Renal outcome in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from the UK NCRI Myeloma XI trial

Response and Dynamics of Renal Function in Transplantation-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with a Novel Agent: The CAREMM-2201 Study

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) frequently results in renal impairment (RI), and its natural course has not been fully elucidated in the era of novel agents. We aimed to identify the dynamics of renal function after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following induction treatment using a novel agent in transplantation-eligible NDMM patients with RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤50 mL/min/1.73 m²) at diagnosis. The factors associated with achieving a renal response based on the term renal benefit regardless of baseline eGFR were investigated as well. In a multicenter registry database including 1795 patients with plasma cell disorder, 140 transplantation-eligible NDMM patients who developed RI at the time of initiation of treatment for NDMM were identified. They received protocol-based treatment (PBT) consisting of induction treatment using proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory drugs followed by ASCT. MM and renal responses were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria. To evaluate the standardized improvement of renal function irrespective of baseline eGFR, renal benefit was defined as a sustained (for at least 3 months) increase in eGFR >15 mL/min/1.73 m². The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 7.4 years. With a mean baseline eGFR of 24.8 ± 13.9, the renal complete response (renalCR) and renal benefit rates were 49.3% and 67.9%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, the 3 factors significantly associated with reduced likelihood of achieving both renalCR and renal benefit were age ≥55 years, light chain type NDMM, and failure to improve eGFR by 5 mL/min/1.73 m² with supportive care when measured 3 days prior to induction therapy and at the initiation of chemotherapy. Hypertension and advanced eGFR also were associated with poor renalCR achievement. The mean eGFR improved until the time of ASCT and then decreased gradually over time. The mean eGFR improved significantly until 4 months post-PBT compared with each eGFR at previous time points, but this significant improvement disappeared by 5 months post-PBT. In a subgroup of patients who developed RI after undergoing ASCT (n = 55), the eGFR increased temporarily at 1 month post-ASCT; however, this improvement reverted to baseline at 2 months post-ASCT. Among another subgroup of 27 patients who were dialysis-dependent at the time of initial treatment, 18 (66.7%) were no longer dialysis-dependent after a median of 60 days. The best renal response was acquired early during the PBT period, and ASCT did not have a robust impact on the renal outcome. Patients who failed to achieve a renal benefit should be provided with the best supportive care for chronic kidney disease, and this simplified criterion for evaluating the renal response needs to be validated in larger studies before it can be recommended. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of IgD myeloma: experience across UK national trials

Immunoglobulin D (IgD) myeloma is a subtype often considered to have adverse features and inferior survival, but there is a paucity of data from large clinical studies. We compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with IgD myeloma from UK phase 3 myeloma trials analyzed in 2 groups: old (1980-2002) and recent (2002-2016) clinical trials, based on the time of adoption of novel myeloma therapies. Patients with IgD myeloma comprised 44 of 2789 (1.6%) and 70 of 5773 (1.2%) of the old and recent trials, respectively. Overall, IgD myeloma was associated with male predominance, low-level paraproteinemia (<10g/L), and λ light chain preference. The frequency of ultra-high-risk cytogenetics was similar in IgD myeloma compared with other subtypes (4.3% vs 5.3%, P > .99). Despite the old trial series being a younger group (median age: 59 vs 63 years, P = .015), there was a higher frequency of bone lesions, advanced stage at diagnosis, worse performance status, and severe renal impairment compared with the recent trials. Furthermore, the early mortality rate was significantly higher for the old trial series (20% vs 4%, P = .01). The overall response rate following induction therapy was significantly higher in the recent trials (89% vs 43%, P < .0001), and this was consistent with improved median overall survival (48 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35-67 months vs 22 months; 95% CI, 16-29 months). Survival outcomes for IgD myeloma have significantly improved and are now comparable to other myeloma types because of earlier diagnosis, novel therapies, and improved supportive care. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT01554852.

Perspectives on the Risk-Stratified Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

The multiple myeloma treatment landscape has changed dramatically. This change, paralleled by an increase in scientific knowledge, has resulted in significant improvement in survival. However, heterogeneity remains in clinical outcomes, with a proportion of patients not benefiting from current approaches and continuing to have a poor prognosis. A significant proportion of the variability in outcome can be predicted on the basis of clinical and biochemical parameters and tumor-acquired genetic variants, allowing for risk stratification and a more personalized approach to therapy. This article discusses the principles that can enable the rational and effective development of therapeutic approaches for high-risk multiple myeloma.

How to Treat High-Risk Myeloma at Diagnosis and Relapse

Survival in multiple myeloma has improved greatly during the past 2 decades, but this change has primarily benefited patients who have standard-risk disease. Patients with high-risk disease remain a challenge to diagnose and treat. To improve their clinical outcomes, it is imperative to develop tools to readily identify them and to provide them with the most effective available treatments. The most widely used stratification system, the revised International Staging System, incorporates serum β-2 microglobulin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and high-risk chromosomal abnormalities [del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16)]. Recent updates have included mutational status and chromosome 1q abnormalities. Plasma cell leukemia, extramedullary disease, circulating plasma cells, renal failure, and frailty are also associated with poor outcome. The treatment approach for a newly diagnosed patient with high-risk multiple myeloma should include induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation if appropriate, and maintenance therapy. Triplet therapy with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and steroid, with or without an anti-CD38 antibody, should be considered for induction, along with a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug for maintenance. Aiming for a deep and sustained response is important. Similar principles apply at relapse, with close monitoring of response, especially extramedullary disease and active management of side effects, so that patients can continue therapy and benefit from treatment. Immune-based therapies, including autologous CAR T-cell-based therapies and bispecific antibodies, show promising activity in relapsed disease and are being actively explored in earlier disease settings. As the prognosis for high-risk disease remains poor, the future goal for this patient group is to develop specific clinical trials to explore novel approaches and therapies efficiently.