How I treat a refractory myeloma patient who is not eligible for a clinical trial

Biological and Translational Considerations regarding the Recent Therapeutic Successes and Upcoming Challenges for Multiple Myeloma

Even though multiple myeloma (MM) is still considered incurable, the therapeutic management of this disease has undergone a major transformation over the last two decades, with several new classes of therapeutics and diverse options for their combined use in many different regimens that have contributed to major improvement in overall survival of patients. This review discusses key themes underlying the pharmacological and immune-based therapies that represent the cornerstones of this progress. A major part of the clinical progress achieved by these classes' therapeutics has depended on the targeting of molecular pathways with distinct or preferential roles for the biology of plasma cells-normal or malignant-and the ability of many of these agents to be incorporated into combination regimens that exhibit enhanced antimyeloma responses, without precipitating acceptable levels of toxicity. This review also discusses why these advances have not yet translated into curative outcomes and how these remaining barriers could be overcome.

Clinical impact of frailty on treatment outcomes of elderly patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone

We compared efficacy and safety, according to frailty, of elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), for whom bortezomib treatment had failed. Patients, 164 (52.9%) and 146 (47.1%), were classified as non-frail and frail using a simplified frailty scale. The overall response rates (ORR) and survival outcomes were lower in frail than in non-frail patients (ORR: 56.2% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.069; median progression free survival: 13.17 vs. 17.80 months, P = 0.033; median overall survival: 23.00 vs. 36.27 months, P = 0.002, respectively). The number of treatment emergent adverse events in grade 3 or worse was higher in frail than in non-frail patients (41.8% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.002, respectively). In frail patients, independent poor prognostic factors for survival were two or more Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, prior to exposure to both bortezomib and thalidomide, and achieved less than partial response In conclusion, frailty could predict clinical outcomes of Rd treatment in elderly patients with RRMM who had failed prior bortezomib. In frail patients, lower CCI in addition to less previous treatment exposure and deep response were associated with better survival.