Toxicities of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with lymphoma

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Fit Patients With Late Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Responded to Salvage Chemotherapy

The standard of care (SOC) for fit patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ≥12 months after completing frontline therapy is salvage chemotherapy (ST) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this strategy may not be optimal for patients with certain clinical characteristics. We retrospectively studied 151 patients with DLBCL that relapsed ≥12 months after R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like frontline therapy who underwent ST and ASCT at Mayo Clinic between July 2000 and December 2017 or the University of Iowa between April 2003 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment information, and outcome data were abstracted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median time from frontline therapy completion to 1st relapse was 26.9 months. The median line of ST was 1 (range 1-3), and 17 (11%) patients required >1 line of ST. Best response before ASCT was partial response (PR) in 60 (40%) and complete response (CR) in 91 (60%) patients. The median age at ASCT was 64 yr (range 19-78), and 36 (24%) patients were of ≥70 yr. The median follow-up after ASCT was 87.3 months. The median PFS and OS were 54.5 and 88.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS based on the age at ASCT (including patients aged ≥70-78 yr), sex, transplant era, time to relapse, LDH, extranodal site involvement, and central nervous system/nerve involvement at relapse. However, patients with advanced-stage relapse had inferior PFS than those with early-stage relapse (median 45.3 versus 124.7 months, P = .045). Patients who required > 1 line of ST, compared to those requiring 1 line, had significantly inferior PFS (median 6.1 versus 61.4 months, P < .0001) and OS (17.8 versus 111.7 months, P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in survival in patients who achieved PR versus CR, though numerically inferior in the former, with median PFS of 38.9 versus 59.3 months (P = .23) and median OS of 78.3 versus 111.7 months (P = .62). Patients achieving CR after 1 line of ST had excellent post-ASCT outcomes, with median PFS of 63.7 months. In conclusion, survival after ASCT was unfavorable in patients with late relapsed DLBCL (≥12 months) who required more than 1 line of ST to achieve PR or CR, and such patients should be treated with alternative therapies. Conversely, survival was favorable in patients who required only 1 line of ST, supporting the current clinical practice of ASCT consolidation in these patients. Moreover, outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 to 78 yr at ASCT, similar to younger patients, highlighting the safety and feasibility of this approach in such patients.

Subsequent Malignancies After CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Patients With Lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are an established treatment for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). With the remarkable success in improving survival, understanding the late effects of CAR T cell therapy is becoming more relevant. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of subsequent malignancies in adult patients with B-NHL. We retrospectively studied 355 patients from 2 different medical centers treated with four different CAR T cell products from 2016 to 2022. The overall cumulative incidence for subsequent malignancies at 36 months was 14% (95% CI: 9.2%, 19%). Subsequent malignancies were grouped into 3 primary categories: solid tumor, hematologic malignancy, and dermatologic malignancy with cumulative incidences at 36 months of 6.1% (95% CI: 3.1%-10%), 4.5% (95% CI: 2.1%-8.1%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 2.1%-7.5%) respectively. Notably, no cases of T cell malignancies were observed. In univariable analysis, increasing age was associated with higher risk for subsequent malignancy. While the overall benefits of CAR T products continue to outweigh their potential risks, more studies and longer follow ups are needed to further demonstrate the risks, patterns, and molecular pathways that lead to the development of subsequent malignancies.

Long-term remission after upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for CD5+ diffuse large-B cell lymphoma

CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare subtype characterized by an inferior outcome. While dose-dense therapy shows promising activity, the optimal management remains to be determined. To evaluate the benefit of consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 47 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed de novo CD5+ DLBCL. Of 19 patients ≤ 70 of age with age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 2-3, eight underwent upfront ASCT, and nine did not, despite preserved organ function and response after induction therapy. The remaining two, ineligible for ASCT due to early progression or comorbidities, had a dismal clinical course. Among younger 17 high-risk patients eligible for ASCT, ASCT was associated with better overall (p = 0.0327) and progression-free survival (p = 0.0184). Younger patients without ASCT demonstrated similar outcomes to older patients with similar risk profiles. ASCT could be considered for high-risk CD5+ DLBCL with a response after induction therapy.

