Cefepime Extraction by Extracorporeal Life Support Circuits

Bioanalysis of six antibiotics from volumetric microsamples: a new tool for precision dosing in critically ill children

Background: Volumetric absorptive microsamples (VAMS) can support pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic studies. We present the bioanalytical method development for the simultaneous quantification of ampicillin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, piperacillin, tazobactam, and vancomycin from VAMS. Methods & results: Optimal extraction, chromatographic, and mass spectrometry conditions were identified. Maximum extraction recoveries included 100 μl of water for rehydration and methanol for protein precipitation. Chromatographic separation used Phenomenex Kinetex™ Polar C18 column with a mobile phase comprising water/acetonitrile with formic acid and was fully validated. Hematocrit effects were only observed for vancomycin. Samples were stable for 90 days at -80°C except for meropenem, which was stable for 60 days. Conclusion: Multiple antibiotics can be assayed from a single VAMS sample to facilitate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.

Meropenem extraction by ex vivo extracorporeal life support circuits

BACKGROUND

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem-type antibiotic commonly used to treat critically ill patients infected with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. As many of these patients require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), it is important to understand how these extracorporeal life support circuits impact meropenem pharmacokinetics. Based on the physicochemical properties of meropenem, it is expected that ECMO circuits will minimally extract meropenem, while CRRT circuits will rapidly clear meropenem. The present study seeks to determine the extraction of meropenem from ex vivo ECMO and CRRT circuits and elucidate the contribution of different ECMO circuit components to extraction.

METHODS

Standard doses of meropenem were administered to three different configurations (n = 3 per configuration) of blood-primed ex vivo ECMO circuits and serial sampling was conducted over 24 h. Similarly, standard doses of meropenem were administered to CRRT circuits (n = 4) and serial sampling was conducted over 4 h. Meropenem was administered to separate tubes primed with circuit blood to serve as controls to account for drug degradation. Meropenem concentrations were quantified, and percent recovery was calculated for each sample.

RESULTS

Meropenem was cleared at a similar rate in ECMO circuits of different configurations (n = 3) and controls (n = 6), with mean (standard deviation) recovery at 24 h of 15.6% (12.9) in Complete circuits, 37.9% (8.3) in Oxygenator circuits, 47.1% (8.2) in Pump circuits, and 20.6% (20.6) in controls. In CRRT circuits (n = 4) meropenem was cleared rapidly compared with controls (n = 6) with a mean recovery at 2 h of 2.36% (1.44) in circuits and 93.0% (7.1) in controls.

CONCLUSION

Meropenem is rapidly cleared by hemodiafiltration during CRRT. There is minimal adsorption of meropenem to ECMO circuit components; however, meropenem undergoes significant degradation and/or plasma metabolism at physiological conditions. These ex vivo findings will advise pharmacists and physicians on the appropriate dosing of meropenem.