Bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis

Subclinical lower airways correlates of chronic allergic and non-allergic rhinitis

The upper and lower airways behave as a physiological and pathophysiological unit. Subclinical lower airways abnormalities have been described in patients with rhinitis without asthma. These are expressed as bronchial hyperreactivity, abnormalities in lung function and bronchial inflammation, likely as a result of the same phenomenon with systemic inflammatory impact that reaches both the nose and the lungs, which for unknown reasons does not always have a full clinical expression. Patients with rhinitis are at increased risk of developing asthma; therefore, most authors suggest a careful clinical evaluation and monitoring of these patients, especially if symptoms related to inflammation in the lower airways are observed. Although current treatments, such as H1-antihistamines, intranasal steroids and allergen immunotherapy, are quite effective for the management of rhinitis, it is difficult to prove their capacity to prevent asthma among subjects with rhinitis. Evidence showing that the treatment of rhinitis has a favourable impact on indicators of bronchial hyperreactivity and inflammation among subjects that have no symptoms of asthma is more frequently described. In this review, we address the frequency and characteristics of lower airway abnormalities in subjects with rhinitis, both in paediatric and adult populations, their likely predictive value for the development of asthma and the possibilities for therapeutic intervention that could modify the risk of subjects with rhinitis towards presenting asthma.

Rhinitis patients with sputum eosinophilia show decreased lung function in the absence of airway hyperresponsiveness

Purpose

Sputum eosinophilia is observed frequently in patients with rhinitis. Sputum eosinophilia in patients with non-asthmatic allergic rhinitis has been suggested to be related to nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). However, the clinical significance of sputum eosinophilia in patients with non-asthmatic rhinitis without AHR has not been determined. We conducted a retrospective study examining the influence of sputum eosinophilia in patients with non-asthmatic rhinitis without AHR on pulmonary function and expression of fibrosis-related mediators.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients with moderate-to-severe perennial rhinitis without AHR were included. All underwent lung function tests (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and forced vital capacity [FVC]), skin tests to inhalant allergens, methacholine bronchial challenge tests, and hypertonic saline-induced sputum to determine eosinophil counts. Sputum mRNA levels for transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) were also examined. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of sputum eosinophilia (≥3%, eosinophilia-positive [EP] and <3%, eosinophilia-negative [EN] groups).

Results

FEV1 was significantly lower (P=0.04) and FEV1/FVC tended to be lower (P=0.1) in the EP group than in the EN group. In sputum analyses, the MMP-9 mRNA level (P=0.005) and the ratio of MMP-9 to TIMP-1 expression (P=0.01) were significantly higher in the EP group than in the EN group. There was no significant difference in TGF-β mRNA expression between the two groups.

Conclusions

Sputum eosinophilia in patients with moderate-to-severe perennial rhinitis without AHR influenced FEV1 and the expression pattern of fibrosis-related mediators.

Purinergic signaling in the airways

Evidence for a significant role and impact of purinergic signaling in normal and diseased airways is now beyond dispute. The present review intends to provide the current state of knowledge of the involvement of purinergic pathways in the upper and lower airways and lungs, thereby differentiating the involvement of different tissues, such as the epithelial lining, immune cells, airway smooth muscle, vasculature, peripheral and central innervation, and neuroendocrine system. In addition to the vast number of well illustrated functions for purinergic signaling in the healthy respiratory tract, increasing data pointing to enhanced levels of ATP and/or adenosine in airway secretions of patients with airway damage and respiratory diseases corroborates the emerging view that purines act as clinically important mediators resulting in either proinflammatory or protective responses. Purinergic signaling has been implicated in lung injury and in the pathogenesis of a wide range of respiratory disorders and diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inflammation, cystic fibrosis, lung cancer, and pulmonary hypertension. These ostensibly enigmatic actions are based on widely different mechanisms, which are influenced by the cellular microenvironment, but especially the subtypes of purine receptors involved and the activity of distinct members of the ectonucleotidase family, the latter being potential protein targets for therapeutic implementation.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in preschool children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Nonasthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis often have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), characteristic of asthma. The presence and degree of atopy is suggested to be important for BHR in patients with asthma. We aimed to assess BHR to methacholine (direct stimulus) and to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP; indirect stimulus) in preschool children with allergic rhinitis and to investigate their relationship with the degree of atopy.