Transplantation and Cellular Therapy for Older Adults-The MSK Approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieves durable remission in approximately 60% of patients. In relapsed or refractory disease, only about 20% achieve durable remission with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ZUMA-7 (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]) and TRANSFORM (lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) trials demonstrated superior event-free survival (and, in ZUMA-7, overall survival) in primary-refractory or early-relapsed (high-risk) DLBCL with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT; however, list prices for CAR-T exceed $400 000 per infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of second-line CAR-T versus salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT.

DESIGN

State-transition microsimulation model.

DATA SOURCES

ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM, other trials, and observational data.

TARGET POPULATION

"High-risk" patients with DLBCL.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Health care sector.

INTERVENTION

Axi-cel or liso-cel versus ASCT.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200 000 per QALY.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

The increase in median overall survival was 4 months for axi-cel and 1 month for liso-cel. For axi-cel, the ICER was $684 225 per QALY and the iNMB was -$107 642. For liso-cel, the ICER was $1 171 909 per QALY and the iNMB was -$102 477.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

To be cost-effective with a WTP of $200 000, the cost of CAR-T would have to be reduced to $321 123 for axi-cel and $313 730 for liso-cel. Implementation in high-risk patients would increase U.S. health care spending by approximately $6.8 billion over a 5-year period.

LIMITATION

Differences in preinfusion bridging therapies precluded cross-trial comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Neither second-line axi-cel nor liso-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $200 000 per QALY. Clinical outcomes improved incrementally, but costs of CAR-T must be lowered substantially to enable cost-effectiveness.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

No research-specific funding.

Utility of routine pulmonary function test after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in lymphoma

This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of routine pulmonary function testing (PFT) at the 12-month mark post-autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) in identifying clinically significant lung disease in lymphoma survivors. In 247 patients, 173 (70%) received BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan), and 49 (20%) received TBC (thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) conditioning regimens. Abnormal baseline PFT was noted in 149 patients (60%). Thirty-four patients had a significant decline (reduction of >/= 20% in DLCO or FEV1 or FVC) in post-AHCT PFT, with the highest incidence in the CNS lymphoma group (39%). The incidence of clinically significant lung disease post-transplant was low at 2% and there was no association between abnormal pre- and 1-year post-transplant PFTs with the development of clinical lung disease. While this study illustrates the impact of treatment regimens on PFT changes, it did not demonstrate a predictive value of scheduled PFTs in identifying clinically significant post-AHCT lung disease.

Treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the era of novel agents

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a highly heterogeneous presentation that ranges from an indolent disease to an extremely aggressive one. Several clinical and biological prognostic markers can assist in determining the aggressiveness of the disease. Such as MIPI, Ki-67, and TP53, NOTCH1, and CDKN2A mutations. While aggressive chemoimmunotherapy regimens combining rituximab and cytarabine, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation yield the most promising results, this treatment is too toxic for older patients. Several lower-intensity regimens have shown efficacy in older patients with reduced toxicity profiles. However, older relapsed/refractory patients have an extremely poor outcome. In the last several years, there is a major trend toward chemotherapy-free regimens, targeted therapies such as BTK, BCL-2 and PI3K inhibitors, and immunotherapies such as lenalidomide and CAR-T, which can provide a promising strategy for older patients. Herein we review the current therapies for older MCL patients, chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies.

How to Treat Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Oncologic and Cardiovascular Considerations

Anthracycline-containing therapy is the cornerstone of frontline treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and autologous stem cell transplantation, and more recently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are the primary treatment options for relapsed refractory DLBCL. Given these therapies are all associated with cardiovascular toxicities, patients with underlying cardiac comorbidities are severely limited in treatment options. The focus of this review is to outline the cardiotoxicities associated with these standard treatments, explore strategies developed to mitigate these toxicities, and review novel treatment strategies for patients with underlying cardiovascular comorbidities. DLBCL patients with underlying cardiac complications are a high-risk patient population who require complicated management strategies that utilize a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists.

Comparison of design methods for a safety run-in phase of a phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In pediatric oncology, a Phase II trial often utilizes a safety run-in phase followed by an efficacy phase that enrolls at the dose level selected based on the safety run-in. Different from a Phase I trial, a Phase II safety run-in often assesses a very small number of dose levels. In the context of a safety run-in that assesses two or three dose levels, this article aims to compare three design methods, including the algorithm-based designs 3 + 3 and Rolling 6, and the model-assisted designs such as the Bayesian optimal interval design.

METHODS

Extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate and compare operating characteristics of the three design methods for a safety run-in with two or three dose levels, varying the starting dose level.

