Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral azacitidine maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Cost-effectiveness of adding quizartinib to induction chemotherapy for patients with FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia

The FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib has been shown to improve overall survival when added to intensive induction chemotherapy ("7 + 3") in patients 18-75 years old with newly diagnosed AML harboring a FLT3-ITD mutation. However, the health economic implications of this approval are unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of quizartinib using a partitioned survival analysis model. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. In the base case scenario, the addition of quizartinib to 7 + 3 resulted in incremental costs of $289,932 compared with 7 + 3 alone. With an incremental gain of 0.84 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with quizartinib + 7 + 3 induction vs. 7 + 3 alone, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the addition of quizartinib to standard 7 + 3 was $344,039/QALY. Only an 87% reduction in the average wholesale price of quizartinib or omitting quizartinib continuation therapy after completion of consolidation therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant would make quizartinib a cost-effective option.

Cost-effectiveness of azacitidine and ivosidenib in newly diagnosed older, intensive chemotherapy-ineligible patients with IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia

Ivosidenib + azacitidine (IVO/AZA) is approved in the United States for newly diagnosed, older or intensive chemotherapy-ineligible patients with IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. We created a partitioned survival analysis model to evaluate the health economic implications of this approval. Model outputs were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of IVO/AZA versus AZA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. In the base case scenario, IVO/AZA and AZA resulted in life-time costs of $403,062 and $161,887, respectively. With an incremental gain of 0.95 QALYs, the ICER of IVO/AZA was $252,782/QALY. In sensitivity analyses, only a reduction in the price of IVO by 59.3% lowered the ICER to below $150,000/QALY and 99.95% of model calculations yielded ICERs of >$150,000/QALY. In a model in which all patients received IVO monotherapy after progression on AZA monotherapy, the ICER was $155,453/QALY and various model inputs that would make IVO/AZA cost-effective were identified.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations for acute myeloid leukemia pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare blood cancer with a poor prognosis. Recently, targeted drugs have improved survival both in the elderly and in fit patients. However, as monthly costs of targeted agents are high, regulatory bodies often impose restrictions on their use.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the value-for-cost of targeted drugs such as gemtuzumab ozogamycin, CPX-351, midostaurin, gilteritinib, glasdegib, venetoclax, oral azacytidine and enasidenib used to treat adult AML. EMBASE and TRIP databases, together with authority websites were searched for technology assessments. Add-on drugs, namely midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamycin, have been reported to have the best pharmacoeconomic profile for newly diagnosed fit patients with FLT3 mutation or favorable/intermediate cytogenetics, since allogeneic transplant rates were stable or reduced. Most of the other drugs, on the other hand, did not achieve highly favorable cost-for-benefit, due to a poor absolute survival gain and/or increased transplant rates.

EXPERT OPINION

The cost of most targeted therapies for AML in unfit patients seems unfair in comparison to the absolute survival advantage provided in fit patients. Point of cure and transplant outcomes should be standardized to allow comparability among the models.