Ponatinib, Chemotherapy, and Transplant in Adults with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A review of immunotargeted therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: making progress in chemotherapy-free regimens

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PH + ALL) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality of B-ALL in adults and is associated with poor prognosis. Previously, the only curative treatment option in PH + ALL was allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Since 2000, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy, represented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib, has become the first-line treatment for PH + ALL. Currently, the remission rate and survival rate of Imatinib are superior to those of simple chemotherapy, and it can also improve the efficacy of transplantation. More recently, some innovative immune-targeted therapy greatly improved the prognosis of PH + ALL, such as Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin. For patients with ABL1 mutations and those who have relapsed or are refractory to other treatments, targeted oral small molecule drugs, monoclonal antibodies, Bispecific T cell Engagers (BiTE), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells immunotherapy are emerging as potential treatment options. These new therapeutic interventions are changing the treatment landscape for PH + ALL. In summary, this review discusses the current advancements in targeted therapeutic agents shift in the treatment strategy of PH + ALL towards using more tolerable chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation regimens confers better disease outcomes and might obviate the need for HSCT.

Is intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation mandatory for curing Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young patients in the era of multitarget agents?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment outcomes for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have improved with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patients with Ph+ALL, its role remains debatable in the era of TKIs and blinatumomab.

AREAS COVERED

There are some issues regarding Ph+ALL. First, do young patients require intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the era of multitarget agents? Second, which TKI is preferred for frontline therapy? Third, should allo-SCT be performed in patients achieving complete remission with ponatinib and IC? Fourth, can chemo-free treatment lead to a cure without allo-SCT? We searched relevant literature from the last 30 years on PubMed; reviewed the role of chemo-free therapies and combinations of ponatinib and IC; and assessed the necessity of allo-SCT in young patients with Ph+ALL.

EXPERT OPINION

Allo-SCT may not be needed, even in young patients with Ph+ALL treated with ponatinib-based IC or combined ponatinib and blinatumomab as frontline therapy. When adopting a ponatinib-based chemo-minimized regimen for induction, allo-SCT is needed with posttransplant ponatinib maintenance. Continuous exposure to ponatinib at pre- or post-transplant is regarded as one of the most important factor for the success of treatment.

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: ten frequently asked questions

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions.

Advances in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of frontline immunotherapy-based regimens

Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are both active in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and improve outcomes compared with conventional chemotherapy in this setting. Several prospective clinical trials have explored the use of these agents in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL, with promising outcomes observed in younger and older adults and in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL. These novel regimens result in high rates of deep measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and may improve survival compared with chemotherapy-only approaches, allowing for less reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This review discusses novel approaches to integrating INO and/or blinatumomab into frontline ALL regimens, including the potential role of chemotherapy-free regimens in some subgroups. The role of MRD monitoring is also discussed, including how this can inform decisions for consolidative allogeneic HSCT or investigational approaches with CD19 CAR T-cells.

Ponatinib vs Imatinib in Frontline Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I.

Objective

To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022.

Intervention

Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival.

Results

Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.

Management of ALL in adults: 2024 ELN recommendations from a European expert panel

ABSTRACT

Experts from the European Leukemia Net (ELN) working group for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia have identified an unmet need for guidance regarding management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from diagnosis to aftercare. The group has previously summarized their recommendations regarding diagnostic approaches, prognostic factors, and assessment of ALL. The current recommendation summarizes clinical management. It covers treatment approaches, including the use of new immunotherapies, application of minimal residual disease for treatment decisions, management of specific subgroups, and challenging treatment situations as well as late effects and supportive care. The recommendation provides guidance for physicians caring for adult patients with ALL which has to be complemented by regional expertise preferably provided by national academic study groups.

Frontline combination of dasatinib and low-intensity chemotherapy in adults with de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Studies on dasatinib-based low-intensity induction regimens and post-remission strategies are limited in China. Therefore, we conducted a single-center phase 2 trial in newly diagnosed adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to establish the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients received one month of dasatinib plus low-intensity chemotherapy and two months of dasatinib monotherapy for induction, followed by a single course of high-dose methotrexate for consolidation. Subsequently, they underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based treatment for maintenance therapy between October 2015 and August 2022.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median age was 45 years (range, 20-71). The rates of major and complete molecular responses in the third month were 18.2% and 40.9% respectively. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 5-89), the estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 52.4% and 73.2%, respectively. The TKI-based cohort had a significantly poorer DFS (p = 0.014) and OS (p = 0.008) than the allo-HSCT cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that dasatinib-based low-intensity chemotherapy is safe and effective as an induction strategy in the Chinese population. Allo-HSCT plays a crucial role in the long-term outcomes of patients with Ph+ ALL.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02690922.

