Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism and risk of occult cancer

Risk and Prognosis of Cancer in Patients With Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Compared With the Danish General Population

BACKGROUND

Whether cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a marker of cancer in clinical practice remains unknown. Little is known about the prognosis of cancer detected subsequent to CVT.

METHODS

We used Danish nationwide registries (1996-2019) to identify patients with a first-time primary inpatient diagnosis of CVT without a history of cancer (N=811, 65% women, median age 42 years). We assessed the risk of an incident cancer diagnosis using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). This measure contrasts the number of observed cancers among patients with CVT to the number of expected cancers where patients with CVT have the same cancer risk as the general population. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression to compare the survival of patients with both cancer and CVT with the survival of patients with cancer but without CVT, matched on cancer site, sex, age, and year of cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Observing 43 incident cancer cases during follow-up, the overall SIR was unity (SIR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.75-1.40]). However, the risk was ≈7-fold the expected level in the first 3 months following CVT diagnosis (SIR, 7.00 [95% CI, 3.02-13.80]) and ≈2-fold the expected level from 3 to 12 months following CVT diagnosis (SIR, 2.21 [95% CI, 0.89-4.56]). By 12 months following CVT diagnosis, the risk resembled the expected level (SIR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.50-1.09]). Survival among cancer patients with prior CVT versus cancer patients without prior CVT was 91% versus 87% after 6 months and 65% versus 70% after 5 years. The adjusted hazard ratio of death was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.44-1.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CVT were not at overall increased risk of a cancer diagnosis, except in the first 3 months after diagnosis during which period the risk was elevated ≈7-fold. The estimate from this early period, however, was based on only a few cancer diagnoses. Unlike other forms of venous thrombosis, a prior diagnosis of CVT did not negatively impact cancer survival.

Thrombosis in Pregnant Women with Hematological Malignancies: A Case-Based Review

Cancer and pregnancy induce a procoagulant environment which may lead to maternal and fetal complications, such as venous thromboembolism, fetal growth restriction, and fetal loss. The incidence of hematological malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy is rising, and thrombotic events in such malignancies are not rare. Management of thrombosis during pregnancy poses a therapeutic challenge, that is further exacerbated by the impact of cancer. The available data on managing pregnant women with hematological malignancies are limited to those with myeloproliferative neoplasms, mainly essential thrombocythemia, and, to a lesser extent, polycythemia vera. Low-dose aspirin is recommended throughout pregnancy, and considering treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin and interferon formulations is advised for high-risk patients. Currently, guidelines for handling thrombotic events in pregnant women with lymphoma or leukemia are lacking, and their management is based on data extrapolated from retrospective studies, and guidelines for prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. The present case-based review will focus on the complex issue of thrombotic risk in pregnant women with hematological malignancies, specifically myeloproliferative neoplasms, lymphomas, and leukemias.

Unusual thrombosis or pregnancy complications associated to ovarian cancers: two clinical cases

AIM

Using illustrative cases of two patients with ovarian cancer who developed unusual thrombosis in pregnancy, to describe the difficulties in diagnosing and managing such patients.

METHODS

We present the analysis of two cases of thrombosis of unusual localization (central artery of the retina and transverse and sigmoid sinus thrombosis) during pregnancy in women with hidden ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

In both cases, the symptomatic of unususal thrombosis was interpreted as a manifestation of eclampsia, leading to a choice of non-optimal obstetric tactics on a background of hidden ovarian cancer, which in both cases were diagnosed only postpartum.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy itself is a risk factor for thrombotic complications and in case malignancy develops in parallel with pregnancy, this risk is multiplied. In patients with ovarian cancer, difficulties arise both in detecting the tumor itself due to the enlarged uterus and in interpreting some of the symptoms, which can be regarded as a manifestation of pregnancy complications.