van den Akker TA, Liu YC, Liu H, Chapman J, Levine JM, Weinberg OK, Geyer JT. Myeloid Proliferations Associated with Down Syndrome: Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Forty Cases from Five Large Academic Institutions.
Pathobiology 2023;
91:89-98. [PMID:
36996802 PMCID:
PMC10857798 DOI:
10.1159/000530431]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia is significantly increased in children with Down syndrome (DS). Within the revised 2016 WHO edition, these entities are jointly classified as myeloid leukemia associated with DS (ML-DS). Additionally, infants with DS may develop transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) which is histomorphologically similar to ML-DS. While TAM is self-limiting, it is associated with an increased risk of subsequently developing ML-DS. Differentiating TAM and ML-DS is challenging but clinically critical.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective review of ML-DS and TAM cases collected from five large academic institutions in the USA. We assessed clinical, pathological, immunophenotypical, and molecular features to identify differentiating criteria.
RESULTS
Forty cases were identified: 28 ML-DS and 12 TAM. Several features were diagnostically distinct, including younger age in TAM (p < 0.05), as well as presentation with clinically significant anemia and thrombocytopenia in ML-DS (p < 0.001). Dyserythropoiesis was unique to ML-DS, as well as structural cytogenetic abnormalities aside from the constitutional trisomy 21. Immunophenotypic characteristics of TAM and ML-DS were indistinguishable, including the aberrant expression of CD7 and CD56 by the myeloid blasts.
DISCUSSION
The findings of the study confirm marked biological similarities between TAM and ML-DS. At the same time, several significant clinical, morphological, and genetic differences were observed between TAM and ML-DS. The clinical approach and the differential diagnosis between these entities are discussed in detail.
Collapse