Long-Term Results of the Dasatinib-Blinatumomab Protocol for Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report the long-term results of the frontline trial with dasatinib and blinatumomab in induction/consolidation (GIMEMA LAL2116, D-ALBA) for adult Philadelphia-positive ALL (Ph+ ALL), which enrolled 63 patients of all ages. At a median follow-up of 53 months, disease-free survival, overall survival, and event-free survival are 75.8%, 80.7%, and 74.6%, respectively. No events have occurred among early molecular responders. A significantly worse outcome was recorded for IKZF1plus patients. Twenty-nine patients-93.1% being in molecular response (ie, complete molecular response or positive nonquantifiable) after dasatinib/blinatumomab-never received chemotherapy/transplant and continued with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor only; 28 patients remain in long-term complete hematologic response (CHR). An allogeneic transplant was carried out in first CHR mainly in patients with persistent minimal residual disease; 83.3% of patients are in continuous CHR. The transplant-related mortality was 12.5% for patients transplanted in first CHR and 13.7% overall. Nine relapses and six deaths have occurred. ABL1 mutations were found in seven cases. The final analysis of the D-ALBA study shows that a chemotherapy-free induction/consolidation regimen on the basis of a targeted strategy (dasatinib) and immunotherapy (blinatumomab) is effective in inducing durable long-term hematologic and molecular responses in adult Ph+ ALL, paving the way for a new era in the management of these patients.

Clinical efficacy and safety of flumatinib versus dasatinib combined with multi-drug chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Flumatinib, a highly selective ABL kinase inhibitor, exhibits stronger inhibition of intracellular BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity, compared to Imatinib. However, there is limited research comparing the real-world efficacy and safety of flumatinib and dasatinib in patients with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL).

OBJECTIVE

Investigating the differences in therapeutic efficacy and safety between flumatinib and dasatinib in combination with multi-drug chemotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.

METHOD

In this study, we assessed 43 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL (20 in the flumatinib group, 23 in the dasatinib group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gender, age, fusion gene type, initial blood routine, bone marrow blast cell ratio or chromosome karyotype between the two groups. Within 1 month, there were no significant differences in the complete response (CR), major molecular response (MMR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate between the flumatinib and dasatinib groups. Similarly, within 3 months, there were no significant differences in CR or MMR rates between the two groups. However, the rates of complete molecular response (CMR) and MRD negativity within 3 months were significantly higher in the flumatinib group, compared to the dasatinib group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the flumatinib group exhibited fewer adverse reactions compared to the dasatinib group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that flumatinib is a safe and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for achieving CMR and MRD negativity in patients with Ph+ ALL, as supported by this small series of patients.

Olverembatinib combined with blinatumomab in treating T315I-mutated Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: two-case report

ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) act an irreplaceable role in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The treatment of these diseases has been revolutionized by the application of immunotherapeutic modalities. However, diseases with ABL kinase domain mutation T315I are resistant to the majority of TKIs, which is responsible for treatment failure. Olverembatinib is a third-generation TKI that has been approved for the treatment of T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in China; its usage in Ph+ ALL needs further exploration. Here, we present two cases with relapsed T315I mutation Ph+ ALL who received the combination regimen of blinatumomab and olverembatinib. This regimen, which has not been reported yet, was safe and effective as the patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negative after 1 cycle of therapy. The management of these cases provides evidence of this new chemo-free regimen as an efficient approach for relapsed or refractory(R/R)Ph+ ALL.