RESULTS

The performance of algorithm-based and model-assisted designs can be influenced by selection of the starting dose level, with trials starting at a lower dose level having a higher probability of selecting a low dose or considering all doses as toxic. The impact is larger for 3 + 3 and Rolling 6 but to a lesser extent for Bayesian optimal interval design. For a safety run-in with two dose levels, using 3 + 3 or Rolling 6 and starting at the higher dose often lead to similar performance to Bayesian optimal interval design. For safety run-in with three dose levels, starting at the middle dose with 3 + 3, Rolling 6 or Bayesian optimal interval design is a good compromise between improving correct dose selection and imposing a toxic dose to less patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being sensitive to the starting dose level, the 3 + 3, Rolling 6 and Bayesian optimal interval designs overall demonstrate reasonable performance, which can be further improved with wise selection of the starting dose level. The Rolling 6 design remains the recommended design method especially if pharmacokinetics is important or required with this design having the feature of treating six patients per dose level. When designing a safety run-in, selection of a design method or selection of a starting dose should consider both the performance of the design approaches with different choices of a starting dose level and the magnitude of safety concerns with the dose levels under investigation.

Late effects in patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with or without autologous stem cell transplantation

Studies on late effects in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are becoming increasingly important as survival is improving, and novel targeted drugs are being introduced. However, knowledge about late effects is limited. The aim of this population-based study was to describe the magnitude and panorama of late effects among patients treated with or without high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT). The study cohort included all patients with MCL, recorded in the Swedish Lymphoma Register, aged 18 to 69 years, diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 (N = 620; treated with HD-ASCT, n = 247) and 1:10 matched healthy comparators. Patients and comparators were followed up via the National Patient Register and Cause of Death Register, from 12 months after diagnosis or matching to December 2017. Incidence rate ratios of the numbers of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and bed days were estimated using negative binomial regression models. In relation to the matched comparators, the rate of specialist and hospital visits was significantly higher among patients with MCL. Patients with MCL had especially high relative risks of infectious, respiratory, and blood disorders. Within this observation period, no difference in the rate of these complications, including secondary neoplasms, was observed between patients treated with and without HD-ASCT. Most of the patients died from their lymphoma and not from another cause or treatment complication. Taken together, our results imply that most of the posttreatment health care needs are related to the lymphoma disease itself, thus, indicating the need for more efficient treatment options.

A novel conditioning regimen of chidamide, cladribine, gemcitabine, and busulfan in the autologous stem cell transplantation of aggressive T-cell lymphoma

Background

The prognosis of patients with peripheral T-cell (PTCL) or lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma (T-LBL) remains poor under current conditioning regimens before receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Methods

Patients with PTCL or T-LBL were enrolled to receive ASCT using the conditioning regimen of chidamide, cladribine, gemcitabine, and busulfan (ChiCGB). Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) was used to evaluate the response to ASCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were employed to assess the patient outcome, and adverse events were used to assess the regimen’s safety. The survival curve was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Twenty-five PTCL and 11 T-LBL patients were recruited. The median time to neutrophile and platelet engraftments was 10 days (8–13 days) and 13 days (9–31 days), respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS were 81.3 ± 7.2% and 88.5 ± 5.4% for all patients; 92.0 ± 5.4% and 81.2 ± 8.8% for PTCL patients; and both 81.8 ± 11.6% for T-LBL patients, respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS were both 92.9 ± 4.9% for patients with complete response (CR) but 50.0 ± 17.7% and 75.0 ± 15.3% for patients with non-CR, respectively. Infection was the most common non-hematological toxicity, and all toxicities were mild and controllable.

Conclusions

ChiCGB was a potentially effective and well-tolerated conditioning regimen to improve the prognosis of patients with aggressive T-cell lymphoma. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to assess ChiCGB as a conditioning regimen for ASCT.

