Is tidal expiratory flow limitation predictive of sleep-related disorders in the elderly?

Relationship between airflow limitation in response to upper airway negative pressure during wakefulness and obstructive sleep apnea severity

PURPOSE

The objective was to determine if alteration in airflow induced by negative pressure (NP) applied to participants' upper airways during wakefulness, is related to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as determined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).

METHODS

Adults 18 years of age or greater were recruited. All participants underwent overnight polysomnography to assess their apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). While awake, participants were twice exposed, orally, to -3 cm H2O of NP for five full breaths. The ratio of the breathing volumes of the last two breaths during NP exposure to the last two breaths prior to NP exposure was deemed the NP ratio (NPR).

RESULTS

Eighteen participants were enrolled. A strong relationship between the AHI and the exponentially transformed NPR (ExpNPR) for all participants was observed (R2 = 0.55, p < 0.001). A multivariable model using the independent variable ExpNPR, age, body mass index and sex accounted for 81% of variability in AHI (p = 0.0006). A leave-one-subject-out cross-validation analysis revealed that predicted AHI using the multivariable model, and actual AHI from participants' polysomnograms, were strongly related (R2 = 0.72, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that ExpNPR, was strongly related to the AHI, independently of demographic factors known to be related to the AHI.

Expiratory Flow Limitation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and COPD: A Quantitative Method to Detect Pattern Differences Using the Negative Expiratory Pressure Technique

BACKGROUND

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL), determined by the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique, can exhibit overlapping patterns in COPD, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and non-OSA obesity. We assessed the ability of a quantitative method to assess EFL to discriminate COPD from obese and OSA patients during NEP (-2 to -3 cm H(2)O) testing.

METHODS

EFL was quantified by measuring the area under the preceding control tidal breath (Vt) subtended by the NEP curve (%AUC). To quantify mean lost flow, the ratio of %AUC to percentage of control Vt over which EFL occurred (%EFL) (= %AUC/%EFL) was computed. Percent EFL, %AUC, and %AUC/%EFL was compared in 42 patients with COPD, 28 obese subjects without OSA, 50 with OSA (26 mild-moderate, 24 severe) and 19 control subjects, in seated and supine postures.

RESULTS

All patients exhibited %EFL values significantly higher than control subjects, corrected for age and gender (ANOVA). All but the COPD group exhibited higher %EFL while supine, but not %AUC or %AUC/%EFL. Amongst seated subjects, %EFL was highest in COPD, and amongst supine groups, it was greatest in OSA and COPD. %AUC/%EFL was significantly higher in mild-moderate OSA than in COPD only while seated. %AUC or %AUC/%EFL did not discriminate amongst other cohorts in either posture.

CONCLUSIONS

Computation of %EFL helps distinguish EFL in COPD, obese and OSA patients from those of control subjects. Computation of %AUC and %AUC/%EFL is useful in determining the magnitude of extrathoracic FL in individuals with obesity and OSA, but does not distinguish between cohorts.

A negative expiratory pressure test during wakefulness for evaluating the risk of obstructive sleep apnea in patients referred for sleep studies

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by increased upper airway collapsibility during sleep. The present study investigated the use of the negative expiratory pressure test as a method to rule out obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

Flow limitation was evaluated in 155 subjects. All subjects underwent a diurnal negative expiratory pressure test and a nocturnal sleep study. The severity of sleep apnea was determined based on the apnea-hypopnea index. Flow limitation was assessed by computing the exhaled volume at 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 s (V0.2, V0.5, and V1.0, respectively) during the application of a negative expiratory pressure and expressed as a percentage of the previous exhaled volume. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed to identify the optimal threshold volume at 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 s for obstructive sleep apnea detection.

RESULTS

Mean expiratory volumes at 0.2 and 0.5 s were statistically higher (p <0.01) in healthy subjects than in all obstructive sleep apneic groups. Increasing disease severity was associated with lower expiratory volumes. The V0.2 (%) predictive parameters for the detection of sleep apnea were sensitivity (81.1%), specificity (93.1%), PPV (98.1%), and NPV (52.9%). Sensitivity and NPV were 96.9% and 93.2%, respectively, for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, and both were 100% for severe obstructive sleep apnea.

CONCLUSION

Flow limitation measurement by V 0.2 (%) during wakefulness may be a very reliable method to identify obstructive sleep apnea when the test is positive and could reliably exclude moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea when the test is negative. The negative expiratory pressure test appears to be a useful screening test for suspected obstructive sleep apnea.