Diagnostic and therapeutic advances in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of gene analysis and targeted immunotherapy

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most rapidly changing hematological malignancies with advanced understanding of the genetic landscape, detection methods of minimal residual disease (MRD), and the development of immunotherapeutic agents with good clinical outcomes. The annual incidence of adult ALL in Korea is 300-350 patients per year. The WHO classification of ALL was revised in 2022 to reflect the molecular cytogenetic features and suggest new adverse- risk subgroups, such as Ph-like ALL and ETP-ALL. We continue to use traditional adverse-risk features and cytogenetics, with MRD-directed post-remission therapy including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, with the introduction of novel agents, such as ponatinib, blinatumomab, and inotuzumab ozogamicin incorporated into frontline therapy, good MRD responses have been achieved, and overall survival outcomes are improving. Accordingly, some clinical trials have suggested a possible era of chemotherapy-free or transplantation-free approaches in the near future. Nevertheless, relapse of refractory ALL still occurs, and some poor ALL subtypes, such as Ph-like ALL and ETP-ALL, are unsolved problems for which novel agents and treatment strategies are needed. In this review, we summarize the currently applied diagnostic and therapeutic practices in the era of advanced genetic analysis and targeted immunotherapies in United States and Europe and introduce real-world Korean data.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in Chile: A single-center analysis

Background

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia represents 20% of acute leukemias in adults. Currently, there is limited data in Chile regarding the clinical, cytogenetic, and prognostic characteristics of this condition.

Methods

This is a retrospective, observational, and descriptive study of 67 patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia at the Arturo Lopez Perez Foundation between 2018 and 2021. The main objective is to evaluate epidemiological and clinical characteristics, as well as identifying factors associated with improved overall survival and/or progression-free survival.

Results

88% of the cases were B-lineage, mainly the common B phenotype. Cytogenetic analysis was performed in less than 50% of the patients, with lower yield than expected according to the literature. Molecular testing was performed in 86.5% of the patients, with the most frequent alteration being BCR-ABL. No study was performed to search for Ph-like abnormalities. The rate of complete response after induction was 83.3%, the majority of patients having negative minimal residual disease. Only 12% of the patients received consolidation with allogenic bone marrow transplant. At 2 years, the overall survival was 69% and the progression-free survival was 59%.

Conclusion

The results in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival are similar to those reported in the literature. Important diagnostic gaps prevent adequate prognostic characterization. Allogeneic consolidation transplantation was performed in a lower percentage than expected, highlighting the national deficit in access to this treatment.

Ponatinib Improved the Prognosis of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Japanese Single-Center Cohort Study

Introduction The overall survival (OS) of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) has improved with the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with intensive chemotherapy. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the possibility of long-term survival without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of treatment and the resultant outcomes in Ph+ALL patients using real-world data. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective analysis utilizing Akita University Hospital data (Akita, Japan) from November 2000 to June 2023 to evaluate the outcomes of TKI with intensive chemotherapy for Ph+ALL. Results Twenty-three patients with Ph+ALL were treated with intensive chemotherapy combined with TKI, including six imatinib, four dasatinib, and 13 ponatinib. The median patient age was 53 years (range; 28-67). Eighteen patients (78%) achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) within three months. HSCT was performed in 16 patients (70%), all of whom did not receive post-transplant TKI maintenance therapy. Six of the seven patients who did not undergo HSCT received maintenance therapy with ponatinib after intensive chemotherapy. The three-year OS was 81%. Ponatinib treatment resulted in a much higher OS rate than imatinib/dasatinib (100% vs. 60%; P=0.011). CMR within three months was identified as a prognostic factor for molecular relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR)=0.22; P=0.027). CD20 positivity was identified as a risk factor for hematological relapse (HR=5.2, P=0.032). Conclusion Even in a single-center cohort study, ponatinib, as a combination TKI with intensive chemotherapy or maintenance therapy, may improve the prognosis of Ph+ALL. Patients with CMR within three months might not necessarily need to receive HSCT, but a subsequent treatment-free status could have been achieved only by HSCT. Furthermore, CD20 positivity may be a useful biomarker for future treatment decisions in patients with Ph+ALL.