Outcomes of Older Adults with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Mayo Clinic Cohort Analysis

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an important treatment that can offer a cure for patients with lymphoma. However, advanced age is an important factor that determines eligibility and outcomes after ASCT. Over the past decade, attributed to improved supportive care, ASCT for older patients has become more feasible. In this study, we report the single-center outcomes of older patients with lymphoma undergoing ASCT at Mayo Clinic Rochester to highlight its interval improvement over time and to help redefine the implications of ASCT in the chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy era. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of older patients with lymphoma who underwent ASCT between 2000 and 2021. We report various relevant transplantation-related outcomes, including progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), relapse incidence, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in older patients with various lymphoma histologic subtypes. The main outcome was NRM, defined as the time from ASCT to non-lymphoma-related death, with relapse as a competing event. Of 492 patients age ≥65 years were analyzed. The median age at ASCT was 68.8 years. The most common indication for ASCT was diffuse large B cell lymphoma, accounting for 59.3% of cases. In multivariate analyses, patients undergoing ASCT in 2009 to 2021, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0, and low Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) (0 to 3) had a significantly lower NRM. Factors associated with OS included age, lactate dehydrogenase level, and HCT-CI. The 1-year NRM in older patients was low at 6.0%, in concordance with previous reports. Age should not be the sole factor determining a patient's ASCT eligibility. With the proper patient selection, ASCT remains a reasonable option for older patients with lymphoma.

The role of transplantation in Hodgkin lymphoma

Despite the success of frontline anthracycline-based chemotherapy for classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL), approximately 15% of patients do not achieve an adequate response and require further therapy. For transplant-eligible patients, additional treatment followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) provides a durable response in 50% of patients. The most refractory patients, including those requiring multiple lines of therapy to achieve a response or those relapsing after an autoHCT, may achieve long-term survival with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Contemporary salvage regimens used as a bridge to transplant have expanded to include not only non-cross resistant chemotherapy, but also brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). As the management of relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL evolves with the introduction of novel agents, so too does the role of transplantation. The paradigm of chemosensitivity as a predictor for autoHCT efficacy is being challenged by favorable post- autoHCT outcomes in heavily pre-treated CPI-exposed patients. Contemporary supportive care measures, validated comorbidity assessments, and an increased donor pool with haploidentical donors have broadened the application of transplantation to an increasingly older and diverse patient population. Despite the introduction of increasingly effective treatment options for R/R cHL, transplantation continues to play an important role in the management of these patients. In this review, we explore the impact of salvage therapy on autoHCT, conditioning regimens, maintenance therapy and the diminishing role of alloHCT for patients with cHL.

What is the role of up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma?

Up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the established standard of care for younger, transplant-eligible MCL patients and is associated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. However, there is no randomized controlled trial data, with therapy including rituximab and cytarabine, that has established a PFS and overall survival (OS) benefit with ASCT in the modern era. Multiple retrospective studies have failed to identify an OS benefit associated with ASCT in younger MCL patients. The high-risk patient subgroup with evidence of baseline TP53 mutation has a dismal outcome with intensive chemoimmunotherapy followed by ASCT, thus up-front ASCT is not optimal for this patient subset. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will help to clarify the role of up-front ASCT in the future. For example, the ongoing European MCL Network Triangle study incorporating ibrutinib into chemoimmunotherapy induction and maintenance with and without ASCT will help define the role of ASCT in the era of novel biologically targeted agents (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02858258). Additionally, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is a powerful prognostic tool in MCL, and the ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network E4151 study is comparing maintenance rituximab alone vs ASCT consolidation in MCL patients who achieve remission and MRD-undetectable status post induction (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267433). ASCT remains a highly efficacious initial therapy for younger MCL patients; however, ultimately the decision to pursue ASCT requires discussion of risks vs benefits, incorporating patient preferences and values.

Obesity and Risk for Lymphoma: Possible Role of Leptin

Obesity, which is considered a pandemic due to its high prevalence, is a risk factor for many types of cancers, including lymphoma, through a variety of mechanisms by promoting an inflammatory state. Specifically, over the last few decades, obesity has been suggested not only to increase the risk of lymphoma but also to be associated with poor clinical outcomes and worse responses to different treatments for those diseases. Within the extensive range of proinflammatory mediators that adipose tissue releases, leptin has been demonstrated to be a key adipokine due to its pleotropic effects in many physiological systems and diseases. In this sense, different studies have analyzed leptin levels and leptin/leptin receptor expressions as a probable bridge between obesity and lymphomas. Since both obesity and lymphomas are prevalent pathophysiological conditions worldwide and their incidences have increased over the last few years, here we review the possible role of leptin as a promising proinflammatory mediator promoting lymphomas.

The role of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in primary central nervous system lymphoma: is it an alternative to ASCT for consolidation following HD-methotrexate based induction in low-income settings?