METHODS

Methacholine and AMP bronchial challenges were performed in preschool children with allergic rhinitis (n = 96), using a modified auscultation method. The end point concentration, resulting in audible wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation, was determined for each challenge. The degree of atopy was assessed using serum total IgE levels, the number of positive skin-prick tests, and atopic scores (sum of graded wheal size).

RESULTS

BHR to methacholine (end point concentration, ≤8 mg/mL) and to AMP (end point concentration, ≤200 mg/mL) was observed in 32 (33.3%) and 26 (27.1%) subjects, respectively. No significant relationship was observed between BHR to methacholine and any atopy parameter. In contrast, the atopic scores were higher in the AMP-BHR(+) group compared with the AMP-BHR(-) group, and a significant association was found between the degree of atopic scores and the frequency of BHR to AMP (score for trend, p = 0.006). Such a relationship was not observed for serum total IgE levels and the number of positive SPTs.

CONCLUSION

BHR to methacholine and BHR to AMP were detected in a significant proportion of preschool children with allergic rhinitis. The degree of atopy in terms of atopic scores seems to be an important factor for BHR to AMP but not for BHR to methacholine.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and adenosine monophosphate and the degree of atopy in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

nonasthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis often have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Not only the presence but also the degree of atopy are important factors in BHR of patients with asthma. BHR is commonly evaluated by bronchial challenges using direct or indirect stimuli.

OBJECTIVES

to assess BHR to methacholine (direct) and to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) (indirect) in children with allergic rhinitis and to compare their relationships with the degree of atopy.

METHODS

methacholine and AMP challenges were performed in 88 children with allergic rhinitis, and a provocative concentration causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC(20)) was calculated for each challenge. The degree of atopy was measured using serum total IgE levels, number of positive skin prick test results, and atopic scores (sum of graded wheal size).

RESULTS

BHR to methacholine (PC(20) <8 mg/mL) and to AMP (PC(20) <200 mg/mL) was observed in 22 (25%) and 30 (34%) patients, respectively. No association was found between BHR to methacholine and any atopy parameter. In contrast, serum total IgE levels and atopic scores were higher in the group with BHR to AMP than in the group without BHR to AMP. Furthermore, a significant association was found between the degree of these 2 parameters and BHR to AMP (score for trend, P < .001 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

both BHR to methacholine and BHR to AMP were detected in a significant proportion of children with allergic rhinitis. The degree of atopy seems to be an important factor in BHR to AMP but not in BHR to methacholine.

Modifications in forced vital capacity during adenosine monophosphate-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma: relationship with the response to methacholine and the effect of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

The effect of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) on forced vital capacity (FVC) has never been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare methacholine- and AMP-induced changes in FVC, as a marker of air trapping, in asthmatic patients treated and not treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).

METHODS

Airway responsiveness to equipotent concentrations of AMP and methacholine was obtained in asthmatic patients treated (n = 32) and not treated (n = 18) with ICSs. The response was expressed by the provocation concentration of agonist that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 20% (PC20) and by the slope of the FVC values recorded at each step of the challenge against the corresponding FEV1 values (sFVC).

RESULTS

Although methacholine and AMP PC20 values were similar in patients treated and not treated with ICSs, the mean (95% confidence interval) methacholine sFVC (but not AMP sFVC) was higher in those treated with ICSs (0.91; 0.77-1.06) than in those not taking ICSs (0.69; 0.57-0.81; P = .03). No significant correlation was found between sFVC and PC20 values obtained with either methacholine or AMP. Methacholine and AMP sFVC values were significantly related, but only in the group treated with ICSs (r = 0.60, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the AMP-induced decline in FVC in asthmatic patients is similar to that observed with equipotent concentrations of methacholine, the apparently different effect of ICSs on changes in FVC induced by each agonist suggests that the information provided by the 2 bronchoconstrictor agents is not interchangeable and that the information generated by the analysis of the effect of each agonist on FEV1 and FVC may be complementary.