Enriching single-arm clinical trials with external controls: possibilities and pitfalls

For the past decade, it has become commonplace to provide rapid answers and early patient access to innovative treatments in the absence of randomized clinical trials (RCT), with benefits estimated from single-arm trials. This trend is important in oncology, notably when assessing new targeted therapies. Some of those uncontrolled trials further include an external/synthetic control group as an innovative way to provide an indirect comparison with a pertinent control group. We aimed to provide some guidelines as a comprehensive tool for (1) the critical appraisal of those comparisons or (2) for performing a single-arm trial. We used the example of ciltacabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after 3 or more treatment lines as an illustrative example. We propose a 3-step guidance. The first step includes the definition of an estimand, which encompasses the treatment effect and the targeted population (whole population or restricted to single-arm trial or external controls), reflecting a clinical question. The second step relies on the adequate selection of external controls from previous RCTs or real-world data from patient cohorts, registries, or electronic patient files. The third step consists of choosing the statistical approach targeting the treatment effect defined above and depends on the available data (individual-level data or aggregated external data). The validity of the treatment effect derived from indirect comparisons heavily depends on careful methodological considerations included in the proposed 3-step procedure. Because the level of evidence of a well-conducted RCT cannot be guaranteed, the evaluation is more important than in standard settings.

Pharmacological profiling identifies divergent chemosensitivities of differentiating and maturing iPSC-derived human cortical neuron populations

Neuronal differentiation and maturation are extended developmental processes. To determine whether neurons at different developmental stages have divergent chemosensitivities, we screened differentiating and maturing neuronal populations using a small compound library comprising FDA-approved and investigational drugs. Using a neurotoxicity assay format, both respective neuronal population-based screening campaigns performed robustly (Z-factors = 0.7-0.8), although the hit rate for the differentiating neurons (2.8%) was slightly higher than for maturing neurons (1.9%). While the majority of hits were toxic to both neuronal populations, these hits predominantly represented promiscuous drugs. Other drugs were selectively neurotoxic, with receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors disproportionally represented after confirmation. Ponatinib and amuvatinib were neuroinhibitory for differentiating and maturing neurons, respectively. Chemoinformatic analyses confirmed differences in potential drug targets that may be differentially expressed during neuronal development. Subsequent studies demonstrated neuronal expression of AXL, an amuvatinib target, in both neuronal populations. However, functional AXL activity was confirmed only in the maturing neuronal population as determined by AXL phosphorylation in response to GAS6, the cognate ligand of AXL, and concurrent STAT3Y705 phosphorylation. Differentiating neurons were unresponsive to the effects of GAS6 suggesting that the AXL-STAT3 signaling axis was nonfunctional. Amuvatinib treatment of maturing neuronal cultures significantly reduced pAXL levels. These studies indicate that neuronal developmental states may exhibit unique chemosensitivities and that drugs may have different neuro-inhibitory effects depending upon the developmental stage of the neuronal population.

Prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies in the targeted therapy era

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be serious and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. Patients with inactive and even resolved HBV infection still have persistence of HBV genomes in the liver. The expression of these silent genomes is controlled by the immune system. Suppression or ablation of immune cells, most importantly B cells, may lead to reactivation of seemingly resolved HBV infection. Thus, all patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy. For patients with resolved HBV infection, there are two approaches. The first is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, and treatment with antiviral therapy as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. The second approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, particularly for patients receiving high-risk therapy, especially anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entecavir and tenofovir are the preferred antiviral choices. Many new effective therapies for hematological malignancies have been introduced in the past decade, for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, novel monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibody drug conjugates, and small molecule inhibitors, which may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy.

Ponatinib vs. Imatinib as Frontline Treatment for Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of ponatinib-based treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) has not been compared to imatinib-based treatments in head-to-head clinical trials. We evaluated its efficacy versus imatinib-based regimens using a matching adjusted indirect comparison.

METHODS

Two ponatinib studies were used: the phase 2 MDACC study of ponatinib + hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) in adult patients and the phase 2 GIMEMA LAL1811 study of ponatinib + steroids in patients > 60 years/unfit for intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplant. Studies on imatinib as first-line treatment in adults with Ph + ALL were identified using a systematic literature search. Population adjustment was based on the prognostic factors and effect modifiers identified by clinical experts. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) for complete molecular response (CMR).