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Although potentially curable, its prognosis remains dismal. Its treatment is based on high-doses of methotrexate (HD-MTX) and rituximab, followed by consolidation therapy with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Currently, there is no consensus about the best consolidation strategy, but better outcomes with ASCT are obtained with conditioning regimens based on thiotepa, a high-cost drug with restricted use in resource-constrained settings. Latin American data on clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and therapeutic management in PCNSL are virtually unknown.

Methods

This is a retrospective, observational, and single-center study involving 47-Brazilian patients with PCNSL. We aim to assess outcomes, determine predictors of survival, and compare responses, as well as toxicities in patients consolidated with chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus WBRT.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (24–88 years), and 53.1% were male. LDH ≥ UVN occurred in 44.7%, ECOG ≥ 2 in 67.6%, and 34.1% had multifocal disease. Hemiparesis was the main clinical presentation, observed in 55.3%, 51.0% had intermediate-/high-risk IELSG prognostic score, and 57.6% had an ABC-like phenotype by IHC. With a median follow-up of 24.4 months, estimated 5-year OS and PFS were 45.5% and 36.4%, respectively. Among 40 patients treated with HD-MTX-based induction, estimated 2-year OS was 85.8% for those consolidated with WBRT plus HIDAC versus only 41.5% for those consolidated with HIDAC alone (p < 0.001). Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were not significant, and severe cognitive impairment occurred in only 6.3% (3/47) of cases, all of them treated with WBRT. Age < 60 years, Hb ≥ 120 g/L and WBRT consolidation were associated with increased OS, however, LDH ≥ UVN, hypoalbuminemia, ECOG ≥ 2, Karnofsky PS < 70 and intermediate-/high-risk Barcelona score were associated with decreased OS.

Conclusion

Combined consolidation therapy (CCT) based on WBRT plus HIDAC was associated with increased OS in PCNSL compared to isolated consolidation therapy (ICT) based on HIDAC alone. Here, severe late neurotoxicity was uncommon with this approach. These data suggest that WBRT may be an effective and safe alternative to ASCT for consolidation therapy in PCNSL, particularly in resource-constrained settings, where access to thiotepa for pre-ASCT conditioning is not universal.

Role of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Second-Line Large B Cell Lymphoma: Lessons from Phase 3 Trials. An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Since 2017, 3 CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies-axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel-have been approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma after 2 lines of therapy. Recently, 3 prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted to define the optimal second-line treatment by comparing each of the CAR T cell products to the current standard of care: ZUMA-7 for axicabtagene ciloleucel, BELINDA for tisagenlecleucel, and TRANSFORM for lisocabtagene maraleucel. These 3 studies, although largely addressing the same question, had different outcomes, with ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM demonstrating significant improvement with CD19 CAR T cells in second-line therapy compared with standard of care but BELINDA not showing any benefit. The US Food and Drug Administration has now approved axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel for LBCL that is refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or relapse occurring within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Following the reporting of these practice changing studies, here a group of experts convened by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy provides a comprehensive review of the 3 studies, emphasizing potential differences, and shares perspectives on what these results mean to clinical practice in this new era of treatment of B cell lymphomas.

Evaluation of Melphalan Exposure in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing BEAM and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

High-dose melphalan is one of the main cytotoxic DNA alkylating agents and is used in many transplantation conditioning regimens. Studies have shown a wide range of drug exposure when a traditional weight-based dose of melphalan is used. The optimal melphalan dose in BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), which results in maximum efficacy with acceptable toxicity, is unknown. In this pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of 105 patients with lymphoma undergoing treatment with BEAM and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation, we initially estimated melphalan exposure as area under the curve (AUC) by a noncompartmental analysis and subsequently compared it with a newly developed 2-compartment population-PK model. The 2 models correlated closely with each other. We found that the traditional fixed weight-based dosing of propylene glycol-free (captisol-enabled) melphalan in BEAM results in a wide variation in exposure as estimated by both models. Higher melphalan exposure was significantly associated with increased metabolic toxicities but did not seem to impact progression-free survival. Although our study suggests a melphalan AUC of 8 mg·h/L as a potential target in BEAM, larger prospective studies using personalized PK-directed melphalan dosing are needed to determine the optimal melphalan exposure in lymphomas.

A Real-World Study of Combined Modality Therapy for Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Too Little Treatment Impacts Outcome

In the real-world setting, CMT led to improved outcomes for patients with PET2-positive and unfavorable disease.