Maximal response plateau to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in asthma. Relationship with the response to methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide, and exhaled breath condensate pH

BACKGROUND

No information is available on the plateau in response to adenosine 5'-monophosphate(AMP). The aims of the present study were (1) to determine whether plateau can be detected with AMP and the relation with the plateau in response to methacholine, and (2) to identify the relation between the plateau and indirect markers of airway inflammation, such as exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH.

METHODS

Airway responsiveness to high concentrations of methacholine and AMP, ENO levels, and EBC pH values were obtained in 31 subjects with well-controlled asthma. Concentration-response curves were characterized by their concentration of agonist that produces a decrease in FEV(1) of 20% and, if possible, by the level of plateau.

RESULTS

Although the prevalence of plateau with methacholine (48%) and AMP (58%) was similar, the two challenges did not identify plateau in exactly the same individuals. In 14 subjects who showed plateau with both bronchoconstrictor agents, the mean plateau level for methacholine was 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3 to 30.8), compared with 16.5% (95% CI, 12.2 to 20.8; p < 0.0001) for AMP. Both ENO and EBC pH values were similar in subjects with plateau and in those without plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-controlled asthmatics, the plateau in response to AMP can be identified at a milder degree of obstruction than the plateau in response to methacholine, but the two agonists are not identifying the same airway abnormalities. Furthermore, if ENO and EBC pH are markers of inflammation, the determination of the presence or level of plateau is not a reliable method to identify airway inflammation in asthma.

Evaluation of cytokine mRNA in induced sputum from patients with allergic rhinitis: relationship to airway hyperresponsiveness

BACKGROUND

Although airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, it is also frequently present in allergic rhinitis (AR). However, the pathogenesis of AHR is unclear and the roles of cytokines in the airway have not been well established in AR. We sought to compare cytokine mRNA levels in the sputum of AR patients with or without AHR and those of asthma patients, and to evaluate whether differences in cytokine levels are associated with the development of an abnormal airway response and the absence of respiratory symptoms in AR patients with AHR.

METHODS

Airway cells were obtained by sputum induction from 18 AR patients with AHR, 58 AR patients without AHR, and 27 asthma patients. Airway cell cytokine levels, interleukin (IL) -4, IL-5, IL-13, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), were studied at the mRNA level by RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Vascular endothelial growth factor and IL-5 mRNA levels were significantly higher in AR patients with AHR than in AR patients without AHR, but these were lower than those of asthmatic patients. Eosinophils were significantly higher in AR patients with AHR and in asthmatic patients than in AR patients without AHR. Interleukin-4, IL-13, and IFN-gamma levels were not elevated in AR patients with or without AHR vs asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that VEGF and IL-5 can be important determinants of the development of AHR in AR patients and that lower levels of other cytokines may be associated with the absence of asthmatic symptoms in AR patients with AHR.

Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate in atopic and non-atopic preschool children with recurrent wheezing

BACKGROUND

It is well known that atopy is a major determinant of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) in both asymptomatic and asthmatic children. However, the relationship between atopy and BHR has not been well studied in preschool children with wheezing. BHR is usually measured by bronchial challenges using direct and indirect stimuli.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether atopic and non-atopic preschool wheezers display similar or different BHR profiles for direct and indirect stimuli.

METHODS

Methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenges were performed in 4 to 6-year-old children with recurrent wheezing, using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. Atopy was determined to be present when a child had at least one positive reaction to a panel of 13 common airborne allergens in the presence of positive and negative controls.

RESULTS

A positive response to methacholine (an end-point concentration < or =8 mg/mL) was observed in 89.3% (50/56) of atopic wheezers and in 83.8% (31/37) of non-atopic wheezers (P=0.44) for the difference. By contrast, the frequency of a positive response to AMP (an end-point concentration < or =200 mg/mL) was significantly higher in the atopic group (47/56, 83.9%) compared with the non-atopic group (12/37, 32.4%; P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

While a majority of both atopic and non-atopic preschool wheezers were hyper-responsive to methacholine, atopic subjects were more hyper-responsive to AMP than non-atopic subjects. These findings suggest that atopic and non-atopic wheeze in preschool children are related to distinctive pathophysiologic pathways.

