Impact of bone marrow biopsy on response assessment in immunochemotherapy-treated lymphoma patients in GALLIUM and GOYA

Update on follicular lymphoma

The past two decades have seen remarkable progress in both biological understanding and optimizing treatment of follicular lymphoma. Historically considered an incurable disease, long-term follow-up of several induction approaches demonstrates that up to 40% of patients enjoy remission durations of 10 or more years, and risk of dying of lymphoma continues to fall. This update will focus on progress in follicular lymphoma over the past 3 years, which has included refinements in staging and prognosis, novel immunotherapy treatment approaches for relapsed and refractory disease, and long-term follow-up of pivotal trials. Ongoing trials will define the optimal sequence for these novel treatments, including whether earlier incorporation of these approaches may result in definitive cure of this disease. Through ongoing and planned correlative studies, we are poised to ultimately achieve the goal of a precision management approach to follicular lymphoma.

Relevance of Bone Marrow Biopsies for Response Assessment in US National Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network Follicular Lymphoma Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

Bone marrow biopsies (BMB) are performed before/after therapy to confirm complete response (CR) in patients with lymphoma on clinical trials. We sought to establish whether BMB add value in assessing response or predict progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) outcomes in follicular lymphoma (FL) subjects in a large, multicenter, multitrial cohort.

METHODS

Data were pooled from seven trials of 580 subjects with previously untreated FL through Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) and SWOG Cancer Research Network (SWOG) completing enrollment from 2008 to 2016.

RESULTS

Only 5/580 (0.9%) had positive baseline BMB, CR on imaging, and subsequent positive BMB (P < .0001). Therefore, BMB were irrelevant to response in 99% of subjects. A sensitivity analysis of 385 FL subjects treated on an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study was included. In the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group cohort, 5/385 (1.3%) had BMB that affected response assessment. Since some subjects do not undergo confirmatory BMB, we performed a landmark survival analysis from first radiologic CR with data from 580 subjects from Alliance and SWOG. Of subjects with CR on imaging (n = 187), PFS and OS were not significantly different among those with negative BMB to confirm CR (n = 47) versus those without repeat BMB (n = 140; PFS: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.94, log-rank P = .686; OS: hazard ratio, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.53, log-rank P = .276).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that BMB add little value to response assessment in subjects with FL treated on clinical trials and we recommend eliminating BMB from clinical trial requirements. BMB should also be removed from diagnostic guidelines for FL except in scenarios in which it may change management including confirmation of limited stage and assessment of cytopenias. This would reduce cost, patient discomfort, resource utilization, and potentially remove a barrier to trial enrollment.

Application of the Lugano Classification for Initial Evaluation, Staging, and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The PRoLoG Consensus Initiative (Part 1-Clinical)

Our objective was to provide consensus recommendations from a consortium of academic and industry experts in the field of lymphoma and imaging for consistent application of the Lugano classification. Methods: Consensus was obtained through a series of meetings from July 2019 until September 2021 sponsored by the Pharma Imaging Network for Therapeutics and Diagnostics (PINTaD) as part of the PINTaD Response Criteria in Lymphoma Working Group (PRoLoG) consensus initiative. Results: Consensus recommendations clarified technical considerations for PET/CT and diagnostic CT from the Lugano classification, including updating the FDG avidity of different lymphoma entities, clarifying the response nomenclature, and refining lesion classification and scoring, especially with regard to scores 4 and 5 and the X category of the 5-point scale. Combination of metabolic and anatomic responses is clarified, as well as response assessment in cases of discordant or missing evaluations. Use of clinical data in the classification, especially the requirement for bone marrow assessment, is further updated on the basis of lymphoma entities. Clarification is provided with regard to spleen and liver measurements and evaluation, as well as nodal response. Conclusion: Consensus recommendations are made to comprehensively address areas of inconsistency and ambiguity in the classification encountered during response evaluation by end users, and such guidance should be used as a companion to the 2014 Lugano classification.

The value of FDG PET/CT imaging in outcome prediction and response assessment of lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Treatment strategies of lymphoid malignancies have been revolutionized by immunotherapy. Because of the inherent property of Hodgkin lymphoma and some subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma as a highly FDG-avid tumor, functional ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging is already embedded in their routine care. Nevertheless, the question is whether it is still valuable in the context of these tumors being treated with immunotherapy. Herein, we will review the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging lymphoid tumors treated with immunotherapy regimens.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed database was conducted on the value of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for immunotherapy response monitoring of patients with malignant lymphoma. The articles were considered eligible if they met all of the following inclusion criteria: (a) clinical studies on patients with different types of malignant lymphoma, (b) treatment with anti-CD20 antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors or immune cell therapies, (c) and incorporated PET/CT with ¹⁸F-FDG as the PET tracer.

