A risk model for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL integrating clinical risk factors and pretransplant Deauville score

Management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a look at up to date evidence and current treatment approaches

The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years. Gradual improvements have been made in the management of cHL patients, particularly in prolonging the survival rate for those in the relapsed setting. Most of these improvements came with the addition of brentuximab vedotin and PD1 blockade (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) into the current cHL treatment algorithms. On the other hand, the treatment approach to cHL has become more complex than ever before, with multiple ways to add and sequence therapies to achieve long-term remission. In this review, we will discuss the most up-to-date evidence on the management of cHL patients with the inclusion of ongoing clinical trials in cHL. We will provide a general overview of the current therapeutic landscape of cHL in light of these most recent data. We conclude with our perspective on how the approach to cHL treatment may evolve in the future.

Risk stratification for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma integrating pretransplant Deauville score and residual metabolic tumor volume

Pretransplant Deauville score (DS) is an imaging biomarker used for risk stratification in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, the prognostic value of residual metabolic tumor volume (rMTV) in patients with DS 4-5 has been less well characterized. We retrospectively assessed 106 patients with relapsed/refractory cHL who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. Pretransplant DS was determined as 1-3 (59%) and 4-5 (41%), with a markedly inferior event-free survival (EFS) in patients with DS 4-5 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.14; p = .002). High rMTV_41% (rMTV_high , ≥4.4 cm³ ) predicted significantly poorer EFS in patients with DS 4-5 (HR, 3.70; p = .014). In a multivariable analysis, we identified two independent factors predicting treatment failure: pretransplant DS combined with rMTV_41% and disease status (primary refractory vs. relapsed). These two factors allow to stratify patients into three groups with divergent 2-year EFS: 89% for low-risk (51%; relapsed disease and either pretransplant DS 1-3 or DS 4-5/rMTV_low ; HR 1), 65% for intermediate-risk (28%; refractory disease and either DS 1-3 or DS 4-5/rMTV_low ; HR 3.26), and 45% for high-risk (21%; DS 4-5/rMTV_high irrespective of disease status; HR 7.61) groups. Pretransplant DS/rMTV_41% combination and disease status predict the risk of post-transplant treatment failure and will guide risk-stratified approaches in relapsed/refractory cHL.

A PET in a time of need: toward early PET-adapted therapy in DLBCL in first relapse

Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant remain a standard of care in the management of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at first relapse. However, this paradigm is increasingly being challenged by novel immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART-cells). Traditional positron emission tomography-based (PET) prognostication takes place after salvage and before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and while useful, for many patients this information comes too late and at the expense of unnecessary toxicity. In this edition of Leukemia & Lymphoma, two groups present their findings on the use of early quantitative PET markers and the correlation with outcomes in patients embarking on second line salvage chemotherapy. These approaches have the potential to better identify patients who are destined for treatment failure and help guide appropriate sequencing of alternative therapies or the development of PET-adapted clinical trials.