The effect of challenge method on sensitivity and reactivity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with suspected asthma

BACKGROUND

The following two methods of inhalation challenge have been used to determine the airway responsiveness: the tidal-breathing method; and the dosimeter method. The objective of the study was to determine the influence of the challenge method on the response to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP).

METHODS

This study measured airway responsiveness to AMP by dosimeter and tidal-breathing methods in 25 subjects with suspected asthma. The two AMP challenges were conducted in random order, on separate days, at the same time of day, at intervals of 1 to 5 days. Concentration-response curves were characterized by the provocative concentration of a substance causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and slope.

RESULTS

The dosimeter PC20 values were significantly higher than the tidal-breathing PC20 values, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) values of 50.35 mg/mL (95% CI, 19.50 to 129.72 mg/mL) and 28.97 mg/mL (95% CI, 11.99 to 69.98 mg/mL; p = 0.02), respectively. The mean difference in the PC20 values obtained with each method was 0.80 doubling concentrations (95% CI, 0.16 to 1.44 doubling concentrations). The mean values for the slope were 17.0%/log mg/mL (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.5 mg/mL) with the tidal breathing method and 13.8%/log mg/mL (95% CI, 9.0 to 18.7 mg/mL; p = 0.03) with the dosimeter.

CONCLUSIONS

The tidal-breathing method produces AMP PC20 values that are significantly lower than the dosimeter method and slope values that are significantly higher than the dosimeter method. These data suggest that the results obtained with each method of testing may not be comparable.

Determinants of airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in school-age children with asthma

Airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) is more specific than that to direct stimuli for asthma diagnosis and response to treatment, but is not detected in all patients with asthma. This study was planned to determine predictive factors for responsiveness to AMP in asthmatic children between 7-16 years old. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 71 asthmatic children who were challenged by AMP in our department. All children were characterized by skin-prick and lung function tests and bronchial challenge with AMP. Data on simultaneous methacholine challenge tests were available for 46 children, 34 of whom were also challenged with a third stimulus, exercise. Potential demographic factors for responsiveness to AMP were assessed by logistic regression analysis within the study group. The proportion of school-age children with asthma responsive to AMP was 39.4%. The geometric mean provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (PC20AMP) was 20.50 mg/ml (range, 0.31-377 mg/ml). There were no significant differences either in response to methacholine below 16 mg/ml (P = 0.66) or in PC20 methacholine level (P = 0.075) when we compared AMP-responsive and -nonresponsive children. These two groups also did not differ with respect to their response to exercise challenge in subgroup analysis (P = 0.34). Among school-age children with asthma, allergic rhinitis (P = 0.004) and sensitizaton to grass mix (P = 0.001), cereal mix (P = 0.003), house dust mite (P = 0.024), and cat (P = 0.043) were found to be more frequent in AMP-responsive children than the others. There was no difference in lung function test parameters between children responsive to AMP and the others. Grass pollen sensitization was found to be the only independent predictive factor for determining AMP responsiveness in school-age children with asthma (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-17.45; P = 0.003). In conclusion, atopic sensitization is the most important predictive factor for responsiveness to AMP in school-age children with asthma, as in adults.

Effect of omalizumab on adenosine 5'-monophosphate responsiveness in subjects with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of omalizumab on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP).

METHODS

Thirty-four subjects with mild to moderate allergic asthma were randomized to receive placebo (n = 16) or omalizumab (n = 18) subcutaneously during 12 weeks. Airway responsiveness to AMP was measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas the response to methacholine was measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, the increase in AMP PC(20) (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) was significantly greater in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 1.52 doubling concentrations (95% CI, 0.25-2.79, p = 0.02). Compared with baseline, the mean AMP PC(20) values at 12 weeks were increased by 1.91 doubling concentrations with omalizumab (p < 0.001) and 1.01 doubling concentrations with placebo (p = 0.16), but changes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Changes in methacholine PC(20) values were not significantly different between the omalizumab and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces the response to AMP without decreasing the response to methacholine. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that the contribution of IgE to the development of AMP bronchoconstriction is more important than their role in the induction of methacholine hyperresponsiveness.

Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.

Effect of histamine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate provocation on sputum neutrophils and related mediators in atopic patients

BACKGROUND

Airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation can be noninvasively studied by bronchial provocation using direct (histamine) or indirect (adenosine 5'-monophosphate [AMP]) stimuli and induced sputum.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the immediate effects of histamine and AMP challenge on induced sputum neutrophil counts and related mediator levels.

METHODS

We performed a single-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-way, crossover, methodological study in 14 atopic patients (median age, 25 years; 8 males; mean +/- SD forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 99% +/- 5%) without anti-inflammatory medication use. At baseline, sputum induction was performed. Bronchial challenges with AMP, histamine, or placebo were performed 48 hours later. Thirty minutes after challenge, sputum induction was performed again. Challenge periods in each patient were separated by more than 2 weeks. Sputum cells and the mediators leukotriene B4, interleukin 8, myeloperoxidase, and albumin were quantified.

RESULTS

Comparing median challenge-induced relative changes in cells and mediators, neither histamine nor AMP challenge altered the induced sputum neutrophil counts (histamine, 2.7%; AMP, 2.95%; placebo, -2%; P > .07 for all), interleukin 8 levels (histamine, 2.4 ng/mL; AMP, -3.8 ng/mL; placebo, -0.2 ng/mL; P > .06), leukotriene B4 levels (histamine, -4.8 pg/mL; AMP, 3 pg/mL; placebo, 6 pg/mL; P > .08), or myeloperoxidase levels (histamine, 0.16 microg/mL; AMP, 0 microg/mL; placebo, -0.03 microg/mL; P > .07). Sputum albumin levels were increased after histamine challenge compared with AMP and placebo challenge (P < .01 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Histamine and AMP provocation have no major effects on induced neutrophil counts and related mediator levels in atopic patients, whereas histamine challenge induces plasma leakage. Potential interactions of noninvasive methods to evaluate airway reactivity and inflammation should be carefully considered.

The effect of natural pollen exposure on eosinophil apoptosis and its relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Limited data suggest that there is increased eosinophilic inflammation in the airways of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) during pollen season even if they do not have asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of natural pollen exposure on inflammatory cells and apoptosis of eosinophils and its association with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) during and out of pollen season in SAR patients sensitized to only grass pollens.

METHODS

Forty SAR patients and 10 patients with nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) from Ankara, Turkey, were recruited to participate in the study. Two induced sputum samples were taken from SAR patients during pollen season (May-June) and out of pollen season (November-January), but only 1 induced sputum sample was taken from NAR patients. Slides of induced sputum were evaluated by 2 cytologists with the use of light microscopy after cytocentrifuged and dyed with May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain. Induced sputum samples were sufficient for differential cell counts in 14 SAR and 7 NAR patients.

RESULTS

Eosinophil counts in SAR patients were statistically higher in pollen season (19.4% +/- 16.2%) compared with out of season (4.6% +/- 6.9%, P = .003) and with NAR patients (4.7% +/- 9.5%, P = .01). The apoptotic eosinophil counts in SAR patients were statistically higher out of pollen season (3.0% +/- 4.5%) than in pollen season (0.38% +/- 0.80%, P = .02) and higher than those of NAR patients (0.14% +/- 0.26%, P = .005). The apoptotic ratio was statistically higher after pollen season compared with pollen season (0.720% +/- 0.394% vs 0.044% +/- 0.116%, P = .002). Blood eosinophil counts of SAR patients were increased during the pollen season (364 +/- 187/mm3) compared with out of season (278 +/- 219/mm3, P = .04) and with NAR patients (85 +/- 54/mm3, P = .001). The number of SAR patients who had BHR during the pollen season (7/14) was higher than the number who had BHR out of season (2/14, chi2 = 4.2, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that changes in eosinophil counts and eosinophil apoptosis may be related to the changes of natural pollen exposure and seasonal changes of BHR in SAR patients.

