denileukin diftitox, interleukin-12 and monoclonal antibodies such as alemtuzumab and rituximab.

The treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with photopheresis

Photopheresis or extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is an immunomodulating procedure that has been available for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) since 1987. A concentrated white blood cell (WBC) sample spiked with 8-methoxypsoralen (methoxsalen) is exposed to an ultraviolet A light source, then all blood components are returned to the patient. Treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) with ECP has been reported in over 400 patients. The combined overall response rate for all stages of CTCL is 55.7% (244 out of 438) with 17.6% (77 out of 438) achieving a complete response. Efficacy in treating certain clinical stages (IB, IIA, III and IVA) and skin stages (T2 and T4) of MF and SS is favorable, although randomized trials comparing ECP to other standard therapies are needed. The use of ECP to treat early stage patients remains controversial. Efforts to establish the effectiveness of combining ECP with other newer immunoadjuvant therapies and modifications of the procedure to enhance immunomodulation are exciting prospects for patients with CTCL.

Influence of extracorporeal photopheresis on clinical and laboratory parameters in chronic graft-versus-host disease and analysis of predictors of response

We report 28 patients with advanced chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) treated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). All had failed conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Of the patients, 27 had extensive cGVHD and 20 had more than 50% cutaneous surface area involvement. ECP was initiated approximately 2 years after onset of cGVHD and 3 years following allogeneic stem cell transplantation and administered fortnightly for 4 months and then monthly. Response was assessed using quantifiable disease measures, including skin score, liver function tests (LFTs), blood counts, and lung function tests. Regression analysis allowed assessment of any pretreatment clinical or laboratory parameters that predicted response. There were 25 patients who completed 3 months and 21 who completed 6 months of treatment. Systemic immunosuppression was stable or reduced in 86% of patients. There were 3 patients who died from cGVHD. After 6 months, median skin scores were 53% lower (P =.003) in sclerodermoid and lichenoid disease. Of 6 patients with mucosal ulceration, 3 improved. A nonsignificant improvement of LFTs occurred. We infer that ECP is effective even in patients with extensive cutaneous cGVHD of 2 years duration that is resistant to conventional therapy. Furthermore, both sclerodermoid and lichenoid subtypes responded. However, no baseline parameters predicted a favorable response to ECP, so patient selection must continue to be made on clinical grounds.

Phase 2 study of alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome

This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab in 22 patients with advanced mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). Most patients had stage III or IV disease, reduced performance status, and severe itching. The overall response (OR) rate was 55%, with 32% of patients in complete remission (CR) and 23% in partial remission (PR). Sézary cells were cleared from the blood in 6 of 7 (86%) patients, and CR in lymph nodes was observed in 6 of 11 (55%) patients. The effect was better on erythroderma (OR, 69%) than on plaque or skin tumors (OR, 40%) and in patients who had received 1 to 2 previous regimens (OR, 80%) than in those who had received 3 or more prior regimens (OR, 33%). Itching, self-assessed on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale, was reduced from a median of 8 before treatment to 2 at end of therapy. Median time to treatment failure was 12 months (range, 5-32+ months). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (causing fever without pneumonitis and responding to ganciclovir) occurred in 4 (18%) patients. Six additional patients had suspect or manifest infection (fever of unknown origin, 3; generalized herpes simplex, 1; fatal aspergillosis, 1). One patient had fatal Mycobacterium pneumonia at 10+ months. All serious infectious adverse events (except CMV) occurred in patients who had received 3 or more prior regimens. Progression of squamous cell skin carcinoma was noted in 1 patient. Alemtuzumab shows promising clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced MF/SS, particularly in patients with erythroderma and severe itching and those who were not heavily pretreated.