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified two studies (GRAAPH-2005 and NCT00038610) reporting the efficacy of first-line imatinib + hyper-CVAD and one study reporting the efficacy of first-line imatinib monotherapy induction + imatinib-based consolidation (CSI57ADE10). Ponatinib + hyper-CVAD prolonged OS and gave a higher CMR rate than imatinib + hyper-CVAD. The adjusted HR [95% confidence interval (CI)] for OS was 0.35 (0.17-0.74) for MDACC vs. GRAAPH-2005 and 0.35 (0.18-0.70) for MDACC vs. NCT00038610; the adjusted OR (95% CI) for CMR was 12.11 (3.77-38.87) for MDACC vs. GRAAPH-2005 and 5.65 (2.02-15.76) for MDACC vs. NCT00038610. Ponatinib + steroids prolonged OS and gave a higher CMR rate than imatinib monotherapy induction + imatinib-containing consolidation. The adjusted HR (95% CI) for OS was 0.24 (0.09-0.64) and the adjusted OR (95% CI) for CMR was 6.20 (1.60-24.00) for GIMEMA LAL1811 vs. CSI57ADE10.

CONCLUSION

In adults with newly diagnosed Ph + ALL, first-line treatment with ponatinib was associated with better outcomes than first-line treatment with imatinib.

Preclinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of dasatinib and ponatinib for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

LCK is a novel therapeutic target in ~40% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), and dasatinib and ponatinib can act as LCK inhibitors with therapeutic effects. We herein report a comprehensive preclinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of dasatinib and ponatinib in LCK-activated T-ALL. In 51 human T-ALL cases, these two drugs showed similar patterns of cytotoxic activity, with ponatinib being slightly more potent. Given orally in mice, ponatinib was associated with slower clearance with a longer Tmax and higher AUC0-24 h, although maximum pLCK inhibition was comparable between the two drugs. After establishing the exposure-to-response models, we simulated the steady-state pLCK inhibitory effects of each drug at currently approved dosages in humans: dasatinib at 140 mg and ponatinib at 45 mg once daily are both sufficient to achieve >50% pLCK inhibition for 13.0 and 13.9 h/day, respectively, comparable to pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents in BCR::ABL1 leukemias. Moreover, we developed a dasatinib-resistant T-ALL cell line model with LCK T316I mutation, in which ponatinib retained partial activity against LCK. In conclusion, we described the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of dasatinib and ponatinib as LCK inhibitors in T-ALL, providing critical data for the development of human trials of these agents.

Management of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the current era

Before the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) the outcome of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was dismal. The TKI combination with induction regimens has greatly improved the long-term outcome of Ph+ ALL, specifically ponatinib a most potent TKI in combination with HyperCVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) chemotherapy has demonstrated 5 years overall survival up to 75%. Historically, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) used to be the only potential curative option, recent data suggest that patients who achieve complete molecular remission within 3 months of TKI based induction therapies can achieve comparable overall survival with or without allo-HSCT. Intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy may not be the desirable treatment option in elderly Ph+ ALL patients due to anticipated tolerance, recently in a phase II study, "chemotherapy free" combinations such as blinatumomab (bispecific anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody) with ponatinib in treatment naïve Ph+ ALL patients have shown a complete response rate of 95% and 2 years overall survival of 93%. In this review we have highlighted the evolving treatment landscape of Ph+ ALL and what to look for in future.

Using immunotherapy and novel trial designs to optimise front-line therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: breaking with the traditions of the past

Multidrug chemotherapy has historically been the cornerstone of therapy for both children and adults with acute lymphocytic leukaemia. However, in the past decade, several novel immunotherapies have proven to be highly effective in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukaemia, including the anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin, the CD3 × CD19 bispecific antibody blinatumomab, and two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products. These agents are all approved in the USA as monotherapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. However, their use as single agents in the salvage setting might not be taking full advantage of their anti-leukaemia potential, because our ability to cure a patient is likely to be greatest when the most effective therapies are safety integrated into front-line treatment regimens. Several ongoing studies have yielded encouraging data with routine incorporation of inotuzumab ozogamicin or blinatumomab, or both, in patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and these approaches are emerging as new standards of care. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia, chemotherapy-free regimens combining blinatumomab and a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor are changing acute lymphocytic leukaemia therapy, highlighting the potential for these novel agents to reduce-or perhaps eliminate-the need for chemotherapy in some subtypes. In this Viewpoint, we review promising data from ongoing clinical trials of novel immunotherapy-based combinations that are being explored in patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphocytic leukaemia. We also discuss the challenges of randomised studies in the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape and argue for the ability of well designed, non-randomised studies to more rapidly advance the standard of care in acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

Ph+ ALL in 2022: is there an optimal approach?

Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) carried a very poor prognosis prior to the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that block the activity of the BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. With improvements in TKI efficacy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), survival has improved over the past 3 decades, and the role of chemotherapy and allogeneic HCT is now changing. Better risk stratification, the application of the third-generation TKI ponatinib, and the use of immunotherapy with the CD19-CD3 bifunctional T-cell engaging antibody blinatumomab in place of chemotherapy has made therapy for Ph+ ALL more tolerable and arguably more efficacious, especially for older patients who comprise most patients with Ph+ ALL.

Evidence-Based Minireview: What is the optimal tyrosine kinase inhibitor for adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

The incorporation of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to intensive chemotherapy significantly improved the outcomes of patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This was first shown with the addition of the first-generation TKI imatinib, which allowed more patients to be bridged to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) and led to superior long-term outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone. The use of second-generation TKIs (eg, dasatinib and nilotinib) has led to further improvement in outcomes of patients with Ph- positive ALL, with a long-term survival of 40% to 60% in several studies. Ponatinib is a third-generation, more potent TKI that results in high rates of molecular response and promising long-term survival even when allogeneic SCT is not routinely performed. While randomized data to support the TKI selection in Ph-positive ALL are lacking, data from single-arm studies suggest deeper molecular responses and superior survival outcomes with each successive generation of TKI. More recently, chemotherapy-free regimens with blinatumomab and TKIs have shown excellent results in the frontline setting and may represent an emerging paradigm shift in the treatment of Ph-positive ALL.

Current Status of Novel Agents for the Treatment of B Cell Malignancies: What's Coming Next?

Resistance to death is one of the hallmarks of human B cell malignancies and often contributes to the lack of a lasting response to today's commonly used treatments. Drug discovery approaches designed to activate the death machinery have generated a large number of inhibitors of anti-apoptotic proteins from the B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 2 family and the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway. Orally administered small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 protein and BCR partners (e.g., Bruton's tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase) have already been included (as monotherapies or combination therapies) in the standard of care for selected B cell malignancies. Agonistic monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives (antibody-drug conjugates, antibody-radioisotope conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells) targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs, such as CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD38) are indicated for treatment (as monotherapies or combination therapies) of patients with B cell tumors. However, given that some patients are either refractory to current therapies or relapse after treatment, novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Here, we review current strategies for managing B cell malignancies, with a focus on the ongoing clinical development of more effective, selective drugs targeting these molecules, as well as other TAAs and signaling proteins. The observed impact of metabolic reprogramming on B cell pathophysiology highlights the promise of targeting metabolic checkpoints in the treatment of these disorders.

Modern Management Options for Ph+ ALL

Simple Summary

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has represented a major step forward in the therapy of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Recent improvements in the therapy are focused on early use of third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, their combination with immunotherapy, the refined indication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the optimal use and duration of maintenance therapy, and the management of patients with molecular or hematological relapse with combination of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, including cellular therapies. Improvements in the assessment of measurable residual disease and in the detection of mutations in the ABL1 domain are contributing to the better selection of the therapy for newly diagnosed as well as for relapsed or refractory patients.

Abstract

Impressive advances have been achieved in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) since the initial concurrent use of imatinib and standard chemotherapy. The attenuation of chemotherapy has proven to be equally effective and less toxic, the use of third generation TKI upfront has improved the frequency of complete molecular response and the survival rate, and the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immunotherapy has further increased the rate of molecular response to 70–80% after consolidation, which has been translated into a survival rate of 75–90% in recent trials. As a result of these improvements, the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being redefined. The methodology of measurable residual disease assessment and the detection of ABL1 mutations are also improving and will contribute to a more precise selection of the treatment for newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. Finally, new compounds combined with immunotherapeutic approaches, including cellular therapy, are being used as rescue therapy and will hopefully be included in first line therapy in the near future. This article will review and update the modern management of patients with Ph+ ALL.