Mast cell mediator release in nonasthmatic subjects after endobronchial adenosine challenge

BACKGROUND

Adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) has been shown to cause bronchoconstriction in atopic subjects but to have no effect on nonatopic nonasthmatic subjects. Endobronchial AMP challenge has previously been shown to cause mast cell mediator release in asthmatic subjects, but it is unknown whether a similar response occurs in atopic nonasthmatic and nonatopic nonasthmatic control subjects who have no response to inhalation AMP challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the change in mast cell-derived products after endobronchial saline challenge and AMP challenge in subjects with and without a positive inhalation response to AMP.

METHODS

Inhalation challenge with AMP challenge was performed in normal, atopic nonasthmatic, and atopic asthmatic subjects. Levels of mast cell mediators were measured after endobronchial adenosine challenge and after placebo endobronchial saline challenge.

RESULTS

There were significant increases in histamine, tryptase, protein, and prostaglandin D2 levels (P=.02, P=.02, P=.01, and P=.01, respectively) after AMP challenge compared with after saline challenge in nonatopic nonasthmatic subjects. There was no significant increase in any mediator in either of the other 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests dissociation between mediator release and bronchoconstriction in response to AMP.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

It is widely appreciated that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways associated with airway hyperresponsiveness, and that nasal polyposis and asthma are related diseases. The objective of this study was to determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between nonasthmatic patients with nasal polyposis and healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty patients without asthma with nasal polyposis and 16 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of AMP and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method.

RESULTS

Bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was detected in 7 (35%) subjects with nasal polyposis. The geometric mean (95% CI) of ENO for subjects with nasal polyposis was 33.1 parts per billion (ppb) (24.0-45.7 ppb) compared with 12.3 ppb (8.5-18.2 ppb) for the healthy controls (p = 0.0002). ENO values were significantly higher in atopic than in nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis [51.3 ppb (32.3-83.2 ppb) vs. 24.5 ppb (16.2-37.1 ppb), p = 0.02]. Nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled AMP causes airway narrowing in a significantly higher proportion of nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis than in healthy controls. Furthermore, increased concentrations of ENO are detected in atopic and nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis. These results suggest that bronchial inflammation is present in nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis.

Activation of mast cells by immunoglobulin E-receptor cross-linkage, but not through adenosine receptors, induces A1 expression and promotes survival

BACKGROUND

Mast cells are a potent source of mediators that regulate the inflammatory response in allergy and asthma. Mast cells can be activated through different receptors, for example, via cross-linkage of the high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc epsilon RI) and by adenosine acting on specific receptors. We have recently described mast cell survival of an IgE receptor activation by up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic gene A1.

OBJECTIVE

To compare mast cell survival and expression of A1 after activation through the Fc epsilon RI and by an adenosine agonist.

METHODS

Bone marrow-derived, cultured mouse mast cells (BMCMC) were activated either with IgE+antigen or with the adenosine receptor agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (NECA). Release of beta-hexosaminidase, cell viability, phosphorylation of Akt and IkB-alpha, and expression of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes were measured after activation.

RESULTS

Activation of BMCMC with NECA caused the release of beta-hexosaminidase, although to a lesser extent than after Fc epsilon RI activation (33% and 98%, respectively). Activation by both NECA and Fc epsilon RI stimulated phosphorylation of Akt (Ser473 and Thr308) and IkB-alpha (Ser32), both of which are implicated in the regulation of cell survival. However, only cells that were activated through Fc epsilon RI, but not by NECA, expressed A1 and exhibited an increased survival rate compared to the control.

CONCLUSION

These results show that adenosine receptor activation of BMCMC does not induce the same survival programme in mast cells as does activation through Fc epsilon RI. These findings may be important for understanding the role that mast cells play in asthma provoked by different stimuli.

Research applications and implications of adenosine in diseased airways

Adenosine, when given by inhalation, initiates the narrowing of airways in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The underlying mechanism of this narrowing appears to involve the stimulation of specific mast cell surface adenosine receptors with the subsequent release of mediators and contraction of airway smooth muscle. Although methacholine and histamine have become gold standards as bronchial provocants used to quantify bronchial hyperresponsiveness, the airways response to the indirect stimulus adenosine more closely reflects bronchial inflammation. This distinctive feature of adenosine could be exploited to enable superior diagnostic discrimination between asthma and COPD, allow better monitoring of disease activity and progression, and improve the individual adjustment of long-term asthma management with topical glucocorticosteroids. In this article, we review recent developments in this area of rapidly evolving clinical research, focusing on the putative role of adenosine as a mediator of airway inflammation and as a useful bronchoprovocant in several clinical and research applications.