RESULTS

From the initial 1488 papers identified, 91 were ultimately included in our study. In anti-CD20 therapy, the highest pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of baseline, early, and late response monitoring parameters for progression-free survival (PFS) belong to metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (3.19 (95%CI: 2.36-4.30)), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (3.25 (95%CI: 2.08-5.08)), and Deauville score (DS) (3.73 (95%CI: 2.50-5.56)), respectively. These measurements for overall survival (OS) were MTV (4.39 (95%CI: 2.71-7.08)), DS (3.23 (95%CI: 1.87-5.58)), and DS (3.64 (95%CI: 1.40-9.43)), respectively. Early and late ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT response assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and immune cell therapy might be an effective tool for prediction of clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

For anti-CD20 therapy of lymphoma, the MTV as a baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-derived parameter has the highest HRs for PFS and OS. The DS as visual criteria in early and late response assessment has higher HRs for PFS and OS compared to the international harmonization project (IHP) visual criteria in anti-CD20 therapy. Early changes in ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters may be predictive of response to ICIs and cell therapy in lymphoma patients.

Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging for Phenotyping and Management of Lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) represents molecular imaging for non-invasive phenotyping of physiological and biochemical processes in various oncological diseases. PET imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) for glucose metabolism evaluation is the standard imaging modality for the clinical management of lymphoma. One of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET applications is the detection and pre-treatment staging of lymphoma, which is highly sensitive. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also applied during treatment to evaluate the individual chemo-sensitivity and accordingly guide the response-adapted therapy. At the end of the therapy regiment, a negative PET scan is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy may be alleviated. Future PET studies using non-¹⁸F-FDG radiotracers, such as ⁶⁸Ga-labeled pentixafor (a cyclic pentapeptide that enables sensitive and high-contrast imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4), ⁶⁸Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) that reflects the tumor microenvironment, and ⁸⁹Zr-labeled atezolizumab that targets the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), may complement ¹⁸F-FDG and offer essential tools to decode lymphoma phenotypes further and identify the mechanisms of lymphoma therapy.

Time for an individualized approach to first-line management of follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma is a heterogeneous B-cell lymphoma both in presentation and at progression. For most patients it is a chronic, relapsing indolent disease with overall survival expectations now potentially beyond 20 years. However, in a significant minority (~20%) who experience early progression or histological transformation after treatment, the disease no longer has an indolent behavior. This review looks at the development of prognostic indices, staging and therapies for follicular lymphoma, identifying where the data can, and cannot, guide the multidisciplinary team to determine an individualized approach to first-line therapy. A nuanced patient- and disease-specific approach is necessary to maximize disease response and survival while minimizing therapeutic toxicity.

Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide (GALEN) in advanced, previously untreated follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy

Obinutuzumab and lenalidomide (GALEN) is an active immunomodulatory combination with a manageable safety profile in multiple types of lymphoma. We report efficacy and safety results for the phase 2 GALEN study in previously-untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years had ECOG PS ≤ 2, high-tumor burden, grade 1-3a FL. Induction treatment was obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV, days 8/15/22, cycle 1; day 1, cycles 2-6) plus lenalidomide (20 mg/day, days 1-21, cycle 1; days 2-22, cycles 2-6) for 6 cycles. Maintenance included obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 2 cycles) plus lenalidomide (10 mg, days 2-22) for ≤ 12 cycles (year 1) followed by obinutuzumab (1000 mg every 56 days) for 6 cycles (year 2). The primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) after induction per IWG 1999 criteria. From October 2015 to February 2017, 100 patients were enrolled. CRR after induction was 47% and overall response rate (ORR) 92%. Post-hoc analyses per 2014 Lugano classification including patients with missing bone marrow assessments identified an additional 13 patients fulfilling CRR criteria, resulting in a complete metabolic response of 80% and ORR of 94%. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 82% and 94%, respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (48% any-grade; 47% grade ≥ 3) but only 2% of patients presented febrile neutropenia; others were mainly grade ≤ 2. No other specific grade ≥3 toxicity occurred at a frequency higher than 3%. Overall, these results demonstrated promising clinical efficacy for the chemo-free backbone obinutuzumab and lenalidomide in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL patients. Except for neutropenia, the safety profile of the combination is remarkable. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01582776.

Follicular lymphoma: is there an optimal way to define risk?

Follicular lymphoma (FL) has a long natural history and typically indolent behavior. In the present era, there are a plethora of prognostic factors combining clinical, biological, and genetic data to determine patient prognosis and help develop treatment strategies over the course of a patient's lifetime. The rapid pace of tumor-specific and clinical advances in FL has created a challenge in the prioritization and implementation of these factors into clinical practice. Developing a comprehensive understanding of existing prognostic markers in FL will help select optimal ways of utilization in the clinical setting and investigate opportunities to define and intervene upon risk at FL diagnosis and disease recurrence.

