host disease: Analysis of practice variation and failure-free survival

Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Prophylaxis of Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: An Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) limits the long-term benefit of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). This clinical trial evaluated repeated infusions of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during the early stage (45 days and 100 days) after haplo-HSCT to prevent chronic GVHD.

Objective

To determine whether repeated infusions of MSCs during the early stage after haplo-HSCT decreases the incidence of severe chronic GVHD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, multicenter, parallel randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2016 to January 2022. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of acute leukemia and having a haploidentical, suitable related donor for HSCT. The median (range) follow-up time was 39.0 (1.5-67.0) months.

Interventions

The enrolled patients with a haploidentical relative for HSCT received the modified busulfan/cyclophosphamide + antithymocyte globulin modified regimen and standard GVHD prophylaxis. Patients were randomly chosen to receive MSCs (the MSC group) (1 × 106 cells/kg, every 2 weeks, starting from 45 days after transplant, 4 times total) or regular prophylaxis (control group).

Main Outcome and Measure

The cumulative incidence of severe chronic GVHD.

Results

Of 158 patients, 58 (36.7%) were female individuals; the median (range) age for the MSC and control groups was 28 (18-60) years and 28 (18-56) years, respectively. A total of 158 patients were screened, and 148 patients were randomly assigned to the MSC group (n = 74) or control group (n = 74) 1 day before MSCs infusion. The estimated 2-year cumulative incidence of severe chronic GVHD was 5.4% (95% CI, 1.8%-14.0%) in the MSC group and 17.4% (95% CI, 10.1%-28.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88; P = .03). There was no difference between the MSC and control groups in the cumulative incidence of leukemia relapse (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.55-2.47; P = .68). The cumulative incidence of stage II to IV acute GVHD in the MSC group was significantly lower than that in the control group (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.67; P = .01). The MSC group had better GVHD-free and relapse-free survival rates than the control group (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; P = .04).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this randomized clinical trial show that early repeated infusions of MSCs decreased the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD, and the incidence and severity of acute GVHD manifested as a better GVHD-free and relapse-free survival rate for patients after haplo-HSCT.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IIR-16007806.

Chronic GVHD: review advances in prevention, novel endpoints, and targeted strategies

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a curative therapy for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic disorders. Chronic graft-versus-host (cGVHD) disease remains a significant hurdle for long-term survival in patients post allo-HCT, and it remains the leading cause of late non-relapse mortality. The risk factors for development of cGVHD include degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity, increasing recipient age, use of peripheral blood stem cells as a source, myeloablative conditioning regimens, prior acute GVHD (aGVHD), and female donor to male recipient. Our biological understanding of cGVHD is mostly derived from transplantation mouse models and patient data. There are three distinct phases in the development of cGVHD. Approaches to prevent GVHD include pharmacologic strategies such as calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) combined with methotrexate or mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus), and IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors (mycophenolate mofetil). Increasingly, posttransplant cyclophosphamide is emerging as a promising strategy for GVCHD prevention especially in a setting of reduced intensity conditioning. Other approaches include serotherapy (ATG, Campath) and graft manipulation strategies. A significant obstacle to evaluating the response of novel GVHD-directed therapies has been standardized response assessments. This has functioned as a barrier to designing and interpreting clinical trials that are structured around the treatment of cGVHD. Novel endpoints including failure-free survival, Graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), and current GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CGRFS) may create a clearer picture for post-HCT outcomes. Targeted therapies including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition, JAK1/2 inhibition, and ROCK2 inhibitors have improved cGVHD therapy, especially in the steroid refractory setting. Continued improvement in prophylactic strategies for cGVHD, identification of accurate cGVHD treatment endpoints, and access to novel therapeutic agents are expected to improve cGVHD outcomes.

Understanding and treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host-disease

The skin is the outermost mechanical barrier where dynamic immune reactions take place and is the most commonly affected site in both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). If not properly treated, pain and pruritis resulting from cutaneous GVHD can increase the risk of secondary infection due to erosions, ulcerations, and damage of underlying tissues. Furthermore, resulting disfiguration can cause distress and significantly impact patients' quality of life. Thus, a deeper understanding of skin-specific findings of GVHD is needed. This review will highlight some promising results of recent pre-clinical studies on the pathophysiology of skin GVHD and summarize the diagnostic and staging/grading procedures according to the clinical manifestations of skin GVHD. In addition, we will summarize outcomes of various GVHD treatments, including skin-specific response rates.