Effect of cigarette smoking on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine differences in airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between smokers and nonsmokers with allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

A total of 41 adults with allergic rhinitis (16 smokers and 25 nonsmokers) were challenged with increasing concentrations of methacholine and AMP. Airflow was assessed after each concentration, and the response to each bronchoconstrictor agent was measured by the provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)).

RESULTS

The geometric mean PC(20) AMP values were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers: 72.4 mg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.9 to 154.9) vs 204.2 mg/mL (95% CI, 120.2 to 346.7) [p = 0.021]. The proportion of subjects with bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was higher in smokers (12 of 16 subjects) than in nonsmokers (7 of 25 subjects) [p = 0.005].

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that smokers with allergic rhinitis have a greater AMP sensitivity than nonsmokers.

The role of adenosine as a novel bronchoprovocant in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is evidence that bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled adenosine may be a better marker of airway allergic inflammation than bronchial hyperresponsiveness to other spasmogens. Here the authors review the most recent development in this area of rapidly evolving clinical research, focusing on the putative role of adenosine as a useful bronchoprovocant in asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

New studies have provided evidence that hyperresponsiveness to AMP strongly correlates with sputum, blood/bronchial tissue eosinophilia and exhaled nitric oxide, whereas hyperresponsiveness to methacholine is related to changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, thus reflecting changes in airway caliber and functional state. Other recent studies have emphasized that the state of atopy is critically important in the bronchial response to inhaled AMP. The early finding that in people with asthma treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids significantly reduces airway responsiveness to AMP, as compared with other spasmogens such as methacholine or bradykinin, has been confirmed by recent reports which have also outlined that this is an early phenomenon.

SUMMARY

Taken together these studies evidence that hyperresponsiveness to inhaled adenosine may be a better marker of airway allergic inflammation than hyperresponsiveness to other spasmogens. This peculiar property of adenosine suggests that bronchial provocation with inhaled adenosine could provide a reliable noninvasive tool for monitoring asthma activity/progression, and assessing the response to antiinflammatory treatments.

Modifications of airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate and exhaled nitric oxide concentrations after the pollen season in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

s: To determine the effect of cessation of exposure to pollen on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis, and to explore the relationship between changes in airway responsiveness and changes in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels.

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects were studied during the pollen season and out of season.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fourteen subjects without asthma with pollen-induced rhinitis who showed bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine and AMP during the pollen season and 10 healthy nonatopic control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis, ENO concentrations, provocative concentration of agonist causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) methacholine, and PC(20) AMP were determined during the pollen season and out of season. Healthy control subjects were studied during the pollen season. In subjects with allergic rhinitis, PC(20) AMP increased from a geometric mean of 79.4 mg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.6 to 199.5 mg/mL) during the pollen season to 316.2 mg/mL (95% CI, 158.5 to 400.0 mg/mL) out of season (p = 0.004). The ENO concentrations decreased from 63.1 parts per billion (ppb) [95% CI, 50.1 to 79.4 ppb] during the pollen season to 30.2 ppb (95% CI, 23.4 to 38.0 ppb) out of season (p < 0.001). The ENO concentrations out of pollen season were still significantly increased in subjects with pollen-induced rhinitis when compared with healthy control subjects. There was no relationship between individual changes in ENO levels and changes in either PC(20) methacholine or PC(20) AMP.

CONCLUSIONS

In pollen-sensitive subjects with allergic rhinitis, the cessation of exposure to pollen is associated with a significant reduction of airway responsiveness to inhaled AMP. However, no association was found between allergen-induced changes in ENO values and in airway responsiveness to either direct or indirect bronchoconstrictors. These findings suggest that modifications in ENO and in airway responsiveness are the consequence of different alterations induced by allergen exposure on the lower airways.

