Bispecific antibody therapies

Tumour Microenvironment: The General Principles of Pathogenesis and Implications in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide, constituting around 30-40% of all cases. Almost 60% of patients develop relapse of refractory DLBCL. Among the reasons for the therapy failure, tumour microenvironment (TME) components could be involved, including tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and different subtypes of cytotoxic CD8+ cells and T regulatory cells, which show complex interactions with tumour cells. Understanding of the TME can provide new therapeutic options for patients with DLBCL and improve their prognosis and overall survival. This review provides essentials of the latest understanding of tumour microenvironment elements and discusses their role in tumour progression and immune suppression mechanisms which result in poor prognosis for patients with DLBCL. In addition, we point out important markers for the diagnostic purposes and highlight novel therapeutic targets.

Current status of bispecific antibodies and CAR-T therapies in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of plasma cells, is an incurable disease that is characterized by the neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells leading to extensive skeletal destruction. This includes osteolytic lesions, osteopenia, and pathologic fractures. MM is clinically manifested through bone pain, renal insufficiency, hypercalcemia, anemia, and recurrent infections. Its prevalence and the need for effective treatment underscore the importance of this research. Recent advancements in MM therapy have been significant, particularly with the integration of daratumumab into first-line treatments. The use of daratumumab in regimens such as DRD (Daratumumab, Revlimid, Dexamethasone) and D-RVd (Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone) represents a paradigm shift in the treatment landscape. GRIFFIN and CASSIOPEIA trials have highlighted the efficacy of these regimens, particularly in prolonging progression-free survival and deepening patient responses. The shift from older regimens like MPV (Melphalan, Prednisone, Velcade) to more effective ones like DRD and RVD has been pivotal in treatment strategies. This review also focuses on the potential of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies in MM. CAR-T therapy, which has shown success in other hematological malignancies, is being explored for its ability to specifically target MM cells. The latest clinical trials and research findings are analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and challenges of CAR-T therapy in MM. Additionally, the role of bispecific antibodies, which are designed to bind both cancer cells and T cells, is explored. These antibodies offer a unique mechanism that could complement the effects of CAR-T therapy.

Immune effector cell-associated haematotoxicity after CAR T-cell therapy: from mechanism to management

Genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have become an effective treatment option for several advanced B-cell malignancies. Haematological side-effects, classified in 2023 as immune effector cell-associated haematotoxicity (ICAHT), are very common and can predispose for clinically relevant infections. As haematopoietic reconstitution after CAR T-cell therapy differs from chemotherapy-associated myelosuppression, a novel classification system for early and late ICAHT has been introduced. Furthermore, a risk stratification score named CAR-HEMATOTOX has been developed to identify candidates at high risk of ICAHT, thereby enabling risk-based interventional strategies. Therapeutically, growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the mainstay of treatment, with haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) boosts available for patients who are refractory to G-CSF (if available). Although the underlying pathophysiology remains poorly understood, translational studies from the past 3 years suggest that CAR T-cell-induced inflammation and baseline haematopoietic function are key contributors to prolonged cytopenia. In this Review, we provide an overview of the spectrum of haematological toxicities after CAR T-cell therapy and offer perspectives on future translational and clinical developments.

Supportive care measures for bispecific T-cell engager therapies in haematological malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) therapies are revolutionising the treatment of several haematological malignancies, including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, various subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Due to their unique mode of action in activating endogenous T cells, they are associated with several important early side effects, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. In addition, TCEs can cause target-specific toxicities and carry a significant risk of infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, supportive care measures for TCEs have largely been inferred from other T-cell therapies, such as CAR-T (chimeric antigen receptor) therapy. Further research into TCE-specific supportive care measures is needed to improve the tolerability of these therapies for patients. A key question moving forward is understanding how to predict and minimise early toxicity (cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome). Associated infection risk is a significant cause of patient morbidity, therefore a better understanding of how to optimise TCE-dosing and prophylactic measures, such as intravenous immunoglobulin and antimicrobials, will be crucial to achieving an improved balance of toxicity and efficacy. Enabling early outpatient delivery of these therapies to select patients at lower risk of toxicity may also help to improve patient experience and quality of life.

SUMMARY

Here we review up-to-date guidance and literature on existing supportive care measures for bispecific TCE therapy-related toxicities. We highlight both unique and serious side effects of TCE therapies that require improved management strategies to enable more patients to benefit from these efficacious drugs.

Harnessing Nanotechnology: Emerging Strategies for Multiple Myeloma Therapy

Advances in nanotechnology have provided novel avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. This review elucidates the potential of nanotechnology to revolutionize myeloma therapy, focusing on nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, nanoscale imaging techniques, and nano-immunotherapy. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems offer enhanced drug targeting, reduced systemic toxicity, and improved therapeutic efficacy. We discuss the latest developments in nanocarriers, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, used for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, siRNA, and miRNA in MM treatment. We delve into nanoscale imaging techniques which provide spatial multi-omic data, offering a holistic view of the tumor microenvironment. This spatial resolution can help decipher the complex interplay between cancer cells and their surrounding environment, facilitating the development of highly targeted therapies. Lastly, we explore the burgeoning field of nano-immunotherapy, which employs nanoparticles to modulate the immune system for myeloma treatment. Specifically, we consider how nanoparticles can be used to deliver tumor antigens to antigen-presenting cells, thus enhancing the body's immune response against myeloma cells. In conclusion, nanotechnology holds great promise for improving the prognosis and quality of life of MM patients. However, several challenges remain, including the need for further preclinical and clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of these emerging strategies. Future research should also focus on developing personalized nanomedicine approaches, which could tailor treatments to individual patients based on their genetic and molecular profiles.