Hepatic graft-versus-host disease: what we know, when to biopsy, and how to diagnose

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the serious complications that may develop after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), for hematologic malignancies, solid organ transplantation, and other hematologic disorders. GVHD develops due to T lymphocytes present in the graft attacking the host antigens, which results in tissue damage. A significant number of HCT patients develop acute or chronic GVHD, which may affect multiple organs including the liver. The diagnosis of hepatic GVHD (hGVHD) is challenging as many other conditions in HCT patients may lead to liver dysfunction. Particularly challenging among the various conditions that give rise to liver dysfunction is differentiating sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) from hGVHD on clinical grounds and laboratory tests. Despite the minimal risks involved in performing a liver biopsy, the information gleaned from the histopathologic changes may help in the management of these very complex patients. There is a spectrum of histologic features found in hGVHD, and most involve histopathologic changes affecting the interlobular bile ducts. These include nuclear and cytoplasmic abnormalities including dysmorphic bile ducts, apoptosis, and cholangiocyte necrosis, among others. The hepatitic form of hGVHD typically shows severe acute hepatitis. With chronic hGVHD, there is progressive bile duct loss and eventually fibrosis. Accurate diagnosis of hGVHD is paramount so that timely treatment and management can be initiated. Techniques to prevent and lower the risk of GVHD from developing have recently evolved. If a diagnosis of acute GVHD is made, the first-line of treatment is steroids. Recurrence is common and steroid resistance or dependency is not unusual in this setting. Second-line therapies differ among institutions and have not been uniformly established. The development of GVHD, particularly hGVHD, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

First-line steroid-free systemic treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after novel prophylaxis regimens

In the early randomized trials the efficacy of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was comparable to corticosteroids (CS), but these results became obsolete with the introduction of CNIs in prophylaxis. Recently several effective CNI-free GVHD prophylaxis regimens were introduced based on posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) and αβ ex vivo T-cell depletion (αβ-TCD). Among patients treated under these protocols 34 patients with grade II-IV acute (aGVHD) and 40 with moderate and severe chronic (cGVHD) disease were treated with CNIs or other CS-free regimens as the first line. Overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in cGVHD than in aGVHD: 80% (95% CI 68-92) vs 47% (95% CI 30-64%), p = 0.0031. In aGVHD it was almost completely restricted to isolated stage III skin GVHD. In cGVHD patients with moderate disease ORR was higher than in severe: 96% (95% CI 88-100%) vs 56% (95%CI 32-81%), p = 0.0022. Two-year overall survival was 76% (95% CI 58-87%) in aGVHD and 95% (95% CI 81-99%) in cGVHD. Failure-free survival was 21% (95% CI 9-37%) in aGVHD and 81% (95% CI 64-91%) in cGVHD. Patients responding to steroid-free regimens had lower use of systemic antibiotics (p = 0.0095), antifungals (p = 0.0319) and antivirals (p < 0.0001).

Novel Approaches to the Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an immune-mediated disease that ensues after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation often affecting multiple organs, decreases quality of life, and necessitates immunosuppressive therapy. The current standard first-line cGVHD therapy is glucocorticoids (GCs) which have major side effects. So far, all attempts to improve response to first-line GC therapy of cGVHD by adding other agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, or cyclosporine A have not improved response. The data reported in the trial by Miklos et al indicate that ibrutinib should not be added to GC in first-line cGVHD therapy. The findings instruct future studies that aim at the identification of patients with cGVHD who may benefit from a GC-ibrutinib combination using biomarkers or clinical parameters. Currently, ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, and belumosudil are the only drugs that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for steroid-refractory cGVHD. In light of the current standard management of cGVHD, the trial results indicate that ibrutinib will remain reserved for second-line therapy, which may be due to its mechanisms of action. The recommendation on the basis of this trial is that GC monotherapy remains the standard therapy for cGVHD.

Organ-specific response after low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for steroid refractory chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Despite new therapeutic options, treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD) remains challenging as organ involvement and clinical manifestations are highly variable. In previous trials of low-dose interleukin-2 (LD IL-2), we established the safety and efficacy of LD IL-2 for treatment of SR-cGVHD. In the present report, we combined 5 phase I or II clinical trials conducted at our center to investigate organ-specific response rate, co-involvement of organs, predictors of organ-specific response and its possible association with immune response. For 105 adult patients included in this report, the overall response rate after 8 or 12 weeks LD IL-2 was 48.6% and 53.3% including late responses in patients who continued treatment for extended periods. Skin was the most frequent organ involved (84%) and the organ-specific response rate was highest in liver (66.7%) followed by GI (62.5%), skin (36.4%), joint/muscle/fascia (34.2%) and lung (19.2%). In multivariable analysis, shorter time from diagnosis of cGVHD to IL-2 initiation, shorter time from transplant to IL-2 initiation, and fewer prior therapies were associated with overall response as well as skin response. For immunologic correlates, CD4Treg:CD4Tcon ratio at one week was significantly higher in patients with overall and skin response; skin response was significantly associated with lower number of total CD3 T cells, CD4Tcon and CD8 T cells and higher number of B cells. For lung responders, terminal effector memory cell counts were lower within all T cell populations compared to non-responders. Organ-specific mechanisms of injury should be investigated and organ-specific targeted therapies need to be developed.