Effect of salmeterol on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide in pollen-sensitive asthmatic subjects

OBJECTIVE

Using a model of natural allergen exposure, we examined the effect of regular treatment with salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO).

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to monotherapy with salmeterol (n = 14) or placebo (n = 13).

INTERVENTIONS

Salmeterol, 25 micro g, and placebo inhalers, two puffs bid, for 6 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Spirometry, the level of a provocative concentration of a substance (methacholine) causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)), the PC(20) level for adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), and ENO were measured before the pollen season and were repeated at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment with salmeterol or placebo.

RESULTS

The decrease in FEV(1) during the pollen season was significantly larger in the placebo group than in the salmeterol group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 0.20 L (95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.35; p = 0.047). Changes in PC(20) for methacholine, PC(20) for AMP, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. However, a mean (+/- SEM) decrease in the PC(20) for methacholine of -1.0 +/- 0.4 doubling concentrations was observed within the placebo group (p = 0.03), whereas no significant changes were observed within the salmeterol group. A significant decrease in PC(20) for AMP (doubling concentrations) was observed within the placebo group (-2.1 +/- 0.6; p = 0.003) and the salmeterol group (-1.5 +/- 0.4; p = 0.003). ENO concentrations increased significantly among the placebo and the salmeterol groups during natural pollen exposure.

CONCLUSION

These observations indicate that natural allergen exposure and the regular use of salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO and airway responsiveness than allergen exposure alone.

Exhaled nitric oxide and bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) between subjects with allergic rhinitis with and without increased responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with the order of challenge tests randomized.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-eight subjects without asthma with allergic rhinitis and 10 healthy nonatopic control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of adenosine 5'monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method. A positive response to both bronchoconstrictor agents was detected in nine subjects with allergic rhinitis, whereas four subjects showed increased responsiveness to AMP but not to methacholine. The geometric mean (range) ENO values were significantly higher in subjects with allergic rhinitis with increased responsiveness to either methacholine or AMP than in subjects with normal responsiveness to both agonists: 51.3 parts per billion (ppb) [22.0 to 108.5 ppb] vs 25.1 ppb (5.7 to 102.9 ppb, respectively; p = 0.007) and healthy control subjects (11.2 ppb [5.0 to 31.9 ppb], p < 0.001). Subjects with allergic rhinitis with normal responsiveness to both agonists also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.007). No correlation was found between ENO and either of the provocative concentrations of methacholine or AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV(1).

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects without asthma but with allergic rhinitis, the presence of bronchoconstriction in response to methacholine or AMP is associated with increased ENO concentrations. However, elevated concentrations of ENO are detected even in subjects with allergic rhinitis without airway hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness is not the only factor that determines the increased NO levels detected in subjects with allergic rhinitis.

Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5' monophosphate and the shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis

The objective of this study was to determine differences in airway sensitivity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between allergic rhinitis subjects with plateau and those without evidence of plateau on the concentration response curves to methacholine. A total of 51 adults (38 subjects with allergic rhinitis and 13 healthy controls) were challenged with increasing concentrations of methacholine and AMP. The methacholine challenge was terminated when there was a 40% or more decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), whereas the AMP challenge was stopped when FEV1 had fallen by more than 20%. A plateau for methacholine was detected in all 13 healthy controls and in 27 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR-plateau group), whereas 11 subjects with allergic rhinitis did not exhibit a plateau (AR-non-plateau group). The median (range) PC20 AMP (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1) value for the AR-non-plateau group was 44.0 mg ml(-1) (3.3-400.0), compared with 400.0 mgml(-1) (12.1-400.0) in the AR-plateau group (P=0.03) and 400.0 mgml(-1) in the healthy control group (P=0.007). The proportion of subjects who showed bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was higher in the AR-non-plateau group (73%) than in the AR-plateau group (30%) (P=0.03). However, three subjects with allergic rhinitis who had normal sensitivity to methacholine and plateau showed bronchoconstriction in response to AMP. We conclude that, in subjects with allergic rhinitis, the absence of plateau on the concentration response curves to methacholine is associated with a higher prevalence and degree of bronchoconstriction in response to AMP. However, the two bronchoconstrictor stimuli were not identifying the same abnormalities of the airways.