Current Role of Functional Imaging in the Management of Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional imaging with 18FDG-PET-CT has transformed the staging and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Herein, we review the current role and future directions for functional imaging in the management of patients with lymphoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because of its increased sensitivity, PET-CT is the preferred modality for staging of FDG-avid lymphomas. It appears to have a role for interim assessment in patients with HL with adaptive strategies that reduce toxicity in lower risk patients and increase efficacy in those at high risk. Such a role has yet to be demonstrated in other histologies. FDG-PET-CT is also the gold standard for response assessment posttreatment. Newer uses include assessment of total metabolic tumor volume and radiomics in pretreatment prognosis. Whereas PET-CT is more sensitive than other current modalities for staging and response assessment, the future of PET-CT will be in conjunction with other modalities, notably assessment of minimal residual disease and microenvironmental markers to develop risk adaptive strategies to improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma.

Is it time for PET-guided therapy in follicular lymphoma

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography-Computerised Tomography (PET) is now established as the gold-standard imaging modality for both staging and response assessment of follicular lymphoma (FL). In this Perspective, we propose where PET can, and cannot, guide clinicians in their therapeutic approach. PET at diagnosis/pre-treatment is important for staging, with greater sensitivity compared to standard CT and consequent improved outcomes in truly limited stage FL. Small datasets suggesting a high baseline SUVmax identifies de-novo histologic transformation (HT) are not corroborated by data from GALLIUM, the largest prospective study using modern therapies for FL. Nonetheless, the role of baseline quantitative PET measures requires further clarification. The median survival of patients with newly diagnosed FL is now potentially beyond 20 years. Treatment of symptomatic FL aims to achieve remission and optimise quality of life for as long as possible, with many patients achieving a "functional cure" at the cost of unwanted treatment effects. Several studies have identified that end-of-induction (EOI) PET after initial chemoimmunotherapy for patients with high tumour burden is strongly predictive of both progression-free and overall survival, and EOI PET is being evaluated as a platform for response-adapted treatment. There remain unmet needs: improving the inferior survival for patients remaining PET-positive; and quantifying the PFS and time to next treatment advantage, and additional toxicity of anti-CD20 maintenance in patients achieving complete metabolic remission. In the absence of an overall survival advantage for frontline maintenance, the question of using PET to guide our therapeutic approach is more important than ever in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

End-of-treatment PET/CT predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL after first-line treatment: results from GOYA

GOYA was a randomized phase 3 study comparing obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) vs standard-of-care rituximab plus CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective analysis of GOYA aimed to assess the association between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with positron emission tomography (PET)-based complete response (CR) status. Overall, 1418 patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 21-day cycles of obinutuzumab (n = 706) or rituximab (n = 712) plus 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP. Patients received a mandatory fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-PET/computed tomography scan at baseline and end of treatment. After a median follow-up of 29 months, the numbers of independent review committee-assessed PFS and OS events in the entire cohort were 416 (29.3%) and 252 (17.8%), respectively. End-of-treatment PET CR was highly prognostic for PFS and OS according to Lugano 2014 criteria (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.38; P < .0001; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P < .0001), irrespective of international prognostic index score and cell of origin. In conclusion, the results from this prospectively acquired large cohort corroborated previously published data from smaller sample sizes showing that end-of-treatment PET CR is an independent predictor of PFS and OS and a promising prognostic marker in DLBCL. Long-term survival analysis confirmed the robustness of these data over time. Additional meta-analyses including other prospective studies are necessary to support the substitution of PET CR for PFS as an effective and practical surrogate end point. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01287741.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas, with an estimated 150,000 new cases annually worldwide, represent almost 30% of all cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients typically present with progressive lymphadenopathy, extranodal disease, or both and require therapy. Despite the advanced stage at presentation in the majority of patients, more than 60% can be cured with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy (Fig. 1A). Patients with treatment failure after R-CHOP often have a poor outcome — in particular, those with disease that is refractory to frontline or subsequent therapies — although some patients can have a durable remission and be cured after secondary therapies. Over the past two decades, improved insights into large B-cell lymphomas, in terms of epidemiology, prognostic factors, and biologic heterogeneity, have led to a refinement of disease classification and the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Biopsy remains indispensable for evaluating bone marrow involvement in DLBCL patients despite the use of positron emission tomography

Initial staging by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning is recommended for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Whether both PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) are required remains unclear. This study examined whether staging by PET/CT is sufficient. Participants with untreated DLBCL assessed using both PET/CT and BMB were included. Patients received independent diagnostic assessments from a radiologist and a hematopathologist. Both hematoxylin-eosin staining and CD20 immunostaining were performed to determine the bone marrow involvement in BMB. A total of 84 patients were included. The number of patients with positive bone marrow involvement identified by PET/CT and BMB was 16 (19%) and 22 (26%), respectively. Eight (10%) patients showed positive results in both tests. When considering BMB as a reference, PET/CT showed 36% sensitivity and 87% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 79%, respectively. BMB-positive patients had shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival than their BMB-negative counterparts. Compared to PET/CT-negative patients, patients with positive results did not show any significant differences in PFS and OS. However, among 16 PET/CT-positive patients, poor PFS and OS were observed among patients who were also BMB positive. BMB remains a mandatory step in staging of untreated DLBCL patients.