Similar to clinical trials, favorable, non-bulky, and PET2-negative subgroups had comparable survival outcomes with chemotherapy-alone.

Multiple clinical trials have assessed de-escalation strategies from combined modality therapy (CMT) to chemotherapy-alone for the treatment of early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), confirming similar outcomes. The application of these data to the real-world is limited, however. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study comparing CMT vs chemotherapy-alone in patients with early-stage cHL (stage IA-IIB) treated between January 2010 and December 2020. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans after chemotherapy cycle 2 (PET2) were independently reviewed by a nuclear radiologist (Deauville score ≥4, positive; ≤3, negative). Patient outcomes were compared by using an intention-to-treat analysis. Among 125 patients (CMT, n = 63; chemotherapy-alone, n = 62) with a median follow-up of 59.8 months (95% CI, 48.6-71.0), no differences in overall survival were observed (5-year overall survival, CMT 98.0% vs chemotherapy-alone 95.1%; log-rank test, P = .38). However, there was reduced progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy-alone among all patients (2-year PFS, CMT 95.1% vs chemotherapy-alone 75.3%; log-rank test, P = .005) and in those with bulky (n = 43; log-rank test, P < .001), unfavorable (n = 81; log-rank test, P = .002), or PET2-positive (n = 15; log-rank test, P = .02) disease. No significant differences in PFS were seen for patients with non-bulky (log-rank test, P = .35), favorable (log-rank test, P = .62), or PET2-negative (log-rank test, P = .19) disease. Based on our real-world experience, CMT seems beneficial for patients with early-stage cHL, especially those with PET2-positive and unfavorable disease. Chemotherapy-alone regimens can lead to comparable outcomes for patients with favorable, non-bulky, or PET2-negative disease. We conclude that although results seen in clinical trials are replicated in certain patient subgroups, other subgroups not fitting trial criteria do poorly when radiotherapy is excluded.

Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Data for outcomes after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients ≥70 years are limited. Auto-HCT is feasible in older DLBCL patients. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes of auto-HCT in DLBCL patients aged 60 to 69 years (n = 363) versus ≥70 years (n = 103) between 2008 and 2019. Non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models. All patients received BEAM conditioning (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside and melphalan). On univariate analysis, in the 60 to 69 years versus ≥70 years cohorts, 100-day NRM was 3% versus 4%, 5-year REL was 47% versus 45%, 5-year PFS 40% versus 38% and 5-year OS 55% versus 41%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients ≥70 had no significant difference in NRM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.39), REL (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.56), PFS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.63) compared to patients 60 to 69 years. Patients ≥70 years had a higher mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.85, p=0.02), likely because of inferior post-relapse OS in this cohort (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.61, P = .001). DLBCL was the major cause of death in both cohorts (62% versus 59%). Older patients should not be denied auto-HCT solely on the basis of chronological age.

Activity and Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Private Sector in Australia

BACKGROUND

Few Australasian Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) programs perform ASCTs in the private sector. Relatively little is known about ASCT outcomes in the private sector, which varies in care delivery models to the public system.

AIMS

We investigated transplantation activity and survival outcomes at Icon Cancer Centre's Brisbane-based private clinical and laboratory ASCT program, over a 23-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of all adults who underwent ASCT at Icon between 1996-2018. Main outcome measures were transplant activity, overall survival (OS) and day-100 and 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM). Outcomes were benchmarked against the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR).

RESULTS

Between 1996-2018, 1676 ASCTs were performed in 1454 patients. From 2010-2018, ASCTs performed at Icon contributed 40% of all South East Queensland ASCTs. In the last 5-years, 21% of Icon's patients were ≥70-years, compared to 5% across Australasia. For the entire cohort, 100-day, and 1-year TRM was 1.1% and 1.7% respectively, whilst for those aged ≥70-years, it was 2.0% and 3.1%. For ASCTs performed between 2014-2018, 100-day and 1-year TRM was 0.8% and 1.4%, which was half the TRM rates reported by the ABMTRR. The 10-year post-transplant OS at Icon was higher than the ABMTRR data, across all disease subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Icon is the largest ASCT contributor in Queensland, with excellent OS and low TRM, demonstrating the critical role of the private sector in the administration of this highly complex therapy. The Icon ASCT program is inclusive of patients aged ≥70-years, demonstrating low and acceptable TRM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.